The MBoard

Non-MegaMan => Any Other Business? => Topic started by: Dr. on 10 December 2007, 06:31:09



Title: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dr. on 10 December 2007, 06:31:09
What movies have you seen recently? Should we see them? Rating?

Beowolf 3D - TERRIBLE. Nothing like story. Best part was when the first kings wife said, "Many kinds of people come to taste the kings mead."

It sounded very much like meat. 4/10


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: BlackMcJack on 10 December 2007, 06:36:44
What movies have you seen recently? Should we see them? Rating?

Beowolf 3D - TERRIBLE. Nothing like story. Best part was when the first kings wife said, "Many kinds of people come to taste the kings mead."

It sounded very much like meat. 4/10

Really, it's a movie with Angelia Jolie and monster killing...... How can this not be awesome.

But I can't wait for Todd Sweeney, hehe need a shave?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 10 December 2007, 06:45:59
I've seen Beowulf, Hitman, Golden Compass and No Country for Old Men recently.

The only one that really held my interest was the last one. Hitman was okay enough to be at least entertaining but it attracts the hugest crowd of douchebags that ever come to our Cineplex. They just go in because they know it has nudity and they're all "LOL TITS GIMME SOME"

Then yesterday we hooked up a DVD player to one of our digital projectors and watched Jurassic Park after we closed up. The Saturdays before that we have been watching each episode of Star Wars, but it was cancelled this week because the one orchestrating the showings had the flu. Anyway in the movie there was a guy in the helicopter at the beginning who appeared to have no pants on. We were laughing at this.

And I have to admit I am looking forward to Sweeney Todd as well. Unfortunately it's already been decided that we're watching National Treasure on that day, but I'm totally going to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dr. on 10 December 2007, 06:53:34
nt and Sweeney are the movies to see.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 December 2007, 06:54:25
GO SPEED RACER (http://speedracerthemovie.warnerbros.com/cmp/main.html)

Seriously, why?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 December 2007, 12:52:39
Well, how bout that thar Cloverfield that's comin' out. The one with the terrible advertising, shown before Transformers as a nameless movie that caught the attention of everybody. It's plot is that apparently a new monster has invaded New York (lol statue of liberty) and it's all shot at POV, we're supposed to get the feeling we're in the movie.. anybody?

Personally just by the trailer it looks really well done and sinister, I'm gonna see it.

Comes out Jan.18.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dr. on 10 December 2007, 13:08:35
By far  the most interesting trailer in years, IMHO.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 10 December 2007, 15:02:22
Yay, another Blair Witch Project.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 December 2007, 15:14:59
I hear the movie's going to be awesome, I just hate a lot of the hype for it.

Yay, another Blair Witch Project.
Theres one part where they're walking through the abandoned city at night, and they just see a random horse pulling an empty carriage. That's instant ##### your pants spooky.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dr. on 10 December 2007, 15:59:17
That's why that  was in there!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 10 December 2007, 20:21:33
Did you just say that cloverfield had terrible advertising? I hope you were being sarcastic. That movie had some of the best advertising that I have ever seen. The mystery, the countless websites, it was even on the news. SO many people devoted their lives to figuring out what it was.


Also, The Mist.  :( *Cries thinking about it*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 December 2007, 20:23:37
The advertising itself wasn't very bad, the real problem was the hype, it had more hype than Gurren Lagann! Go look on youtube and you'll see hundreds of "LOLZ I NO WHAT CLOVERFEELD IS ABOOT". People trying to look for clues in the screens, and some poster art, it's just too retarded..

Also, I hear the Mist's actual ending was changed. Spoilers plz.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: KPL on 10 December 2007, 20:29:17
I saw Eastern Promises.

It's about the russian maffia in England.
If you get the chance to visit this movie, I think you should. The only thing that bothered me slightly was the ending. But to know about that, you should go see it.

Viggo Mortensen plays a very good russian.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 December 2007, 20:33:21
MOSKAU MOSKAU.

Sorry. I might pick it up, my cousin said it was good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 10 December 2007, 20:38:17
Behold, the ending to the Mist!

[spoiler] Everyone in the store becomes crazy christians except the main character, his female teacher friend, his son, and an old couple. The escape the christians from killing them by a hair and make a mad dash for the car. He grabs the gun on a whim. They drive and drive until they run out of gas. His son is asleep. They decide to kill themselves- however, there is only enough bullets for everyone but him. So he does the good deed and kills them all, including his son. He is yelling and sobbing, (the most depressing thing I have ever seen in a movie) and he stumbles out of the car. He hears monsters coming, and he prepares himself for death. Not 10 seconds later does the mist clear and he is rescued. [/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 December 2007, 01:31:33
The reason Cloverfield is being so hyped is because the creator has mastered the art of gathering excessive attention for his projects.

Look at Lost... even to this day, there are people watching every episode, all of them being freeze-framed and paused endlessly for clues towards a show that's already been airing for 3 years.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 December 2007, 01:33:24
Beowulf - 9/10 - Great retelling of Beowulf with some new twists. I loved the CGI; some parts looked so realistic that I couldn't tell if it was animation or live-action.

The Darjeeling Limited - 10/10 - Wes Anderson's best yet, hilarious and touching. The ending shot is one of the most beautiful movie scenes that I've ever seen.

The Golden Compass - 6/10 - Eh, it was okay. If you're an adult you can easily fill in the anti-religion stuff, but it was somewhat entertaining. Could have been a lot better, but if they ever make the sequel, I'll go see it.

Hitman - 7/10 - It's The Bourne Identity's dumber and louder brother, but it's still pretty entertaining. Hopefully they'll make more movies in this series.

The Mist - 7/10 - Well-made horror flick with an ending that was complete balls. They should have just ended it where the novel did and then add the rest for an "unrated director's cut".

Mr. Magorium's Wonder Imporium - 6/10 - This could have been so much better. The kid is damn annoying; you're supposed to feel bad for him, but there's no way that you really can. And Dustin Hoffman could have done without the lisp.

No Country for Old Men - 10/10 - One of the year's best movies, and the badguy is so damn creepy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 11 December 2007, 01:51:15
That guy was my hero. He was creepy, but kickass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 11 December 2007, 04:34:54
Yeah. No Country for Old Men kicked ass. It was anything but typical. And if you pay attention, there is NO music in the whole movie. That takes serious skillz.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 December 2007, 04:43:00
Speed Racer's Ten Best of 2007 List (no order)

3:10 to Yuma
300
Amazing Grace
American Gangster
The Darjeeling Limited
Eastern Promises
Hot Fuzz
The Namesake
No Country for Old Men
Reign Over Me


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 December 2007, 04:57:51
...I have missed so many movies this year, and that has resulted in me seeing only two movies from that list, though I agree strongly with both.

"300" was an amazing adrenaline-pump-a-thon and a spectacularly original work of art. It defines badass.

"Hot Fuzz" is one of my all-time favorites, but only 'cuz I'm a sucker for British humor and, of course, the accents. Simon Pegg is a genius.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: guitaristjoe on 12 December 2007, 01:14:26
God...  I read that spoiler for The Mist...

That has got to be THE most depressing thing I have ever read in my life.

I saw Beowulf in IMAX 3D.  The movie itself wasn't that great, but you couldn't have convinced me so while I had those glasses on.  10 story tall screen doesn't hurt either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 12 December 2007, 06:21:45
Read? Try WATCHING it. The acting was way too good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 12 December 2007, 16:36:50
Well, how bout that thar Cloverfield that's comin' out. The one with the terrible advertising, shown before Transformers as a nameless movie that caught the attention of everybody. It's plot is that apparently a new monster has invaded New York (lol statue of liberty) and it's all shot at POV, we're supposed to get the feeling we're in the movie.. anybody?

Personally just by the trailer it looks really well done and sinister, I'm gonna see it.

Comes out Jan.18.

My theory the instant I saw it was they are redoing Godzilla.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 December 2007, 18:37:26
Awake - 8/10 - Way better than I thought that it would be. Fairly interesting story with some twists that I didn't see coming, and Jessica Alba proves that she can *gasp* ACT!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2007, 19:30:08
GO SPEED RACER (http://speedracerthemovie.warnerbros.com/cmp/main.html)

Seriously, why?

BECAUSE.

Well, how bout that thar Cloverfield that's comin' out. The one with the terrible advertising, shown before Transformers as a nameless movie that caught the attention of everybody. It's plot is that apparently a new monster has invaded New York (lol statue of liberty) and it's all shot at POV, we're supposed to get the feeling we're in the movie.. anybody?

Personally just by the trailer it looks really well done and sinister, I'm gonna see it.

Comes out Jan.18.

My theory the instant I saw it was they are redoing Godzilla.

The UK has a show called Peep Show that is shot entirely in POV and hilarious. That's good. That movie sounds lame.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 13 December 2007, 21:51:08
Well, I saw Golden Compass, and I think it was pretty good. Blood and death was cut out, obviously, but nothing that bugged me too much. I can see how working the actual ending into the beginning of the next movie would work.

Also, I saw the Speed Racer trailer.
Is it possible to see it without being slack-jawed in horror?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 13 December 2007, 22:07:04
Thanks everyone, because of you I curiously watched the trailer to Speed Racer. Thank you, you can all burn in hell.

Jokes aside, has anyone else seen the Ironman trailer? Looks fantastic, and the actor who plays Tony Stark looks so much like him. When they started playing Iron Man by the Black Sabbath I just had to laugh, it was so cheesey!XD


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2007, 23:48:35
The Speed Racer trailer was packaged with all showings of The Golden Compass, and I promise you it haunted me the entire way through the movie.

Cloverfield looks interesting to me, but it's not something I care too much about.

On the subject of POV-filming, there was an episode of Scrubs that had a few sequences shot from a new intern's POV on his first day. It was done pretty badly, and it bugged me because Scrubs is an amazing show, among the funniest on the air. It just felt annoyingly unfunny to do that, but I understood the effect they were going for. Too little effort put into the sequences.

I'm going to look into Peep Show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 December 2007, 16:13:05
Peep Show is funny as all hell, and you all can kiss my ass if you don't like the Speed Racer movie trailer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 14 December 2007, 18:42:09
I never knew anything about Iron Man until I saw that trailer. Now I'm interested.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: CM on 15 December 2007, 03:36:08
I don't even remember the last movie I saw in theators, I probably should work on that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Teelio on 15 December 2007, 04:08:02
I Am Legend.

...

REALLY freaked-up movie.

Go see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 15 December 2007, 07:54:27
I liked that movie. The random loud jumpy parts were annoying and pointless, though.

[spoiler]When the dog ran into that dark place, and he saw all those infected homo sapiens standing in a circle, I burst out laughing. I KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 16 December 2007, 00:36:26
That movie was damn amazing.  I watched it today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 16 December 2007, 04:00:39
Well, how bout that thar Cloverfield that's comin' out. The one with the terrible advertising, shown before Transformers as a nameless movie that caught the attention of everybody. It's plot is that apparently a new monster has invaded New York (lol statue of liberty) and it's all shot at POV, we're supposed to get the feeling we're in the movie.. anybody?

Personally just by the trailer it looks really well done and sinister, I'm gonna see it.

Comes out Jan.18.

My theory the instant I saw it was they are redoing Godzilla.

Godzilla has been retiered until his 60th anniversary. Until then, Gamera will replace it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 04:02:26
I don't see the difference.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 December 2007, 04:03:28
Legend looks really good to me, I might go with a friend to see it next Friday.

and it won't be Godzilla, they said it wasn't going to be Godzilla, but a new monster.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 04:09:54
Peep Show is funny as all hell, and you all can kiss my ass if you don't like the Speed Racer movie trailer.

AGREE.

It looks fun and light, as it should be, and visually cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 16 December 2007, 04:12:31
Legend looks really good to me, I might go with a friend to see it next Friday.

and it won't be Godzilla, they said it wasn't going to be Godzilla, but a new monster.

I'd rather have the Japs do the movie, not Americans, they somehow always ruin monster movies based off in Japan. Example, the american Godzilla.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 04:13:44
Don't say "Japs".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 December 2007, 04:15:04
In my town, that means Jewish American Princess... you know, the rich, snobby girl-girls that are ever-so annoying.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 04:17:55
In the rest of the world it's an 1860's+ racial epithet that disparages Japanese people.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 16 December 2007, 04:20:19
Really? Maybe I shouldn't abbreviate anymore, it can get me into trouble at some point.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 04:33:02
Yeah, I wouldn't. It started in WWI, you see.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 December 2007, 04:39:28
I always find it funny when someone uses the term and everyone assumes they're talking about a Jewish girl. It's weird living in a predominantly Jewish town - I seem to be the only one that knows any Jew jokes, seeing as I was away at military school for a while. Around here, they just don't get told, so ANY Jew joke will do. So naive...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: CM on 16 December 2007, 09:23:44
Does anyone actually watch movies any more? I mean isn't everyone just waiting for the cult classics of our youths to be remade and horribly butchered in cinema format?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 December 2007, 18:09:43
People still watch new movie. And people are waiting to see something they've seen before. It's a whole thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2007, 00:06:15
Every once in a while it happens. Seeing something new, I mean. There are also tons of failed attempts that should at least be given props.

In the action + horror departments, things are starting to go better lately. The Saw films were a gulp of fresh air for most people, but in general both genres have been doing better lately. 300 was the embodiment of what an action movie should be.
Even remakes have been of slightly better quality as of late. Adaptations, as well. I just got back from seeing The Golden Compass again - it was just as enjoyable the second time through, which is saying a lot for me. I'm a VERY picky moviegoer.

The only iffy genre lately is comedy. It's going both ways. Things like Superbad as well as Will Ferrel's movies are trying to be original and succeeding, but other things like Evan Almighty and other attempts are failing at originality. Fred Clause was actually pretty decent, I might add, by the way.
Other attempts are just total failures anyway. Borat is questionable in all aspects.

The movie industry is in a weird jam right now - almost everything has already been done, and there's been enough time in between for them to rejuvenate the old stuff until newer ideas can be thought up... it's kind of a standstill right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: CM on 18 December 2007, 00:43:25
It's got to a point where we are making remakes of remakes. Which is lame. And the titles of movies are getting lamer as well. Lucky Number Sleven, wtf is a sleven?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 18 December 2007, 00:49:24
Sleven is the main characters name.

Also, Superbad wasn't original, It was American Pie all over again. Coming-of-age comedies haven't been funny for a long, long time.

"OMG LOOK HOW AWKWARD TEENS ARE!! LOL!! SEXORZ!! LOL!!"

Please.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: CM on 18 December 2007, 00:58:22
It was clear they wanted to make the name of the movie Lucky Number Seven but were too busy being retarded so they made the main characters name a slight variation. I don't see how this is suposed to be cool.

Smokin' Aces wasn't bad but I was really drunk and drinking in the theator to get much plot out of it, didn't understand the ending at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2007, 01:54:18
Sleven is the main characters name.

Also, Superbad wasn't original, It was American Pie all over again. Coming-of-age comedies haven't been funny for a long, long time.

"OMG LOOK HOW AWKWARD TEENS ARE!! LOL!! SEXORZ!! LOL!!"

Please.

As far as what you're talking about, that's very true. I mean more in the way that the jokes are actually funny and the humor is very well-implemented, while most comedies nowadays just aren't all that funny the whole way through.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 18 December 2007, 02:04:40
most comedies nowadays just aren't all that funny the whole way through.

That much I'll agree with.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2007, 02:07:22
Fair enough, fair enough.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 7 January 2008, 06:11:57
So... who liked Sweeney Todd?

I did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rahvin on 7 January 2008, 08:18:25
GO SPEED RACER (http://speedracerthemovie.warnerbros.com/cmp/main.html)

Seriously, why?
Well...there goes another fond childhood memory down the bowels of Hollywood...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 January 2008, 01:39:32
Cloverfield.
Discuss.

WANT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 January 2008, 02:02:28
COMING SOON. VERY SOON.

I've managed to not think about it at all. It doesn't interest me THAT much, but it does look pretty damn cool. Who knows, it could be crap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 January 2008, 02:14:53
I'm skipping school to see it, none the less. Screw midterms. Unless it gets a 2 star or less rating.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 8 January 2008, 19:02:12
Meet The Spartans (http://www.meetthespartans.com/)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 January 2008, 19:09:53
Did anybody spot that part in the Cloverfield trailer when some random chicks sillouette exploded? Like, her entire abdomen enlarged like there was some alien baby bursting out, theres probably going to be some spawn creatures from the big monster.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 8 January 2008, 20:27:48
NOw I want a slusho....or 7 of them...at once....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 January 2008, 21:05:03
U CANT DRINK JUST 6 XERO!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 8 January 2008, 21:18:33
NOw I want a slusho....or 7 of them...at once....
You sound like Coop...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 8 January 2008, 21:21:49
That wasn't my intention....if you paid attention to the viral marketing for Cloverfield you'd understand the reference...like Preventer has.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 8 January 2008, 21:26:15
I'm trying to avoid watching any trailers until we get TV adverts here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 January 2008, 21:35:14
Odd, Cloverfield trailers have showed North America for a while now.

And damnit Xero, why can't you call me WIND like everybody else? Why can't you all do that!?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 January 2008, 21:35:55
preventerWINDUHHHH.

Call him that.

Every time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 January 2008, 21:38:27
It should be up there with the BBcodes, so everyone doesn't have to type my huge name.

How bout it Abe? preventerWINDUHHHH button. Huh? Huh?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 8 January 2008, 21:43:56
Odd, Cloverfield trailers have showed North America for a while now.

So far, we've got no adverts here in the UK. If there are any here, I haven't seen them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 January 2008, 21:45:37
Do yourself a favor man.

http://www.cloverfieldmovie.com/

watch


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 9 January 2008, 22:04:31
Did anyone else enjoy I Am Legend? I thought it was awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 9 January 2008, 22:07:24
I'm thinking of watching it, my bro has it and told me it's a remake of "Omegaman". I'm thinking of watching that first.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 9 January 2008, 22:34:06
Actually, The Omega Man was based on the same book I Am Legend is based on.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 January 2008, 23:20:35
I've wanted to see it for a while but haven't. I hear reports that there's a pretty damn clear nod to there being an upcoming Batman Superman movie in it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Kamon on 9 January 2008, 23:28:52
I highly recommend watching it if you find the time.

Would confirming or disproving a nod need a spoiler button? *dense*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 January 2008, 23:40:26
You don't have to confirm, I know it's there. A couple of my friends who've seen it told me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 10 January 2008, 00:08:50
It uses the Returns logo, unfortunately...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 January 2008, 00:28:49
... Oh...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 11 January 2008, 22:14:32
I Am Legend was good. Until the setting was done being defined and the plot set on. In other words when [spoiler]the woman shows up.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 12 January 2008, 01:08:50
I've wanted to see it for a while but haven't. I hear reports that there's a pretty damn clear nod to there being an upcoming Batman Superman movie in it.

WB is actually making that Justice League movie that's slated to some out some time between 2009 and 2011 (I forget when exactly).

But they're using different actors for batman and Superman, since Bale has a three movie contract as Batman, and that third movie will probably not be Justice League.

Same for the superman guy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 January 2008, 01:39:03
Bale can't be the Batman of JLA or Batman/Superman because it would look weirrrrd.

Not really. But I can see kids in the future not understanding how Batman/Superman doesn't come after Dark Knight but before Batman (original).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 January 2008, 02:49:25
Alright, I'm a bit late here, but I just saw Juno.

Magnificent. Absolutely magnificent. Some of the best acting I've seen in a long time, and it was so heartfelt, smart, and clever that I am telling you right now that it made it onto my top movies list, which isn't exactly definite in any way, but certainly doesn't include a lot of movies like Juno.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 January 2008, 14:41:26
GO SPEED RACER (http://speedracerthemovie.warnerbros.com/cmp/main.html)

Seriously, why?
Well...there goes another fond childhood memory down the bowels of Hollywood...

Hater.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 January 2008, 19:27:50
Wall-E (http://www.apple.com/trailers/disney/walle/)

Seems like a really childish movie, after all it's made by the guys who made Toy Story, Monsters INC. etc. But I always found those movies funny, so I'm going to watch this one, looks amazing too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 16 January 2008, 19:45:14
Reminds me of R.O.B.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 January 2008, 19:58:32
Toy Story is one of my favourite childhood movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Voulnet on 16 January 2008, 21:23:37
The Lion King, for the win.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 16 January 2008, 21:37:22
I've always loved Pixar.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 January 2008, 21:48:11
Bah. Give me The Goonies or Little Monsters any day.

Also, Wall-E looks like a midget Johnny 5.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 January 2008, 00:13:47
Well, duh, Goonies.

ACTUALLY I saw this kid who looked almost exactly like Chunk today and I was like :-O in the middle of the street.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2008, 00:25:07
The Sandlot was MY movie back in the day. Toy Story was right up there, too.

I love Pixar movies to death, they're the only kids movies nowadays that I can truly sit through and say that I enjoyed it as much as any other quality teen/adult movie.
I thought I posted the Wall-E trailer. It looks interesting, to say the least.

Rattatouille was jawesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Voulnet on 17 January 2008, 00:26:19
You don't wanna know about my brother's cooking adventures after watching Rattatouille.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2008, 03:43:41
A review of Cloverfield by the folks at Explosm.net (http://explosm.net/articles/20032)

They've never seen it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2008, 04:10:20
Coincidently, I just read that about an hour ago, but I didn't think anyone here would enjoy it.

Explosm is a great site, with hit-or-miss comics. They're either hilarious or crap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2008, 21:52:16
It's worth checking daily.

For instance, today's pretty good.
Also, the videos (like "I love Noodles" or whatever it's called) are golden.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2008, 21:58:07
"I Love Noodles" is indeed golden. So very golden.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2008, 22:06:41
You were the one that showed it to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2008, 22:54:01
Oh. Well, then, roundabout fun for all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2008, 23:14:16
Yep :D

I REALLY wanna see Cloverfield. We have a 90% chance of a Snow Day tomorrow so I'm gonna go see it at the first showing.
It's gonna be sick.
I hope.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2008, 23:15:00
I might see it tonight at midnight.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 January 2008, 02:32:08
I'll be seeing Cloverfield tomorrow along with something else. Not sure what, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2008, 03:14:25
I'm kinda' mad because all my friends opted against seeing it tonight, and we're busy all weekend. I got myself all hyped up for it, too.

Even if I don't care too much about it, especially in comparison to all those obsessed fans, it's still one of the more interesting titles to be released lately, and it's one I want to see pretty badly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 January 2008, 03:17:00
I guess there was a whole online thing with it, which I guess is neat, but they always suck. Really bad.
It's like a text based videogame with 404s.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2008, 03:23:37
I'm not gonna' lie, I devoutly followed the LOST ARG between the second and third seasons, but I lost interest about halfway through the summer. It was pretty neat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 January 2008, 07:32:11
Oh my #####ing god Cloverfield is awesome as all #####ing hell! That was so much better than I expected it to be!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 January 2008, 15:00:41
NOW I REALLY WANT TO SEE IT EVEN MORE.
Since it's a snow day here, and I don't have a ride, I'm gunna have to walk a few miles to go see it.

It's wintery mixing, so it'll be snowy rainy sleety hail-y.
Poop.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 January 2008, 18:51:52
I get to see it tonight for free after we close!

MUAHAHAHAHA.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 January 2008, 20:06:33
OKAY.
I watched it.
It was great.

Some non spoiling tips-
Right at the VERY end of the actual film, with the view of Coney Island, watch the sky on the right, not the beach or the ocean.
Also, sit through the credits and right as they are about to end the music stops, listen really closely.

Worth the price you'll pay for it but it leaves you wanting more.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2008, 22:36:40
I was about to go see it today at 4:40, but my friends all cancelled. Ugh. Pissed me off a bit, since like I said, I'm busy all weekend.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 January 2008, 22:47:33
Just go see it yourself.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2008, 22:48:29
It's already 5:50 anyway, and I'm not too keen on going on my own anymore. I'm the kind of guy who needs someone there right after the movie to go "HOLY ##### THAT WAS AWESOME" with.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 January 2008, 22:51:47
Bring a hobo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 18 January 2008, 22:52:10
Agreed. I enjoy movies much more when I share the experience with someone else.

I have to admit, while I'm apprehensive as hell, I'm tempted to see Cloverfield based on what I've heard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2008, 22:55:49
Bring a hobo.

"Hey, guys, he says this movie is meant for older audiences. It may not be appropriate."
"Listen, Mr. Homeless Man. If you don't wanna' buy us the tickets and not get your ten bucks and not buy yourself a bottle of vodka, then be my guest."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2008, 02:33:59
I never go to movies alone, if I want to see and no one else does, I don't go. I'd rather wait than be one of those guys.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 03:00:32
Exactly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2008, 03:04:51
One of those guys tried to cuss us out once back in middle school 'cause we were talking a bit into the coming attractions for Scary Movie 2. He was wearing a bucket hat and was fat so I decided he was a knob. I stared him down.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 03:09:19
There have only ever been two movies where I would have gone alone to, and both times I was lucky enough to find someone willing to go indulge in my odd tastes.

Those were the Hitchhiker's Guide movie and The Golden Compass. I actually saw The Golden Compass twice, each time with a different girl that I knew would be easily sucked into all that stuff.

My friend hit me on the way out of Hitchhiker's Guide because he thought it sucked, and yet there I am walking with him talking about much a thrill it was to finally see the movie adaptation and how I could die happy.

My feelings for the movie have since died down a bit, but I think I was floating on the way out of the theater.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 January 2008, 03:28:25
Those were the Hitchhiker's Guide movie and The Golden Compass. I actually saw The Golden Compass twice, each time with a different girl that I knew would be easily sucked into all that stuff.
Did they suck something else that night?

My feelings for the movie have since died down a bit, but I think I was floating on the way out of the theater.
just liek da whail in dat movie lololol!!!1


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 03:38:31
No, see, he was falling. Not floating. Moron.

And no. I'm not that guy, either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 January 2008, 03:44:45
Who's to say he wasn't floating down, really fast? Huh? Moron.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 03:54:17
That's generally called falling.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2008, 04:00:33
Or landing. Or emergency landing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 04:15:44
Failed emergency landing, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2008, 04:28:17
There's no way to pass an emergency landing, really, as they're not supposed to happen in the first place.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 04:30:04
Well, you can still fail them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2008, 05:58:32
By staying in the air, maybe.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 January 2008, 11:30:36
Douglas Adams once said that the secret to flying is to throw yourself at the ground and miss.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 January 2008, 11:58:39
I saw Cloverfield again; not as jaw-dropping as the first time, but still pretty #####ing awesome. I also saw The Orphanage, which was an okay movie. I thought the pacing was a little too slow, but it had a good storyline and was beautiful to look at...very well done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 January 2008, 17:19:09
CLOVERFIELD, loved it.

OKAY.
I watched it.
It was great.

Some non spoiling tips-
Right at the VERY end of the actual film, with the view of Coney Island, watch the sky on the right, not the beach or the ocean.
Also, sit through the credits and right as they are about to end the music stops, listen really closely.

Worth the price you'll pay for it but it leaves you wanting more.

I liked that music, too. One guy insisted on standing there through the credits before we could clean it so we basically stood there and hung out, listening to the music. And then I heard it and I didn't really give a rat's ass. It didn't make any sense to me at the time, and now I don't even remember what it was. And I didn't bother to stay 'til the end AGAIN 'cause I'd already seen it.

[spoiler]WE HAVE A BITE![/spoiler]

I like that there aren't any stupid sound effects to make you jump and stuff. It seems like thrillers these days abuse that ##### to no end.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 January 2008, 17:53:01
To Maj's spoiler-
[spoiler]*shreak* *pop*[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 January 2008, 01:53:26
Somehow I think it missed something, just something.. and I was looking forward to it all year too : (

The monster looked exactly like I thought it would look like! Ha!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 January 2008, 01:55:09
I'm still pissed that I haven't been able to see it yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 January 2008, 02:24:11
Somehow I think it missed something, just something...

Everybody kind of feels that way.

I want a sequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 20 January 2008, 02:27:02
Just got back from Cloverfield.

It was pretty decent, and did a good job of making NY feel claustrophobic.

Did anyone else find it ironic that the man with the camera was named Hud?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 20 January 2008, 09:22:24
I didn't find it ironic, but I did notice that. I didn't consciously make the connection with the camera, though. My absent-minded thoughts on the subject were more or less "There's something fitting about that name" but I was still paying more attention to the movie itself.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 January 2008, 15:43:04
Hud was a sucky cameraman.

[spoiler]was[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 January 2008, 01:26:43
Just got back from Cloverfield.

It was pretty decent, and did a good job of making NY feel claustrophobic.

Did anyone else find it ironic that the man with the camera was named Hud?

I'm pretty sure that was done on purpose, although I didn't realize the connection until I was on my way home from the midnight showing - I wouldn't have realized it without having played the Descent games years ago.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 January 2008, 01:34:17
Hud was a sucky cameraman.

[spoiler]was[/spoiler]
OM NOM NOM NOM NOM! *spits out*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 21 January 2008, 01:40:48
Cloverfield:

The movie was awful.

First, while the characters weren't bad, the drama bomb plot concerning them was absolutely BORING compared to the ##### awesome that was the monster attack and it's little friends that was going on in the back ground.

The camera was so #####ing shaky that it made me want to vomit. Badly. Wholly half the movie was excessive "shaking the camera" to hammer home the fact it was an "armature filming" angle. And when it wasn't being spun, shaken or waved around, the camera was pointed at the guys feet or wall. They could have kept the camera much more stable and STILL kept the feel they were aiming for.  Really, not even the most retarded, brain damaged paint huffing special Olympic runner up type with parkensons would jolt the camera as bad as the people in this movie.

This idea worked for Blair Witch because it was largely not dependant on the background goings on, but this movie was done on the epic scale of monster destroys city. And the monster was fairly interesting. I was far more interested in what it was, how it got there and how the fight against it was going than these idiots running around.

I'd say the movie was bad. It would have been OK for what it was if they'd handled the camera better, but as it was, I just think the movie took one awesome concept and one boring as ##### concept and made you sit through the boring one while dangling the awesome one just out of reach for 80 minutes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 January 2008, 01:43:36
Definitely too much drama, needed more gore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 21 January 2008, 09:20:31
I think it's sticking to realism when it keeps you away from that information, really. A lot of secrets are kept from the general public, so it's not surprising that there's no immediate explanation of the events available to these people, and it'd be lame to have some explanation tacked on all half-assed-like after the end of the tape.

But yeah, a lot of people got refunds due to motion sickness, so I can concede that point.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 January 2008, 15:32:35
I'm watching To Kill a Mockingbird for my Film & Filmmakers class.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 January 2008, 23:17:40
That's a good book. The movie ain't bad either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 January 2008, 23:55:31
Atticus Finch is probably the coolest name ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 January 2008, 00:06:59
It's up there.

I loved when he shot the dog.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 January 2008, 00:22:47
I loved the social commentary on racism BUT THAT'S JUST ME.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 January 2008, 05:46:09
You're just a raisin...

in the sun...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 January 2008, 06:42:53
Just watched Across the Universe.

What a trip, man. I love The Beatles, and I thought I'd be disappointed with this. I guess I was just expecting something entirely different. I honestly knew nothing about this movie before watching it, and it was a very pleasant surprise.

Although some of it way beyond weird, it all had a nice... well, it was art.
I highly reccomend it.

I want you so baaaaad... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwB8QiKWodk)

Posted on: 23 January 2008, 05:07:31

I finally saw Cloverfield. I was hanging with my friends all day, and then suddenly we decided to see Cloverfield at a theater about two hours away from town. It was really cheap, $2.50 a ticket.

Anyway, I really liked it, but the response was extremely varied between the 10 or so kids I saw it with. A few loved it, a few hated it, and one guy fell asleep.

I thought it was really cool, but it didn't make it to my Class 1 favorite list. Class 2, maybe. (I'm tired of ranking movies, so I rate them 1-5, 1 being absolute freaking awesome favorite and 5 being utter crap.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 February 2008, 08:53:52
So... someone I know spotted "Frank" from I Am Legend in Cloverfield.

And we just saw The Eye at the screening I'm back from, and guess what's in THAT movie:

[spoiler]A FLAMING HOMELESS MAN.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 February 2008, 03:59:21
Well, I wasn't planning on seeing it, but I just got back from Strange Wilderness. A few friends and I went to see it on a whim. We literally saw the commercial, said "Hey, let's go see the movie," and went. It's been a long day.

While it is certainly not a GOOD movie, it was definitely very entertaining in an incredibly stupid way. I laughed a lot, but it could've been because I was already in a goofy mood, but we all seemed to enjoy it. It's pretty ridiculous and CERTAINLY not a family film in ANY way. The movie it most reminded me of was Beerfest - unrealistic plot mixed with stupid yet successful humor.

Trash, yes, but I laughed a lot and I can't deny it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 3 February 2008, 15:05:48
Cloverfield had a unique approach to camera work. And that's it.

I mean... Love interest stuck across town during a monster attack? Could you get any less original? And the monster designs were just as boring.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 6 February 2008, 17:24:34
I no longer remember the last time I saw a monster and thought "Wow, I've never seen anything like that before."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 February 2008, 00:13:53
I looked at your face.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 7 February 2008, 00:15:35
I rolled my eyes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 8 February 2008, 03:44:58
What overwhelming wit...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 8 February 2008, 04:21:59
I watched Blade Runner: The Final Cut last night. It was the first time that I had seen the movie all the way through; every other time it was just in bits and pieces. Great movie, but that ending was really abrupt. There needs to be more to this story - are the sequel novels any good?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 February 2008, 05:07:51
I haven't read them at all but what I've heard is no. QUITE no.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 8 February 2008, 17:36:23
The PC game was good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 February 2008, 06:56:24
I saw Juno and Michael Clayton today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 10 February 2008, 12:59:06
I watched Blade Runner: The Final Cut last night. It was the first time that I had seen the movie all the way through; every other time it was just in bits and pieces. Great movie, but that ending was really abrupt. There needs to be more to this story - are the sequel novels any good?

Does the Final Cut have the voice-overs?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 10 February 2008, 13:03:21
It has every version, so yes and no.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 February 2008, 00:44:58
I watched Blade Runner: The Final Cut last night. It was the first time that I had seen the movie all the way through; every other time it was just in bits and pieces. Great movie, but that ending was really abrupt. There needs to be more to this story - are the sequel novels any good?

Does the Final Cut have the voice-overs?

There was text at the beginning, but I don't recall any voiceovers. I think what Abe is referring to is the five-disc version that you can get in a sexxxy metal briefcase. Over here you can get it in either the two-disc version (done so all of those who bought the four-disc last fall wouldn't go into a tizzy) or the five-disc (which rocks).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 11 February 2008, 02:58:36
The voice overs were in the original where Han Solo explained everything.

Made a whole lot of sense compared to the first time I watched it where there were no voice overs.

BTW, saw Cloverfield last night. Good movie but... LEAVES TOO MANY GODDAMN QUESTIONS!

[spoiler]
Did the monster die!?
Where did the monster come from!?
Why did the monster attack!?
Did that other girl who went on that other helicopter survive?
WTF HAPPENED TO THAT GIRL WHEN HER EYES BLED!?!?!??!?1?![/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 February 2008, 03:59:25
1) Those are kind of spoilers.

2) Apparently there's a lot of online stuff you have to look at to explain the movie, and it was intended to be that way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 February 2008, 04:00:47
1) True

2) True


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 11 February 2008, 05:10:34
GEEZ SRRY.

And links, please? Going to bed so can't bother right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 February 2008, 06:20:00
Donno, haven't seen it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 February 2008, 07:03:04
Here's a crazy idea: look it up yourself!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 February 2008, 07:07:10
In the time it took to post the question he could've found it himself, heh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 11 February 2008, 13:04:45
I DID find it myself.

Wikipedia, bitches.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 11 February 2008, 18:14:51
The voice overs were in the original where Han Solo explained everything.

Made a whole lot of sense compared to the first time I watched it where there were no voice overs.

It also gave the whole thing a more noir feel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 February 2008, 14:46:59
I just watched Barefoot Gen.. I don't think I have to explain anything, it was tough..

Posted on: 13 February 2008, 02:50:20

OMMGMFMGMFMG!!!11

DragonBall movie has been announced, looks like it's actually happening now.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1098327/

Looks like Krillin isn't even in it...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 15 February 2008, 16:43:29
The ways in which that will be horrible are numerous.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2008, 17:02:56
...this is... like... ugh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 February 2008, 17:11:28
Can I say...

Childhood ruined?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2008, 17:12:16
Not yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 15 February 2008, 18:15:07
OMMGMFMGMFMG!!!11

DragonBall movie has been announced, looks like it's actually happening now.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1098327/

Looks like Krillin isn't even in it...

(http://www.websophist.com/WelcomeToLastWeek.jpg)



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 February 2008, 19:06:34
(http://www.emporia.edu/earthsci/garden/rock06.jpg)

Heres the rock I bought a month or two ago. It's pretty cool, and it may look small on the outside, but inside it's quite roomy and comfy. I say to my friends I can see Jesus on my rock, but they can never see it.

I'm living under it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 15 February 2008, 19:14:43
I SEE IT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 February 2008, 20:41:54
I'm callin' you Patrick from now on.

As for the new movie: I cannot imagine it working at all. Hopefully, this is just DragonBall and not DragonBall Z.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2008, 20:47:59
I think it's pretty clear that it's just Dragon Ball, since it said Piccolo is the main villain.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 February 2008, 20:49:55
True, but I'm also hoping it won't spawn another.

Unless they intend to do very well graphically, or something... I dunno. I'm more disgusted about this, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 February 2008, 21:18:30
The apparent poster.

Honestly, Goku doesn't look that bad..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 February 2008, 21:38:26
... No. No. No. No. No.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 February 2008, 21:53:45
Yeah, the suit looks cool. But not for DB... OH WELL!

lol @ piccolo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 15 February 2008, 22:33:53
The suit is dumb, his hair isn't even close, etc.

I understand a human can't get their hair like Goku.. but come on... that's just... retarded.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 15 February 2008, 23:06:40
Which is why you use CG for the hair.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 February 2008, 23:30:21
(http://www.websophist.com/WelcomeToLastWeek.jpg)

Actually, to tell the truth, I knew about this movie since last year.

No lies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 15 February 2008, 23:33:26
I've HEARD about a real life DBZ movie like years ago. But never actually saw anything proving it existed until today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 February 2008, 00:04:23
Yeah me too, but I never actually thought they'd do it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 February 2008, 02:17:05
Why does no one seem to notice how horribly fake that poster is?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 February 2008, 02:29:11
Why does no one seem to notice how horribly fake that poster is?
CUZ ITS REAL DUH

We all know it's fake, not even DB would have a poster that hideous. Although, the two actors in the movie are the right people.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 February 2008, 02:54:57
I was referring more to things like the edges of the clothes, the hands, the hair on the arms, and so forth.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 16 February 2008, 03:55:14

Actually, to tell the truth, I knew about this movie since last year.

No lies.

I did too, but I've always enjoyed that "Hello, and welcome to last week" picture. It fits.

I saw Jumper today. I thought it was interesting and fun, but there isn't anything great about it. I hope that they make enough money for them to make a sequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 February 2008, 04:32:28
I was interested in that movie till I saw it starred Hayden Christensen.

Not only do I not want to see him in anything ever, I'd like to see him lynched.

Then maybe he'd learn how to emulate emotion


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 16 February 2008, 04:57:35
I dunno, I think he's okay. I've heard that he was great in Shattered Glass, and I thought he was okay in Awake and Jumper. He's good for the "everyman" roles like James Franco. Unfortunately, that's about all he can do well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 February 2008, 06:07:05
Watch Life as a House and understand what it is to want him dead.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 16 February 2008, 08:50:48
I was interested in that movie till I saw it starred Hayden Christensen.

Not only do I not want to see him in anything ever, I'd like to see him lynched.

Then maybe he'd learn how to emulate emotion

Hahaha, most people where I work were like "... Oh. Him. Well, #####."

And then there's this girl who was all "Well, he doesn't NEED acting. He's just perfect! Have you SEEN his eyes?"

Anyway I didn't walk into that auditorium expecting anything thought-provoking with amazing acting. It was sort of a movie to just hang out and watch and not really care who the actors were.

In the end I was entertained by the concept and the action in the movie. And, I guess, a bit of the humour. Nothing else really made it onto my "cup of tea" chart.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 February 2008, 18:01:16
Honestly, Goku doesn't look that bad..

Yes, he does.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 17 February 2008, 00:45:28
So. Movies.

I liked Charlie Wilson's War.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 February 2008, 02:20:25
I wanted to see that, but it came out right at the end of the semester and was out of theaters before I got back to college.

I saw Definitely, Maybe today. It was good. Nice to see Ryan Reynolds do a role that's both comedic and dramatic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 February 2008, 03:36:04
I feel like watching The Last Starfighter.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 February 2008, 08:33:48
I own that movie...made me giddy after the first time I saw it. Good stuff.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 February 2008, 04:40:55
Oh my #####ing God. I'm watching Firestarter on TV.

##### yes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 February 2008, 17:32:08
I watched four movies yesterday, 3 of them for the first time.

Good Luck Chuck: Meh.
The Number 23: TWO THUMBS UP
...I forgot what the third movie was.
Ghostbusters: DUH FOUR THUMBS UP AS ALWAYS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2008, 02:45:00
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm The Fifth Element is on TV!

:-D


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 23 February 2008, 02:47:04
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm The Fifth Element is on TV!

:-D

BOO PEACHTREE TV


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2008, 02:48:28
I don't care when it's The Fifth Element. M-I-C-K-E-Y? Because it's The Fifth Element and it's too awesome.

It's currently at my favourite sequence in the whole movie - The opera / Diva dance.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 23 February 2008, 02:53:33
And now it's finished.

THE STONES ARE IN THE BLUE CHICK!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 23 February 2008, 02:56:29
The Poster is an obvious shoop.

And Krillian could be one of the uncasted people listed.

And black.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2008, 02:57:29
And now it's finished.

NOT IN MY HEART ASSHOLE!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 23 February 2008, 18:05:44
I watched DOA: Dead or Alive with my roommates last night. Fun was had by all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 February 2008, 18:22:05
If you're going to watch Vantage Point, expect to see an action movie. There's nothing thought-provoking about it like the concept would imply.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 23 February 2008, 20:27:56
I saw the Transporter for the first time yesterday (It was playing on the TV Screens while I gave blood).

I was surprised at it being a good movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 24 February 2008, 19:56:22
I saw Persepolis last night in my roommate's hometown. They have an indie theater there, and the owner pretty plays whatever she damn well pleases. Apparently last week she ran a showing of all of the short films that were nominated for Oscars; this week she had The Bucket List (if someone wanted to go see it, I'd go), The Savages (Want to see this), There Will Be Blood (Already saw it...it was good, but I don't need to see it again), and Persepolis. Persepolis was really good. Really funny at times, and I thoroughly enjoyed the animation.

I also watched Matchstick Men last night at his buddy's house. Good movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 24 February 2008, 21:19:59
Current: Critters 4

Brad Dourif > You


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 February 2008, 22:49:45
I put the Persepolis book in my drawer at work, I don't know if I'm going to read it though since I watched a decent sized trailer for the movie last night I might opt to just see the movie and not read it first, it looks pretty close to the book anyway. Plus I heard from my boss that the book is VERY indie, in the "it's so thickly indie it's just trying to be indie" kind of sense, so I don't know.

Last night Jess and I rented Across The Universe. We got 5 minutes into the movie (and it already was awesome) and my DVD player #####ed up in a smashingly incredible manner and locked the disc inside it. So I got my  "crappier" DVD player and we watched Old School. I've just finished unbuilding and then rebuilding the broken DVD player just to get the Across The Universe DVD out. I don't really want to watch the movie without her though so I guess I just spent money to rent a headache instead of a movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 25 February 2008, 00:05:26
>_>

<_<

The upcoming Horton hears a who movie looks nice.  *Is beaten and mauled*

Anyone think they should make "The Lorax"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 February 2008, 00:18:50
Actually, "Horton Hears a Who" does look surprisingly good.

Mike, "Across the Universe" is a gem. Any haters out there who say they ruined the songs are just losers who think they know what they're talking about. Nobody expected the covers to math the original Beatles tracks in any way, it's all about putting them together in a single wonderful, unique experience. It's also a good movie to watch with a girl, so yeah, wait 'till you can watch it with her.
It gets slow at some bits, but too much of it is amazing so you never get bored.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 February 2008, 00:57:21
If I don't go out tonight I'm gonna see if she wants to try watching it again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 February 2008, 00:59:46
Good choice. "I Want You So Bad" is my favorite scene.

Excuse me while I math the original Beatles tracks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 February 2008, 01:03:04
Actually, "Horton Hears a Who" does look surprisingly good.

Mike, "Across the Universe" is a gem. Any haters out there who say they ruined the songs are just losers who think they know what they're talking about. Nobody expected the covers to math the original Beatles tracks in any way, it's all about putting them together in a single wonderful, unique experience. It's also a good movie to watch with a girl, so yeah, wait 'till you can watch it with her.
It gets slow at some bits, but too much of it is amazing so you never get bored.

The Prudence character is a waste of time and film. Bono was unnecessary, but whatever. It was still good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 February 2008, 01:07:25
I agree with you on Prudence. "...you'll let me be your man" threw me off a bit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 February 2008, 01:09:38
Uhf Bono shows up? I hope it's a second. I hate that kid.

Excuse me while I math the original Beatles tracks.

Heheh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 February 2008, 01:12:35
I agree with you on Prudence. "...you'll let me be your man" threw me off a bit.

She just sucked as a character. There was nothing to her at all from the very start, she was annoying in any scene that she was in other than the final one, and her singing was crap. The whole "Oh my god, is that Prudence" thing during the Mr. Kite circus...way to ruin a great scene.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 February 2008, 01:15:23
Ahaha, I didn't even understand why they felt it necessary to stick Prudence in there, though I didn't have as much of a problem with her as you seem to.

I still like the "She came in through the bathroom window," line.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 February 2008, 01:18:40
Yeah...which brings me to my main problem in the movie. Unnecessary characters like Prudence and to a degree, Dr. Robert and Mr. Kite, are thrown in just so they can make 20+ more Beatles references. Great for inside jokes, crappy for an actual film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 February 2008, 01:20:50
Fair enough. I'd say they needed filler, but it was a LONG movie anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 February 2008, 01:37:02
Fair enough. I'd say they needed filler, but it was a LONG movie anyway.

Musicals always, always, ALWAYS have filler. The difference is when they can actually make it work. Across the Universe made it work sometimes, other times it was absolutely terrible. There was seriously one transition when the characters seriously said "Hey! What's that over there," leading right into the next song. It's like...you've got to be kidding me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 February 2008, 04:52:58
Last night; Boondock Saints and Grandma's Boy for the first. Well actually I had seen the end of Boondock Saints, but yeah. Good stuff, even though Boondock Saints is just a bunch of cool scenes strung together.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 February 2008, 11:54:14
Oh, I finally saw Night at the Museum, by the way. It wasn't horrible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 28 February 2008, 20:57:22
It wasn't good either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rama Olendris on 28 February 2008, 21:11:01
I haven't actually seen a movie for a while... I think the last one I saw was Waterboys, a Japanese comedy about high school boys pulling off a synchronized swim team. Thus compromising masculinity ensued and lots of bullying. Over all the movie was okay... 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 28 February 2008, 21:27:35
Sounds like a movie CHOCK full of lulz.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rama Olendris on 28 February 2008, 21:58:36
Sounds like a movie CHOCK full of lulz.

It had its moments. But it was a little dry compared to most western movies because it was Japanese- the humor was pretty damn funny though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 February 2008, 08:36:13
So in my T-kick and through the magic of internet flash players I watched all three Terminator movies today.

The Terminator, 1984
It was good to see The Terminator again, as it's not often on TV and I don't own any of the movies. For some reason I had it in my head that Kyle and Sarah were a few years younger, so I'm glad that got out of my system. Plus I felt like hearing Kyle explain some stuff again to see how it matched up with the rest of it all. And seeing the part they used for the cover of Metal Gear, the part where Sarah's photo burns (which was recently alluded to in the TV series along with that whole massacre), ans seeing Kyle drive a car that looks like the General Lee with a big plasma mini-gun mounted on top it while fighting some kind of massive Skynet assault robot (T-Tank?) during the opening were all pretty cool.

And Sarah Connor's boobies when that actress was still young and good looking.

If it was still 1984 (and I was born and sentient) the T-800 (Arnold) would have scared the ##### out of me. Not now, being that it's 24 years later and rubbery faces with metal and a red eye look like crap. But you know.

What we learned: "The future is not set. You must be stronger than you imagine you can be."

Terminator 2: Judgment Day, 1994
Well of course it's the best movie of all of them. AND it doesn't ##### up the timeline since at the end of this movie you can call it a day; The research that leads to Cyberdyne System's creation of Skynet from the hand and the chip of the T-800 from the first movie. Unlike that T-800 though, the villain of this movie still kind of irks me. It mostly has something to do with watching it when I was a kid, but still, that T-1000 is a creepy mother#####er. He has all the badassosity of Arnold in the first movie, but has that whole "I can charm my way into your house" crap since the T-800 in the first movie was a straight up big honking fiend. A monster. He "never stops", to haphazardly quote Kyle in the first movie. Okay. Wicked. A big ass lummox is coming for you.

But then T-1000 comes in and #####s that up all over the place, 'cause he's still the baddest of asses but then he's got all that sick charm. AND he can change shape, and that's never not creepy. Plus he constantly stabs people through with arm blading. Oh, and shooting him is worthless, running him over is worthless. Stabbing, freezing, teasing, none of it works. The only thing you can do is melt him. MELT HIM. Now, in my life melting stuff comes up all the time. But for you? Yeah I know, I'd ##### my pants too.

But holy #####, John Connor. This kid is 9 or 10? NINE OR TEN? I mean, I know he's messed up and all that, but uh... Whoo. That kid talks like a sailor. I figured he was about 13 just from watching. He couldn't be older but I did the math and he's 10. I'm not sure how long after conception the scene with preggers Sarah is in the first movie, so he could be 9. Either way, that's #####ed. He steals and swears like... Well at LEAST 13. Think about it. When I was ten, I was in grade five. I swore all the time and watched porn and ##### but that's 'cause where I used to live my best friend was like 4 years older than me...

... Maybe it's not that odd that he's ten. >_>

But, the third movie AND the TV series both change John's age at the time of T2 to 13, for whatever reason. Maybe because it feels right.

Anyway the movie ends with the heartfelt moment that still tearjerks a friend of mine to this day. It's all sad and triumphant at the same time like the first movie. And now the machines will never try to usurp the planet... Or so we're led to believe!

What we learned: "The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."... again.

Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines, 2003
So yeah. It's Judgment Day finally. The movie was... Pretty throwaway. But I finally saw it so that's good. Hm. Not a lot happens in the movie. It was all in the commercial really. The guy who played John Connor, while looking nothing like the kid from T2, looks exactly like John Connor. He looks like a lot like the guy that played Kyle Reese in the first Terminator. And the guy playing John in the show looks like an inbetween version of the T2 and T3 Johns. So that's something.

T-X is crap though. Of all the Terminator series I've seen in action over the years (T-70, T-800/101, T-850, T-888, T-1000, T-1000000, and whatever the hell Cameron is), T-X is definitely the lamest. I mean, the T-70 was in the "Terminator 2: 3-D"/"Terminator 3-D" thing at Universal Studios and it was literally supposed to be the first humanoid shaped Terminator and the last one made directly by Cyberdyne, so it's supposed to be a piece of crap robot with a machine gun. The T-1 million is lame as can be, except I at least thought that was cool when I saw it ten years ago. Being 12 will do that.

The T-X is just... blah. A bunch of gimmicks fused into one Terminator. A girl was an interesting move I guess, they do it in the show and it works out OK. It definitely would make the bot creepier. Except there's a key difference between "Cameron" (such a clever name ::) ) and the T-X; The T-X looks like total bitch. She slicks her hair up like a shallow man-eater in the first ten minutes of the movie just to prove it. Cameron is small and has that whole innocent young girl thing going. Her expressions (or lack there of) are creepy, but as it was said in the show she's just plain freaky 'cause on the outside she's as sweet as any young girl but inside she's just another one of THEM. Then, the T-X has similar abilities to T-1000. Which is crap. They just wanted to make the threat the same, but it didn't work. Her liquid stuff utterly fails to be useful to her or interesting to me until her face goes all  liquid pissed off at the end. And the fact that she talks like three times makes her even more boring. The ability to control other machines? Eh. Ill-conceived. An OK idea I guess, but implemented badly. It was basically worthless until she got to the T-800.

And the T-800's explanation of John Connor's future death? Crap. Not only is it just gay because the John Connor of the future doesn't seem to type to fall for something as easy as that, but also it just doesn't make sense. In the first movie Kyle Reese says the whole reason Skynet sent a T-800 back in time to kill Sarah Connor is because killing John Connor in the future wouldn't accomplish anything since Skynet's already lost the war and sending Terminators back is a last attempt. So, the whole "a T-800 came and iced John in the future" is a trashy method of trying to make the girl seem important.

Also, this all happens in 2004 and the TV series #####s up by placing Judgment Day in the 2010's. Why? I don't know, but I like it better as I could never imagine Skynet being created by 2004.

That said. It was OK, I guess. But pretty flimsy. Not enough of actual Judgment Day and it screwed around too much. But I liked the almost Twilight Zone-esque ending with the narrative and a truck-out to nukes going off worldwide.

What wtf @ no explanation how Cyberdyne made Skynet without the arm and chip from the first T.

What we learned: There's no stopping the future....?



Aaaannnnnnd that's it for unasked dorkliness on my part. Keep in mind I could only have noticed this stuff because I watched them all in a row, and I've accumulated knowledge over 21 years... Whatever, still dorky.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 1 March 2008, 03:07:01
Be Kind Rewind
The Other Boleyn Girl
Charlie Bartlett


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 March 2008, 13:27:52
Ooh, I forgot about Be Kind Rewind.

Anyone know if it's good or not?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 1 March 2008, 15:20:13
Well, I just saw it last night with Irradiated-Man.
It was pretty good, it got a 4.5 out of 5 from both of us.
It relies too much on cheap laughs in the beginning (though it was still moderately funny) and starts off kind of slow, but once it actually gets going it's awesome.
Yeah, you should definitely go see it if you're a fan of Jack Black, or if you just like hilarious remakes of classic movies. But be warned, the movie isn't all about remaking movies, though the 'sweding' takes up a big part of the movie their are plenty of scenes in which no classic movies are mentioned or parodied. Still, there are plenty of nonmovie scenes in which classic movie themes are implemented, one example is Jerry (Jack Black) getting in an accident with electricity and coming back from the experience with a strange ability.
Yeah, but like I said, it's a good movie, it's funny and it leaves you with a warm feeling at the end. I'd suggest seeing it with a friend.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 March 2008, 02:45:51
I just saw 'I Am Legend'.
Great movie, disappointing last 10 minutes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 March 2008, 22:52:49
I got tickets to see a sneak preview of Never Back Down. I thought meh, I like fighting so it could be cool. Not really.

It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. It's flaw was really the writing; The production value was good, the acting was fine, some interesting choices with the camera but it was fine other than the movement of the plot being just plain dumb.

There was not as much fighting as I thought there would be, the best fight is in the middle of the movie where the main character fight like three or four guys in the middle of the street in the day time and no one does anything. The movie was basically Fast And The Furious but for fighting. Character evolution was pretty lacking, so a lot of what the characters would do or decisions they'd make didn't really make a lot of sense and weird things and looks just sort of happen seemingly randomly. The fighting is obviously faked since 90% of the shots of someone doing a move are match cuts, but it's cool that the characters do MMA fighting (not a big surprise since UFC is so popular). If the movie had a plot to speak of, it would have been good.

And the guy from Blood Diamond. is. always. sweaty. even. when.. there's.. no.. reason... for... it... He also has a line I can't stop mimicking.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 13 March 2008, 22:55:32
I got tickets to see a sneak preview of Never Back Down. I thought meh, I like fighting so it could be cool. Not really.

I'm predicting you should brace yourself for a big let down.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 March 2008, 22:56:32
I just reviewed the movie, genius. I saw it last night.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2008, 22:58:55
Sano is currently suffering from a rare form of AIDS that disables him from reading past the first paragraph of any post.

I hate Sano and I can say that a lot since he can't read this. Whoohoo! Sano is stupid and nobody likes him! Yay!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 March 2008, 23:07:32
Oh, OK.

What a jerkface, but haha he'll never know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 13 March 2008, 23:18:38
Hai guyz!
I DUN CAR!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 March 2008, 00:45:47
You keep saying that like it's believable.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 March 2008, 01:21:14
He's like Naruto but lamer.

"Believe it! I dun car!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 14 March 2008, 01:35:50
DattebayoRamen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 14 March 2008, 02:23:40
I stel dun car.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 14 March 2008, 04:26:45
STOP STEALIN' DEM CARS, GOSH.

WE GET THREE NEW MOVIES TOMORROW. OH LORDY LORD WHAT FUN THAT WILL BE. Especially when we only have 3 cleaners instead of the usual five because people are selfish and booked the entire week off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 March 2008, 05:34:53
And one of them is Never Back Down, yea?

Haa...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 15 March 2008, 01:56:01
Semi-Pro: It was okay, but nothing great. Part of me feels like the unrated version will be a bit funnier. Not sure if it was necessary that they went for an R-rating.

Vantage Point: The idea seems awesome, but the movie was just okay. How they kept showing stuff backwards and then starting again at noon got to be pretty annoying. It seemed like this would have worked better as a novel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 March 2008, 18:00:09
Just watched Run Fat Boy Run.

I enjoyed it immensely. Sure, it's no Shaun of the Dead or Hot Fuzz, but it was never supposed to be.
Very funny movie, but then again I'm biased to love Simon Pegg.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 16 March 2008, 19:04:43
I saw Horton Hears a Who.

For a kid's movie I'd say it was pretty damn good. Plus I laughed pretty hard through many parts of the movie. I just got a kick out of how ridiculously random it was. I count at least three scenes where I could NOT stop laughing until it was over. There are parts where I laugh just thinking about it.

[spoiler]I forgot the name of the orange little thing, but when it started floating at the end, I was hysterical. That thing might've scared the living crap out of me if I was a kid watching it.

Also, retarded anime spoof FTW.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 17 March 2008, 03:04:49
Like I said in another topic, I saw 10,000 BC.

It was ok, would've been better if I saw the beginning though (went into the wrong theater).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 17 March 2008, 22:29:11
Dumbest. Idea. For. A. Movie.

Ever.

http://www.imdb.com/video/editorial/me60357838/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Voulnet on 17 March 2008, 22:44:26
I second that.
We males need to come up with OUR version of Teeth.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 March 2008, 22:48:44
Wow. Okay. There's a hundred urban legends like that, all of them are stupid. The princess on Drawn Together has some monster cooch too. And that's just so subtle. Abstinence. I get it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 March 2008, 23:27:58
Ahaha, I heard about this ages ago on Explosm.net. First thing I thought of was what Mike mentioned from Drawn Together.

It looks ridiculous. When I first heard about it, I thought it was an old movie that's been out for a while, but now I see it's not out yet.

EDIT: Nevermind, I was somewhat right.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 March 2008, 23:50:52
I've heard that the Killer Condom movie is even worse.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 March 2008, 23:54:49
Is that real? Because that's actually a good idea for a comedy-horror. Not a horror parody, mind you. Just a horror that's so ridiculous you laugh, whether or not it was intended.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 18 March 2008, 23:58:55
I don't think that's what it is though. Plus, gynecology makes me uncomfortable. There are certain things that I just don't want to see. Like a girl peeing. Never.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 March 2008, 00:04:08
Is that real? Because that's actually a good idea for a comedy-horror. Not a horror parody, mind you. Just a horror that's so ridiculous you laugh, whether or not it was intended.

Yeah, it's a German horror flick.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116791/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 March 2008, 00:10:56
Hehe, wow. I'll probably never see that in my life. Shame, too. Killer condoms could very well make for some really good guilty-pleasure sort of "wow, this sucks" entertainment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 March 2008, 00:13:57
"wow, this sucks"

lol


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dr. on 19 March 2008, 00:50:19
I seen Doomsday on sunday, and I thought it was by far the best movie of the year.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: dzx9 on 19 March 2008, 03:10:24
Dumbest. Idea. For. A. Movie.

Ever.

http://www.imdb.com/video/editorial/me60357838/

I don't get it... does her vag have teeth or something?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 March 2008, 03:23:26
Edit: ignore that post that was here, I never watched the trailer.

My god.....

Posted on: March 18, 2008, 10:20:13 PM

That's f'ed up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 March 2008, 10:47:26
Dumbest. Idea. For. A. Movie.

Ever.

http://www.imdb.com/video/editorial/me60357838/

I don't get it... does her vag have teeth or something?

Very yes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: dzx9 on 19 March 2008, 14:01:55
I'm not cool with that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 19 March 2008, 14:55:10
None of us are. It seems like the kind of movie that girls would go see to get a feeling of empowerment and listen to "we're not gonna take it" (the #####ty one from the PMS commercial) on the way home.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 March 2008, 18:10:51
No it doesn't. It just seems like a bad movie. It's not female empowering at all since it puts forth the age old idea that there's something wrong with them, which is ##### you find all over stuff from back in the day, case in point; Original Sin.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 March 2008, 20:04:06
Apparently this is what happens if the ##### troll forgets to climb out when she reaches 21.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 19 March 2008, 20:31:06
Wow, not even Dr. Mario would touch THOSE genitals.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 19 March 2008, 20:31:49
Wow, not even Dr. Mario would touch THOSE genitals.

Are you KIDDING me? Have you ever MET Doctor Mario?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 March 2008, 01:29:38
The movie wouldn't load, so I Youtube'd it.

WTF.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 March 2008, 01:15:40
Dr. Mario probably installed those genitals.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 March 2008, 06:48:16
You know, it's easy to scare people after watching Shutter. All I had to do was cling to the wall and wait for people to turn the corner.

Stupid movie. Really stupid. Two people predicted something very close to what actually happened, and I was predicting minor things that were proven right in the next instant.

One part succeeded in creeping me out but the rest of the time I was laughing. Either way it's no skin off my ass, I watched it for free and I got to hang out with coworkers while doing it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 2 April 2008, 01:51:52
http://uk.movies.ign.com/dor/articles/863515/legend-of-zelda-movie-trailer/videos/legendofzelda_filmtrailer_040108.html;jsessionid=1adeemgkodn0i

Here we go again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 2 April 2008, 02:26:58
Wow. That's pretty good for a fake.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 2 April 2008, 02:33:20
That's one hell of an April fools joke.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 2 April 2008, 02:36:41
That's one hell of an April fools joke.

A very high quality one anyways.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 April 2008, 06:55:13
Uh huh. Right.

It's not actually good. It's good until the first shot of Ganondorf, and then is starts losing quality faster and faster since not only do Ganondorf and Zelda look like ##### but so do some of digital stuff. Like it's high quality but so obviously not movie quality. I think the thing that looked the best was those flying spinny things in the desert. They should have kept it to a teaser trailer's length as there some nice shots that could probably be convincing surrounded by an assload of clearly bull##### stuff. It's about one of the best looking fakes out there (naturally, since IGN has the budget) but it's still plainly obvious that it's an AFD prank.

Posted on:  2 April 2008, 12:52:04

Ahah... Ahahaha... AhahahAHA... HAaHAhaAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAH AahhahsHaHaHAhaHAdubfsieu!

http://joblo.com/dragonball-pics


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 April 2008, 13:47:27
You just made my morning!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 April 2008, 17:49:48
WOW.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 April 2008, 20:17:55
HA.
HAHAHA.
jeeeeezum.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 6 April 2008, 20:20:47
That was supposed to be Dragonball? It seemed like random people taking pictures of themselves.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 6 April 2008, 20:37:12
Guess I missed the pics? There aren't any on the site anymore, the studio made them take it off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 April 2008, 21:15:26
D:


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 April 2008, 21:51:45
Oh well. You missed some funny looking crap. It was like one big cosplay convention.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 6 April 2008, 22:01:31
Hopefully it's better than this, but I doubt it, this movie is pure genius.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jX38JOO1lTY


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 April 2008, 22:24:37
*shudder*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rama Olendris on 8 April 2008, 22:35:43
LOL.

I'm gunna get shot for this... but... Speed Racer... What are everyone's thoughts?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 8 April 2008, 23:28:38
Everyone I know in person is like "It's gonna SUCK, the original show SUCKED and so will this" but I'm willing to give it a chance.

Upcoming movies that REALLY interest me are Iron Man, The Dark Knight, and Wall-E. I haven't been paying too much attention, though, I'm just forced to because I'm surrounded by this subject when I work.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 April 2008, 00:12:54
Even worse than Speed Racer:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0472181/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rama Olendris on 9 April 2008, 00:25:13
Wow... what the ##### is happening to Hollywood?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 April 2008, 00:26:02
Not only is it fully CGI, not regularly animated, but it's meant to be a trilogy.

My teacher was telling me about it today and I didn't believe him until I looked it up at home.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 April 2008, 01:21:41
Traditionally animated.

I think Speed Racer looks like fun. It's Speed Racer for god's sakes, it's meant to be all about looking nuts and not about content. TRUST me, I've read some Speed Racer comics before.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 9 April 2008, 02:32:27
Upcoming movies that REALLY interest me are Iron Man, The Dark Knight, and Wall-E.

Not a big movie guy and I don't watch much of them, but I'm interested in Wall-E.

Even worse than Speed Racer:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0472181/

Are you serious?

#####ing Smurfs?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 April 2008, 02:37:11
I know, right?!

And I'm interested in Wall-E because I love everything Pixar's ever done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 April 2008, 08:51:56
The Forbidden Kingdom was decent. It was like a martial arts version of The Never-ending Story.

In all reality, it's a Wapanese boy's wet-dream.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 21 April 2008, 11:29:00
This shows how up to date I am about this crap, since the article was posted March 5:
Watchmen Movie Costumes (http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/03/05/first-look-complete-watchmen-costumes-officially-revealed/)

Just about everything makes me shriek like a small child on helium (Dr. Manhattan isn't there, unfortunately, but I guess there's not much costume there to start with), with the possible exception of Ozymandias. I'm hoping it's just the photo, but he looks too weedy.

Also, armor nipples. :(


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 April 2008, 16:51:34
Watched "No Country for Old Men."

Not bad, but I don't recommend it. It's like they quit 3/4 of the way through.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 April 2008, 18:25:41
Watched "No Country for Old Men."

Not bad, but I don't recommend it. It's like they quit 3/4 of the way through.

What, with the ending and not seeing everything? That's actually how the book is from what I've heard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 April 2008, 19:06:42
Nah, it's just an abrupt stop, it never even hit a climax, just kind of got resolved I guess.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 21 April 2008, 20:43:46
Watchmen Movie Costumes (http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/03/05/first-look-complete-watchmen-costumes-officially-revealed/)

A Watchmen movie!?

Man, I need to research this...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 April 2008, 18:35:04
Yeah I saw the costumes a long time ago (It feels like, donno when). They're looking pretty sweet. I was worried the movie was going to have everyone looking EXTREMELY gay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 April 2008, 05:43:00
I saw the new Harold & Kumar tonight and absolutely loved it.

For a stupid comedy it's very entertaining, I highly reccomend it. Some really funny lines in there.

Plus, the stuff with Neil Patrick Harris is epic.

Oh, and wait 'till the end of the credits. We did by accident, we were just sitting and talking, and then we got a nice final laugh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 27 April 2008, 21:25:49
Haha, yeah.
I can't believe she thought the poem was lame, though. I thought it was awesome.

Also I was cleaning the auditorium before the credits even finished and when that part came up the day after I saw the movie, I was like "omg"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 April 2008, 21:27:02
Ahaha, I need the written words to the poem. It was brilliant.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 April 2008, 20:45:34
(http://i30.tinypic.com/23swtb8.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 April 2008, 20:46:10
It's very weird seeing Heath Ledger's name there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 April 2008, 20:47:17
I wanna see them make a sequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 April 2008, 20:48:03
What?

Anyway I don't find it weird to see his name at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 April 2008, 20:49:26
I'm really excited for this, though, for the record. I don't usually care about superhero stuff TOO much, but I've always had a thing for Batman.

"lol asr has a ting 4 batmen!" Yes, assholes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 April 2008, 21:01:27
What?

I meant, a "Dark Knight 2".

so many bat mens.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 April 2008, 21:02:44
Well they're making a third "Batman Begins". Dark Knight being the second one. After that it's the first Batman and on from there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 May 2008, 04:49:10
It's a sixth Batman. And just watch the trailer, it's obviously going to be good.

I want to see Speed Racer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 May 2008, 07:38:14
I wouldn't say it's 100% for sure going to be good, but I hi-*reads sig*

Yeah... yeah, you probably do.

IRON MAN SCREENING TOMORROW. If it's allowed, that is. I remember nearing the summer last year we had to wait a week to screen movies like Pirates of the Caribbean or Spider-Man 3 to honour the company's wishes, even though they have no way of finding out. But I'm pretty sure it's Iron Man.

Also, I thought I already said so, but Forgetting Sarah Marshall was priceless. Saw that two weeks ago and I was laughing really hard. I have "Dracula's Lament" on my iPod. I'm trying to avoid playing it too much though because it'll lose its humour quicker that way, but there you go. This doesn't say much at all, I guess, but it's an excellent movie in my view.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 2 May 2008, 23:00:59
I WANNA SEE IRON MAN.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 2 May 2008, 23:17:27
I WANNA SEE IRON MAN.

Then watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 2 May 2008, 23:26:34
i has no moniez.

Gonna get some tomorrow and go with my girlfriend though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 2 May 2008, 23:34:43
I see. So, when're YOU gonna be an iron man and stick it to'er? Eh!? Eh!?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 2 May 2008, 23:56:03
##### off dude.
It ain't like that.

*rolls eyes*
: '(

Posted on: May 02, 2008, 06:52:34 PM

No Wind, I'm not pissed, stop whining.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 2 May 2008, 23:58:11
I'm not whining, I'm just saying yer takin' it too seriously.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 2 May 2008, 23:59:28
I see. So, when're YOU gonna be an iron man and stick it to'er? Eh!? Eh!?

Jokes about boning cross the line.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 May 2008, 00:01:42
But I was just playiiin'!

Oh fine : \


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 May 2008, 03:23:35
IronMan was unbelievable.

I do not walk out of many movies this satisfied. I can honestly say this movie was amazing.
Clever laughs, true thrills, awesome action, and great acting.

I never knew much about IronMan but I love Tony Stark's character. Very entertaining.

And trust me on this, stay 'till the end of the credits.
[spoiler]He really IS in every movie.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 May 2008, 03:36:53
I will see it tomorrow.
It shall be grand.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 May 2008, 03:39:27
Unbelievable. I'll just keep saying that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 May 2008, 04:59:20
I've heard good things from die hard Ironfans (I totally just made that up, and for now I think it's excellent) so I can't wait to see it. I worked all day so I couldn't go when I knew it wouldn't be packed and was supposed to go tonight but no dice so I'll see soon hopefully.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: MOX on 4 May 2008, 04:38:30
I dont know much about Ironman eiether, but from seeing the flying mechanical suits and explosions on the trailer I can say that I'm hyped to watch the movie just for the action.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 May 2008, 04:53:07
As you should be.
It does not disappoint, save for the fact that it ended.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 May 2008, 15:39:07
It was a great ending, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 May 2008, 03:58:03
Just saw Iron Man. It was great, and I DO know about Iron Man.

I'm not sure if I like Jarvis the Ultimates way. I know why they chose to do it that way (it's far too Batman otherwise, given the current timing of releases), but Jarvis is so damn charming as an actual person.

Hopefully if they make another I'll get to see some [spoiler]War Machine. As he is completely badass. Iron Monger was cool but I totally knew that Ob was double dealing the whole time. Crimson Dynamo would make a cool villain in the next movie. [/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 May 2008, 04:11:33
See, this movie actually made me feel bad for missing out on IronMan comics as a kid.

I only ever read a small handful of Spidey ones, and rarely ever, even. It just wasn't my thing.

But IronMan is something I could've really gotten into. And if it isn't, the movie did a really good job of making me think so.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 May 2008, 04:36:21
I watched the One Piece today.

It was alright, but impossible to understand if you haven't seen the show. The movie is basically one of the more important story arcs in the series (30+ episodes) condensed into an hour and a half movie.

...Not that anyone here actually cares, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 May 2008, 05:25:45
See, this movie actually made me feel bad for missing out on IronMan comics as a kid.

I only ever read a small handful of Spidey ones, and rarely ever, even. It just wasn't my thing.

But IronMan is something I could've really gotten into. And if it isn't, the movie did a really good job of making me think so.

The movie was exactly like the comics, pretty much. Just like the good two Spidey flicks.

... I'm gonna photoshop a pic of IM in the movie into WM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 5 May 2008, 06:09:59
I watched the movie, I loved it to bits, but it could've used more action. But thats just my need for flashy explosions kicking in.

I loved the WarMachine part, I was expecting that guy to be him XD

Also, like ASR, I really wished I could have gotten into Ironman, I remember watching the 90's cartoon but can only remember the first episode. I say a lot that he's my favorite super hero, even though I know ##### all about him =.=

[spoiler]Samuel L. Jackson is Nick Furry. (http://youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU)[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 May 2008, 07:01:28
Well duh, Rhodes is War Machine in the comics.

And it's Fury.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 5 May 2008, 07:06:26
[spoiler]Haha, I know very little about superhero comics in general, so I kept thinking he was saying McFury. I've heard it several times for the past three days, too...[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 May 2008, 07:42:29
Hahaha. Nono, Nick is the man. Ultimate version or regular, doesn't matter.

I made a War Machine out of a movie photo, though it doesn't show much. It was hard and he doesn't have the big ass shoulder cannon stuff but it looks OK. I'll show it later.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 May 2008, 11:37:09
We were sitting in the theater, and my friend goes "...but Nick is white!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 5 May 2008, 15:47:39
It's not the colour of his skin that matters, just how big his cigar is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 May 2008, 07:54:55
Try not to crap your pants. For all who want to see what Two-Face will look like...



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 6 May 2008, 11:28:58
Sort of looks like the B:TAS version.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 May 2008, 14:14:23
DAYUM that looks good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 6 May 2008, 14:23:25
Acid will do that to you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 6 May 2008, 16:05:52
I went and saw IronMan the other day. I thought it was really good. I walked in though knowing absolutely nothing about him though. I saw him make an appearance in Tony Hawks Pro Skater 3, but I didn't know any of his back story. I was pleasantly suprised with how good the movie really was. I half expected it to suck due to it being like the sixth superhero movie to come out, but it kicked some ass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 6 May 2008, 19:32:11
MANK!

That's quality.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 6 May 2008, 22:44:53
Iron Man is the best Marvel comic to film movie they've ever done.  I wasn't expecting it to suck, but frankly I was stunned by just how good it was.  And the casting was phenominal all the way.  If you've not seen it yet, be sure to stay through till after the credits.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 May 2008, 22:47:44
I wasn't expecting it to suck, but frankly I was stunned by just how good it was.

Perfect way to describe my same thoughts. I never advocate movies like this, but I've been telling everyone specifically to go out and see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 May 2008, 03:19:59
We were sitting in the theater, and my friend goes "...but Nick is white!"

In the regular (616) universe he is. In the Ultimate universe he's Black, and they a lot of the movie stuff from Ultimate universe. It would have been too hard to cast the 616 universe Nick Fury (he was played by Hasselhoff back in the old Captain America one, and that was no good) so they went with the Ultimate Nick Fury which was an obvious casting choice.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 7 May 2008, 03:53:52
Man... all of you guys keep saying to stay after the credits. What did I miss? y.y I guess I should just go see it again.  :)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 7 May 2008, 05:04:07
You missed a commercial, pretty much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 May 2008, 06:01:15
We were sitting in the theater, and my friend goes "...but Nick is white!"

In the regular (616) universe he is. In the Ultimate universe he's Black, and they a lot of the movie stuff from Ultimate universe. It would have been too hard to cast the 616 universe Nick Fury (he was played by Hasselhoff back in the old Captain America one, and that was no good) so they went with the Ultimate Nick Fury which was an obvious casting choice.

Actually, Hasselhoff played Nick Fury in his own made-for-TV movie. Fury never appeared in any of the Captain America movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 9 May 2008, 20:59:39
I might see Speed Racer tomorrow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 May 2008, 02:05:11
YOU CAN DIE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 May 2008, 03:27:12
I cringed when I found out Matthew Fox was in it as Racer X.

NOT MY JACK


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 May 2008, 15:24:43
I cringed when I found out Matthew Fox was in it as Racer X.


NOT MY JACK

He's actually great as Racer X.

I saw Speed Racer yesterday afternoon. It was fun, and it's obvious that the Wachowski brothers love the series - I'm sure that Tatsuo Yoshida would've been proud of this film. At the same time, I was left disappointed by it. Even though it's visually impressive, it's not a great film, yet not bad either. Probably the most impressive "meh" I've ever seen. Good luck to this film trying to break even; it sure as all hell won't in the USA.

Positives:
-Feels like a smarter, 2 hr. 15 min. version of the show.
-The acting is pretty good, although Matthew Fox was really the only one who stood out to me.
-The trippy visuals are awesome.
-The race scenes are pretty damn ridiculous and equally awesome.
-If you were planning to go see while on various illegal substances, you made a good choice.
-The movie is visually stunning.
-It's great seeing Peter Ferandez as a TV announcer (the original voice of Speed Racer, I recognized his voice immediately) and Richard Roundtree (the original Shaft) as a race car driver.

Negatives
-It feels like a 2 hr. 15 min. version of the show.
-It feels long for a 2 hr. 15 min. movie, as the pacing is somewhat crappy.
-The script isn't the greatest
-Too much time is spent building up a plot that feels like it should have ended 20 minutes earlier than it did.
-The PG rating ensures that you'll be seeing this with bratty 4 and 5 year-olds unless you go to a late showing.
-Not really a negative, but where's Connie Orr (the original voice of Trixie)?

Oh yeah, and for those of you who really like the show, there's a subplot introduced that may cause your brain to go bat-##### crazy. It's okay, really. Don't flip out...it resolves itself.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 May 2008, 16:19:29
I flipped out when I found out Matthew Fox was playing Racer X. I was just dumbfounded. It does not seem like his sort of role at all... hehe.

I saw Forgetting Sarah Marshall last night. Very funny movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 May 2008, 16:59:35
I was honestly surprised with his performance as I didn't think much of him in Vantage Point.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 May 2008, 17:09:11
I was scared because I thought it would make me think LESS of him, and as an avid Lost fan, I didn't want to think of him as a ridiculous Speed Racer abomination.

So, this is good news.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 12 May 2008, 03:22:11
Saw Iron Man last night, and I agree with all the awesomeness spoken previously of the film. I'd have to consider it my second-favourite comic book movie of all time, right after Batman Begins and right before The Mask :S


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 May 2008, 00:54:16
I saw the Harold and Kumar sequel last night. It was fun. Felt short. But I liked it.

Want to see Speed Racer soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 May 2008, 07:49:43
I saw Speed Racer again tonight. It was a lot better the second time, probably because I didn't have any expectations that needed to be met and there were no little kids in the audience. Still not a great movie, but a lot of fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 May 2008, 22:32:10
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AoNDp03udhg

Ogawd.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 May 2008, 23:46:44
...George Lopez?

I almost barfed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 May 2008, 00:01:23
What do you expect with the cliche crap Disney comes up with now?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 May 2008, 00:11:15
This is leaning more towards stupid than cliche.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 20 May 2008, 03:23:48
I couldn't even finish watching that. And I'm by myself right now too.

I'm embarassed to watch it BY MYSELF. That's how bad it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 20 May 2008, 04:06:07
What The #### was that?

I think I'm bleeding out of my eyes.

O.O

That was more vile than HSM. WTF?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 20 May 2008, 04:28:54
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AoNDp03udhg

Ogawd.

Ogawd is right.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 20 May 2008, 04:34:39
Yes.

WTF???!!!?!?!? Sums it up nicely too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 May 2008, 12:02:43
I don't feel like living after watching that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 20 May 2008, 15:40:29
I seriously want to go find the guy that made that. Terrible things will be done >.>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Rama Olendris on 20 May 2008, 15:52:01
Uuuuuhhhg! I WAS right. Hollywood is completely out of ideas! That trailer made me honestly want to punch kittens.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 21 May 2008, 02:03:36
Kittens!? WHY!? CHIHUAHUAS!

Oooooooo CHIHUAHUAS!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 21 May 2008, 02:04:50
...

*hits Chaos in the back of the head with a pipe*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 May 2008, 02:31:28
I hate that the song is stuck in my head.
I might gouge out my memory.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 21 May 2008, 02:34:31
Good thing I watched only 15 seconds of it. I can't remember anything other than those dogs. And George Lopez (lolwtf?)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 21 May 2008, 03:28:16
This movie has restored my faith in Disney.  ::)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 21 May 2008, 04:36:55
WHY GEORGE!? WHY!?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 25 May 2008, 21:45:06
Guys, don't go see Iron Man.  It's the worst #####ing movie ever.

Get this, the guy wasn't even made of iron. He was just a man in an iron suit. But get this, the suit wasn't even made of iron. It was like a technometalwhadjahoozit.  Total BS.  Iron can't even shoot lasers. I looked it up. I'll bet the flying was fake, too.

In conclusion. Iron Man sucks. Save your money for Jack Black's panda movie. At least you'll see some real action instead of a couple of pussies firing puss grenades at each other.

I give it a 5/5.

Posted on: May 21, 2008, 01:27:20 AM

Hey, and don't see Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skullzzz either.  I mean, old people, are OLD.  And plus Shia Lebouf. I'm surprised I typed that correctly. I'm surprised this movie wasn't MORE RIDICULOUS! I mean, Russians? Aliens? Am I spoiling the movie? Do I care?

Did I mention Harrison Ford is old as balls? I think I did not. So now I did.

In conclusion.  Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skallsz blows big wads of crazy. Kung Fu Panda is sure to be a karate CHOP at the box office, so you should see that instead.

I give it a 1up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 May 2008, 22:08:38
I don't want to even bother with the new Indie, but I'll get dragged to see it eventually.

All it means to me is that A) Hollywood is deep into the revival fad and Back to the Future 4 is probably on the way and B) they're going to stop making those delicious Limited Edition Indiana Jones Mint Crisp M&M's soon.


In other news, I bought Pulp Fiction on DVD today on a whim. Mainly because I remembered it being #####ing awesome the last time I saw it, and that was when I was 5-13 years old, somewhere in that range. I can't remember.
Watching it now, when I can actually understand and appreciate it for the wonderful film it is, I'm now safely adding it to my small list of Favorite Movies Ever Made along with the likes of Jurassic Park, Shaun of the Dead, and Back to the Future 2, an honor that the likely imminent Back to the Future 4 will not be sharing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 May 2008, 01:44:09
Back to the Future 4 wouldn't even make sense and anyone who knows those movies knows that.

Kind of like how they're making more Terminator movies that happen during the war with the machines even though that's incredibly stupid. But you know, whatever, the third movie ruined the entire point and message of the series anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 May 2008, 03:45:48
ASR, There is one part in that movie that i use a partial definition in my relationship with my girlfriend.
In Jackrabbit slims when they are sitting there quiet for a few seconds and "Don't you hate that? Those long awkward silences, but you know you've found someone special when you can just shut the ##### up for once."
Paraphrased of course.
Pulp Fiction is one of my favorites too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 May 2008, 04:03:04
Yeah, but I've heard that line before. From here:
(http://sinfest.net/comikaze/comics/2002-07-13.gif)
For some reason, I love this lone comic strip by itself. And yeah, this is obviously from after Pulp Fiction was made, but I didn't remember the line from the first time I saw the movie, so yeah. Sinfest wins.

Pulp Fiction really is one of those "perfect" movies. I almost applauded whilst sitting there in my own living room alone.

Back to the Future 4 wouldn't even make sense and anyone who knows those movies knows that.

Trust me, that's not enough to keep it from ever happening.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 May 2008, 04:30:26
I just shared that with my girlfriend.
She loves it.
Dude, ASR, you're the man.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 May 2008, 06:09:04
Indiana Jones made me laugh. Like, the story itself was cool to me. Nothing overwhelmingly awesome, but good for an Indiana Jones. But like, all the main characters should've died probably well over ten times before the movie ended, and some of the stunts the characters pulled off could just NEVER have happened in real life. It was so ridiculously unbelievable that I found myself laughing at it. Still, it's nothing you wouldn't expect from an Indiana Jones film. I guess there's a nostalgia factor involved, but I enjoyed it, and I would so see it again.

[spoiler]He survived a nuke BY HIDING IN A FRIDGE. A #####ING NUKE. I LOL'D.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 26 May 2008, 07:14:18
Yeah, that was like. Whoa.

I liked the part with the siafu ants. I liked that part because I remember watching this documentary about killer ants and the siafu was one of those killer ants they talked about, and then they were in Indiana Jones and I was like YO YO YO I KNOW YOU ANTS.

They aren't massive and huge like he says they are.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 28 May 2008, 17:20:56
I saw Iron Man a few weeks back, and being a fan of the comic, I have to say... I loved it.

It had everything I wanted out of an origin movie... Except one thing.

What it had:

1. Witty, drinking, playboy Tony Stark.
2. Perfect casting
3. A very true to the source, albeit more contemporary, telling of the origin.
4. Tony Stark coming off as eccentric and brilliant, rather than just a cold Genius.
5. Pretty awesome pseudo-technology
6. Cool looking suits
7. Rhodey and hinting at War Machine
8. Tony actually drinking
9. Decent looking fight Scenes

What it lacked:

1. Well, not really lacked, so much as the fight between Iron Man and Iron Monger could have been longer.


So really, Iron Man was AWESOME.


Surprisingly, I'm REALLY looking forward to the new Hulk movie.

Edward Norton is one of my favorite actors, and co-wrote the movie.

From what I've seen, he seems to understand Hulk better.

Tim Roth as the Abomination ALSO looks pretty cool.

And they made it clear that this movie is a reboot, which I am HAPPY about, since the 2003 movie SUCKED. (Absorbing Man is his father, WHAT?)

Also, creators have made it clear that the fight scene at the end of the movie, between Hulk and the Abomination, is twenty minutes long.


[spoiler]There will also be a cameo by Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), in the vein of Sam Jackson as Nick Fury in the Iron Man movie. [/spoiler]

Also, there's another Captain America Easter Egg, like in Iron Man (The shield is in one of the background shots), an it's the Super Soldier serum (or so they say).

Then after that, it's Hellboy II: the Golden Army, which, at first, I was weary of, since the first one wasn't very good, but after reading the comic (that was basically the opening sequence of the movie), and seeing trailers and footage of it, I'm optimistic.


And The Dark Knight looks so good. Batman Begins was really great, and this one doesn't look disappointing, and though at first Joker's look had me suspicious, I think he can be great.

And that Two Face picture on the previous page didn't hurt.

EDIT:

And for those that haven't heard, the Captain America movie in 2011 will indeed be set in World War II, which is #####ing awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 May 2008, 18:24:24
I too am excited for the new Hulk Movie.
I love Edward Norton's acting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 May 2008, 21:22:50
I wish Jarvis had been a man instead of a computer system.

Problem with the new Hulk is that directors or producers or whoever are pushing/pushed for a Hulk Smash type movie and Norton is pushing/pushed for a whole emotional thing. The indecision makes me wary.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 29 May 2008, 14:02:17
I wish Jarvis had been a man instead of a computer system.

Really, I didn't mind Jarvis as an AI, since, on the whole, he wasn't as important to Iron Man as say... Alfred is to Batman.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 May 2008, 21:57:06
Well I figure if they had made him a man it would have far too Batmanny of a movie especially with Dark Knight coming out later.

But Jarvis is so charming. I miss him. In the comics too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 1 June 2008, 14:54:00
Saw The Strangers last night.  Pretty good.  Liv Tyler is sexy.

Creepy murderers who listen to old records are not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 1 June 2008, 16:36:23
I watched Iron Man on Monday. It was cool. But not super cool. Just cool.

Iron Man is like a maturized Megaman who's lost his taste for blue and anti-alchoholism.

I suggest you watch this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 1 June 2008, 17:04:21
I watched Iron Man on Monday. It was cool. But not super cool. Just cool.

Iron Man is like a maturized Megaman who's lost his taste for blue and anti-alchoholism.

I suggest you watch this.


Iron Man isn't anything like Megaman.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 1 June 2008, 18:02:34
Iron Man isn't anything like Megaman.

No, I meant like the costume colors and Stark's drinking habits, and . . . never mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 1 June 2008, 18:04:03
I've heard how awesome Iron Man is, and to compare it to Mega Man for some reason actually makes me think less of it.

Not a whole lot mind you, but a tiny bit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 June 2008, 00:29:00
Iron Man isn't anything like Megaman.

No, I meant like the costume colors and Stark's drinking habits, and . . . never mind.

Still wrong.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 2 June 2008, 16:42:06
Iron Man isn't anything like Megaman.

No, I meant like the costume colors and Stark's drinking habits, and . . . never mind.

Still stupid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 3 June 2008, 16:00:58
I saw Prince Caspian last night. I thought it was pretty good, certainly a lot better than the first one. Hopefully this one makes enough money so they make Dawn Treader.

I also watched 17 minutes of City Dragon, a kung fu flick that I picked up over at a dollar store. Wow, this movie is amazingly terrible...starring M.C. Kung Fu. Who says everything in rhyme. Thankfully, I finished my lunch and popped it out of the DVD player...whether I pop this in again remains to be seen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 June 2008, 16:22:18
Bad movies are only fun with friends.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 June 2008, 18:43:40
You can find a great double feature at the dollar store.
'Attack of the Giant Gila Monster' (actually not that bad, still great with friends)
and 'The Creature From the Haunted Sea' (worst filming I've ever seen, basically so lame it's hysterical).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 June 2008, 19:13:39
The next "bad movie" on my list is Teeth. We never actually buy any usually,  but I might make an exception with Teeth.
It's become an epic joke with my friends, we always reference it and how stupid it sounds but we've never gotten off our asses to watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 June 2008, 20:02:27
I watched Tank Girl the other day. Made me so happy to watch it again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 June 2008, 23:16:21
Teeth looks hilarious.
Tank girl is loltime.

"I'll need a magnifying glass and some tweezers."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 June 2008, 00:09:53
My favourite part is when she's going after the truck and she's in the tank like "Tank Giiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrlllllllll!" I don't know why. Tank Girl's such a badass. And Jet Girl is pretty sassy (not in the movie, but by the end of it at least and apparently in the comics).

I'm gonna start reading the comics at work.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 4 June 2008, 00:11:22
Tank Girl's good? It's going to be shown on Teletoon this week for the big "F'N MOVIE" thing. Just wondering if I should watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 June 2008, 00:16:04
Yeah they're showing on Tuesday. Whether it's good depends on you, really. It's one of those old 1995 post apocalyptic punk rock movies based off a comic book. I personally love Tank Girl. It stars the girl who played Kit in A League Of Their Own (one of my favourite movies from back in the day) and, get this, Ice T is in it!



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 June 2008, 03:38:19
Oh, yeah, I saw Indie today.

Nothing amazing, but it was a fun ride. The refrigerator part was the best.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 June 2008, 22:16:34
Seen Tank Girl (actually, a while ago >_>)

I liked it. It was pretty WTF a lot of times but I really liked it. Especially the comic book parts.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 8 June 2008, 02:24:26
Saw Don't Mess With The Zohan yesterday.

I thought it was pretty dang funny, also Dave Matthews plays a white supremacist.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 June 2008, 02:42:02
Would you recommends it to a Matrican?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 June 2008, 04:30:30
Saw Don't Mess With The Zohan today.

It was pretty cruddy. I honestly didn't think it was anything special. Yes, there were tons of funny parts, but for the most part it just wasn't a good movie and you could easily live without seeing it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 8 June 2008, 05:15:57
I didn't think it was anything mega-special either, but I think the parts that were funny were enough to warrant a movie ticket to watch them though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 8 June 2008, 18:48:09
I ranged from laughing really hard to getting really annoyed that the movie wouldn't just END already.

Kung Fu Panda was much better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 June 2008, 19:05:07
My friend guessed one of the plot-point "twists" early on, but it was so cliche and obvious that I was dumbfounded that he'd actually lean over and say "I bet this is going to happen: _________."

When the reveal in the movie came up an hour later or whatever I said really loud in the theater "HEY DARRYN DO YOU WANT A GOLD MEDAL HEY HEY WAIT I BET THERE'S GOING TO BE A JOKE WITHIN THE NEXT MINUTE OH WAIT THERE IT IS DO I GET A GOLD MEDAL NOW" and nobody got mad, the rest of the audience laughed with me and my friends while Darryn moped and acted all angry.

It was like my friend trying to spoil Indiana Jones for me by saying that Shia LeBouf was Indie's son. Everyone knew that the day he was CAST as Indie's son.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 June 2008, 22:52:25
I didn't know that, but assumed that, so it's cool you said it. I'm going to see Indy on tuesday, finally.

I still want to see Zohan, don't care what you say. Mainly because my friend who is from Israel and has a similar accent (they didn't really get it right) wants to see it and I'm just gonna pretend it's all possible and that my friend can do everything the Sandman does in the movie and does so on a regular basis.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 June 2008, 17:32:28
I saw Taxi Driver the other night after picking it up at Wal-Mart for $6. Great movie...it kept me guessing the whole time because I really had no idea what Travis was going to do next.

I also watched Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull last night with my folks. I thought it was pretty good and fun, but not great. It got more ridiculous as it went on, and I'm not sure that I really liked the whole sci-fi approach that they took with this one. Oh well; it was one hell of a ride and I wouldn't mind seeing another one.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 June 2008, 19:52:08
Ya feelin' lucky, punk?

Taxi driver is a great movie, anyone who hates hookers and drug dealers should watch it.
Absolutely crazy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 June 2008, 00:47:58
Who hates hookers and drug dealers? I don't understand.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 11 June 2008, 05:19:39
TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTALS II

Going to stay up extra just to watch it.

Seen the first one last night, loved it. Heard II was the best and III was the worst. Going to watch II soon. Going to watch III anyway tomorrow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 June 2008, 05:21:50
Wrong. The first one is the best, the second one is good, and the third one is pile of steaming cannibalized transient bodies.

The second one is just fun 'cause of Vanilla Ice and Super Shredder.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 11 June 2008, 05:26:23
Yeah II was pretty badass.

But I was badasser.

III was just ass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 June 2008, 06:39:17
Ya feelin' lucky, punk?

That's the Dirty Harry series, dude.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 June 2008, 15:54:06
WELL EXCUSE ME, I know he says some thing into the mirror that gets really cliched till the end of time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 11 June 2008, 16:03:08
WELL I FEEL ASLEEP(!!) HALFWAY INTO THE FILM. >:(

Sucks. :( There was about an hour left of the film... But what I did saw from it... the first was better.

Going to see how bad III is tonight.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 11 June 2008, 18:59:57
Ya feelin' lucky, punk?

Taxi driver is a great movie, anyone who hates hookers and drug dealers should watch it.
Absolutely crazy.

I think you missed the point of the movie.

WELL EXCUSE ME, I know he says some thing into the mirror that gets really cliched till the end of time.

"You talking to me? Are YOU talking to me?! [looks around] Well, there's nobody else here, so you MUST be talking to ME!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 June 2008, 19:02:50
THAT'S IT.

Thank you.
*'tarded*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 June 2008, 19:03:21
A friend of mine dressed up as the main character for Halloween.

I haven't seen the movie.

WELL I FEEL ASLEEP(!!) HALFWAY INTO THE FILM. >:(

Sucks. :( There was about an hour left of the film... But what I did saw from it... the first was better.

Going to see how bad III is tonight.

After you watch it, watch the Angry Videogame Nerd's videos about the Turtle MOVIES (not the games, but that's good stuff too). And then you'll know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 June 2008, 17:19:56
I went to the premiere of the Incredible Hulk last night.

IT WAS AWESOME.

Holy crap, so so so sosaidfoaisjfoasidfj goooooooooood.  And Liv Tyler is sexy.  Again.  That's two sexy movies she's in that I've seen this year.  Ed Norton did an outstanding job as the Hulk, it was amazing.  The Abomination/Hulk fight was SUPREME.  Giasf9sdu8hf I wanna see it again. Right now.

God there were SO many throwbacks to the classic Hulk TV show.  Like a newly-arranged "The Lonely Man" segment, and friggin Lou Ferrigno.  And of course Stan Lee had the most awesome role of all,

[spoiler]as being the only person in the entire United States to drink the ONE bottle that was poisoned by Banner's gamma infected blood, hahaha[/spoiler]

Just go see it. Today.

It gets a million points.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 June 2008, 17:23:34
I really want to see it, and I had plans to do so today, but suddenly I'm going to Baltimore for some family bat mitzvah and ugh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 June 2008, 20:05:35
IT'S AWESOME


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 13 June 2008, 20:38:23
I'm going to watch The Happening tomorrow.

M. Night Shyamalan is a meh story writer but this one looks kinda interesting...

I at least want to know what's happening.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 13 June 2008, 20:41:11
What's happening?

His career is dwindling.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 June 2008, 06:08:44
I saw Kung Fu Panda. If you're a fan of martial arts flicks, then you'll like this one. Otherwise...you may not.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 June 2008, 06:12:45
I'm going to watch The Happening tomorrow.

M. Night Shyamalan is a meh story writer but this one looks kinda interesting...

I at least want to know what's happening.

I'll give you odds that the twist in it (because I'm pretty sure this one actually has one) is that's just The Reckoning from biblical and all the people who live are actually the damned one. But that's just my guess from trailers/commercials and I could easily be wrong.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 14 June 2008, 08:10:33
You are easily wrong.

The Happening was an aaaaaaweoijawoeijaowiejaosome movie!  Good lord, two awesome movies in two days.  I'm impressed with myself.

After you leave the theaters, I promise you will become paranoid about everything around you.  I still am.  A little bit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 14 June 2008, 16:04:07
I went to the premiere of the Incredible Hulk last night.

IT WAS AWESOME.

Holy crap, so so so sosaidfoaisjfoasidfj goooooooooood.  And Liv Tyler is sexy.  Again.  That's two sexy movies she's in that I've seen this year.  Ed Norton did an outstanding job as the Hulk, it was amazing.  The Abomination/Hulk fight was SUPREME.  Giasf9sdu8hf I wanna see it again. Right now.

God there were SO many throwbacks to the classic Hulk TV show.  Like a newly-arranged "The Lonely Man" segment, and friggin Lou Ferrigno.  And of course Stan Lee had the most awesome role of all,

[spoiler]as being the only person in the entire United States to drink the ONE bottle that was poisoned by Banner's gamma infected blood, hahaha[/spoiler]

Just go see it. Today.

It gets a million points.


... Did you text me on my phone at like 3 in the morning?

Someone texted to me that The Incredible Hulk was awesome, and it's from a number I don't recognize.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 14 June 2008, 16:27:58
^Rofls

Also, I can't go to Thunder Bay today so... Not watching The Happening.

Tomorrow I will though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 14 June 2008, 23:37:20
I went to the premiere of the Incredible Hulk last night.

IT WAS AWESOME.

Holy crap, so so so sosaidfoaisjfoasidfj goooooooooood.  And Liv Tyler is sexy.  Again.  That's two sexy movies she's in that I've seen this year.  Ed Norton did an outstanding job as the Hulk, it was amazing.  The Abomination/Hulk fight was SUPREME.  Giasf9sdu8hf I wanna see it again. Right now.

God there were SO many throwbacks to the classic Hulk TV show.  Like a newly-arranged "The Lonely Man" segment, and friggin Lou Ferrigno.  And of course Stan Lee had the most awesome role of all,

[spoiler]as being the only person in the entire United States to drink the ONE bottle that was poisoned by Banner's gamma infected blood, hahaha[/spoiler]

Just go see it. Today.

It gets a million points.


... Did you text me on my phone at like 3 in the morning?

Someone texted to me that The Incredible Hulk was awesome, and it's from a number I don't recognize.

I don't think I have your number chap.  Unless your name is Travis.  What did it say exactly?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 15 June 2008, 04:23:25
I went to the premiere of the Incredible Hulk last night.

IT WAS AWESOME.

Holy crap, so so so sosaidfoaisjfoasidfj goooooooooood.  And Liv Tyler is sexy.  Again.  That's two sexy movies she's in that I've seen this year.  Ed Norton did an outstanding job as the Hulk, it was amazing.  The Abomination/Hulk fight was SUPREME.  Giasf9sdu8hf I wanna see it again. Right now.

God there were SO many throwbacks to the classic Hulk TV show.  Like a newly-arranged "The Lonely Man" segment, and friggin Lou Ferrigno.  And of course Stan Lee had the most awesome role of all,

[spoiler]as being the only person in the entire United States to drink the ONE bottle that was poisoned by Banner's gamma infected blood, hahaha[/spoiler]

Just go see it. Today.

It gets a million points.


... Did you text me on my phone at like 3 in the morning?

Someone texted to me that The Incredible Hulk was awesome, and it's from a number I don't recognize.

I don't think I have your number chap.  Unless your name is Travis.  What did it say exactly?

That Hulk was awesome. And it turns out it was just some girl I dated, but nothing ever happened with.


Also, watched Punisher: Warzone trailer, and it looks bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 June 2008, 05:42:33
Got back from watching the Zohan, pretty okay. Needed more action and flipadeedoo's. The only good humor was the stuff coming from the Zohans mouth. It was a 5/10, wouldn't buy the DVD or own it in any other way..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 June 2008, 06:07:08
Just saw The Incredible Hulk. It was great. I'm not gonna bother comparing it to Iron Man like everyone undoubtedly has/will. They're both equally great but are totally different from each other so there's no point talking about them together.

Anyway there's nothing I didn't like (except that holding Hulk's hand showed how much he wasn't actually there, but it was fine). Just that it ended, and I even had to pee for the ENTIRE movie. Like even going into the theatre but there was a line outside and I didn't want to leave it, though I could have as my friends would have stayed there. Whatever. I made it.

Don't bother to stick around for credits, there's nothing at all after them (and thank God they aren't as #####ing long as Iron Man's).

I think now that Marvel isn't outsourcing anything in their movies, the quality will be constantly up to par with these two. Iron Man and Incredible Hulk were done with the same quality as Spider-Man 2. Like it just LOOKS great and quality, if you catch my drift.

Like... Spider-Man 3, looked very cheaply done and just not as clean and fine tuned as #2, for example. And X-Men 3 looked about the same as Spider-Man 3. Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, and Spider-Man 2 were made on a whole other level of quality, I can't really describe it so I hope you all get what I mean.

You are easily wrong.

Then I expect the twist is dumb. Unless there isn't one. Either way I have absolutely no plans to see it. I looks good but I just don't really care enough.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 16 June 2008, 00:58:16
I saw Indy and Kung Fu Panda (drive in movie double feature).
Good movies.
Nothing to say that hasn't been said.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2008, 01:05:52
My friends saw The Hulk when I was in Baltimore but, hey, we saw IronMan twice, so if this is just as good I might convince them to go again.

Otherwise I'll have to resort to another friend... I hate taking her to movies because she talks the whole damn time. I saw The Golden Compass and Jumper with her and both times she was asking questions like "is that even possible?" or "what movie is he/she from?" and such.
If it wasn't my second time seeing The Golden Compass I would've been angry, because I had been anxiously awaiting that movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2008, 01:57:16
Yeah that ##### is totally annoying. I know a few of those.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2008, 01:58:10
I'll admit, I'm glad she was there for Jumper because her comments were better than the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2008, 01:59:06
So is a jumper form Osh Kosh B'Gosh, I'll bet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 16 June 2008, 16:33:39
Saw Hulk.  Excellent movie.  Not as good as Iron Man, but then I think Iron Man was the best Marvel comic to movie ever (yes, it's better than all 3 Spider Man movies).  Hulk, never the less, was still fantastic.  Was Marvel in charge of the FF and Daredevil movies?  If so, I guess even Marvel can ##### up thier own movies, if not, they need to reboot FF and Daredevil like they did Hulk.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2008, 16:35:01
Before Iron Man, Marvel used to outsource their movies. Mainly on the writing end of it, I guess. So I'm really sure FF and Daredevil are other people's fault.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 16 June 2008, 19:58:37
I'd love to see FF fixed so Doom is.... DOOM.  And not some schmuck business man in a trench coat with a hood.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2008, 20:18:04
I watched Rise of the Silver Surfer on HBO or something a month or so back.

It was horrible, and you can't get around that no matter how you spin it. Even the special effects sucked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2008, 20:26:47
I didn't mind either of the FF movies THAT much. The first one was pretty dumb and all, obviously, but I didn't care since I was sure it would be. The only reason I saw the second one was because Silver Surfer was in it. It was better than the first. Surfer was awesome for all the 7 minutes he was actually Silver Surfer until whatever crap happened to him and he became some loser painted pewter.

Galactus was total ass. I figured they wouldn't do the real Galactus, sure, but they didn't even do the Ultimate version which they so love to use for everything in their movies. I don't really like Ultimate Marvel, like, at all, but I get it. They just made him a storm with like a cloudy hand or claw or some weird thing. It was like the Beast Planet from Shadow Raiders or Unicron but made entirely gaytown USA.

Doom sucked ass in both movies. That wasn't even close to how awesome Doom is. He's my favourite comic villain and they #####ed him over.

Anyway both movies were bad but they weren't as bad as Daredevil, which doesn't make any sense at anytime in the movie and is totally #####. I could probably (but won't) watch both FF movies again. But Daredevil just makes me physically angry.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 16 June 2008, 20:39:02
I'd love to see FF fixed so Doom is.... DOOM.  And not some schmuck business man in a trench coat with a hood.

Funny thing is, the actor who played Doom, Julian McMahon, can actually do a really good European Accent, but was asked not to.

I think if the script... If just about everything wasn't horrible, he'd have been a decent Doom.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2008, 20:41:48
Script was my main problem with both FF movies. The acting itself is meh, even though some of the actors can do better. I thought the special effects for The Silver Surfer while he as still silver and a badass were cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 16 June 2008, 23:00:09
It was more a reference to the costume they used for Doom than the actor.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 17 June 2008, 02:47:16
Definitely. The cloak was bull#####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 June 2008, 03:41:40
I liked that he had a rocket launcher though. But his costume was assed up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 June 2008, 07:08:25
The Fantastic Four comics have never been great...I don't see why anyone would expect the movies to be.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 June 2008, 07:21:52
The originals suck so bad that if you the FF Essential Vol. 1, the first three issues they don't even have their powers yet. And in those days comics were monthly AT BEST, so they had a lot more pages per issue.

The FF comics nowadays are so-so. Depends on who's writing the arc and which FF book you're reading. I read a bit recently, but.. Meh. Stopped reading.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 June 2008, 08:50:08
I watched "Let's Go To Prison" recently.

It was a very dark comedy but I enjoyed it for what it was. An interesting viewing, to say the least.
It's very different than a lot of the stuff you see nowadays and delightfully unique in terms of plot.
Sure, it's got a lame twist but it sort of fit, you know?

All in all it was pretty bland and felt really empty, and there wasn't anything very special about it. It wasn't particularly funny at all and it certainly wasn't dramatic either, and the story was nothing noteworthy, so I guess what I'm saying is... it's interesting in its own right, but not really all that good.

Will Arnett is really underplayed, too, compared to what I've seen in Arrested Development and even Blades of Glory.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 17 June 2008, 15:43:02
K. I'm finally going to see The Happening today.

I'M GOING IN. WISH ME LUCK!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 June 2008, 20:56:39
Got a ticket from work for an advance screening of The Love Guru tonight. I'm gonna go 'cause it's free and I kind of want to see this. I don't know if I think it looks good or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 June 2008, 20:58:54
I think it looks like crap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 June 2008, 20:59:40
I thought so at first but after seeing a bit more, I don't know. Could surprise me. The price is right, anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 June 2008, 21:12:52
Mike Myers makes me laugh.

I have no idea whether or not it will be a good movie, though. I'm hoping good, because I'll probably end up seeing it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 20 June 2008, 15:28:52
The Fantastic Four is meh, to be sure, but one thing is certain: DOOM IS MADE OF VILLIAN BADASSNESS.  He's easily one of Marvel's best villians, right up there with Magneto.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 20 June 2008, 15:43:37
The Fantastic Four is meh, to be sure, but one thing is certain: DOOM IS MADE OF VILLIAN BADASSNESS.  He's easily one of Marvel's best villians, right up there with Magneto.

Doom > Magneto


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 June 2008, 16:05:26
Hulk 2099 beats them all!

Speaking of 2099, I kind of liked Doom 2099.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 June 2008, 18:47:49
What about in the old Guardians of the Galaxy when doom was completely an adamantium robot (except his brain was still his) and he had Wolverine's claws because apparently he kills Wolverine in the future?

Anyway Love Guru was OK. It's pretty much Austin Powers type humour with new characters. Starts worse than it ends up, but it's still just alright. Nothing great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 June 2008, 16:51:27
Hindu leaders are absolutely pissed with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 June 2008, 21:43:23
Well what else is new? The only reason Clone High isn't on is because people got pissed at the Ghandi character, who was the best one. And in the nest Iron Man movie, doesn't anyone really think that no one will get offended by a villain called The  Mandarin?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 June 2008, 23:04:11
I'll get pissed if its like the Amazing Iron Man animated movie. Seriously, Mandarin comes back, possesses some chick and Tony gets all emotional, thus freeing her from the Mandarin. BECAUSE THATS HOW YOU BEAT SUPER VILLAINS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 June 2008, 02:46:00
They're apparently going to do it more like the whole Extremis arc in Iron Man. Where the Mandarin is trying to make the world really Darwinist so that only the strongest end up surviving. Which is just a ripoff of a few other Marvel villains.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 23 June 2008, 02:53:06
Well what else is new? The only reason Clone High isn't on is because people got pissed at the Ghandi character, who was the best one. And in the nest Iron Man movie, doesn't anyone really think that no one will get offended by a villain called The  Mandarin?

Yeah man, I really love those oranges.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 July 2008, 04:12:00
FINALLY saw Wall-E today.

Masterpiece.

Pixar officially cannot make a bad movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 July 2008, 04:20:54
Wall-E was a spectacular movie.
Best rated G movie I've ever seen.
Going to see Hancock tomorrow.
Screw the critics, it looks cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 July 2008, 04:22:31
Like, honestly, Pixar is magical. Everything they touch is golden.

Jeff Garlin did a great job, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 July 2008, 04:24:37
I really want to see Wall-E, I didn't even notice it's out..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 July 2008, 06:36:29
I hear he beeps and clicks and whirrs the whole movie and that makes me wary. But I might check it out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 July 2008, 14:34:53
He says about 3 different words in the whole movie.
Which doesn't really matter, because most of the emotions are conveyed without.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 July 2008, 15:56:49
I hear he beeps and clicks and whirrs the whole movie and that makes me wary. But I might check it out.

It's called fantastic storytelling.

Be wary, but have faith in Pixar.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 July 2008, 17:15:36
The short film beforehand was great too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 3 July 2008, 17:43:29
What I liked was that Disney doesn't like commercials, so we didn't have to add the corporate commercials to the trailer pack for all that crap before the feature presentation, meaning it starts sooner. Of course that means when I check the movie when it starts, it goes straight to that #####ing Beverly Hills Chihuahua trailer, but it's easier for me to check the sound that way... not that I ever need to.

And oh yeah, I enjoyed the movie, except there was a misframe during the screening, meaning there was a line in the middle of the screen, and the bottom of the frame showing above the line, and the top showing below the line, so I had the keys thrown at me during the movie and I had to run out of the auditorium and all the way upstairs to fix it. But that has nothing to do with the quality of the film itself, it was just... unusual. I liked it though, I just missed a part.

Then there was a second misframe at the credits, and I'm like "How the hell did he manage that?" One of our staff at each time is responsible for making up the films, and I was trained on it recently, and I find it actually quite difficult to ##### up. It's just a matter of using your eyes and cutting on the proper line.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 July 2008, 17:50:45
Sounds like working in a theater is fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 July 2008, 21:19:23
I've heard it's not.

I hear he beeps and clicks and whirrs the whole movie and that makes me wary. But I might check it out.

It's called fantastic storytelling.

Be wary, but have faith in Pixar.

I really they tell the story well without dialogue, that I knew. I'm just not sure if I'd rather see something else in theatres and wait for DVD for Wall-E.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 July 2008, 22:18:18
There are speaking parts, like Jeff Garlin as the captain of a ship and some humans and one robot, which has a really cool steering wheel design.. But not much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 July 2008, 22:49:21
Hm. Well there's still lots I want to see so I don't know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 July 2008, 00:24:54
Hancock is great.
Very quick ending though....

[spoiler] HANCOCK DIES!!!!![/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 July 2008, 00:17:21
I watched Charlie Bartlett last night/this morning, and Shooter today.

Both were pretty good.

Robert Downey always rules, and so does Mark Wahlberg.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2008, 00:53:48
Four Brothers is the dopest Marky Mark movie I've ever seen.

Seeing Hancock tonight.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 6 July 2008, 06:17:16
Watched Wall-E today, it was good. Seemed like it was too short.

I also sat in the isle to watch it. There were no good seats.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2008, 08:22:35
Hancock was great. I loved every minute of it. The opening scene to the end, all wicked. Just really good, I don't have to say more. You can't really predict the story until you see the movie, which is nice. You can't really predict anything IN the movie until about a few scenes before it happens, so that's pretty good since most movies I can predict from the trailer, or the first part of the movie anyway.

It was Wall-E or Hancock tonight. I'm very happy with my decision as Wall-E is more of the kind of movie I can see anytime, as I don't think I'll ever really have to say "Have you seen Wall-E?" in a conversation before blowing some spoiler. And it won't come up at work when talking to nerds. Which is my entire day.

I got passes to an early screening of Hellboy II. That's gonna be dope.

Also that preview before Hancock with the dog, Bolt? That's like the first talking animal 3D Animation movie I've actually wanted to see in a looong time as I have been very utterly completely totally tired of the whole overused "let's made a 3D animated movie... ABOUT ANIMALS DAT TALLLLLK!!!1111" genre. So that'll be fun. It's like Homeward Bound. OK, not really, but if you've seen the preview you know what I mean.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 July 2008, 16:01:24
YES, Mike, that's what I said about Bolt! They showed that preview before Wall-E, too. It was the only preview packaged with it.

It actually looks like something I'd like.

And Wind, Wall-E was not too short.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 July 2008, 16:32:00
I got passes to an early screening of Hellboy II. That's gonna be dope.

How the hell do you keep getting passes to stuff?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 July 2008, 16:51:12
He has a friend who works at the theater?

I'm going to be watching Hancock today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 July 2008, 16:58:16
I don't think I'd use any early passes because that means I'm forced to see it on a certain day.

Then again, if it's a movie I really want to see, then yeah, I guess I wouldn't mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 6 July 2008, 17:29:34
And if you see it early, there should be less people.

People being the primary reason I don't go to theatres anymore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2008, 20:29:48
It's generally full, actually. And that's the only annoying part. Having to go on a certain day isn't bad, because it's free. Free trumps having to go on a wednesday night.

I got passes to an early screening of Hellboy II. That's gonna be dope.

How the hell do you keep getting passes to stuff?

We get passes at work. I guess they send them to us for publicity or something, as we give some to our usual customers. It gets people talking about the movies, which is the ultimate advertisement.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 6 July 2008, 21:26:28
Where do you work now? I remember you working at a deli.
Gonna see Hancock and Wall-e this week. Probably a twofor.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 July 2008, 00:21:44
Hancock seemed a lot cooler than he ended up being though.
[spoiler]
One of God's angels? the hell?[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 July 2008, 06:42:59
They never said that.

[spoiler]They were just CALLED gods, angels, and now superheroes. When he asked what they are, what she literally said was "Gods, angels" with a comma and then mentioned that these days they're called superheroes. What they actually are was never actually explained at all in the movie. I like that what they are is still ambiguous.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 July 2008, 07:00:46
Well if they won't explain it thoroughly then I won't see it.. I saw the trailer and it said something about a "secret". Too bad it wasn't that thrilling..

Also, I'm not going to see it, so anybody who has seen it wanna tell me about the main villain/threat?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 July 2008, 07:19:32
Well if they won't explain it thoroughly then I won't see it.. I saw the trailer and it said something about a "secret". Too bad it wasn't that thrilling..

That's not the secret. And it's not even important.

The move is awesome. Don't be a chud.

Reading spoilers before seeing a movie is stupid too, by the way.

[spoiler]Also, all that that meant was that they've been called many things over the years. Whatever they are.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 July 2008, 08:31:52
So... I just went and watched Hancock.

I finished watching it five minutes ago. Yep.

Anyway, the guy who plays Leonard in The Big Bang Theory was in the background in two scenes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 7 July 2008, 16:56:54
Wall-E. Kicked butt.

And SO DID HANCOCK. Great movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 7 July 2008, 18:43:18
Hancock got really bad reviews in my town. Louisiana is terrible at reviews. because Hancock rocked face.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 July 2008, 20:58:00
It got meh reviews everywhere because it's forced to be compared to other superhero movies this season, and there's so many this year. But the movie was awesome. I think I'm gonna be Hancock for Halloween.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 7 July 2008, 22:15:12
Gee, your costume will be hard.
 >.>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 July 2008, 01:28:27
I'm gonna' be a pirate. I'll just carry around blank CD's with "Hancock 2" and "IronMan 2" written on them in permanent marker.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 July 2008, 02:00:21
Gee, your costume will be hard.
 >.>


Eat me, dough boy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 July 2008, 23:49:33
Great little fake site for Wall-E. (http://www.buynlarge.com/)

Definitely text-heavy, but ripe with parody.

Posted on:  8 July 2008, 05:51:39

Finally saw Hancock earlier today.

I like it quite a bit, but even though they're both very different movies and really shouldn't be compared, I think I liked Wall-E more.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 01:53:25
A friend of mine made a parody of the movie's title.

Hancock-Footpussy

I laughed my socks off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 9 July 2008, 01:57:01
I didn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 9 July 2008, 01:57:52
A friend of mine made a parody of the movie's title.

Hancock-Footpussy

I laughed my socks off.

Reading that post caused me to lose the ability to feel joy. :(


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 01:59:02
Sorry Sano, want some cheese with that whine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 9 July 2008, 01:59:49
Cheese makes me poo funny.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 02:00:55
Green veggies make me poo funny.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 9 July 2008, 02:03:10
You're fat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 02:05:53
So's Rosie Odonell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 02:11:36
My friends and I joke about movie titles and they're porn-film counterparts, like Scattatouille, Kinky Kong (which is real), and Armaget-it-on.

We decided that if anyone brings "Hancock" up in any of these conversations, they get shunned.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 02:15:23
Shun me all you like.

Hancock-Footpussy
Hancock-Footpussy
Hancock-Footpussy
Hancock-Footpussy
Hancock-Footpussy


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 02:20:49
See, the thing is, that's not even appropriate.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 02:23:25
Neither is Armaget-it-on.

See, the thing is, kids my age find this stuff hilarious. Sorry if you don't feel the same.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 9 July 2008, 02:29:30
Neither is Armaget-it-on.

See, the thing is, kids my age find this stuff hilarious. Sorry if you don't feel the same.
Exactly that is what is wrong.
Note: I didn't even chuckle.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 9 July 2008, 02:36:03
I think we find it funny because all we can do is joke about it. You can't blame us for being curious. And what better way to kill the cat than with funny curiousity?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 02:36:59
I wasn't going against you, I was just saying the word you used that is quite similar to "kitty" was a little too vulgar for MMM.

Don't get me wrong, I swear quite a bit. I hate taboos and censorship, and I'm never afraid to swear in public or talk about questionable things, but I'm ALWAYS smart about it. There are always places where that stuff is not appropriate.

And here, I at least respect that Abe tries to keep it kid-friendly. I'm blowing it out of proportion right now, because I don't really care this much, but now I have to explain it to you.

None of the ones I posted were vulgar, just humorous. I do find porno-movie-titles very amusing, and I have a large mental list of ones my friends and I have come up with over time, but I had to choose wisely which titles to post on MMM.

The three I chose are harmless, with Scattatouille being the most offensive while it really isn't even offensive at all, just moreso than the others.

Whatever.

Oooh, I'd like to take this moment to proudly proclaim that I sometimes watch pornos and fast-forward through the sex scenes just to watch the actual movie. It's a great past-time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 9 July 2008, 02:43:58
Yeha, it's quite funny to watch the bad acting in pornos.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 03:22:19
Sometimes they're funnier than most comedies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 July 2008, 03:50:17
Hancock doesn't even have the word "hand" in it. Yeesh.

A friend of mine made a parody of the movie's title.

Hancock-Footpussy

I laughed my socks off.

Your friend's jokes are over 200 years old. And over 300 years lame.

My friends and I joke about movie titles and they're porn-film counterparts, like Scattatouille, Kinky Kong (which is real), and Armaget-it-on.

We decided that if anyone brings "Hancock" up in any of these conversations, they get shunned.

Scattatouille is from the 2008 MTV Movie awards.

I invented a gay-porn called "You've Got Male", years before Family Guy made up "You've Got Male Genetalia".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 04:00:14
Yeah, I know Scattatouille was in the MTV Movie awards but we though of that one ages ago.

We were specifically talking about Pixar movies. It was hard thinking of good ones. We decided that "The Incredibles" and "Monsters Inc." would just stay the same, sort of like what MTV did with Iron Man.

We had Fisting Nemo, A Thug's Wife, Hummers (a stretch for Cars), and I forgot if we ever thought of anything for Toy Story or Wall-E.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 July 2008, 04:04:02
Yeah. The closest to almost decent I ever heard for Toy Story  was "Sex Toy Story" from MadTV back when it was good.

Hellboy II tomorrow!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 04:07:08
And only a few days 'till Journey to the Center of the Earth.

I only want to see it because it has a t-rex and Brendan Fraser is one of my few man-crushes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 July 2008, 04:08:18
It looks like the same old Brendan Fraser in oldy times stuff, but 3D would be interesting.

A friend just told me he got passes to see it tomorrow, but I'm already going to Hellboy II.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 04:09:50
I really like the art style for the Hellboy movies and obviously the comics, too, but I've never seen or read any of it.

It looks like the same old Brendan Fraser in oldy times stuff

And then after this we've got a third The Mummy. Monkeybone still kicks ass, though, and Bedazzled is only good because of him. It's not really good though. AND he had the best guest episodes in Scrubs, even better than Michael J. Fox's.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 July 2008, 04:11:55
I've read some. Started a few weeks ago but a frienemy keeps coming into my store so I have to talk to him and thus can't read. I watched the first live action movie online today. One of the animated movies is on TV right now, but I'm only kind of watching because I'm about to go to bed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 04:39:22
Oh, I forgot to say I saw a movie poster for a new X-Files movie at the theater.

Wha?

Could be cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 July 2008, 05:04:10
Yeah should be alright.

And now, What if Michael Bay wrote The Dark Knight (http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994%3ABlogPost%3A355506)?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 July 2008, 05:09:32
Yeah should be alright.

And now, What if Michael Bay wrote The Dark Knight (http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994%3ABlogPost%3A355506)?

Everyone read this.
They hack ALL the internets.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 05:15:50
Ahaha, I read the whole thing.

"Something out of a comic book!", "this happens seventeen times", and "let's hack the internet" all made me laugh pretty hard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 9 July 2008, 05:16:23
Modern movies as Russian folk art (http://ziza.ru/2006/06/16/rastamanskie-narodnye-skazki.html)

Cleverly done and quite brilliant. I don't recognize some of them, though, and I can't read Cyrillic. Whoever the artist is, they've done Terminator, Matrix, Lord of the Rings, Spiderman, Star Wars, Harry Potter, Anaconda, and War of the Worlds.

Anyone want to try and figure out the ones I couldn't identify?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2008, 05:22:41
Those are pretty cool. But yeah, I only identified the same ones you did. I don't think I would've caught The Matrix though if you didn't say it, even though now it's obvious.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 9 July 2008, 08:35:50
The one before Anaconda could be Fahrenheit 451.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 July 2008, 12:32:08
I second that except I say that it definitely IS.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 July 2008, 04:20:13
Ahaha, I read the whole thing.

"Something out of a comic book!", "this happens seventeen times", and "let's hack the internet" all made me laugh pretty hard.

"She wears glasses because she's also the smartest woman in the world" was the first that got me, heh.

Yeah should be alright.

And now, What if Michael Bay wrote The Dark Knight (http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994%3ABlogPost%3A355506)?

Everyone read this.
They hack ALL the internets.

Everyone do what John just said.

I'm gonna check out the link Yubi posted when I'm home later tonight.

Posted on:  9 July 2008, 17:35:52

OK. Hellboy II was good. I really liked it. Better than the first one story-wise, funnier than the first one, plus it has Johann Krauss! And Hellboy doesn't look made of plastic. And Abe Sapien's voice is different, but not bad. Might even be better actually. He looks more alive than in the first one too. Also Snare is in it and is wicked.

Edit: On the Russian thing, I think the one before the one that is most certainly Fahrenheit 451, that could be Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas but that's just a pretty half-hazard guess. I have absolutely no idea what the first one, the Croc one, or the one with the guy using the computer are.

Although come to think of it, that computer one could be Johnny Mnemonic, since he seems to be putting a USB stick up his ass. But that's a more reckless guess than Fear and Loathing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 10 July 2008, 06:05:36
The Fahrenheit 451 movie sucked REALLY bad... Even if you watch it before reading the book you would find it bad.

Which is sad because the book is beautiful. Some of the best writing I've ever read.

I heard another movie's coming out in 2009, though, supposed to be truer to the book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 July 2008, 07:21:02
I thought the movie was pretty good.

[spoiler]The girl lives in both the movie and the play, Bradbury noted this and while he didn't exactly agree with it, felt that it made the story better for general audiences[/spoiler].


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 10 July 2008, 22:49:45
Edit: On the Russian thing, I think the one before the one that is most certainly Fahrenheit 451, that could be Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas but that's just a pretty half-hazard guess. I have absolutely no idea what the first one, the Croc one, or the one with the guy using the computer are.

Although come to think of it, that computer one could be Johnny Mnemonic, since he seems to be putting a USB stick up his ass. But that's a more reckless guess than Fear and Loathing.

The USB one is the most confusing because he looks exactly like JohnnyDepp!Wonka, but for the computer. I'm not familiar with Johnny Mnemonic and I haven't seen Fear and Loathing yet, so I wouldn't know.

I think I heard that the crocodile is based on some actual folk tale than a movie? I don't know. For all I know it could be based on a movie that was based on a Russian folktale about a crocodile. Talk about recursion.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 July 2008, 00:08:52
Johnny Mnemonic is about people that can store data files in their brains and then can also transport the data to someone for money. Keanu Reeve's character takes on   a bigger file than he's got space for and it starts #####ing him up. A story unfolds, blah blah.

I think Matrix and Terminator are the most obvious ones. Matrix has the déja vu cats, blue pill, poses, the phone, etc. Terminator has the metal half face, the bike, the blackmith's shop in the background (allusion to either where Sarah Connor killed the first Terminator or where T-1000 and the second Terminator bought it, probably the former).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 July 2008, 05:08:59
I finally saw both The Hulk and The Love Guru.

The Hulk was FANTASTIC. Everything I was hyping it up to be. I know I'm a bit late, but still. Marvelous stuff. Ed Norton's my dog.

The Love Guru was... actually not terrible. I liked it a HELLUVA lot more than Zohan, and they're both the same sort of movie: big-name funnyman makes purposely juvenile movie not to be taken too seriously.
Love Guru might not be the best movie nor the funniest, but it was definitely entertaining and fun to watch. Mike Myers is just funny, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 11 July 2008, 07:02:11
*sputters with horror*

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/25476518.html


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 11 July 2008, 07:40:13
Ew. Get a tan.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 11 July 2008, 13:26:32
... what is this twilight thing?
*reads Wikipedia*

...

...

... This is the most unimaginative thing I think I've ever read about.
Could the author possibly think of an ORIGINAL storyline that hasn't been done to death?
Maybe more original titles?
Maybe some characters and character-based relationships that AREN'T based on common mythologies?

Oh man, and I bet the main character is one of those damn annoying girls who won't shut up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 July 2008, 15:13:05
I've known about that for a while. A few of my girl friends are OBSESSED with that series, and I hate everything vampires so I always make fun of them. They told me about the movie this instant it was announced.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 11 July 2008, 21:54:28
Oh man, and I bet the main character is one of those damn annoying girls who won't shut up.

The main character is Bella, short for Isabella Swan. She has ivory skin that doesn't tan in the sun. She's a newcomer in a town that strangely bears no resemblance to its real world counterpart (I know a person who's lived there). She's wildly intelligent, has read all the classics from Chaucer to Shakespeare, and becomes obsessed by vampires because they're all smokin' hot. The plot doesn't start proper until about four hundred pages in, because up until then it's all about her romance with Edward. (The book is five to six hundred pages in length.)

Why do I know this much? Because people I thought were my friends posted great long excerpts of it at me in AIM until I wanted to die.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 11 July 2008, 21:59:40
... whoa, whoa, WHOA.

The main character is a MARY SUE?
WHERE IS THE AUTHOR
WHY IS THIS BOOK POPULAR
I'M GOING TO GRIND SOME BONES TO MAKE MY BREAD
I NEED MY MEDICINE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 July 2008, 02:19:40
Ew. Get a tan.

The girl is nice though. I couldn't care less about the man and his exposed oval nipples.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 July 2008, 02:26:09
He looks like my only gay friend so it just fits for me, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 July 2008, 02:31:19
Anyway.

TODAY I GOT A PASS TO GO SEE THE DARK KNIGHT ON WEDNESDAY!




















Jealous?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 July 2008, 07:46:40
Eat a dick.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 July 2008, 08:10:29
No thanks, I'll go see The Dark Knight before you even have the option to and do it for free instead, thanks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 July 2008, 14:50:24
Well, after you do that, then.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 12 July 2008, 19:26:25
I watched the 2008 Rambo on Comcast at a party. It's pretty good, even though it has no real storyline and just lots of blood and gore. But it's politically incorrect. In truth, Burmese people didn't torture citizens as severely as it was shown in Rambo. Maybe they did in the past, but these days Burmese soldiers are more civil. I should know, I'm Burmese.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 July 2008, 19:49:40
But are you a Burmese SOLDIER?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 12 July 2008, 20:17:39
Yeah, deep, deep inside my heart, I am evil and twisted and dumb and I wanna be a dictator. Which I do, I adore Hitler. "Heil Hitler!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 12 July 2008, 20:29:36
I used to be like you.
Then I realized that he was a just a scared little German midget sociopath.

I idolize Stalin now.
at least i think so


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 12 July 2008, 20:31:46
A scared little German midget sociopath with a tootbrush moustache.

In other news, I flip open a Shonen Jump mag and I get bombarded with 'New Live Action DBZ Film!'

God please help me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 July 2008, 21:25:57
Yeah. Not funny.

Anyway, you can't know what goes on in the military of yours or any other countries unless you're running them, and running them directly.

So talk to Haliburton.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 July 2008, 05:57:49
Just got back from Hellboy II.

I love del Toro's artistic styling, and he can write a fairly decent story line, but the romance sub-plots (of which there are many) felt forced and unnatural.

A love story poisoned the first movie, and this movie doesn't handle them any better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 July 2008, 08:41:39
I don't like Liz-Hellboy romance crap because it never happened in the comics. I didn't mind the other romance but I see what you mean. But this movie was more of a B.P.R.D. movie than a Hellboy movie all in all, which is neat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 July 2008, 14:30:04
Yes and no.

The BRPD aspects held my attention quite well, but it also gave me the feeling that there was more interesting stuff happening elsewhere for a good portion of the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 July 2008, 19:50:10
Yeah I see what you mean, but I didn't mind it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 14 July 2008, 04:38:59
I just now came back from watching Hellboy II. I liked it.
Mind you I've read very, very little of the comics, but the movie itself holds up solidly.

The romance scenes are a little overdone at points, but so much awesome crap happens later because of it that you can't complain. They tie in things and keep the movie's plot pretty solid and devoid of loose ends (well, mostly).

This sort of thing is important when you're marketing to more than a niche audience.
I'd say it's a good compromise, but I'm curious to know what Lunche thinks (probably hates it).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 July 2008, 06:58:16
No thanks, I'll go see The Dark Knight before you even have the option to and do it for free instead, thanks.

*weeps*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 July 2008, 16:15:51
I just finished watching Hellboy 2, less than legal ways of course.. Good stuff, When Mike told me that Liz and HB didn't actually have a relationship in the series I never would have imagined what happened in the movie would happen. But I digress, the action scenes were pretty solid, didn't help that the screen size was ass though. After watching the first movie I really wanna get into HB, and after watching this, I want to even more. Of course, buying the comics and catching up on the series is gonna be a burden, so I'll find some other way.. some how

Also, the Dark Knight doesn't interest me, not one bit. Not a fan of DC.

Posted on: 14 July 2008, 14:32:37

This movie hurts me.

Disaster Movie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWy5abFkaMk)

Why do these guys keep making movies? God #####ing damnit..

heres the poster for the movie, incase you don't want to watch the trailer (which I recommend you don't)

(http://www.moviesonline.ca/movie-gallery/albums/userpics//poster_disaster-m.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 July 2008, 16:43:00
Ugh, I've been bitching about this for a while now. Definitely watch the trailer. Just so that you know how horrible it's going to be. There isn't even a funny joke IN the trailer.

Not only that, but nothing in the trailer has anything to do with any sort of Disaster Movie.

I mean, look at the poster. Nothing in THAT even has anything to do with a Disaster Movie!

One of the posters I saw had the statue of liberty half-underwater wearing a snorkeling mask, an obvious spoof of The Day After Tomorrow. However, how the ##### do you a spoof a movie like The Day After Tomorrow?! That movie was so bad that it was awesome, but the point is that it's bad. But I do love it. I mean, Jake Gyllenhal gets chased down a hallways by GLOBAL WARMING at the end! And there's wolves!

Anyway, with The Day After Tomorrow, they're quite a while late anyway.
The only other poster I saw had like Indiana Jones crushed by that boulder that chases him. And it says "ROCK ON." I literally stopped in the hall of the theater with my friend to point it out and talk about how horrible it is.

These aren't movies.

They're just horrible abominations of mixed pop-culture references.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 14 July 2008, 16:57:10
The Day After Tomorrow was that apocalyptic snowstorm movie, right?
I liked it, but then I like ice and snow.

I make it a point not to watch any movie with "Movie" in the title.

The first thing that happened in that trailer? Iron man being squashed by a car cow?
... what was that about?
That doesn't even make enough sense to be funny, unless you're a five-year-old.

The rest of it is just more of the same poorly coordinated slapstick "comedy" with very, very poor acting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 July 2008, 17:02:44
I believe he was crushed my a cow. This movie is terrible.. I remember watching Scary Movie and it was alright, funny even.. but this is just going too far.

I have a friend who talks about these movies all the time, and thinks their spoofs are hilarious. I shun that friend quite often..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 July 2008, 17:26:02
The first Scary Movie was decent, and the second one wasn't horrible either. I almost enjoyed Scary Movie 3 because I was a big fan of The Ring and Signs.

Everything afterwards has left me speechless.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 14 July 2008, 17:30:41
None of them are any good, if you ask me.

They're all inane attempts at comedic spoofing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 July 2008, 17:33:42
I'm just saying the first two Scary Movies were the closest to anything watchable.

Everything just spiraled out of control afterwards.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 14 July 2008, 17:34:08
Scary Movie 2 is one of the worst things ever created.

I saw that and the Ali G movie in one day and contemplated suicide soon after.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 14 July 2008, 18:26:32
I went to see Hellboy II on Friday.

I threw up about 30-40 minutes in.

It was unrelated to the movie though, but I didn't get to see it all, so that sucks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 July 2008, 18:38:36
I saw that and the Ali G movie in one day and contemplated suicide soon after.

I hear NOTHING but bad things about the Ali G movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 July 2008, 03:05:29
I like it.

Anyway these people should just spoof their own movies. At least that would contain them to not ruining other people's ##### with crappy ass costumes like that Hellbitch in the poster.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 15 July 2008, 15:38:09
.... Movie Movie?
I would have to shoot everyone.
In the world.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 July 2008, 16:59:54
Mike, I promise you they will get to that point. They will run out of things and spoof their own movies, somehow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 July 2008, 23:52:41
I can't wait to not see Spoof Movie and Meet The Coneheads.

I just finished watching Hellboy 2, less than legal ways of course.. Good stuff, When Mike told me that Liz and HB didn't actually have a relationship in the series I never would have imagined what happened in the movie would happen. But I digress, the action scenes were pretty solid, didn't help that the screen size was ass though. After watching the first movie I really wanna get into HB, and after watching this, I want to even more. Of course, buying the comics and catching up on the series is gonna be a burden, so I'll find some other way.. some how
[/img]

Trade Paperbacks, man, trade paperbacks. AKA Collections to you newbars. Just get volume 1 and go one from there. I'm actually still just started into reading volume 1 because I keep getting customers and frienemies coming into the store and talking at me.

No thanks, I'll go see The Dark Knight before you even have the option to and do it for free instead, thanks.

*weeps*



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 16 July 2008, 03:51:08
I can't wait to not see Spoof Movie and Meet The Coneheads.

I just finished watching Hellboy 2, less than legal ways of course.. Good stuff, When Mike told me that Liz and HB didn't actually have a relationship in the series I never would have imagined what happened in the movie would happen. But I digress, the action scenes were pretty solid, didn't help that the screen size was ass though. After watching the first movie I really wanna get into HB, and after watching this, I want to even more. Of course, buying the comics and catching up on the series is gonna be a burden, so I'll find some other way.. some how
[/img]

Trade Paperbacks, man, trade paperbacks. AKA Collections to you newbars. Just get volume 1 and go one from there. I'm actually still just started into reading volume 1 because I keep getting customers and frienemies coming into the store and talking at me.

No thanks, I'll go see The Dark Knight before you even have the option to and do it for free instead, thanks.

*weeps*



The first volume, to me, is hard to get through at times, since Byrne wrote the dialog for it.

Everything after Seed of Destruction is GOLDEN though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 16 July 2008, 06:08:00
(http://www.moviesonline.ca/movie-gallery/albums/userpics//poster_disaster-m.jpg)

WHERE THE ##### ARE THEY GETTING THE MONEY TO KEEP MAKING THESE #####TY MOVIES!?

...This is why I always just mark this thread as read.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 16 July 2008, 10:38:40
Jeez. Those movies only get made because kids in middle school think it'll be cool to go see. Much like when I was there and the first and second Scary Movie came out. I saw Hellboy II and Meet Dave on Sunday... I think. Didn't have high expectations for Meet Dave, and then I started laughing uncontrollably within the first 2 minutes and it seemed to never stop. Very solid comedy. And Hellboy 2 was freaking AWESOME. Del Toro amazes me again. And I'm going to a midnight showing of Dark Knight tomorrow. Needless to say, I'm freaking excited.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 July 2008, 10:43:08
I heard Meet Dave was really funny, but it was also really crap. Eddie Murphy even skipped his own premier to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 July 2008, 16:10:12
Meet Dave is supposed to be funny? Huh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 July 2008, 03:04:08
The Dark Knight was awesome.

Harvey Dent was #####ing wicked.

Joker was pretty much perfect.

And I saw it in IMAX, so the sound was like real life clear and the screen was huge and I got there early enough that I didn't have to crink my neck at the massive massive IMAX screen.

I just wish Bale didn't have an awful Bat-voice, and that he'd close his mouth more often.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 July 2008, 03:26:11
I haven't seen a movie at IMAX in years! I feel it's about time I do that again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 July 2008, 04:05:16
IMAX is Canadian tech. You're not allowed, Michigalec!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 17 July 2008, 04:09:55
No matter what you have over there in Ottawa, the IMAX at Science World is better. Way better. Is yours a huge #####ing globe? I thought not.

Alas, there are no feature films shown there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 July 2008, 04:38:46
You have NO idea what we have. But clearly the IMAX in the movie theatre was not a globe, so you have this round señor Grasas-so!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 July 2008, 00:32:41
Watchmen Trailer!

http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/watchmen/trailer


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 18 July 2008, 04:48:27
Holy #####ing son of a #####ing #####.

Looks awesome. Though I still need to finish reading the comic...

When's it supposed to come out?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 July 2008, 04:50:07
March '09.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 18 July 2008, 04:59:10
Ah, well I got plenty of time then.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 July 2008, 05:02:42
Better read it a few times.

There's so much stuff in it, that every time you read it, you find something new.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 July 2008, 05:24:50
I'll watch another time. No sound on this computer.

Just saw The Happening. I liked it. I think of the ones I've seen it was his creepiest movie, only in that when nothing's happening he still uses all the creepy filmmaking elements. Which is actually annoying as you don't get much time to not think something is about to burst out or something. Also, [spoiler]he usually finishes his movies. The guy kills the alien. The man is a ghost and #####s off. The lady goes back to the water, etc. This one... Just ends. And they starts elsewhere.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 July 2008, 08:25:23
Just saw The Dark Knight.

Absolutely amazing. 10/10.

RIP Heath Ledger.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 July 2008, 14:52:35
The Dark Knight.
Went to the midnight release with a bunch of friends.
Over 800 people there.
LONG FRIGGIN MOVIE.
Like, wow.
I'm very surprised.

I thought it ended like 4 times while I was watching it.
TOO BAD HEATH IS DEAD.
The Joker was freaking great.

Best scene in the movie?
Tractor Trailer?
No.
Bike up the wall 180?
No.
Batman walking through a rave and beating the ##### out of people for no reason and throwing a guy off a fire escape?
##### yes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 July 2008, 15:14:34
It really was an AMAZING movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 July 2008, 15:34:10
Things to make it better:
-Less cliche lines from the cops (seriously, it was bad)
-Bale's Batman voice was a GREAT Solid Snake impression. But it's doesn't belong.
-Sonar eyes looked retarded, and why not just turn them off?
-Batman's fist fights were too robotic, and didn't feel authentic.
-It needs more BAM! CLUNK!! WASHOOOOM!!!

Was there anything after the credits?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 18 July 2008, 18:32:58
The Watchmen trailer is OMG SQUEE HAPPY. Still fearful it's going to be ruined, but slightly less so.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 July 2008, 23:48:57
HOLY #####.

I went in to Dark Knight with high expectations and it SURPASSED them.

In fact, I was blown away!


That was a great movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 19 July 2008, 04:33:28
I really need to get the hell out of my house and go into a theater.

I feel free as a bird without parents. I need an elaborate scheme to kill them and replace them with artificial clones.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 July 2008, 05:19:29
Things to make it better:
-Less cliche lines from the cops (seriously, it was bad)
-Bale's Batman voice was a GREAT Solid Snake impression. But it's doesn't belong.
-Sonar eyes looked retarded, and why not just turn them off?
-Batman's fist fights were too robotic, and didn't feel authentic.
-It needs more BAM! CLUNK!! WASHOOOOM!!!

Was there anything after the credits?

No.

RIP Heath Ledger.

God, shut up.

He did great, but #####ing hell everyone is blowing all this ##### way out of proportion. He did awesome, and it's a shame, but ##### he's going to win awards posthumously MORE because he died than because he did a great job (which he did, yes).

And I have to say, Harvey Dent was the biggest shine in that movie. Not to take anything away from how perfect Joker was.

Just... Hrm. It's SO much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 19 July 2008, 06:41:11
Best Joker intro/magic trick ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 July 2008, 06:54:12
My favourite part of the movie, I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 19 July 2008, 08:32:10
I think I was more excited about the Watchmen trailer than The Dark Knight. Both equally sexy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 19 July 2008, 16:52:03
Best Joker intro/magic trick ever.

I'm gonna make this Pencil disappear!


Also, when we first see Two Face, I actually cringed. It was awesome.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 July 2008, 19:48:10
His eye looked TOO fake the first time you see it, but it looked fine every other time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 July 2008, 22:53:01
Quite fake.
So much I didn't like it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 July 2008, 23:59:53
Same. Only in that first reveal. It was fine later on.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 July 2008, 01:00:38
Also, the half and half was TOO perfect, I mean, his lips being full on one side and all ripped apart and stuff on the other didn't seem right, like one would be pulled over to the other side a bit or something.

Still, the fact that he could put up with that pain and not bleed like crazy is creepy.

He's gonna be in the new adds for Clearasil soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 20 July 2008, 06:09:53
Computer broke, so I missed a bit.

Sounds like working in a theater is fun.

The company sucks, and I mean major ass. But this particular building, Cineplex Aurora, has a good cast of people, and it's enjoyable to work with good people with a sense of humour and a management that's capable of getting off their asses and helping out when things are rough.

A friend of mine made a parody of the movie's title.

Hancock-Footpussy

I laughed my socks off.

Sadly, there are people older than me that would find that quite funny.

Anyway.

TODAY I GOT A PASS TO GO SEE THE DARK KNIGHT ON WEDNESDAY!

I hate you.

Haha, I had to close thursday night, and we ended up being one of the theatres that played the midnight show. It wasn't fun. And the big GM, the General Manager was there to see it and thus wasn't working, and he seemed about to explode at us for simple things, and it's like, I'm only one person, I can only do so much. But oh well, at least he wasn't yelling. He was just maintaining that "I think you're doing a bad job" tone that pisses me off because he has no idea what I've been doing.

I'm finally going to see it tonight, because I've been working and this was the first screening we managed to find time for. Have to wait 'til 1:45 when the last Dark Knight finishes before I can start the movie, though. I'm sure it'll be worth it. The past few days have been a bit draining, and I finally have something to look forward to, so that's good.

EDIT: Oh yeah... some of us were speculating about Johnny Depp as the Riddler. I don't really know much about the Riddler, so I have no opinion, but what do you guys think? Not to say it's actually going to happen, or even that the Riddler would actually be in the next film, but rather do you think he'd do well for the part?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 20 July 2008, 06:20:55
Harvey Dent has the strongest optical nerves ever.

Or his eyeball has floaty-powers.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 July 2008, 19:20:29
Frankly, it's incredible he's even able to talk. Because he can't make such facial movements.

Still, the fact that he could put up with that pain and not bleed like crazy is creepy.

No it isn't. His face logically should have been completely cauterized.

EDIT: Oh yeah... some of us were speculating about Johnny Depp as the Riddler. I don't really know much about the Riddler, so I have no opinion, but what do you guys think? Not to say it's actually going to happen, or even that the Riddler would actually be in the next film, but rather do you think he'd do well for the part?

No. Very very no. Not Depp, no thanks, never.

Anyway at work (at the comic store job, rather) we were speculating all day friday as to what villains could be in the next movie.

I want to see Catwoman portrayed or at least acknowledged (with her good costume, the goggles one, or with the stitchy Michelle Pfeiffer costume, or an amalgam of both) but if she was in it she'd have to be the secondary villain (like Scarecrow and Two-Face).

We thought about The Riddler, but again he'd have to be the secondary villain. Riddler isn't even homicidal. Although, with Catwoman being a cat burglar and Riddler being a clue master, it would actually get a lot of the World's Greatest Detective vibe in there, which would be cool. Though one of my friends says The Riddler is confirmed as the villain in the next movie, I've not heard anything official and I think it's rather soon.

Beyond those two we have to start asking the question; Do we start to delve into the world of superpowers? So far these Bat movies have been based more or less on the realism angle, and superpowers could blow all that to ##### if it's done even fraction off.

Clayface would be sweet, but not big muck monster Clayface. The Clayface who is like, just toxic and #####s people up.

Someone at the store thought Poison Ivy would be good, as long as she just did the pheromone thing kind of like Scarecrow and his gas, and didn't have all the plant controlling #####e.

I like Mr. Freeze's origin and stuff a lot, but he's SUCH a comic booky villain that it could be weird. Very weird. But at the same time, they could make it work because at least he has a loose vague basis in science.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Dizzy on 20 July 2008, 23:33:09
I liked how Fox said, "It can protect against cats." When he did, I immediately thought of Catwoman in the next movie. Possible hint to the next movie? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM?!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 21 July 2008, 00:20:28
The writers were clever.

They weren't that clever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 21 July 2008, 18:34:41
I think this is what they meant:

(http://www.themanime.org/images/ZeroWing-Cats.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 July 2008, 18:38:43
I liked how Fox said, "It can protect against cats." When he did, I immediately thought of Catwoman in the next movie. Possible hint to the next movie? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM?!

Wasn't Harvey Dent in the movie? He'll probably be the next villain.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 July 2008, 20:14:39
Well, Wind, I suggest you go see the movie.

[
RIP Heath Ledger.

God, shut up.

He did great, but #####ing hell everyone is blowing all this ##### way out of proportion. He did awesome, and it's a shame, but ##### he's going to win awards posthumously MORE because he died than because he did a great job (which he did, yes).

Oh, shush, his performance in this movie was absolutely amazing. Amazing enough to warrant one more RIP. I mean, all that lip-smacking and the way he walked... ugh. Very impressive acting. I'm not like saying he's the greatest person ever and it's the worst thing ever that he died, I'm just acknowledging his loss at a time when I felt he deserved to be acknowledged.

And yeah, the movie was just flat-out incredible. I actually sort of want to see it again.

I at least need to see the first, I still haven't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 July 2008, 23:07:58
Well, Wind, I suggest you go see the movie.

[
RIP Heath Ledger.

God, shut up.

He did great, but #####ing hell everyone is blowing all this ##### way out of proportion. He did awesome, and it's a shame, but ##### he's going to win awards posthumously MORE because he died than because he did a great job (which he did, yes).

Oh, shush, his performance in this movie was absolutely amazing. Amazing enough to warrant one more RIP. I mean, all that lip-smacking and the way he walked... ugh. Very impressive acting. I'm not like saying he's the greatest person ever and it's the worst thing ever that he died, I'm just acknowledging his loss at a time when I felt he deserved to be acknowledged.

And yeah, the movie was just flat-out incredible. I actually sort of want to see it again.

That's exactly what I just said, you homo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 July 2008, 23:29:56
Shush your face.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 July 2008, 00:41:01
That's exactly what I just said, you homo.

Your post did make it sound like all the praise wasn't warranted, even if you said a few times that it was. I know you were tying to say that he's receiving extra accolades because he's dead now, but the generally disdainful tone of the post skewed your message.

Starting off with "God, shut up." didn't help much either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 July 2008, 00:45:48
There were also a lot of pound signs! Angriness!

Edge hit it on the nail, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 July 2008, 01:05:25
That's exactly what I just said, you homo.

Your post did make it sound like all the praise wasn't warranted, even if you said a few times that it was. I know you were tying to say that he's receiving extra accolades because he's dead now, but the generally disdainful tone of the post skewed your message.

Starting off with "God, shut up." didn't help much either.

Oh, I know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 July 2008, 02:45:43
So, then it was intentionally ambiguous?

So no matter how it was interpreted you could say "That's exactly what I just said"?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 July 2008, 02:53:49
The original post wasn't intentionally ambiguous but I realized how ASR could have taken it badly when I saw his own post.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 July 2008, 03:48:54
Mike, you're like this close to the edge of looking like a fool.

Quick, smoke bomb!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: XJ on 22 July 2008, 03:58:00
You fool, Mikero doesn't need smoke bombs.

He just points in a random direction, shouts, "Look over there!" comically says, "Yoink!" and runs away. Don't you know Mike at all?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 July 2008, 03:58:37
I like to say that I saw The Dark Knight this evening, but thanks to Yahoo!'s incorrect movie times, I can't. Thanks to this, I won't be able to see the movie for at least a week due to not having any more days off this week.

La-dee-#####ing-dah.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 July 2008, 04:01:15
That truly sucks, man.

You fool, Mikero doesn't need smoke bombs.

He just points in a random direction, shouts, "Look over there!" comically says, "Yoink!" and runs away. Don't you know Mike at all?

It's very hard to develop any sort of relationship with a ninja.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 22 July 2008, 05:17:02
"Oh honey, let's do something romantic tonight! What would you'd like to do?"

"I'm looking forward to killing you. Right now."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 July 2008, 23:24:29
If she said "would you'd like to do?" I would HAVE to kill her.

You fool, Mikero doesn't need smoke bombs.

He just points in a random direction, shouts, "Look over there!" comically says, "Yoink!" and runs away. Don't you know Mike at all?

It's very hard to develop any sort of relationship with a ninja.

And he didn't either, apparently.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 July 2008, 05:15:07
I watched The Dark Knight. Really good, everything up until Joker getting arrested was boring. And I thought that was the end of the movie but the rest of it really surprised me, after that scene everything was spectacular.

Also.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 July 2008, 05:16:54
None of it was boring, you tardorama.

I just watched the Watchmen trailer like four times.

Wait. Watched the Watchmen...

"Who watches the Watchmen?"

Cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 July 2008, 05:21:01
None of it was boring, you tardorama.

Like I said, Batman doesn't make me excited. For all I care he can walk into some doughnut related establishment (say Jolly Pirates for instance) and proceed to take a two hour long dump.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: The Otaku on 25 July 2008, 05:46:05
Can you believe Jan Wahl from Kron 4 News gave 'The Dark Knight' two and a half 'hats' out of four?!

Jan Wahl is the so-called 'movie guru' of Kron 4, which is a San Franciscan news channel, just in case you Canadians or whatever-else-ians haven't heard of her. Her rating system uses hats because she's the only person in the studio who's always wearing a different dress hat every day, as she has cancer and is balding.

That cancer must really be getting to her.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 July 2008, 14:31:39
You can't trust anyone's mind who's part of California show business.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 25 July 2008, 17:10:57
Not even my Sister?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 July 2008, 17:12:50
I just watched the Watchmen trailer like four times.

Wait. Watched the Watchmen...

"Who watches the Watchmen?"

Cool.

I've gotten really interested in The Watchmen as of late and I'm going to buy the comic soon. It better be as awesome as you all say it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 25 July 2008, 17:14:30
I just watched the Watchmen trailer like four times.

Wait. Watched the Watchmen...

"Who watches the Watchmen?"

Cool.

I've gotten really interested in The Watchmen as of late and I'm going to buy the comic soon. It better be as awesome as you all say it is.


It's not "The Watchmen" it's just "Watchmen".

And this comic doesn't need a gun... To blow your mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 25 July 2008, 18:09:01
Watchmen is awesome. I just finished it last night.

I plan on reading it again soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 July 2008, 19:53:17
Yeah, as a kid I barely read comics, but still enough to have a general idea. And usually they were just like Spider-Man, and I just read them at a friend's house. Obviously reading random issues on random days isn't enough to get me into them.

...but lately, I keep getting interested in tons of them and I feel like I missed out on my childhood a bit.

Anyway, as I already said, Watchmen has caught my eye and next time I have a chance I'll definitely get it. Promise.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 25 July 2008, 20:10:17
Promise.

YOU BETTER. OR ELSE...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 02:41:24
I just watched the Watchmen trailer like four times.

Wait. Watched the Watchmen...

"Who watches the Watchmen?"

Cool.

I've gotten really interested in The Watchmen as of late and I'm going to buy the comic soon. It better be as awesome as you all say it is.

I wanted to reread it today, because I never finished it the first time. We were sold out. Like everywhere is selling out of Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Which is not unexpected as people are sheep. Sheep aren't people though. Interesting.

I think I'll just borrow it from a friend.

It's not "The Watchmen" it's just "Watchmen".

THANK you. That always pisses me off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 04:26:43
Well, this is one of the few comics I've been meaning to read for a long while now. Another one that's sparked my interest recently is Batman: The Long Halloween. But I hear it's similar to The Dark Knight anyway so I don't really care about that.

I've been wanting to read Watchmen since Simon Pegg mentioned and described it in some commentary or something, and he has good taste, and I don't mind being a sheeple if he's involved. And then you guys over here starting praising it, and that got me more interested. And now with the movie on the horizon it's finally enough to make me get off my ass and buy it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 05:31:41
It's called The Dark Knight Returns. "The Dark Knight" is just another name for Batman. The Long Halloween is supposed to be really good, yeah. The Dark Knight Strikes Again (the rushed sequel to DKR) sucks out loud after half of it apparently.

Watchmen is good, well... It's epic. And it pretty much changed the way comics were written. The movie LOOKS good. I don't know if it'll translate well to film with all the characters (Nite Owl, the girl who's name I forgot that wears the yellow thing, you know...) but I think the Doctor Manhattan and Rorschach stuff will be DAMN good. And The Comedian look almost more perfect than the rest, if that's possible.

Be warned though, Watchmen is a THICK read. It's very good, but very very wordy and it ain't short, really. I got a headache after reading up to Chapter 3 in one sitting, that was when I first starting working at the comic store.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 26 July 2008, 05:35:09
Yeah, it took me an hour to read some of the chapters. The chapter ends are especially wordy.

the girl who's name I forgot that wears the yellow thing, you know...)

Silk Spetre.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 16:20:21
Yeah, I read up on it and I know it's a long read. I actually sort of like that, and assuming I don't get REALLY into it and try to read it all in one sitting, I think it's better that I'll be able to take a long time to read it. Worth the money that way.

I used to read some mangas (like Ranma 1/2 and Dragon Ball) where I could blaze through them in literally less than an hour. Probably 30 minutes with some of them. And it kind of always left me feeling empty.

So something as filled and complex as this is very welcome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 16:45:40
Right, but Dragon Ball manga are like 80% pictures with like a few words MAYBE on each page...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 16:58:44
Which is exactly my point. That was implied in the statement that I can read through them in the blink of an eye.
I actually have a Japanese copy of the first Volume of Dragon Ball, and an American copy of it, and it's fun to look at what was censored and changed because there actually is quite a lot of differences. There's a lot of Bulma panty-shots that were edited in the American release.

Anyway, I'm up in Northern Michigan right now and there's no Borders or Barnes n' Nobles up here so I called a handful of nearby private booksellers, and everyone is sold out of Watchmen.

I really do feel like a sheep, now. Haha, whatever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 20:24:19
Get your comics at a real place, not some regular book store. They are snotty about that stuff and jack you on the prices.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 21:10:37
My chances of finding an actual comic store up here is slim to none. It's not that this place is empty and there's nothing here, because it's not like that at all. There's plenty up here. It's just... good luck finding a Best Buy or a Gamestop or a Borders.
And that's not really a bad thing, either. I sort of like being away from all those stores.

Anyway, back to the matter at hand: I know of at least one comic shop back home and I'll be back around Monday. It's the place where I got my giant 10 inch Marvin action figure from Hitchhiker's Guide. I'll check that out first before I go to Barnes and Noble which is like five minutes from my house.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 21:13:22
I'm having trouble NOT picturing Marvin like the movie version when I read the books.

I recently just got over imagining Ford Prefect as Mos Def.

I also keep imagining Zaphod with one head and two arms, just because sometimes it's hard to wrap my head around all that extra business. Plus he sometimes looks like Jones from Captain Star in my head, and I don't like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 21:18:03
I don't mind the movie-version of Marvin, it's really not a bad design, plus Douglas Adams is the one who made the original design for it when he was planning the movie.

When I read the books, though, I don't seem to think of them as the movie counterparts because I read the books a huge amount of times before the movie came out so it didn't really affect me. Plus I'd listened to the radio series a ton of times and Ford couldn't sound any more British and not-Mos Def-like in those.

I still say that the very first 6-episode Radio Series is the best incarnation of Hitchhiker's Guide.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 21:21:28
I do like the design, but I don't want to converge all my imagination to what I saw in the commercial for the movie, you know? I know all the Hitchiker versions are contradictory so I don't want to conform them.

And Ford sounding Brit definitely helped me get away from imagining Mos. Although it would be funny.

I'm sure I won't ever listen to the radio series or watch the show, just because, but I really want to see the movie when I'm done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 21:28:21
I still have the show on VHS and the only VHS-player in the house is usually not working correctly. I should get it on DVD because I've tried to rewatch it several times and I've always just given up with the VHS-player every time.

And the radio series is definitely worth a listen just because of how great it is. There's a second series which really messes with the plot of the books if that's what you're used to, and then they fixed it again for the 3rd, 4th, and 5th radio series that were made after Douglas Adams died, each based off of the corresponding books.

The show is only good for diehard fans, so don't bother with that. The movie is REALLY Hollywood and has a totally different vibe for the most part, but I sort of like it in its own way. A lot of my friends saw it and never read the books, so they didn't like it. And everyone who read the books and saw agreed that it wasn't as good as the books. So, the movie is stuck in a sad limbo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 21:42:02
VHS-player

It's called a VCR!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2008, 21:44:14
I couldn't remember!

How #####ing sad is that?! I honestly couldn't remember.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2008, 21:44:58
It's OK, I just forgot about how cameras used film at one time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 July 2008, 02:01:40
Today I ordered Watchmen online since that appeared to be my only option.

I also saw Step Brothers. Not good. I laughed at some parts, but honestly, the biggest laughs I had were in the trailer. I'd give it a 4/10.
I'm beginning to think that I really only liked Will Ferrel in Anchorman and nothing else.

Next on the agenda is the new X-Files, Hellboy II, and I still sort-of want to see Journey to the Center of the Earth if only for the dinosaur.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 July 2008, 02:58:21
So earlier today that new Knight Rider movie was on TV. It was alright, and the new KITT was kinda cool. Not as cool as the original Trans Am, but Mustangs are cool enough. They kept it with a red light thing at the front of the car, which is nice, but it's a bit different, which is good. I missed the first half of it but was good for a TV Movie/Straight to DVD thing.

I have a pass to Pineapple Express on wednesday, but I need to find someone to go with.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 29 July 2008, 07:57:27
A GOOD looking Resident Evil movie. (http://gonintendo.com/?p=50611)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 29 July 2008, 08:20:27
Hey, that actually might not suck.
Watching it made me feel all tingly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 29 July 2008, 12:51:29
I don't know what to expect from it, seeing as I've heard all the others sucked and haven't bothered to go watch them (not interested in RE). But I'm getting a FF:Spirits Within feeling, it kind of throws you off, having like 4 RE's in live action and then this on in CG, but then again, it looks really good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 July 2008, 14:23:38
Considering it's CG, it may not suck.
Just watching Leon cap some Zombies (a Leon that LOOKS like Leon) brings back a bunch of RE4 memories.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 29 July 2008, 19:06:50
I was just about to post that :P

I think it looks good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 July 2008, 19:22:22
I watched the trailer without sound a few days ago and it looked pretty cool. It looks faithful to the games, at least. I'm not a big RE fan but I can tell that fans of the games are going to eat this up.

Also, having no sound on your computer is a total bummer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2008, 22:37:25
So I went to buy myself a cordless phone, as I'll need one in college (room requirement to have a phone, and I went with a cordless one as it was 1 dollar more). Then I stopped at Goodwill on the way back, went to check out the tapes. I bought "The Fox and The Hound" for 4 dollars.

I just finished watching it.
I cried when Lady Mc.Widow dropped Tod off in the woods.
I LOVE "THE FOX AND THE HOUND."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 00:01:28
M. Night Shyamaladingdong to direct live-action movie of "Avatar: The Last Airbender." (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117956950.html?categoryid=13&cs=1)

If anyone knows how to correctly respond to this, let me know.


EDIT:
My thoughts: "Avatar: The Last Movie Shyamalan Makes Before Everyone Stops Taking Him Seriously."

Seriously... "he doesn't bend air, there were aliens all alooooong! And he was dead the whole time!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 31 July 2008, 00:25:36
WHAT A TWIST!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 04:12:23
Right. If it's anything like the actual show, I'll have to wait #####ing months for each half hour of story. Even though I love the show.

Couple weeks ago I got a pass for Pineapple Express, which was tonight. I really liked it. It's a bit different that other movies with Seth Rogan in them, but man... For a movie where there's a lot of ridiculous fights/situations, that was REALLY damn realistic. Like, everytime you're like "What would happen in REAL life is blah blah blah" is pretty much how things work. Like you know how in most movies somehow random people just know how to fight all of sudden?

No dice. This is like real life where people fight awkward and do random stuff. I don't want to say too much, but I just thought the whole thing was very true to life even though the stuff that happens is nuts. Hard to explain.

Good movie. Love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 04:59:23
It's got great pre-release reviews and I've heard nothing but great things about it. I'm really looking forward to seeing it. Glad it was good.

I had to see The Dark Knight again to get the bad taste of Step Brothers out of my head, so another good movie would do me well. I just re-watched Knocked Up last night, too. Another good one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 05:01:37
I "watched" the commentary for that and for Superbad while drawing on Saturday. Both were great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 05:03:09
The Superbad commentary is great because Jonah Hill isn't allowed to swear for the most part.

Haven't watched the Knocked Up commentary, but I've been very very bored lately with absolutely nothing to do so it's inevitable because I only brought a handful of movies up here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 05:04:41
Commentary's are great to draw while listening to. If they're funny. Don't EVER try to watch the Anchorman commentary. It is so awful I could've fallen asleep and I had to turn it off before half way, and I finish everything.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 05:09:47
The collector's edition Hot Fuzz DVD I have has like 5 different commentaries. And so far they're all great. Either funny or very insightful.

The one with Edgar Wright and Quentin Tarantino is basically just them showing off their vastly inhuman knowledge of movies, though, so it's almost annoying because they know way more than anybody should know about movies.

Anyway, yeah, I used to leave commentaries on while studying. Haven't done it in a long time (obviously it's summer, but I mean I didn't do it much near the end of last school year.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 05:12:19
Kevin Smith movies have good commentaries. Clerks 2 has a-w-e-s-o-m-e ones.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 05:13:35
I still haven't seen that! I really really need to. Thanks for reminding me.

I wonder if I can get Clerks 1 and 2 cheap on DVD together.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 05:17:56
If you're gonna get the first Clerks movie, get Clerks X (pronounced Clerks ten, but I don't pronounce it like that 'cause it's kind of stupid) which is the 10th anniversary edition that has the original ending Miramax rejected and a cartoon of what happened when Dante and Randall went to the funeral. A good edition.

And Clerks 2 is just great. It's Kevin Smith's favourite of his View Askewniverse stuff, I believe. Scott Mosier too. At least it is compared to the first Clerks, for both of them. When you watch it on DVD, ALWAYS play whatever thing you're about to play with the introduction, when available, as those are great too.

I need to buy the Clerks cartoon on DVD. And Mallrats. And Dogman. And J&Bob. And Chasing Amy. And maybe Jersey Girl. In that order (Mallrats and Clerks cartoon can switch positions though).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 15:37:01
I have Dogma already, I love that movie. Even though I've already seen Clerks a ton, I want to buy it before I buy Clerks 2 and I really don't know why. After Clerks and Clerks 2, I'll get Mallrats. Then wait a while.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 22:57:16
Mallrats is my favourite but the only Kevin Smith movies I own are Clerks (X) and Clerks 2 for some reason. I like them all...

... even Jersey Girl.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2008, 22:58:11
I'm pretty sure I've only seen Clerks and Dogma. Which bothers me, because I know I'm missing out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2008, 23:06:31
Jay and Bob was the first I saw. It's really only for fans of all the other movies (anything that happened before Jersey Girl) but it stands up on it's own if you like that sort of thing (it's mostly THEIR kind of humour, obviously, as opposed to what the other movies are like) and I always find it hilarious, even when I saw it without seeing any of the ones before it.

Clerks and Mallrats happen on the same day, or Mallrats is possibly the day before.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 1 August 2008, 00:41:48
Mallrats is possibly the day before.

Ding.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 04:02:24
Thing is, both movies say the girl died "yesterday", but then contradict each other later.

Posted on: 31 July 2008, 20:44:44

Saw the new X-Files movie.

I'm not sure what I think. I liked it, but I would say that you should just wait for DVD or whathaveyou unless you really want to see it. It's not bad, it's just kind of... Not that X-Filesy. I definitely liked it though. Just not all that creepy or super-paranormal or anything. Lot more story than action, which I didn't mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 04:08:46
I really wanna' see that but I've already decided it'll be the sort of thing I watch on DVD or OnDemand or something.

I was never too into X-Files, but I definitely loved watching it. It used to be on Sci-Fi channel a LOT, and if I wasn't doing anything, I'd sit down and watch, but never made a schedule or routine out of it.

I'll probably like the movie but I can wait.

Also, be glad you didn't have to see Step Brothers. Terrible movie.

Hopefully I'm seeing Pineapple Express tomorrow. Or wait. Apparently it isn't out yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 04:26:54
The first X-Files movie was pretty crap, enough that I've almost completely repressed it. This one was better, I think.

I've heard good things and bad about Step Brothers, so I don't really care.

Pineapple Express I'd like to see again, but I'll wait. I think I see movies multiple times in theatres too often. I saw Knocked Up with at least twice in theatre and like a billion times on DVD and have to take a break from it. Deciding wether I should include the commentary in that break.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 04:32:47
I saw Knocked Up for the first time on DVD, loved it, and then completely forgot about it. I rediscovered it not too long ago, and I'm glad I did.

I rewatch movies a LOT. I have a tally-mark count on the inside of the DVD case for Shaun of the Dead, and the number of tallies is embarrassing.

Basically, I don't mind paying $20 or so for DVDs because I get a LOT of use out of them. Other people in my family buy a DVD, watch it once, and it lays around for a while. Eventually I'll grab it and add it to my own personal collection, where I'll get some real use out of it. I hate renting movies because I know I'm going to watch them again sometime soon, but not immediately.

Lately I've been taking advantage of Blockbuster, though. 4 semi-new movies for $20 is the best deal around, and 2 new movies for $20 is great, too. I usually just wait 'till they move into the other bin, though.

Hell, I got Dead Like Me Season 1 in a 4-for-$20 deal there. Best value ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 04:36:36
My mom never watches a movie more than once I will never understand that. She has DVDs that are actually still in the shrink wrap. I also watch movies a ridiculous amount of times but I don't keep track.

Back in the day, I used to play VHS tapes enough that they'd break completely.

::looks proudly over at 101 Dalmatians::


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 04:39:46
Shaun of the Dead is the only movie I keep track of. The number is actually less than the real amount of viewings because I only started keeping track after realizing I watch it a LOT. There are probably at least 10 more viewings that I don't have marked down.

The only movie I might've watched more is The Sandlot. As a kid, I would watch it OVER AND OVER and it would drive my parents crazy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 05:01:22
Same. Loved that movie too much. If I could, I would have watched it for. Ev. Er. For. Ev. Er. For. Ev. Er. For. Ev. Er...

Never bothered with the sequel, since it has nothing to do with the original.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 05:05:33
The sequel is the ONLY movie I actually stopped watching in disgust. It was ridiculous and stupid and offensive to a great movie.

I still don't own The Sandlot on DVD, but I still have the original VHS from back in the day.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 05:07:42
I could never find the VHS, tried as I did. I keep seeing it on DVD but... I don't know why I don't just get it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 05:18:46
My reason for never getting it as that whenever I see it on DVD, it's paired as a double-feature with the crap sequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2008, 05:20:03
That's one of my reasons too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 17:15:16
I actually re-watched The Sandlot about a month ago. Still holds up after all these years.

Posted on:  3 August 2008, 05:23:55

I have to admit in a guilty-pleasure movie favorite of mine.

I love Zoolander. I don't know what it is about it, but I love that movie. There's so many parts that make me laugh every time, like
"WHAT IS THIS? A CENTER FOR ANTS?"
and
"I was the fat kid in my class." "EW!"

And I know it's just another stupid movie, and I usually don't care much for Ben Stiller, but something about Zoolander just makes me love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 3 August 2008, 19:17:58
I've seen it. It's alright.

... but why male models?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2008, 23:19:26
I'm not an ambiturner!

For the last two years, on September 29th, I made up a holiday and spread it throughout our school called National Zoolander Day. Where you can't turn left all day. You can do a full rotation clockwise until you're facing the direction you want to go, but you can't just turn left. And at the end of the day we all sit and watch Zoolander.

Nobody really took it seriously for the whole day, but it caught on with people who'd seen the movie. I put it on a Facebook event last year and it spread to other schools. I got curious and searched today, and somebody already has "International Don't Turn Left Day" set up for this September 29th.
I don't think it's a copy, just somebody else who had the same idea.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 August 2008, 00:14:49
You invited me to that event. I thing I Maybe'd it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 August 2008, 16:14:21
Haha, yeah. Apparently this one guy didn't even turn left in his car all day, either, which is dangerously cool.

Posted on:  4 August 2008, 03:04:18

Oh. Sweet. Okay. So.
Apparently my dad bought "Death Proof" on DVD a while back because it looked interesting, and he never watched it. For those who don't know, it was Quentin Tarantino's movie from the Grindhouse double-feature he worked on with Robert Rodriguez. I never got a chance to see that, but I had really wanted to.
So, anyway, I just find this movie sitting around unopened, and my dad forgot he had bought it.

So I pop it in.

Unbelievable. I have never gotten such an adrenaline rush from a movie before. Tarantino sets up the PERFECT setting for a no-rules car chase at the end of the movie, and throws sexy filler and interestingly long dialogue into every other crevice of the movie. Just a movie made for maximum fun in the viewing.

Death Proof. I highly reccomend it. Now I have to go watch Planet Terror, Rodriguez's half.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 August 2008, 17:20:15
I watched Death Proof a few months ago.
It was enjoyable, regular Tarantino film making.
The acting wasn't too bad either, considering Zoe Bell was just the stunt girl for Uma Thurman in Kill Bill.

I watched all the special features of the movie.
I know a bit about it.
You have to love how easily the guy went from a power hungry nutball to a crying baby, considering he thought that was fun.
Looking back, that was one of the best scenes in the movie, the end.

I didn't like the girl who gave the lap dance. At all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 August 2008, 17:44:26
I heard both were stupid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 August 2008, 17:47:58
Maybe in the theatrical release, as the Grindhouse double feature has pretty much the abridged versions of the two movies, which separately they aren't as bad.

I suppose.

Or your heard from somebody who doesn't like crazy car chase/shoot 'em up films.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 August 2008, 17:49:32
I said "stupid", not "devoid-of-crazy-action". Either way, I'll probably never bother to seek them out so I'll just see them whenever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 August 2008, 18:00:59
Planet Terror really does look stupid, but I heard it was made to be cheesy.

Death Proof, however, I really knew nothing about. Most of the advertising for Grindhouse was centered around Planet Terror and the girl with the gun-leg.

The best thing about Death Proof is that it REALLY got me into it, it REALLY got me feeling excited and thrilled and got my adrenaline pumping.

I didn't like the girl who gave the lap dance. At all.

Why? What didn't you like about her? I liked her character, and she was drop-dead gorgeous to boot. I don't normally talk about girls' bodies, but she really had like a perfect figure, not that I expect that of girls.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 August 2008, 18:02:58
JC is a chubby chaser.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 August 2008, 18:07:31
That's Xero.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 August 2008, 18:10:37
It wasn't that, something about the way she acted felt cheesy.
Almost as bad as Tarantino's part in the film.

Posted on: August 04, 2008, 01:09:12 PM

AND.

"You know how people say, 'You're okay in my book', or, 'In my book, that's no good.' Well I actually have a book, and you're going in it, under 'Chicken#####.'"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 August 2008, 18:11:09
Tarantino's not a bad actor, really. And neither was that girl. In fact, she was a really GOOD actor. Not quite impressive, but definitely good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 August 2008, 18:12:38
Maybe I'm not remembering correctly, but the lasting impression was 'cheesy.'

Have you watched the special features yet?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 4 August 2008, 20:18:12
I tried watching the Grindhouse movies and it didn't go well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 August 2008, 23:23:54
I could've bought Planet Terror today for $5 but I chose not to. That one didn't seem to interest me much. I would never have bought Death Proof on my own, either. Not the kind of movie I'd see and go "I should get this."

HOWEVER, I got really lucky and found BOTH seasons of Chappelle's Show for $10 each, and quickly nabbed them up.

I also got a movie I've never heard of before, called Big Nothing. I only got it because it has Simon Pegg in it (and David Schwimmer, but I don't care about him). And it was $4. So, it's not much of a loss if it's bad. I have absolutely no idea what it is.

Posted on:  4 August 2008, 21:12:07

Okay, I watched Big Nothing and was PLEASANTLY surprised. A great $5 purchase.
My first thoughts were "Simon Pegg speaking in an American accent? What?"
He sounds a lot different, but it's cool.
The movie is basically the typical "fools committing a crime and getting into more and more trouble as the film goes on" fare, but it's actually really creative and it has likeable characters. There are also plenty of funny moments and it's all-around entertaining.
The sheer amount of genuinely creative twists and "un-twists" as I've dubbed them is kind of impressive.

I've never heard of this movie before, it apparently came out in December 2006. Was it in theaters? I have no idea how this slipped under the radar. I definitely reccomend it.
I give it a 7/10.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 August 2008, 23:26:17
There's THREE seasons of Chappelle's Show. Well, two and half.

I still need the first one, but have the rest.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 August 2008, 03:19:10
I didn't count the "Lost Episodes" as a season (even though it is), but, yeah, they do count and I still need to get those. I can wait a while, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 5 August 2008, 03:54:42
After seeing Dark Knight the second time, I noticed that, at some point, the Batmobile loses a wheel, and the Joker gets away.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 5 August 2008, 03:59:04
But did Robin lay an egg? HUH?! I THOUGHT NOT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 August 2008, 04:10:44
After seeing Dark Knight the second time, I noticed that, at some point, the Batmobile loses a wheel, and the Joker gets away.

An amazing observation.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 August 2008, 04:57:18
In my little town here, we told that joke as "And Joker learned ballet" not gets away.

I was extremely confused when I first heard "And Joker gets away" in the Simpsons.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 August 2008, 14:57:51
Your little town does things wrong.
Do you wear kittens on your knees too?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 5 August 2008, 15:14:19
Where I live both are told. I like the "Joker gets away" one better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 August 2008, 15:23:10
Yes, because it's the correct one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 August 2008, 15:33:28
Do you wear kittens on your knees too?

No.

Parrots.

To fly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 August 2008, 22:43:29
I saw the movie in Smellovision, and Batman didn't smell in it either. But at least half the song was there, so that's cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 August 2008, 22:27:04
I want to see Pineapple Express tonight. I've heard good things from my friends (back home who invited me but I couldn't go because I'm stuck up North and very bored), all of which whom have no taste in movies and will usually like anything, but it's still good things.

And also from Mike, who has great taste.

And Rottentomatoes has it at a 69% which is awesome because it's 69 and that's awesome.

...

Anyway, I watched Thank You For Smoking and absolutely loved it. Great, great movie. 7/10 in my book. Maybe an 8. Actually, yeah, probably an 8. Whatever, doesn't matter, that still means I loved it.

Also watched some crap movie called The Ultimate Gift with some rich snob whose even richer grandpop dies and makes him work for his inheritance from beyond the grave, and there's also this little girl with cancer who dies and it still wasn't sad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 August 2008, 22:47:02
I have a pass to Tropic Thunder on Monday but it's an admit and I don't know if I want to go alone. I did that for my Love Guru pass and that was the first time I'd ever gone to a theatre alone, and I don't think it helped me enjoy myself. It was just weird.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 August 2008, 22:52:06
I saw The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy alone, but that's because I was on break at military school and I had been hyping up the movie SO much that I made my parents drop me off to go see it while they got some stuff done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: AlexThePenguin on 7 August 2008, 22:55:39
I saw Hitchhiker's Guide with friends at Tinseltown.

It was about 1:30. AM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 August 2008, 23:11:27
I didn't want my parents to go with me because I had a feeling they'd hate it.

I went a second time the next week, with them, and they hated it. And made fun of me for liking it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 August 2008, 23:14:56
Parents Just Don't Understand.
(http://www.dhadm.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/will-smith.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 August 2008, 23:27:10
I'm convinced that my dad spends 90% of his life hating things that I like.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 August 2008, 23:30:16
(http://bp0.blogger.com/_yYC5rP7U85M/SBv3gy5s5_I/AAAAAAAAAPg/QAkT040U9wY/s320/DJ+Jazzy+Jeff+%26+Fresh+Prince+-+Parents+Just+Don%27t+Understand.jpeg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 8 August 2008, 06:31:26
I'm convinced that my dad spends 90% of his life hating things that are fun.

Changed it around a bit, and that's exactly what I speculate from my parents.

At least my dad anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 August 2008, 06:35:37
I'm convinced that my dad spends 99% of his life doing nothing.[/u].

Thats my dad right dere.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 August 2008, 23:55:51
Saw Pineapple Express. Loved it.

8/10 in my book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 August 2008, 01:41:08
I'm convinced that my dad spends 99% of his life thinking he has an awesome youngest son.[/u].[/i].

Yep.

Saw Pineapple Express.

I got a Pineapple Express t-shirt from work today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 August 2008, 02:11:39
See, all of you guys quoting my post and editing it are changing MY PERSONAL HISTORY. It is still a quote by me and you are mixing my life with yours and that is NOT okay!

I wouldn't wear a movie shirt unless it had a sick design. I've seen a cool Shaun of the Dead one that I'd wear, and one or two funny Superbad ones.
But I wouldn't just wear a shirt that has like the movie's logo and a picture on it. I don't know if that's what you're describing, but I wouldn't expect much from a free shirt anyway.

ANYWAY ONE MORE THING ABOUT PINEAPPLE EXPRESS!
I did the finger-through-the-pants-so-it-looks-like-my-dong thing first! And I have pictures posted here to prove it! Also, I do that fake-dong-sucking thing that Bill Hader does in the beginning a lot, but that's not something to be proud of I suppose.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 August 2008, 02:56:26
No you didn't. I have a picture of friend doing that years ago, and it was invented decades before that. About twelve minutes after they invented pants with a fly.


I wouldn't wear a movie shirt unless it had a sick design.

Same, and it does. My only gripe is there a pot leaf on it, but it's subtle enough. I probably will only wear it under stuff anyway.

But I wouldn't just wear a shirt that has like the movie's logo and a picture on it. I don't know if that's what you're describing,

It's not. But some of those aren't bad. My Hellboy II, Wanted, and American Gangter ones for instance. But the Hellboy II is more design-y than the others.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 August 2008, 03:41:51
I do tend to like Godfather shirts even though they all look the same, and I don't think I'd ever wear one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Winged Warrior on 9 August 2008, 10:23:31
I just finished watching the latest Futurama Movie.

The beast with a billion backs.
[spoiler]
It was good, I almost thought they seriously were going to end the story this time. They kept edging closer and closer to something that felt nearly complete. With the exception to one missing, loose end.

Though, with class that loose end, took the story by the balls and took everything "back to normal."
[/spoiler]

I was thoroughly amused, and laughed at some of the wittier parts of the movie. (which is why I don't watch a lot of movies. Many do not strike me funny, interesting, or even entertaining.)

I suggest watching it if you haven't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 August 2008, 22:54:17
On saturday my friend Robbie took me out and we saw Step Brothers and I liked and don't know what ASR's deal is this time. Maybe he saw it alone, I don't remember. Much like Talladega, you need the right crowd, and the right energy in the theatre and we had it in spades. But I shouldn't even be online right now as I have work to do on this book and am typing this quickly so I'll probably maybe say more later.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 August 2008, 05:05:07
I saw it with my family, so that probably had something to do with it.

I'll probably like it more the second time, just like with Talladega Knights. I hated it in theaters but the next time I watched it, I didn't think it was so bad.

Posted on: 11 August 2008, 23:00:30

Watched Be Kind Rewind the other day. It was... a very NOTHING movie. I didn't dislike it, but I didn't like it. Just made me feel empty. I mos def love me some Mos Def, but I just wasn't it feeling it this time.

Tonight was better. As I already mentioned, I bought Clerks and Clerks 2 for $10 today and I just finished watching them back-to-back. I've seen Clerks a ton but it's still awesome. And this was my first time seeing Clerks 2. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. That was FANTASTIC. It didn't let me down at ALL. Just plain awesome.

Posted on: 14 August 2008, 08:19:37

With some more spending cash I got from graduation gifts, I bought more View Askewniverse movies that I still haven't seen.
I was gonna' watch them, but hung out with my friends instead.

...and then we saw Tropic Thunder. I've wanted to see it, yes, but I didn't think it would be anything special. Just another comedy, an action spoof with a few actual laughs at most. Hell, I just love Downey, that's the only reason.

It blew my mind. It blew my #####ing mind. It was THAT GOOD.
I never dreamed I'd walk out of the theater praising this movie.

It was the perfect, and I do mean #####ing PERFECT blend of comedy and action. It was a star-studded, action-packed, hilarious, surprisingly engaging film.
And normally I don't think star-studded is a great move, but everyone was clearly having so much fun and were funny in their roles, especially Tom Cruise who I normally don't care for, and don't really like as a person.

Just... it was awesome. Everything about it. Everything in it was either hilarious or explodey-awesome.

It just kept building up and building up and any low points (and don't get me wrong, of course there's one or two) are quickly overshadowed by how awesome everything else is.

Just... see it. Go.

9/10.

I'm happy.

Now time for some Kevin Smith...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 15 August 2008, 05:12:32
Ooh, thats great, I want to see the movie but wasn't sure if it was really good or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 August 2008, 05:15:26
I know, it's just luck that I'd already seen everything else playing that I wanted to.

If I hadn't seen Pineapple Express yet, I probably would've chosen that over this and really missed out.

Admittedly, they're completely completely different sorts of comedies, and they were both awesome, but Pineapple Express is the sort of thing I'm going to watch a million times and Tropic Thunder was definitely a theater experience with friends and a full audience.

Oh, and the fake trailers at the beginning were creatively awesome and a nice breath of fresh air from the samey stuff Hollywood has been pumping out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 August 2008, 05:45:54
I think I saw that on a trailer before watching Dark Knight. I was hooked after hearing the phrase "Who left the fridge open!?"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 August 2008, 02:28:47
I had a pass for Tropic Thunder on monday but I didn't go because I need to see that with friends.

Today I got a pass for Death Race and a shirt for it too. I don't know if I'm gonna go though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 August 2008, 21:24:58
It's DEFINITELY a friends movie. We were actually having tons of mini-conversations during it because there's so much stuff going on that you'll be like "ahaha is that Tom Cruise?" and "oh ##### did you see him in---" and etc.

Posted on: 16 August 2008, 03:02:29

Okay, so I've been going through a Kevin Smith revival lately and finally bought the rest of the View Askewniverse movies that I didn't own, which was, like... every one of them except Dogma, even though I've seen some of them before and always meant to watch them all.

So, coincidentally in light of my Kevin Smith-themed movie-watching, I checked the only Watchmen movie news site I know of (http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com), and there was a very reassuring article.
Apparently Kevin Smith got to watch a preview screening of the movie and said he absolutely loved it. He said that Snyder and co. really did pull it off and that the true fans have nothing to fear.

I've been wary about the movie working out ever since I read the comic, so this is great news.

http://watchmencomicmovie.com/081508-watchmen-movie-kevin-smith.php


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 August 2008, 21:39:26
I know the story should translate well, but I'm not sure about a couple things.

In comic movies they often have to realize (meaning make it more realistic) the costumes since in comics costumes started out rather ridiculous. They did that somewhat with this movie but they still look kind of lame other than Rorschach and Manhattan. But it should be alright since Watchmen costumes were originally designed mostly with the idea of being a parody of comic book costumes in general.

What I'm more worried about, though, is how pretty everything is. It all looks visually fantastic. Problem with that is that's not the way it's supposed to look, actually. The artist of the comics was very able to draw outlandishly gorgeous stuff but was actually told not to, the whole thing was MEANT to be gritty.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 August 2008, 21:45:18
I was under the impression that the artist was told to draw it in an old-fashioned superhero comic book style rather than in a more modern and pretty style, because it was a reimagining of superhero comic book roots.

As a movie, I don't really feel like it's relevant, but I understand what you're saying. However, what do you want them to do? I'd rather it be visually stunning than... well, not.

And as for the story, there's a lot of speculation on whether or not the ending will remain intact. So that's worrisome, and we still don't have a straight answer on that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 August 2008, 22:53:44
There are many ways to be visually stunning, though...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 August 2008, 23:48:03
Looking like me, for example.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 August 2008, 00:32:12
RDRR.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 August 2008, 00:58:54
...eh?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 August 2008, 04:45:29
"Get it, Bart? RDRR? Har di har har!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 August 2008, 06:18:18
Ohhhhhh. Ohhhhhh. Kay.

I have a kids book that I've kept all these years called "CDB." As in "See The Bee."

The whole book is written like that. Granted, it isn't a story. Every page is just a different picture with a caption or dialogue, but everything is written in that style. As a kid I couldn't even figure out what all the pages said, even with the pictures.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 21 August 2008, 01:20:37
Finally went to see Dark Knight.

...man.

How's that for a little of the ol' ultraviolence?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 August 2008, 01:38:30
lol batman don't got any droogs.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 August 2008, 01:56:48
I think one would have to to dress up as a Bat and fight crime.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 August 2008, 06:10:58
Jess and I saw Death Race on a pass last night. It actually wasn't bad. I kinda liked it. I'll talk more about it later or something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 August 2008, 08:05:56
I read that as "Jesus and I saw Death Race" and didn't do a double-take until I finished the rest of the post.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 August 2008, 17:35:07
I should watch that...
I loved the original, where David Carradine (lol Franekstein) beats up Sylvester Stallone.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 August 2008, 01:03:59
I never watched the original but heard enough about it in high school. This one is only BASED on Death Race 2000.

But it was actually like... The least cheesy "ridiculous action" movie I've seen in a long time. Although one of it's trailers is for "Fast and Furious", which is of course another in the "The Fast and the Furious" line except this one is a proper sequel to the original. And by 'proper sequel' I mean it has the same characters finally, and I don't mean 'good sequel'.

Also the Paul Rudd and Sean William Scott movie looks awesome. I'm not sure if it's a Judd Apatow but all signs point to yes seeing as a helluva lot of people from his movies are in it including the hilarious doctor from Knocked Up.

I've decided that I liked Death Race. Which is very surprising to me. I can't really find the words for it now. Like...It's not epic or anything but it's not bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 August 2008, 02:23:12
Oh, that Role Models movie? Ha, that looked hilarious. That and Sex Drive, which I'd seen posters of before but knew nothing about until I saw the trailer (and the Role Models one) before Tropic Thunder.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 23 August 2008, 02:33:40
The minute I saw the trailer for the first time I instantly thought "Twisted Metal?.."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 August 2008, 09:38:57
Today. This morning. Whatever. Irrelevant.

I finally watched Fight Club.

I always felt like it was a sin that I'd never watched it, along with other notable flicks like The Godfather, Scarface, 2001: A Space Oddysey, Die Hard, The Terminator... well, that list goes on forever. There's tons of stuff I really need to watch and feel like I can't call myself a movie fan unless I have.

Anyway, point is...

Fight Club blew my mind.

I really had NO idea what it was about. None at ALL. Nobody ever even hinted to me that it wasn't just about fighting. I knew it was about something meaningful and deep but I had no idea. None at all ("which, by a staggering coincidence" /hitchhiker'sguide).

Final thoughts: why the ##### did I take so long to watch this? I have seriously been missing out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 August 2008, 12:31:51
YES YOU HAVE.

It is a great movie, time and time again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 August 2008, 19:58:10
It's a bit overrated. It's kind of silly how people quote it and obsess about it like it was the greatest movie ever made. It wasn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 August 2008, 20:04:55
The only quote I've ever heard from it is "The first rule of fight club is don't talk about fi~etc" and never anything else.

I've never heard anyone say it's the best movie ever, just people saying that it's fantastic and everyone should see it.

Both of which are true.

However, I can definitely see those kinds of people overly-celebrating a movie like this.

I really liked it and it exceeded my expectations and that's good enough for me, but I have too many other movies that I liked ever more than this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 August 2008, 20:12:13
I AM JACK'S COMPLETE LACK OF SURPRISE. Stuff like that.

Well then you're good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 August 2008, 21:30:46
His name was Robert Paulson.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 August 2008, 23:38:52
The minute I saw the trailer for the first time I instantly thought "Twisted Metal?.."

I said it was the best Mario Kart ever during the movie. And it really is video-gamely. They have to run over pads to activate weapons or shields.

Fight Club is cool but a bit overrated. Before that movie ever existed though, my friends and I had a fight club, but it was called Fight Night. It was on Wednesdays.

There's a concept floating around that you've either seen the Star Wars or the Godfather movies, or neither, but never both. I intend to see Godfather so I can be better than everyone ever.

Now stop reading this post and go watch the Die Hard and Terminator movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 August 2008, 00:27:15
I KNOW.

And yeah, I've heard that Godfather/Star Wars thing and intend to do the same.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 24 August 2008, 00:34:22
I watched Equilibrium last night, solely because of Christian Bale. Some nice scenes, some neat lighting, but it just... wasn't very good. Fahrenheit 451 with eXtreme gun fights. Only part really worth seeing? The final fight scene. Everything else was meh.

[spoiler]I just don't think that being drugged into emotionlessness equals stern and uncompromising. If I can't buy into that, then the whole concept just sort of falls.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 August 2008, 00:39:15
I agree with Yubi and have even mentioned the same stuff about the drug, but I really like the movie anyway.

Except I find the fight when they find he has the dog or whatever and there's like eight guys around him with machine guns pointed at his is one of the more awesome scenes.

But yes, the story can be rather slow and bland. I think that's a big part of the whole idea though.

Other than governmental issues I don't really see how it's like Fahrenheit 451 that much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 24 August 2008, 01:40:28
The burning art bit. Completely different reasons behind it, yeah, but still...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 August 2008, 05:08:28
Ah yeah, that is true.

Posted on: 23 August 2008, 21:16:24

I've been watching Kill Bill tonight. Both volumes. They are on PeachTree and thus censored, but surprisingly not TOO much. Basically they took out or edited a few shots and redubbed or blanked the F, S, and P words, so it's actually been surprisingly alright. Really, I should own these on DVD, but I was waiting for the box set that saw western light. But man I like them, and I always get so creative watching Tarrantino or R.R. stuff that I've got so many ideas floating around right now it's nuts.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 August 2008, 05:10:06
I know what you mean.

I've been trying to see both Kill Bills, but I want to watch them back-to-back. I saw them for $7 each one time and almost bought them, but for whatever reason I didn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 24 August 2008, 14:22:15
Just watch them.

My brother has Volume 1, I have volume 2.
Too bad he's in Washington state now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 24 August 2008, 16:54:18
I watched Equilibrium last night, solely because of Christian Bale. Some nice scenes, some neat lighting, but it just... wasn't very good. Fahrenheit 451 with eXtreme gun fights. Only part really worth seeing? The final fight scene. Everything else was meh.

[spoiler]I just don't think that being drugged into emotionlessness equals stern and uncompromising. If I can't buy into that, then the whole concept just sort of falls.[/spoiler]

The idea of the drug in the movie, Prozium, is to remove the emotional highs and lows that normal people experience. That's why everyone walks around with a "meh" or stern appearance.

It does take some stuff from Fahrenheit 451, but it also borrows elements from 1984 and supposedly Brave New World (I say supposedly because I've never read it, thus, I can't confirm it).

I really like Equilibrium, although I will admit that if it weren't for the fight scenes that Kurt Wimmer dreams up, Equilibrium would have just been another Sci-fi Channel movie original.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2008, 03:51:58
They were selling movie posters on campus, so I bought a great Pulp Fiction one.
Got me in the mood for Tarantino.
So.
Finally watched Reservoir Dogs tonight, with my roommate.

Now I've shifted gears entirely and I'm trying to get him into Arrested Development.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 31 August 2008, 19:20:50
The Mask is on. Awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 31 August 2008, 21:29:30
The Mask is on. Awesome.

I recently bought The Mask Omnibus, which contains all of the Mask Comics that the movie is based on.

So good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 5 September 2008, 02:52:44
Fight Club the movie completely lost the point the book was making.

The book also had a better ending.

Speaking of Palaniuk books, I saw the trailer for Choke the other day. I was excited when I head they were making a movie of it, but now that I've seen the trailer, I have to say I'm less than optimistic.

The trailer made the movie seem like it was aiming to be a comedy.

Again, I think the point was lost.

Though, I must say, there were certainly some funny points in the book. Like when anal beads broke off in his ass and he spent the whole book severely impacted.

Derivative dy = 3 r squared dr over 3


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2008, 03:16:13
I'm not gonna' lie, the ending of Fight Club as a movie really was an effective visual. It really struck a chord to see all that destruction and it sort of worked with however the movie was telling the story, whether or not it was different than the book.

I was thinking of reading the book, but I thought it would be just too similar. Though, now you've made me think it must be different enough for it to warrant a read.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 5 September 2008, 03:18:36
The ending alone is enough reason.

I have no clue why the movie chose to omit the last chapter.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2008, 03:26:37
Then maybe I'll read it.

And book-movies do odd things to try and fit into the framework of Hollywood and reaching a certain audience.

The Golden Compass added an extra cliffhanger right before another cliffhanger that would've made perfect sense to leave in. They left out a chapter that really changed nothing (or rather changed EVERYTHING) save for possibly making people excited and interested enough to want to see the next movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 5 September 2008, 03:28:33
I hear they're making a movie from Atlas Shrugged now as well.

There's no way that WON'T piss all over the book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2008, 03:29:26
I don't know enough about it to have an opinion.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 September 2008, 03:41:36
UHM, IN THE HARRY POTTER 5 MOVIE THEY LEFT OUT THE SCENE WHERE MALFOY MAKES FUN OF RON'S MUM DURING A QUIDDITCH MATCH AND THEN HARRY AND FRED AND GEORGE BEAT THE PISS OUT OF MALFOY BUT NOT WITH GAY WIZARD DUEL ##### THEY JUST BEAT HIM UP INTO A BLOODY PULP WITH FISTS AND HARRY IS HOLDING THE SNITCH THE WHOLE TIME SO IT'S LIKE BRASS KNUCKLES BASICALLY AND IT WAS ACTUALLY KINDA BADASS AND MALFOY HAD TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL AND... uhm... yeah I'll shut up now.

(Although that is true and the whole reason I went to see that movie.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2008, 03:44:24
It's funny 'cuz I would see it if that was still in there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 September 2008, 03:57:16
Well, that was the best book for other reasons too. Many of which I felt were left out of the movie. Which was the best of the movies so far I guess, but I don't really care about them, I just watch them because.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 September 2008, 08:40:23
I want to see How To Lose Friends And Alienate People, comes out on October 3rd, I believe.

The problem is lack of transportation at college, and the even bigger problem of trying to round people up to see a movie when they'd much rather just... well, not. I've got one friend who I think I can convince to go through all the trouble, since she has similar taste in movies as me, though she doesn't share my obsession with Simon Pegg.

I have this disease where I have to see anything with Simon Pegg in it, and I always think it's good. If "Run, Fatboy, Run" sucked, I won't admit it.

Oh, and Megan Fox is in this. Yum.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 September 2008, 08:42:50
Is she a good actress? She's not a good human, as far as I've seen. And her acting is "HUH? (I'm hot)" But sure, she looks dee-lish. But "yum" is something women say about men...

...

<Snare's avatar here>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 September 2008, 08:46:09
In Transformers, she was just eye-candy and that's all we needed.

But I haven't seen her in anything else.

What I can vouch for is that somewhere in the commentary for Spaced, which was recorded after he finished filming for "How To Lose Friends", he joked with either Quentin Tarantino or Kevin Smith that "it's not fair that she's so #####ing beautiful AND that she's such a great actress."

Paraphrased, but he had nothing but praise for her. And Simon has great taste from what I've seen/heard, so I respect the man and his choices.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 September 2008, 08:47:40
Maybe he was being sarcastic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 September 2008, 08:49:47
No, he wasn't. I can't explain. Well, I can.

He went on for a small bit about how she was so beautiful and then she surprised him by being a great actress, too, and they all started joking about how it's totally unfair that she can have both perfect looks and such talent. And he was being genuine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 September 2008, 08:51:10
Maybe...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 September 2008, 08:52:45
LOOK MAN I KNOW WHAT I HEARD AND HONESTLY I HAVEN'T SEEN HER IN ENOUGH STUFF TO JUDGE BUT PROBABLY WHAT I MOST LIKELY IS THAT SIMON PEGG IS A NICE GUY AND DIDN'T WANT TO TALK ##### ABOUT HIS CO-STARS IN A MOVIE HE IS SUPPOSED TO PROMOTE AND ##### MAN I REALLY NEED TO GO TO SLEEP SO OKAY YOU WIN


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 September 2008, 09:01:07
WELL HE WASN'T IN HARRY POTTER 5 AND HE'S BRITISH SO IT WAS HIS DUTY OBVIOUSLY AND HE IS THUS IRRRRRRRRRESPONSIBLE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 September 2008, 16:20:55
I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF HE TURNS UP IN HARRY POTTER 6


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 September 2008, 16:55:00
He should've been in Extras. That would have been weird but cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 September 2008, 16:53:57
I still like how Ricky Gervais is at the end of Spaced in an office-type role, which was just before he made The Office.

Posted on: 14 September 2008, 17:26:03

So, today in Film Interpretation, we watched a movie called Election. With Reese Witherspoon and Matthew Broderick and that one Oz guy from the American Pie movies.

It was a fantastic dark comedy. Really clever and entertaining.

I really like this class.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 September 2008, 17:24:19
Yeah, well, YOUR FACE IS LIKABLE!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 September 2008, 04:30:00
OK so a couple weeks ago my store got passes to Death Note.

Yeah, Death Note. The live action adaptation. I was like "Well this should be awful."
Wrong. Wrrrong.

Now, I've never read the manga or watched the anime but this was actually a pretty cool movie. I like the whole concept, really, and it was well done. Good acting and everything. I really liked it.

The only unfortunate parts are that the Shinigami type guy is visibly the most CG thing since that fire door in Avatar, which isn't even bad it's just not awesome. And the other thing is that it was dubbed. At first it looks poor, but you end up forgetting it's dubbed most of the time anyway.

Oh actually there's a third thing; Japanerds. Seriously. They were awful. The line was full them wearing their stupid pseudo-vampiristic and/or gaynime and/or women's-things-on-men and/or whatever-the-ugly-leatherdaddy-spastic-cousin-of-goth-is clothes. I actually saw two children (Boy and girl? Girl and girl? Boy and boy? No idea.) handcuffed together... Yeah. And all throughout the movie I could tell who was important right away because of the incessant whoos and screams and swoons and lame-teenage-awkwardness-at-a-kiss and everything else that makes me hate any popular anime. Some people actually talked in the movie as if they were still at home watching their pirated fansubbed Death Note episodes while eating barrels of Pocky and drinking chamomile tea because they are such #####ing individuals.

I haven't wanted to kill more people in one room in a long time. And I take the bus DAILY! But still, that was the only actual bad thing. OTHER people. Not shabby, really.

Sonia read the manga and her brother too as well as watching the anime and they both thought it was really good so I think if you liked the Death Note stuff before the movie won't disappoint and if you know nothing about it you'll still enjoy it.

Apparently there's enough story left over for 'at least two more movies', and I'd like to see them. I don't know if I'll end up checking out the original stuff though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 September 2008, 04:38:26
The anime dub is incredibly impressive. And the voice actor for Light Yagmi is the same voice actor as Megaman's from NT Warrior.

I couldn't believe it. He's amazing in Death Note, fanboys even think that his acting is better than the Japanese dub.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 September 2008, 04:50:28
I'm talking about the live action movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 September 2008, 04:51:34
I haven't wanted to kill more people in one room in a long time. And I take the bus DAILY!

BUSES AREN'T ROOMS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 September 2008, 04:55:56
I'm talking about the live action movie.

I know, but I was commenting on the anime. I guess Light's voice actor is the same from the anime for the movie, though.

I haven't wanted to kill more people in one room in a long time. And I take the bus DAILY!

BUSES AREN'T ROOMS

I was wondering where you got that quote until I scrolled up and saw a new paragraph inserted into his post.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 September 2008, 04:58:04
That seems possible.

I haven't wanted to kill more people in one room in a long time. And I take the bus DAILY!

BUSES AREN'T ROOMS

Anything with four walls a roof and floor all connected can be regarded as a room. Actually even that's too specific. The universe is a series of rooms.

There is the unknown universe, biggest #####ing room of all. The known universe inside it. In that room is galaxies. In our Galaxy room is our solar system. In that room is our planet. Then you got your continent, then county, then state/province/whatever-borders-you-got, then your city/town/region, your neighbourhood, home.

Your home is filled with #####ing rooms but is basically a big room to store all your rooms in so let's just focus on a couple rooms. Your bedroom, with your drawers, which could have a box in them, which could some other container(s) which go on into infinity. Alternatively; Your garage if you have one, stores you car, in that you've got the glove compartment, in that the infinity thing again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 September 2008, 04:59:08
You just BLEW my mind. BLEW IT AWAY.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 September 2008, 04:59:38
You blew my mind, Mikero. You blew my mind.

Also, before I post this, DAMN IT ASR I WAS JUST ABOUT TO POST


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 September 2008, 05:06:24
I'm sure there are galactic systems as well, meaning that Andromeda and such would be in with ours. Possibly rotating around some more majestic type of gravity well than a black hole or each other or just still but huddled together like NS-4 robots in their crates, separated from other galaxy clusters by nearly empty voids of space.

Aaaand then the galactic systems could also be probably be classified similarly, and so on until we realize that all things are really moving around a very unique and unfathomable dot at the center of all things/times/events/places/states/classi
        fi

c
    a  t
    io(ns)
.

::broke self::


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 September 2008, 05:08:04
*head explodes*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 September 2008, 05:14:31
I'm almost completely certain everything is dots and borders.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 September 2008, 17:11:28
Today in Film class, we watched The Sixth Sense.

I've seen it over and over and over but god, I'll be damned if I still don't have to hold back tears at that scene with Cole and his mom in the car, you know, "A laaaadyyyy. She died." When he tells his mom his secret.

It's one of the few twist-based movies that still holds up every time you watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 September 2008, 05:12:15
Please. I called that movie when it was in theatres and I saw the commercial. Then later found out I was right. Then didn't see the movie for years. Then did. And it was overrated.

The best scene is when that dead bike woman comes near the car window because it's creepy as hell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 September 2008, 06:00:17
That's the exact scene I'm talking about. "A laaaaaaaadyyy."

And #####, I was 9 or 10 years old when I first saw it so I lacked the ability to figure out the movie, especially since I had no idea what it was supposed to be about. Though, I still think that if I had just watched it for the first time today, I wouldn't have been able to call it.

I still really like it, though. It IS a quality movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 18 September 2008, 06:27:48
I've never seen it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 September 2008, 22:49:41
Bruce Willis is dead the whole time. There, now you know the movie.

That's the exact scene I'm talking about. "A laaaaaaaadyyy."

Yea except I don't give a ##### about what the kid is talking about, I'm just looking at the dead woman creeping me the ##### out.

And #####, I was 9 or 10 years old when I first saw it so I lacked the ability to figure out the movie, especially since I had no idea what it was supposed to be about. Though, I still think that if I had just watched it for the first time today, I wouldn't have been able to call it.

I literally saw the commercial ans was like "Kid sees dead people, Bruce is dead person. Twist. Whoo." and then went did something better than watch it in theatres. It's a good movie, I guess, but I think it was totally overhyped and it continuously fails to totally catch my attention when it's on TV, so I always end up doing something else when it's on.

Now Unbreakable on the other hand... That's the limit, son.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 18 September 2008, 23:10:55
Unbreakable was indeed unbelievably awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 September 2008, 02:01:12
I have Unbreakable on VHS.
It's THAT good.

Also, I'm reading Fight Club.
I wish I had read it before seeing it.
*sigh*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 September 2008, 07:29:33
Yeah, I saw someone reading Fight Club the other day.

I want to read both that and Thank You For Smoking.

Because I like both movies. And the books are probably much better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 19 September 2008, 16:43:12
They usually/always are.

Unfortunately, there were good books I absolutely loved to read back in the day, and when they released the movie, it sucked or failed to produce an equal or better effect.

Example: Holes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 September 2008, 23:38:04
Finished reading Fight Club.
Swell novel.

The movie was a damn near perfect reproduction.
Different ending though....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 02:11:33
Holes was a book? Goddamn.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 September 2008, 02:13:32
"It was a GREAT book."

You'll most commonly hear that line right after "I never read, ever, and I've only ever liked one book. Holes."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 02:17:24
I imagine it being written by Shia LeBoeuf just because.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 September 2008, 02:17:58
I enjoyed that book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 02:18:45
That settles it, I can never read that book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 September 2008, 02:26:44
It actually was pretty good, but it IS a kids book and it's not something anybody over the age of 18 should read for the FIRST time NOW.

It's more of a "haha, yeah, I read that back in the day."

I'm sure if I read it again, I'd hate it.

STANLEY YELNATS.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 02:39:19
Yeah.

Clueless is on TV.

... :-)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 September 2008, 04:51:35
ASR got Holes down perfectly.

It's a good book, but I'd suggest you don't read it Mike. It's not really that advanced.

The movie doesn't do justice. I suggest you don't watch it if you haven't read the book, no matter what age.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 04:52:40
I'll read it when I'm eight again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 September 2008, 04:59:04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMrDUOe2uuk


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 September 2008, 05:00:10
Ha......


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 September 2008, 05:19:00
That show was so much better than it got credit for in the day.

"Shoebies" and "Squid" and "My name's not Maurice!"... aaaaaah, those were the times.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xzeemo on 24 September 2008, 15:40:16
I went and saw "Burn after reading" the other day. I liked it, it was pretty weird, but over all it was pretty hilarious.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 September 2008, 17:27:21
I kind of want to see that.

I FINALLY watched Kill Bill Vol. 1 last night and I'm JUST about to finish up with Vol. 2 in a little bit.

I don't know WHAT it is about Tarantino films that really just gets my blood pumping.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 September 2008, 22:26:24
Vol. 1 and 2 are completely different in style. But you know that by NOW.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 September 2008, 02:32:45
I was kind of hoping the fight with Bill would be super action-packed and climactic, but I still like the way he did it.

Seriously, though, there's something about Tarantino films that just make me get absorbed in them. I get really excited and into what's going on. I think it's because he spends so much time making you really get to know and understand the characters so well and on such a personal level that you REALLY care about what's going on.

So, I found out Simon Pegg was signed on to do Tarantino's next movie, but then he was forced to drop out of it due to scheduling issues. Man, that sucks. That would've perfect.

So, yeah: movies I currently want to see despite one or maybe two of them not being out yet: "Burn After Reading," "Sex Drive," and "How to Lose Friends and Alienate People."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 25 September 2008, 02:35:08
I love Kill Bill 1 and 2.
"Pai Mei taught you...."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 25 September 2008, 03:51:57
Burn After Reading should be in other theatres, because they've been playing at mine for I believe two weeks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 September 2008, 04:17:33
Sex Drive was the one I wasn't sure about being out yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 25 September 2008, 04:29:08
Don't think it is because we only just got a standee for it last Friday, and usually those stick around for a little while before we scrap them, otherwise we don't bother making them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 September 2008, 05:00:14
I finally got off my ass and checked on iMDB: yeah, it comes out October 17th. Or whatever. I already forgot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 September 2008, 23:14:26
I love Kill Bill 1 and 2.
"Pai Mei taught you...."

VOLUME 1 and VOLUME 2.

They are not 1 and 2, they are not "two" movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 September 2008, 23:23:04
And Mike, about your earlier comment about Vol. 1 and 2 being completely different in style:

I'd say it's more TONE that they're different in, rather than style. Because it's definitely Tarantino style all the way through both movies: that is, rapidly changing film styles unexpectedly throughout.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 September 2008, 23:44:23
That's what I meant Mr. Specificio.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 September 2008, 00:04:11
I know.

Maybe.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 September 2008, 01:42:20
Volume is an extraneous word.
I CHOSE not to include it.
I know it's there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 September 2008, 01:45:39
That's like saying...

...there's probably a really good example somewhere. I got nothin'.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 September 2008, 03:12:49
It makes it sound like the second volume is a sequel, and it definitely isn't.

I know.

Maybe.

MAKE A DECISION!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 September 2008, 19:38:25
Choke was bad.

Very bad.

Palahniuk's method of narration really doesn't work well as a voice over.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 1 October 2008, 18:33:09
I hear they're making a movie from Atlas Shrugged now as well.

There's no way that WON'T piss all over the book.

I'm currently reading it. And though it probly makes me a bad person, I actually like it so far. One third in anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 1 October 2008, 20:41:03
That doesn't make you a bad person at all, Atlas Shrugged is one of my favorite books.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 1 October 2008, 22:08:50
There's been a lot of people who were trying to tell me that OBJECTIVISM IS BAD! But as with the Sword of Truth series I usually had the impression people were just doing the logical thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 October 2008, 11:51:04
http://www.movietome.com/infocus/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=712618

Bootleg teaser trailer for Dragon Ball.

Doesn't look impressive.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 4 October 2008, 13:08:37
You know we're all going to watch it, just to see how bad it fails.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 4 October 2008, 17:27:07
What's this "we"?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 4 October 2008, 18:38:46
You know we're all going to watch it, just to see how bad it fails.

Sure, I'll go "See" this movie.

If by "see" you mean "Do something that isn't really supposed to be discussed here" then you'd be right.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 5 October 2008, 05:08:19
I won't watch it.

It didn't even look like Dragon Ball except for the part with the #####ing Dragon Ball.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 5 October 2008, 07:33:27
And even THAT didn't even look like a dragon ball!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 5 October 2008, 14:53:49
Looked more like some sort of cheap-yet-overpriced crap you'd find at Pier-1 Imports.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 October 2008, 16:31:24
Goku is in High School.
King Piccolo is not green.

##### this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 5 October 2008, 16:33:02
Still gonna see the movie, though I have trouble needing to pay 10 dollars for it >.>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 October 2008, 00:48:10
Uh, excuse me, but what the ##### did you guys expect? Even if they did a perfect translation into live action it would be total ass because it just does not work as live action. I'm more surprised by the fact that you guys are surprised.

Posted on:  5 October 2008, 12:16:08

I wonder if they'll all have weird sex scenes at the end of High School Musical 3: Senior Year, like in American Pie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 October 2008, 04:46:25
I bought Sin City today FINALLY for $9.99.

Low on cash so my movie-purchasing flow has slowed down quite a bit. Not only that, but I haven't been to the theater in ages to see a new movie.

I still need to see I Am Legend, and I completely never saw the first new Batman.

Anyway, Sin City's been on my list of must-see for a long time now.

Glad I finally got it.

#####ing LOVED it. This is the new age of action movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 October 2008, 05:19:20
I like Dwight's story best. He's definitely the coolest, even in the comics. Even with his different face(s).

Well, I've not read all the Sin City books, but most of them. I need to read like, Hell And Back and maybe one other one.

It doesn't matter. Because as cool as he is in the books, he's more awesome when he's Clive Owen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 October 2008, 05:23:49
I liked all the stories almost equally. But I did really like that story.

But yeah, the whole thing rocked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 16 October 2008, 05:55:38
I like Dwight's story best. He's definitely the coolest, even in the comics. Even with his different face(s).

Well, I've not read all the Sin City books, but most of them. I need to read like, Hell And Back and maybe one other one.

It doesn't matter. Because as cool as he is in the books, he's more awesome when he's Clive Owen.

I really wish they did Dwight's first story... First. Since I felt like I was missing something when I saw it in theaters. Also, I like A Dame To Kill For better than Big Fat Kill.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 16 October 2008, 16:27:02
Low on cash

PPPPFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFTTTTTTT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 October 2008, 22:30:15
I know, right.

I like Dwight's story best. He's definitely the coolest, even in the comics. Even with his different face(s).

Well, I've not read all the Sin City books, but most of them. I need to read like, Hell And Back and maybe one other one.

It doesn't matter. Because as cool as he is in the books, he's more awesome when he's Clive Owen.

I really wish they did Dwight's first story... First. Since I felt like I was missing something when I saw it in theaters. Also, I like A Dame To Kill For better than Big Fat Kill.

I don't. Not in the movie anyway. In book form I could go either way but the movie sways the decision. Other Marv stories I actually like better.

I liked not knowing Dwight's 'first' story first.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 October 2008, 17:09:03
I saw The Boondock Saints for the first time last week. That was an awesome flick; after watching it, I immediately went out to Wal-Mart to pick it up on DVD...but they were all sold out. Apparently other people out there discovered the awesomeness of this movie at the same exact time.

I'm probably going to see Max Payne this weekend.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 17 October 2008, 17:14:22
Try to enjoy yourself.




I doubt you'll succeed, but there's always the remote possibility.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 October 2008, 17:18:09
Oh, yeah, I just remembered a bunch of other movies I still haven't seen but need to:

- The Boondock Saints
- The Big Lebowski
- The Godfather movies


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 October 2008, 17:28:06
Try to enjoy yourself.




I doubt you'll succeed, but there's always the remote possibility.

I'm pretty good at turning off my brain during action movies (except for the scene with the fighter jet in Live Free or Die Hard), so I'll probably enjoy it in some form.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 17 October 2008, 17:59:19
Max Payne, Saw V, and that James Bond movie are lookin' good as hell. Zack and Miri Make a Porno looks stupid, but I'll go see it for the hell of it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 October 2008, 18:19:31
Zack and Miri Make a Porno looks FABULOUS, you twat.

I'm definitely in the mood for another GOOD comedy, and this looks it can live up to that for me.

Max Payne looks very lame. Didn't see Saw IV so I won't see Saw V yet. And the new Bond definitely DOES look fantastic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 17 October 2008, 22:44:16
#####tard. You fail on numerous levels. All movies with Seth are stupid. That's what they're made to be. Funny stupid. Doy.

Pineapple Express was gold, but by the previews of this new movie, it doesn't look anywhere near as good as Knocked Up and/or P.E. I guess stupid movies appeal to the younger crowd.





Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 October 2008, 00:53:48
What I like about The Boondock Saints is the movie's intro song.

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=1TezgCpPuys
#####in' riverdance to that #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 18 October 2008, 01:58:45
Whole movie is good fun, but I have to agree.
Irish music is good stuff.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 October 2008, 02:14:43
I like that movie a bunch, but I find it's one of those overhyped mothers.

I could've seen that Make a Porno flick on monday night but I know that if I go I'll be wicked tired tuesday morning at work and I'd need to find someone to go on short notice.

I don't think Quantum Of Solace looks good or bad, but firmly in between, one ass cheek on either side of the fence.

Saw ONE commercial for Max Payne ONCE, but it looks cool. Never played the game but I don't care about that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 18 October 2008, 03:19:25
Girlfriend dragged me to go see W. instead of Max Payne tonight. Wasn't a bad flick; was actually better than I thought it would be.

Before the movie started, there were two movie previews that really stuck out to me.

Transporter fans: It might be old news, but the 3rd installment is coming out next month, I believe. I happen to be a huge fan of the Transporter, and this is one movie I'm definitely looking forward to.

Another movie is The Spirit (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWm8U17QguA). Yes, from the comic. Made by the same people that made Sin City, so this movie should kick ass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 October 2008, 04:33:00
Another movie is The Spirit (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWm8U17QguA). Yes, from the comic. Made by the same people that made Sin City, so this movie should kick ass.

Saw that just a while ago, looks great.

I just happened to catch the last bit of Short Circuit, oh man, the nostalgia just tackled me! And right before the scene happened I remembered.. "wait.. number 5 dies.. D:"

I remember crying at the drive in when that happened, I loved that robot..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 October 2008, 17:03:03
Finally saw I Am Legend.

I really liked it.

I don't know why everyone hated the ending, it was a good one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 18 October 2008, 17:14:07
Which ending did you see?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 October 2008, 20:57:57
...are there multiple endings? What do you mean?

What I saw was:
[spoiler]He sacrifices his life to let the woman and her son escape with the cure.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 18 October 2008, 20:59:11
That's the main ending, but there might be multiple endings on the DVD.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 October 2008, 21:09:25
There's probably enough endings on the DVD to cover the endings of the other versions of this movie from over the years.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 18 October 2008, 22:52:16
...are there multiple endings? What do you mean?

What I saw was:
[spoiler]He sacrifices his life to let the woman and her son escape with the cure.[/spoiler]

Yeah, that's the right one.

[spoiler]
The other one is where he gives the vampire girl back to the other vampires and they leave him alone so he survives.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 18 October 2008, 23:35:04
[spoiler]I didn't think they were vampires, but it's kind of understandable, seeing as how they only come out at night.[/spoiler]

But the ending could have still been better than that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 October 2008, 01:42:02
[spoiler]In the book (I Am Legend) they are basically vampires.

In the earliest film adaptation (The Last Man On Earth) they are basically vampires.

In the next film adaptation (The Omega Man) they are albino SoCal hicks who're mental photophobes.

In the latest adaptation (I Am Legend) they are only vampiristic in that they're allergic to UV radiation. But I don't think they drink blood or anything. Haven't seen it.

They changed the name and/or occupation of the guy in most of the adaptions.[/spoiler]

Like i just said I haven't actually seen the new movie but I don't care about spoilers since the initial story is old as hell anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 October 2008, 05:41:21
In the movie, they're more like... an in-between hybrid of zombies and vampires. If you get bitten, you turn into a zombie/vampire, an attribute which is common to both parties. The Fresh Prince is immune to this effect.

Leaning more towards zombies save for the whole "can't be in the light" thing.

They do have a thing for blood though, apparently, since one of the traps Hancock sets involves him cracking open a vial of blood and leaving it out for a vambie to come out and grab.

Zompire.

They're zompires.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 19 October 2008, 06:06:49
Another movie is The Spirit (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWm8U17QguA). Yes, from the comic. Made by the same people that made Sin City, so this movie should kick ass.

Saw the trailer for this months ago, resolved to not see it because.. it looks ridiculous.

The Spirit, if you've ever read the Eisner or Cooke versions, is a pretty seamless mesh of Comedy and Noir.

The movie looks like it's gonna be Noir/Ridiculous.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 19 October 2008, 07:29:01
The Spirit, if you've ever read the Eisner or Cooke versions, is a pretty seamless mesh of Comedy and Noir.

The movie looks like it's gonna be Noir/Ridiculous.

I've read some of the Eisner versions, and yeah you're right.

I'm still checking it out. I'll see whether I'll be disappointed or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 October 2008, 07:37:26
"Eisner versions" can just be called the real versions.

In the movie, they're more like... an in-between hybrid of zombies and vampires. If you get bitten, you turn into a zombie/vampire, an attribute which is common to both parties. The Fresh Prince is immune to this effect.

Leaning more towards zombies save for the whole "can't be in the light" thing.

They do have a thing for blood though, apparently, since one of the traps Hancock sets involves him cracking open a vial of blood and leaving it out for a vambie to come out and grab.

Zompire.

They're zompires.

Nothing at all in that post says why they're at all like zombies at all. And obviously J is immune to it. Mike Lowrey's immune in every incarnation, dumb-bum. Actually they changed the job of Bagger Vance's character from a waste management guy to a virologist . I guess it would have been weird for Jim West to be a janitor and then suddenly know how to run tests on a disease, but they did that with the character in like every movie they made of that book.

Detective Spooner.
Paul.
Cpt. Steve Hiller.
Hitch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 October 2008, 16:59:58
I guess with all that crappy Twilight ##### going on lately, I'd really rather refer to anything as zombies over vampires if given the chance.

And Hitch was the next one I was gonna' use.

Posted on: 19 October 2008, 16:47:22

Captain America easter-egg cameo in The Hulk's alternate opening. (http://www.movietome.com/infocus/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=737839)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 October 2008, 17:02:34
What exactly is that? His face or something? I can't make that out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 October 2008, 17:18:47
It's him frozen in the ice, with his shield.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 October 2008, 17:25:10
I know its him in the ice, I just can't make out what apparently is a human. It just looks like a squigly purple whateverthehell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 October 2008, 17:35:56
Look.
http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/10/11/captain-america-found-in-the-incredible-hulk-deleted-scene/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 October 2008, 17:41:02
I STILL DON'T SEE ??? ??? ???

I see it, thanks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 October 2008, 17:49:15
The link to that was in Alec's link.

But you're welcome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 October 2008, 17:57:07
Screw ASR, he's not helpful AT ALL


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 October 2008, 00:50:42
Every comment on the page ASR linked to was written by retards.

And I'm glad that scene was cut out. It's stupid.

But I can't wait, because on Tuesday I'm buying the DVD and the DVD of Iron Man.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 October 2008, 01:18:20
Haha, that's what I was planning on doing. Both at once, and then a Marvel Movie Night.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 20 October 2008, 01:32:34
I've always wanted to ask others...

Which movie do you think is better: Iron Man or the Incredible Hulk?

I loved Iron Man, pesonally. Then again, I believe most people did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 October 2008, 01:37:48
I feel Iron Man was better overall, but The Hulk had a much better, well... atmosphere, I suppose. I don't know. I really loved them both.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 October 2008, 01:55:33
I can only say Iron Man, because I haven't seen Hulk yet..

#####, I haven't been going to movies lately.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 20 October 2008, 02:24:53
Just saw Casino
                    Royal
                       7

OH I'M SO COOL

Anyway, can't wait for Quantum of Solace.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 October 2008, 04:00:03
Incredible Hulk and Iron Man aren't similar enough in style to really compare.

Iron Man was funnier and lighter with almost no fights. Incredible Hulk was serious and darker with mostly fights. I pretty much liked them both equally, but differently.

Either way, Cap shouldn't have that circle shield when he's frozen if they're going by Ultimate universe (which they usually do).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 October 2008, 04:02:54
I admit that I know absolutely NOTHING about Captain America. Absolutely NOTHING.

The only superheroes I knew anything about as a kid were Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, and the Hulk.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 October 2008, 04:14:22
What you need to know about Cap: He's awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 October 2008, 04:16:35
The only thing I know about Cap is from the animated Ultimate Avengers Movie. Thats it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 20 October 2008, 04:32:48
Incredible Hulk and Iron Man aren't similar enough in style to really compare.

It would have been a no contest if i asked between the previous Hulk and the Incredible Hulk.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 October 2008, 11:29:46
I had no idea who Captain America was until I saw him in a Marvel vs. Capcom game. I must've been eight, which is pretty late considering I knew Spider-Man, Superman, Bat Man, and Hulk long before that age.

I've never seen him in comics or a movie. I just assumed he wasn't popular. I don't know enough about him either except that he throws his shield, but then again, I don't care enough for comics in general so there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 October 2008, 13:58:02
Cap is a terrible super hero, but he has nice ideals. Of course, he's dead now because of that.

That's on par for most DC heroes. The terrible bit, not the dying thing, although both work I guess.

DC has Batman.
And yeah.
There you go. Batman. The only good DC super hero. I still haven't seen that movie.
Sucks being unemployed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 20 October 2008, 14:51:07
Only YOU could call a hero, who punched Hitler in the face on the cover of his very first issue, terrible.

I think you've never read a Captain America comic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 October 2008, 15:00:13
I still think it's a stupid idea for a super hero.
And he's annoying in MvC.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 October 2008, 15:48:43
I'm confident that Captain America is off-the-chain badass.

I just don't read comics.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 20 October 2008, 18:38:30
I disliked him at first because of his name, to be honest. Then, you know, I grew up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 October 2008, 18:48:02
From what Lunche has told me, the ideals he stands for are nice.

... but that costume.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 October 2008, 19:02:57
I knew about Captain America for a long time, my dad made a bronze statue of him in High School and we still have it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 October 2008, 03:02:48
That's wicked.

Cap is actually one of my favourite Marvel heroes. You can't can't him terrible if you actually read his stuff or even some Avengers stuff in the last 10 years. ESPECIALLY (but not limited to) Brubaker's run on the Captain America book. SO damn stellar.

Yeah, that's right. I brought out "stellar" for this one.

I'm confident that Captain America is off-the-chain badass.

I just don't read comics.

Correct, sir.

From what Lunche has told me, the ideals he stands for are nice.

... but that costume.

I only have a problem with the boots. Which they tend to leave out of frame wherever possible.

You might not mind the costume of the current Captain America though.

Incredible Hulk and Iron Man aren't similar enough in style to really compare.

It would have been a no contest if i asked between the previous Hulk and the Incredible Hulk.

Definitely.

Anyway I am VERY tired of Batman in comics. He's great, and I like him just like everyone else on this planet, but... Nothing's fresh. And in every comic he's in that he's not the star of, he's a TOTAL dick to everyone. And it's not necessary most of the time. Also I have a fr-acquaintance that makes everything Batman unbearable.

But I think there are definitely other good DC Heroes. I love the Green Lantern Corps, like the Flash, Titans, Teen Titans (less lately...), and more. But I do think overall Marvel is where it's at.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 October 2008, 19:20:33
It's too bad that the America he stands for is so far removed from the America that really is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 22 October 2008, 19:52:48
It's the America we should strive to be.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 October 2008, 21:50:13
Agreed.

It's just too bad people are selfish.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 October 2008, 03:16:11
It's too bad that the America he stands for is so far removed from the America that really is.
It's the America we should strive to be.

My favourite part about him.

Those ideals encompass this country's goals too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 October 2008, 04:46:51
My dad's boss gave him the Iron Man DVD, doin' a good job I suppose..

So uh.. Iron Man get?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 October 2008, 04:55:00
I'm sacrificng my Iron Man/Hulk money on a shiny new green scooter.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 October 2008, 05:21:14
Oh I bought Iron Man and Incredible Hulk yesterday. Both in steelbooks! :-)

Really I only wanted Iron Man in the "Future Shop exclusive" steelbook because it just felt like the right thing to do being Iron Man and all, and didn't realize the Hulk special 3-disc was also in a black steelbook. I knew I wanted that edition of Hulk, didn't know it wasn't plastic. I usually don't buy the steelbooks but I'm glad I did, these are very nice and the other cover for Hulk is TRASH.

Watched Iron Man last night, and Incredible H tonight.
So great. So great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 October 2008, 05:23:27
Incredible H

Que Rez.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 24 October 2008, 07:23:10
I saw Rocky Horror Picture Show again and I saw V for Vendetta right after that for the first time with my friends.

RHPS is always good fun, and V was mind blowing. Makes me giddy for Watchmen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 October 2008, 17:10:01
RHPS pisses me off. I don't know why.

Still haven't seen V for Vendetta.

I doubt I'll get the special editions of Iron Man and Incredible Hulk because even though I always WANT the special editions of movies, I don't seem to care after the fact. And I keep all my DVD's in one giant DVD case and keep all the single cases they came in inside of a bookcase at home, anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 October 2008, 01:51:58
These were barely more expensive than the regular versions. Like a difference of four bucks.

The regular Hulk (which sounds like a horrible tite, actually. Like I'd want to see or read "The Regular Hulk". Like Issue #1, he has a coffee and reads the paper. Issue #2, The Hulk picks up the kids from Mommy & Me, etc. But I'm rambling..) cover sucks, and so does the regular Iron Man. The second Iron Man (which I guess is the special edition) is only OK, and then the Future Shop Exclusive special edition is the steelbook, which is nice.


Incredible H

Que Rez.


Craaaaaaaaaaaap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 October 2008, 01:53:48
Yeah, special edition DVD's are usually $4-5 more expensive, which isn't that much. I usually go for them. But lately that's the difference between buying one more $10 movie from the bargain bin, which I'd usually rather opt for.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 01:56:19
Movie's a movie. I'm fine as long as I have the movie bits of the movie.

Incredible H

Cue Rez.

Fixed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 October 2008, 02:13:07
I don't usually care, but if it's not much more I'll get the better version. I'm kind of filmmaker so that stuff tends to be worth it sometimes.

Tip: Never buy a movie in Fullscreen. It's actually a bastardized version of the movie from a directorial standpoint.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 October 2008, 02:17:54
My parents NEVER understood that. They always buy movies in Fullscreen, and they make a big deal about it, too. They've returned movies because they accidentally bought them in Widescreen.

Ugh.

Usually I don't make a point to get either one, and just whatever I end up with is what I get because I'm not thinking about it. But if I see both NEXT to each and have the option, I always go for Widescreen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 October 2008, 02:20:50
Yeah my mom doesn't get it either but I'm the one who buys DVDs so whatever.

See, when you chop off the sides like that you actually ruin EVERY #####ING SHOT IN THE MOVIE because nothing is put anywhere without a purpose in a shot, so Fullscreen full-on fully ruins what the director was trying to do.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 October 2008, 02:28:08
Yep. As soon as I got really into movies and how they're made, it bothered me when my parents did that. Because at first I didn't really care or understand what the big difference was anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 03:08:19
My father has always been on top of technology and stuff.
If we got a movie in fullscreen, it was returned immediately and swapped for a widescreen version (assuming that was the original ratio).

Our TV is now widescreen HD because of this.
good times


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 October 2008, 03:09:51
How'd you get the good parents? The ones they gave me don't work right.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 03:14:16
You need the ice beam and five missiles.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 October 2008, 03:17:15
Or 2 super missiles, it saves a lot of time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 03:21:27
Apparently you've never played Super Metroid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 October 2008, 03:40:04
It's been a while since I've picked up Super, I'm going by Zero Mission on this one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 25 October 2008, 03:59:05
I hate full screen.

I hate getting movies as gifts and having them in full screen. Like Mike said, it ruins every damned shot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 25 October 2008, 04:04:47
Similar to ASR, I used to not mind full-screen movies.

I thought, "This is nice."

Then I watched wide-screen.

I thought, "This is nice."

Then I watched full-screen again.

"Ew."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 October 2008, 09:31:22
I'll watch full screen movies on TV and cringe half the time over the fact that whole characters are talking with everything other than their nose and lips completely off screen. The rule of thirds is used for a reason and #####ing full screen rips that to shreds.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 13:48:51
It's also a direct mapping of the common ratio between vertical and horizontal view for your own eyes.

It's been a while since I've picked up Super, I'm going by Zero Mission on this one.

Even in ZM, it's only one super missile. They've always been worth five missiles.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 October 2008, 18:37:41
Really? I specifically remember 2 super missiles.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 25 October 2008, 18:50:44
Really? I specifically remember 2 super missiles.

You're WRONG.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 25 October 2008, 18:56:49
"C'mon, let me hear you say it. Just once."
"I'm going by Zero Mission on this one."
"NO! Ah hah hah, no the other thing..."
"I specifically remember 2 super missiles."
"WRONG!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 25 October 2008, 20:03:23
Really? I specifically remember 2 super missiles.

You're WRONG.

Well excuuuse me princess.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 October 2008, 23:01:45
(http://suitable.cocolog-nifty.com/boy/variety/zelda02_02.jpg)

Oh, I'm not sure I remember if I was around when you guys were talking about it or what, but what were your opinions on that new Indiana Jones movie? I never saw it.

A link to the posts or something would suffice since I can't seem to find them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 October 2008, 05:11:03
The only cool part was Indie in a fridge.

And that was also the part that made me realize this movie is NOT what Indie should be.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 26 October 2008, 05:58:53
Didn't Jake say it was awesome?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 October 2008, 07:53:00
For an Indiana Jones, to me, it did just fine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 October 2008, 13:45:14
Indiana Jones is over the top.

This movie was over the top.

It works.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 October 2008, 16:18:09
I enjoyed it for what it was. It was still mindless Indie entertainment.

But no, they went too far with some things.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 October 2008, 17:07:04
I didn't see it and I've stopped caring to, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 27 October 2008, 01:47:03
Went with three friends to see Saw V earlier today. I just got back from it.

And guess what? By the way V ended, another installment will no doubt be made.

woo...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 01:48:47
We already know there's going to be 6.

We already knew that when they made 3.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 27 October 2008, 01:54:26
Yeah yeah.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 03:42:29
http://watchmencomicmovie.com/102108-watchmen-2008-scream-trailer.php

New Watchmen trailer with some great new footage, but a lot of it is the same from the last trailer.

But trust me, enough new footage to get you even more excited.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: von Teelio on 27 October 2008, 05:01:22
Ah, now that looks promising. The chick in the black and yellow latex is smokin' hot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 27 October 2008, 05:02:08
I watched the trailer with a smile on my face.

My ONLY complaint is Ozymandias. He looks like a scrawny nerd compared to his buff manly look in the comic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 05:15:22
...in the comic, he looked like a buff nerd.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 27 October 2008, 12:43:51
I never read Watchmen.
I don't even know who the characters are.

From that perspective, I'm having a lot of trouble finding a reason to watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 14:58:05
I read it BECAUSE I saw the trailer and it looked so fantastic.

And trust me, one of the best "that looks cool" decisions I've ever made.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 27 October 2008, 16:26:59
Watchmen is a really good graphic novel, practically a must read. I didn't know about it until the trailer, I didn't care too much for the trailer, but I started hearing exclamations of how good the book is, so I borrowed it.

The trailer doesn't really look that good to me, just visually interesting. But I still want to watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 27 October 2008, 17:03:09
I started reading it before the movie was even announced but the trailer is the reason why I bought and finished it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 October 2008, 21:14:25
I don't know if it's OK that I watched that while wearing an Iron Man mask.

Seeing any bit of trailer since reading the graphic novel again, I realize I'm disturbed by how young and fit everyone is. Particularly Nite Owl. And in a sense, Laurie coming down the stairs. That look is fine for the flashbacks to when they tried making that second hero team but... She should be a lot more... Ice cold? Hard? Statuesque? Whatever, I can't see her from the comic and her from the movie being the same person in that scene.

I can deal with

I started reading it before the movie was even announced but the trailer is the reason why I bought and finished it.

Same here. Well, not entirely. The trailer did respark my interest but I'd always meant to finish it and wanted to. Really, the trailer just gave me the urgency to do it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 21:41:24
I only knew about it because Simon Pegg once mentioned it on a commentary or something I had watched.

And when I saw the trailer, I thought it was really cool and heard everyone raving about it online so I got off my ass and read it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 October 2008, 21:42:16
I was told I had to read it when I started working at the comic store.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 27 October 2008, 21:49:42
I already told everyone here the reason why I started reading it.

But it was annoying... my dad made me read it at Chapters where I only had an hour to do so, barely a chapter's worth. He offered me to read his original comics but I didn't want to ruin them by mistake...

When the trailer was announced I decided to buy it so I didn't have to go through Chapters to read it. And well, it's worth it. I can see myself reading it a few more times down the road.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 22:27:10
I just lent my copy out again today, I think it's the fourth time.

I really wish people would buy it themself.

I seem to always be lending out Hitchhiker's Guide and this nowadays. Also Johnny the Homicidal Maniac.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 October 2008, 22:31:26
I've lent Watchmen out twice, when I only lent it out intentionally once to my friend Brian and his roomate slash my friend Shawn's girlfriend decided she was going to borrow it after Brian and still probably hasn't begun to read it. I've reports that it is often "on the floor" and I'm not exactly pleased.

Now then. What Watchmen covers do you guys have, anyway? I have the only good cover the collection has.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 27 October 2008, 22:39:42
I treat other people's stuff with more respect than I treat my own stuff.

I've got... the yellow cover. With the blood?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 October 2008, 22:45:05
Good. The smiley face button cover, really. Which is the only good one. The rest are actually utterly awful.

I'm the same way with other people's things as Majikn. But I can't really think of anyone who respects my stuff.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 October 2008, 23:18:19
I have the yellow smiley face with blood cover, too.

As far as other people taking care of my stuff, it's ranged from people getting kicked out of military school while borrowing a bunch of my DVD's and not returning them... to taking perfect care of things... all the way to someone damaging my copy of Hitchhiker's Guide and buying me a brand new one to make up for it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 30 October 2008, 13:19:03
I saw Max Payne on Friday. Good, but not great. A wonderful, beautiful mess of a film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 November 2008, 18:43:00
Just watched Adaptation.

I'm going to go stare at the wall for about three hours and let my brain settle.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 4 November 2008, 19:08:24
Is that in a good or bad way?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 November 2008, 19:55:05
It's a movie about a screenwriter adapting a book to film that is difficult to adapt to film and so he writes himself into the screenplay and then he's a character and like there are fictional characters and real real characters and then-

Well, it's about a LOT more than that.

My brain still hadn't recovered from the craziness that was Being John Malkovich.

So yes, it's in a good way. A great way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 November 2008, 01:49:33
I'm going to see Role Models tomorrow on a pass.

"WHAAT?"

Haha. Can't wait.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 5 November 2008, 01:54:38
That looks like such a good movie. Love that part too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 November 2008, 02:06:01
He says it at least twice in the commercial, so I'm hoping it's like his catch phrase. 'Cause if it is then it's already hilarious to me.

"WHAAT?!"
Hahahahaha!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 November 2008, 03:13:02
I want to see Zack and Miri Make A Porno more than I want to see Role Models, but I do want to see that, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 November 2008, 03:32:37
I want to see that but with people, and most people are busy. I'm going to this with people, but it helps that it's free to get them out of the homework mess for it.

Still need to see Nick and Nora as well.
(And find a Nora (girl who is my musical soul mate) myself.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 November 2008, 02:33:37
I'm watching V for Vendetta again with my friends right now.

Can anyone guess why?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: saldite on 6 November 2008, 02:34:56
It's the fifth of November...
The Gunpowder Plot, right?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 November 2008, 03:04:43
Hey!
Today is the second anniversary of my uncle's death from Brain Cancer!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 November 2008, 03:10:29
Remember, remember.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 November 2008, 03:39:41
I see no reason why gunpowder treason, should ever be forgot.

Also I liked Role Models a bunch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 November 2008, 03:46:25
Remember, remember.

I can't believe I forgot...

Dang, I feel like I just bought a ticket to the mauling tent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 November 2008, 03:50:10
I see no reason why gunpowder treason, should ever be forgot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 November 2008, 03:53:41
There's a typo on this ticket.

Where it's supposed to read "ADMIT ONE", it says "KILL ME".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 6 November 2008, 04:28:23
There's a typo on this ticket.

Where it's supposed to read "ADMIT ONE", it says "KILL ME".

Trust me, it's not a typo.
Rez had me write those up and he assured me on oath of my death that it's not a typo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 November 2008, 04:30:52
When I asked about whether or not it was ethical to rip these tickets as the swarms roll in, as is my current profession, Rez swore on my grave that it was.

I didn't even know you could do that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 November 2008, 05:40:36
So, I really want to Quantum of Solace but I don't know where any movie theaters are...

Mikero, which bus should I take to get to the nearest theater? :>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 6 November 2008, 07:57:20
I'm watching V for Vendetta again with my friends right now.

Can anyone guess why?

Because you still haven't read the book?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 November 2008, 15:33:36
Oh, that reminds me. I have tracked down a copy of V for Vendetta (the comic) and will be reading it shortly when a friend is done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 November 2008, 21:17:26
It's a hell of a lot more boring.

So, I really want to Quantum of Solace but I don't know where any movie theaters are...

Mikero, which bus should I take to get to the nearest theater? :>

I drive to the theatres in your neck of the desert (sure, that's a saying), sorry. Ask around, you'll want to go see it at the Coliseum, which is...

::licks finger and puts it to the wind::

... West of you, on the highway at least. But I've no idea what bus would go from Baseline to there. Alternatively you could take any bus that goes to the Bayshore Shopping Centre, except you don't know where to walk from there (it's like a 5-10 minute walk from that mall).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 6 November 2008, 23:33:25
I dunno, I quite like the book, but he definitely has better books (Watchmen, League of Extraordinary Gentlmen, etc).

In contrast I can't stand the movie for some reason.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 November 2008, 05:45:18
The movie just had what I liked best, all the talking with Vs and it all just moved along normally. Like, the book is too slow me knowing it all. But I haven't tried to read it in a long time so maybe that's changed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 7 November 2008, 06:05:46
I think the thing that annoys me about the movie is that it is so far removed from the message of the book, I am quite literally, disgusted.

The book was about anarchy, and ended on a much darker note. [spoiler]Basically after not only gutting out the current government, but utterly destroying it, and the people's faith in it, Parliament blows up (more symbolic than anything), chaos ensues. For that one night everyone in London is truly free, no one is watching, no one is listening, and they can do as they please. Whether they want to keep it that way the next day is up to them.[/spoiler] 

The movie was about democracy, and ended with a much more optimistic ending. [spoiler]"Okay, so we all marched out to the streets in costumes, someone blew up Parliament, and the revolution is over. Best regime change ever. Now let's go home with the satisfaction that we enacted change, but doing as little work as possible."[/spoiler]

But I can get that it's kind of a hard read, not intellectually, mind you, but the writing is so damn dense, it's just like... You just have to put it down and say "#####, I can't #####ing read this now, I got a goddamn headache".

I know I can't read it through in one sitting. I don't think you're supposed to anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 November 2008, 06:16:11
That's just how he writes, I guess. I got a headache the first time I read Watchmen, I was reading so hard.

Yes, you CAN 'read hard' and I do it a lot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 7 November 2008, 07:48:25
I read to the max extreme.

But yeah, not everyone is gonna love Moore's style, it is just very very... Dense. Also, crammed with so much symbolism and double meanings and....

Every time I read Watchmen, I find something new. it's why I never get tired of it.

And even more, there are a lot of different ways to interpret that book, and that what keeps it interesting to me, and why it's one of my favorite comics ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 7 November 2008, 18:10:07
everyone is gonna love Moore's style

(http://images.art.com/images/-/Roger-Moore---James-Bond--C10102109.jpeg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 November 2008, 01:41:21
At work today...

Well. On the subject ALAN Moore books. This is just perfect isn't it? After waiting over a year for Absolute Watchmen to come I finally accepted that it was out of print forever and bought the one I bought.

Guess what recently came back in print and we have at the store now? Absolute-#####ing-Watchmen. Goddamnit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 November 2008, 01:57:03
Is that the one that costs an obscene amount of money?

I forgot about that. When I was searching for Watchmen, all the bookstores I went to that knew what I was talking about (and were sold out) told me to wait until November when this new "super version" came out. I said "Thanks, but no thanks" and ordered Watchmen online.

What's so good about it?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 November 2008, 02:42:18
It's really not all that worth it, but an "obscene amount of money" is relative. It's like getting the best super edition DVD.

Absolute Editions just have loads of extras. It's an oversized hardcover, lots of supplemental stuff like scripts and page descriptions, remastered colour (which I think they use in all the trades since 2005 anyway) and stuff like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 November 2008, 03:04:46
If I had known how good it was and how much I was gonna' love it BEFORE I bought it, I might've waited for that.

But by obscene, I mean it was somewhere between $50 and $70 or something, when I could buy the regular one for $20.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 November 2008, 03:08:05
75 bucks USD, I think. I mean it's relative because everyone has a different idea of what's expensive based on what they make and how they came up. But yeah it is. And those extras aren't totally worth it, but it's cool to have. I love reading scripts by Brian Michael Bendis. But he writes like me so that helps (as did Douglas Adams).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 November 2008, 03:16:12
I write like Douglas Adams but I'm pretty sure it's BECAUSE of him.

And yeah, $75, that's what they told me. Wouldn't have gotten it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 November 2008, 04:28:14
You might like Bendis' comics, come to think of it. Not really like Douglas Adams at all, but they've got a realistic dialogue thing with quirkiness, which is how I write dialogue. And personally I find it good, just little things sometimes funny that people do. I can't really explain.

I write like Adams in narration and such things, as well as with tangents that go nowhere about vortexes opening up and passing words onto other planets which start interplanetary war until they both figure out what happened and band together to attack earth but end up getting inhaled by a dog.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 8 November 2008, 22:12:50
Bendis is... I don't know if he's a good writer to be honest. I love some of his stuff, or absolutely hate it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 November 2008, 22:47:27
My only problem with his stuff is how long it takes to tell a story. An eight issue arc of his can often be done in three issues. I actually like he likes to connect to the past all the time, like Secret Invasion connecting to House Of M and stuff like that, but apparently enough people don't like that he does that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 9 November 2008, 00:08:02
Finally watched the Star Wars trilogy. (Previously, I'd seen RotJ and a bit of ANH, but not ESB, and not all in a row.)

This makes listening to Death Cab for Cutie's "I Will Follow You Into The Dark" a little mind-bending.

Note to self: If ever get tempted by a Sith Lord to the dark side, do not design fortress to have convenient mile-deep drops for the hero and/or Face Heel Turned student to push me off of. Or at least put a trampoline at the bottom.

Also, start thinking up good Darth title that isn't some synonym of "bad" or "illness".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 9 November 2008, 00:23:50
Wow, I know some people haven't watched a lot of movies, but I can't believe someone hasn't seen all of Star Wars..

And how about Darth WINDUHHH!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 November 2008, 04:21:29
Boba Fett is better looking without the mask (surprise ending).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 November 2008, 03:00:55
So, I haven't been to a movie theater for this entire school year. Which is okay I guess because I didn't miss a SINGLE hit movie all summer.

But today we all finally went out and saw Quantum of Solace. Which pisses me off because I'd rather have seen either Zack & Miri or Role Models (and I would've seen them instead if both hadn't already started 20-30 minutes before we got there.)

But Quantum of Solace was decent. It bored me at some parts and I've never been big on Bond, but I did like it. Daniel Craig is a pretty badass Bond.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 November 2008, 04:10:59
I have yet to see a Bond flick since by numbers parody that was Die Another Day, so I'm gonna see QoS anytime soon. I rather like Bond, but I think I'm just over with any hype for it all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 November 2008, 05:08:04
There's only one movie between Die Another Day and Quantum of Solace. And that movie is a great Bond movie and it makes Die Another Day look like the #####iest piece of ##### that ever existed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 November 2008, 05:56:44
It was that when I saw it, it needed no help to prove it. It was a laser on the moon that would melt polar ice caps, which is the quintessential parody of Bond movies. It had a sword fight with Madonna. It didn't need any help.

I knew Casino Royale was the only one after Die Another Day until now, but I was just illustrating a point on why I'm done going to see Bond in theatres.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 November 2008, 06:22:40
Then I assume you forgot to add a "not" in your post up there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 November 2008, 15:15:12
I did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 November 2008, 20:44:44
I figured out the bus route to the movie theatre. (Thanks Mike!)

I'm now watching Zack & Miri Make a Porno. After this I'm going to rush to the Quantum of Solace showing to just catch it start of it.

I was a little annoyed that they did't accept my birth cert this time. I had to show my student card alongside it. She then told me to bring a health card next but let me through anyway. :/

Posted on: 15 November 2008, 14:16:07

Zack and Miri was pretty awesome. It  didn't resort to be absolutely random to be funny.

Quantum of Solace time! I'm going to record the intro on my phone... >_>

I could record the whole movie on this phone if I wanted but I'm not an evil bastard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 15 November 2008, 20:57:14
Not to mention the quality would suck.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 November 2008, 23:44:32
The QoS intro wasn't that fantastic. But still cool.

I'm stll so angry that I haven't seen Zack and Miri yet. Ugh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 November 2008, 23:49:45
Yeah, I like the music and visuals of Casino Royale better. Movie was still good, but like Abe said, not as good as Casino Royale. Still worth a watch for non-Bond fans.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 16 November 2008, 06:36:37
I heard that it's based off the first novel.
 
Well, actually they took the first novel, and split it into four parts.

Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace being the first two parts.

Also, I think I'm the only guy on earth who was never relaly a Bond fan to begin with.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 November 2008, 06:44:31
I like the idea of Bond more than I like watching his movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 November 2008, 06:54:27
I heard that it's based off the first novel.
 
Well, actually they took the first novel, and split it into four parts.

Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace being the first two parts.

Casino Royale is a novel. The movie pretty much had its plot but SMERSH was replaced by Quantum and it also had some extra things (the novel was just the Casino bit). Quantum of Solace is one of the short stories in the book Octopussy and the Living Daylights but the movie has nothing to do with the short story, it just uses the name.

THE MORE YOU KNOW


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 16 November 2008, 11:34:19
I saw Quantum of Solace the other day. It was good, but I felt like I was watching Jason Bourne in a James Bond movie.

I also watched a short horror film called Janitor on Xbox Live. I thought it was okay. The girl was cute.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 17 November 2008, 06:33:19
Watching the old 90's Captain America movie, I hear it's crap, but I'm still gonna watch it(obviously!).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 17 November 2008, 12:47:30
Watching the old 90's Captain America movie, I hear it's crap, but I'm still gonna watch it(obviously!).

Rubber ears.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 17 November 2008, 12:55:59
They we're right to say it!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 November 2008, 16:03:02
You think that one's bad? Try watching the two made-for-TV movies from the 70s.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 November 2008, 23:11:23
I can't lie: I think that new Adam Sandler movie "Bedtime Stories" actually looks pretty funny.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 November 2008, 03:03:48
He gets a bad rap 'cause his movies aren't the same style as they used to be and that's not cool. I saw the start of Click on TV, it was too late to actually watch because I had work in the morning but I liked what I saw. Had actual laughs too (but I WAS tired).

I always think his movies look good but for whatever reason I never see 'em.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 November 2008, 03:12:56
You Don't Mess With The Zohan was NOT that good. Some laughs, but, like... just no.

But yeah, I actually enjoyed Click. I saw it in theaters with my family, and I haven't seen it again since then, but I definitely liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 November 2008, 03:14:31
The Zohan was alright here and there, I really liked Rob Schneider in that one, especially the goat scene.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 November 2008, 03:32:32
I don't want to hear about you watching your goatse.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 November 2008, 04:23:19
Gross.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 November 2008, 04:34:31
Note to Self: must get Tropic Thunder on DVD.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 November 2008, 18:41:50
So apparently this was a make-up test for Goku as an ape. It's not final, according to Fox.

Also, Piccolo gets greener as the movie goes on, or something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 November 2008, 18:45:00
...what the... #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 18 November 2008, 18:56:07
It looks like an Alien Monkey thing, so I can't be too upset.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 18 November 2008, 21:19:54
I looked at that, and tried to recall something that looks similar to that.

AND I'M LIKE "OH GARGOYLES. I HAVEN'T SEEN THAT CRAP IN AGEEEEEES."

But seriously, dat be screwed up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 November 2008, 22:44:01
Well, considering there's NO Krillin in this movie, it's going to be nothing but crap. Not one spec of anything will make it better. Nothing at all!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 18 November 2008, 22:50:03
You say that like it could have been something other than crap to begin with.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 November 2008, 23:09:43
I'm just hoping it's one of those horrible-but-fun-to-watch movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 00:02:02
I hope it's as good as Never Back Down!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 00:10:37
I still wanna' see Step Up II The Streets.

What a great name for a movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 00:12:52
Yeah really.

Although apparently as far as dance movies go, Step Up was OK. So who knows.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 00:16:51
On the note of Never Back Down... I had a frienemy who went and saw it and then came back RAVING about how awesome it was.

If he wasn't five times my size I would've maybe attempted to kind of try and sort of hurt him a little bit maybe.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 00:18:54
Yeah. It wasn't good but it was REALLY entertaining. Like I actually would love to watch it right now.

For free only, though. It isn't good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 00:23:23
No, I know what you mean. I probably would've really liked to watch it.

But he thought it was good. He believed it was good. In that sort of "...oh, yeah, this is why I know I'm better than some bits of humanity" sort way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 November 2008, 00:23:47
You say that like it could have been something other than crap to begin with.

Everyone knows Krillin is the backbone of the Dragon Ball Franchise!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 00:27:17
Yeah except he dies all the time.

Actually his deaths always lead to the best stuff.

Hm.

Carry on.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 19 November 2008, 01:01:14
Yeah really.

Although apparently as far as dance movies go, Step Up was OK. So who knows.

Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo has the best movie subtitle ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 November 2008, 05:54:58
The new Star Trek (http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/) movie looks real good, I'm no trekkie, but my dad's a fan of that stuff. The trailer is amazing I think, Abrams seems to be doing a great job..



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 05:57:46
I have to see it for Simon Pegg. And I'm an unwilling fan of Abrams' work. Mainly Lost and Cloverfield. So, well, why not?

In the Spaced special features, they make fun of Simon Pegg because there's a line in Spaced where he says "Sure as every odd numbered Star Trek movie is #####!", but now he's starring in an odd-numbered Star Trek movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 November 2008, 15:16:18
Zachary Quinto is in it.
He's the dude that plays Sylar on Heroes for those who didn't know.

Sylar=Spock.

It might be awkward.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 15:18:41
Yeah, I recognized him when I saw the trailer. It's sad because he looks exactly like Spock. But it works.

Oh, and for all of you that haven't seen the movie Big Nothing: in it, Simon Pegg speaks with an American accent and sounds very different. From what I heard in his single line in the trailer, he's definitely doing that American accent again for Star Trek.

It might be awkward.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 19 November 2008, 17:43:13
he looks exactly like Spock.

No.

But it works.

No.

It might be awkward.

YES.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 November 2008, 19:48:54
It's the damn nose. He looks like Spock at first but then they zoom into his cursed face and OHGODSYLAR how did you get here?

I knew who was playing Spock so damn long ago.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 19 November 2008, 21:50:31
(http://brainfag.com/journal/startrek_spock.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 22:00:57
I knew who was playing Spock so damn long ago.

Exactly.

he looks exactly like Spock.

No.

But it works.

No.

It might be awkward.

YES.

EXACTLY!

http://brainfag.com/journal/startrek_spock.jpg

EXACTAMUNDO!

EDIT:

Teaser Trailer: Horrible voice.

Theatrical: Looks... uh... wut? Are they making this seem as if this is the first ship of it's kind? Do people even have to train to be Captains now do they just recruit whoever? Also, yeah Sylar looks nothing like Spock other than his CLOTHES (and even then...). And Simon Pegleg isn't using an American voice. I don't know who said that but they are deaf.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 22:22:27
No, Simon Pegg definitely sounds like he's using his American accent. He's just really bad at it. I mean, not bad, but it sounds a lot different. Trust me. Go watch Big Nothing and then listen for his line in the Star Trek trailer and you'll know exactly what I mean.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 22:31:05
Who is he playing? Because he sounds like a crap Scottie, which would make more sense.

Sylar guy only looks like a Vulcan in that. Too bad his Sylar voice is his actual one and I'll never be able to not hear Sylar when he does what he calls acting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 22:33:52
Yeah, Pegg's playing Scotty.

Here's the trailer for Big Nothing in which he talks a lot so you'll easily be able to get a feel for his American accent:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwLruD9jDtU&feature=related

But yeah, after watching the Star Trek trailer again, I can't really tell. When he says "I like this ship," it clearly sounds 100% like his American accent and I have no doubts.

But then he says "It's exciting."

And it sounds like his normal voice. So I don't know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 November 2008, 22:37:04
If he's playing Scotty let's assume it's a Scott's accent, yeah?

Yeah.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 22:38:13
OH THAT SIMON WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO WITH HIM


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 November 2008, 23:14:26
OH THAT SIMON WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO WITH HIM
(http://img363.imageshack.us/img363/7213/simontm7.png)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 23:22:30
(http://www.vgmuseum.com/mrp/CVPics7/capn-image2.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 November 2008, 23:28:57
NOT ALLOWED >: (


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 23:33:52
(http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_02/cowellBIG1611_468x510.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 November 2008, 23:37:17
(http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/simon-pegg.jpg)

WOW I CAN'T BELIEVE I POSTED THIS BEFORE ASR I MUST BE A BIGGER FAN


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 November 2008, 23:46:33
CLEARLY

(http://www.randform.org/blog/wp-content/2006/07/Simon_game.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 November 2008, 00:40:33
(http://www.katfm.com/images/80s_nerds/Simon.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 20 November 2008, 04:28:23
(http://www.movieactors.com/freezes1/DemolitionMan38.jpeg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 November 2008, 04:29:41
Oh my God. There's no #####ing way anyone's topping that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 20 November 2008, 04:39:43
I BEG TO DIFFER

(http://www.fosterguitars.com/players/paul-simon.jpg)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 November 2008, 04:47:57
...

(http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/5589/simonhy3.png)

##### y'all..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 November 2008, 04:51:43
I BEG TO DIFFER

Don't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 November 2008, 22:44:05
AAAAAASTRO BOY!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y23aI4HO_w8)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 22 November 2008, 22:04:27
Hmm. Tim Burton's doing an Alice in Wonderland movie.

[spoiler]Supposedly, 19 year old Alice flees an arranged marriage, and falls for the Hatter.[/spoiler]

Johnny Depp is doing the Hatter, of course. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1087007/First-glimpse-Johnny-Depp-ghoulish-Mad-Hatter-Tim-Burtons-Alice-In-Wonderland.html)

And here is Alice. (http://infdaily.fusebox.com/2008/09/our-first-look-at-tim-burtons-alice-in-wonderland.html)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 November 2008, 22:18:40
Yeah I've heard about it, and as a big Alice in Wonderland fan I've decided I don't like this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 22 November 2008, 23:24:28
I'll watch it, and I'm kind of intrigued... but yeah, I got ya.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 November 2008, 00:11:40
I'll probably definitely watch it too. I really like few adaptations of it though. I really dislike the Disney cartoon, but loved the Disney live action show called "Adventures In Wonderland" when I was young.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 23 November 2008, 05:40:47
Johnny Depp is doing the Hatter, of course. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1087007/First-glimpse-Johnny-Depp-ghoulish-Mad-Hatter-Tim-Burtons-Alice-In-Wonderland.html)


"The chameleon Hollywood actor..."

No. Gary Oldman is a "chameleon" actor, if anyone.

Johnny Depp just looks like Johnny Depp in geisha Make-up and a carrot top wig.

I'm pretty sure I don't like this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 November 2008, 06:29:50
I don't specifically hate Johnny Depp, I just don't really like any of his movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 November 2008, 07:02:43
I liked Johnny Dupe before. Like, I love Edward Scissorhands and some of other older work.

But Tim Burton's mancrush on him, combined with things like Pirates and Depp winning some "funniest" actor award thing when up against actual comedies (namely Superbad and Knocked Up) have just made me loathe anything his name gets hookwormed onto.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 23 November 2008, 18:18:21
I much rather would have seen Tim Burton do a movie version of American McGee's Alice.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 23 November 2008, 19:22:44
You speak truth. EVERYBODY DIES!!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 November 2008, 05:23:09
So I finally saw How To Lose Friends And Alienate People.

I actually really, genuinely enjoyed it. I mean, I always like anything with Simon Pegg, even Run Fatboy Run, which I admit wasn't that good but I still liked.

But... I genuinely enjoyed this and thought it was very good. Definitely one of Kirsten Dunst's better roles, she was great in it. Oh, and Pegg was #####ing amazing in it. He really is a great actor.

I've heard that the actual memoirs of Toby Young are a lot less fictionalized than the movie, but even so, I'd really be interested in reading them, now. I really admired the character of Sidney (Toby) Young in the movie.

Posted on: 24 November 2008, 10:05:30

Just as excited to have FINALLY seen Zack and Miri Make a Porno. I was sure it was out of theaters already, but I'm home for break and there's like 8 theaters around where I live, so it turns out my friends and I found a theater that was still playing it and all went to go see it.

Definitely a keeper.

EDIT: Oh, and I just wanted to add: even though there's a whole segment of the movie devoted to Zack and Miri coming up with fake porn titles for movies... they all suck. I mean, "Lawrence of A Labia" was good. But that's about it. Everything else was so lame that if I had thought of it during one of my similar discussions with friends, I probably wouldn't have even said it out loud. That's really my only problem with the movie. Since, you know, fake porn titles for movies is a passion of mine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 November 2008, 00:11:22
Sommat should make a porn called Hairspray.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 November 2008, 00:14:44
That creates an amazing visual Mike.

I'm glad I already ate or I'd have lost my appetite.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 November 2008, 02:07:46
I love watching uncomfortable movies with my family. My mom was like "Let's all watch a movie together!" and she found Forgetting Sarah Marshall on Comcast OnDemand.

I was all "Oh, yeah, let's watch that!" knowing full well that there are about 7 full-on ##### shots.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 28 November 2008, 23:42:44
Here's another Star Trek trailer:

http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/11/25/extra-special-star-trek-trailer-launches-online/

This one has a tiny bit of difference in it... :)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 November 2008, 03:56:30
Saw Bolt today with some friends.

I really liked it. John Travolta's voice worked pretty well. Coulda' done without Miley Cyrus, but she was only in like 20% of the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 November 2008, 04:02:02
I would like to see that film some time....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 29 November 2008, 05:47:56
Hmm. Tim Burton's doing an Alice in Wonderland movie.

C'est bull#####!
Tim Burton's been a little emo bitch ever since Hot Topic raped The Nightmare Before Christmas.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 November 2008, 05:57:36
I doubt I'll ever watch Nightmare Before Christmas again because of how much people I hate love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 November 2008, 06:00:11
I watched it again not too long ago, but it had been years before that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 29 November 2008, 06:02:46
I doubt I'll ever watch Nightmare Before Christmas again because of how much people I hate love it.

I feel the exact same way.
It was my favorite movie as a child.
I'd weep for what's become of it, but emo kids stole crying too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 November 2008, 06:03:45
emo kids stole crying too.

Damn emo kids.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 29 November 2008, 06:05:43
They'd all be gone by now if any of 'em had the balls to actually kill themselves.
Too bad they're all a bunch of pussies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 November 2008, 06:08:44
But yeah, back to Bolt.

It was just, well, really good. I loved the animation on how they got the mannerisms for all the characters just PERFECT. You'll see what I mean. It's got a lot of active and hyper characters that really just come to life. I especially liked Penny's agent.

There was a nice little Finding Nemo reference, too, which further confused this whole thing with all my friends thinking it was another Pixar film. Which it's not, by the way, for anyone who still doesn't get that. But it's definitely up there quality-wise. I was extremely impressed.

It was a lot of fun to watch. Never a dull moment, truly. Kids are going to go NUTS for this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 30 November 2008, 03:44:39
I'd weep for what's become of it, but emo kids stole crying too.

Damn emo kids.

My neighbors have a bunch of them, keep then it little stocks, and let them run around in their backyard.

I don't know how many times those big bastards knocked down my fence, running fast, and breaking my windows with their beaks!

Making loud, booming, drumming noises all hours of the night!

They broke my cat's PSP!

They ate my prize bug collection! Do you know how hard it is to get a Bogong moth this time of year?!

My lawn is always getting eaten and dug up by these bastards.

I can't wait until spring, when my neighbors are finall gonna take these things to the butcher.

I HOPE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 November 2008, 03:58:50
Okay, wow. I thought this was really neat. I've been inadvertantly throwing my ticket stubs from every movie I've seen in a drawer in my room at home all year.

The only movie I've seen while at college this year was Quantum of Solace, and that stub happened to be in my sweatshirt pocket. But everything else I saw at random theaters while at home.

I lined up all the tickets, they start in January with Cloverfield and go all the way to today with Four Christmases (don't ask, I had to see it with my parents.)

Cloverfield (1/24/08)
Jumper (3/07/08)
Harold and Kumar 2 (4/26/08)
Forgetting Sarah Marshall (5/10/08)
Hancock (7/08/08)
The Incredible Hulk (7/10/08)
The Dark Knight (7/17/08)
The Dark Knight (7/29/08)
Pineapple Express (8/08/08)
Tropic Thunder (8/13/08)
Tropic Thunder (forgot the date, ticket stub at school)
Quantum of Solace (11/16/08)
Zack & Miri Make a Porno (11/26/08)
Bolt (11/28/08)
Four Christmases (11/29/08)

I thought it was really cool, especially since every ticket reminded me of a completely different story as to what was going on that day.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 November 2008, 07:02:30
I don't understand what's so cool about the list.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 November 2008, 07:03:33
Nothing. The list is irrelevant. The movies are irrelevant. I just like that I accidentally ended up having the ticket stub to every movie I've seen all year.

Shush, Mike. You're ruining it for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 30 November 2008, 08:48:54
Your list is simultaneously:
A: a fair representation of the movies that were/are worth seeing
and B: more diverse than anything I would have seen myself


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 30 November 2008, 13:27:17
I doubt I'll ever watch Nightmare Before Christmas again because of how much people I hate love it.

I finally saw it last year and just didn't understand what the fuss was about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 November 2008, 16:53:25
It's nothing special at all. It's cool that it's all claymation and Jack is a pretty cool character but aside from that it's not that special. But you can at least understand why it's the sort of thing that would develop into the cult following it is today? It's just got all those qualities that make teen girls obsess over it, even if I can't properly identify those qualities.

Your list is simultaneously:
A: a fair representation of the movies that were/are worth seeing
and B: more diverse than anything I would have seen myself


Ha. Yeah. And I just realized that Wall-E is missing, too. I saw that the weekend it came out. Must've lost the ticket. There's probably another one somewhere that I forgot, too.

EDIT: Oh, and Iron Man! Duh. Wow. Not as exciting to me now that I'm missing some.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 November 2008, 19:25:06
I doubt I'll ever watch Nightmare Before Christmas again because of how much people I hate love it.

I finally saw it last year and just didn't understand what the fuss was about.

I saw it for the first time recently too. With people raving about it you'd think it was the best thing ever made, but I only thought it was okay. I only really liked one song, and it's the one I heard long before I saw the movie.

Apparently it being claymation made it the first of its kind? That might have had something to do with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 November 2008, 19:30:49
I really like the "What's this?!" song. Actually I love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 November 2008, 19:32:53
EXACTLY.

Though the melody of it reminds me of that old "Rupert" show, at times.
That was a weird show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 30 November 2008, 19:33:36
When I first saw NBC all of those years ago I thought nothing special of it. When I saw it again recently about six months ago I still thought nothing special of it.

Good movie to watch, but, like Rocky Horror, it shouldn't have the fan base it does.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 November 2008, 19:40:14
Ugh. Rocky Horror I will NEVER understand.

I can at least see why people could really obsess over Nightmare Before Christmas, because they're the same sort of people who love Invader Zim even more than I do and shop at Hot Topic. It's a group of people.

But Rocky Horror Picture Show... no. Never.

And dude, Majikn. Rupert. Yes. That WAS a weird show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 30 November 2008, 20:08:35
I like the Rocky Horror Picture Show because it's fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 November 2008, 20:30:00
Rupert was one of the best shows ever.

I like all the Nightmare Before Christmas Songs enough. I like the characters more than the actual story. Like I loved them in Kingdom Hearts more than I even like the movie. My boss has the soundtrack at the store, and I really like Oogie Boogie's song where he's like "You're joking, you're joking, I can't believe my eyes! You're joking me, you gotta be, this can't be the right guy! He's ancient, he's ugly, I don't know which is worse. I might just split a seam now If I don't die laughing first!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 30 November 2008, 21:30:30
Rocky Horror is great, but is ruined by the uberfans.

Just like Guitar Hero.

And everything else good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 30 November 2008, 22:21:38
I doubt I'll ever watch Nightmare Before Christmas again because of how much people I hate love it.

I finally saw it last year and just didn't understand what the fuss was about.

Honestly, it's just a fun little movie with a couple catchy songs.

It seemed a lot better when I was a kid, and it first came out.

Me and my dad even saw Tim Burton sneaking out of a book store, where people were trying to get his autograph.

I had no idea who he was/what he looked like/just wanted to use the bathroom anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 November 2008, 23:13:14
Rocky Horror is great, but is ruined by the uberfans.

Just like Guitar Hero.

And everything else good.

Ouch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 December 2008, 18:05:36
Watched Memento.

Wow. Good flick. I love non-linear storytelling, really engages your mind as you watch it, forcing you to become very engrossed in the film.

Reccomended.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 December 2008, 22:29:37
Rocky Horror is great, but is ruined by the uberfans.

Just like Guitar Hero.

And everything else good.

Ouch.

He's completely right, though.

...

Whoo!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 12 December 2008, 04:11:10
Uh... Does anyone care about Dragon Ball Evolution?
'Cause I just watched the trailer and suddenly started giving a damn.
It's like the Mario Bros. movie, but with Dragon Ball!
That's #####ing awesome!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 December 2008, 04:15:50
Is there a trailer? Or... is it called Dragon Ball Evolution or are you talking about something completely different?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 12 December 2008, 04:19:05
Uh... This movie?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo4t8PeqJ6E


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 12 December 2008, 05:21:33
It looks like it'll be a decent movie.

But a terrible Dragonball movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 December 2008, 05:39:08
AHAHAHAHA.




AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA.


Okay, sorry.





AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAA.

Now I need to see that.

Ohmygod "cool." He said "cool" like that. Ohmygod. Listen to how he said "cool."

AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 12 December 2008, 19:48:21
Am going to see that "The Day The Earth Stood Still" movie today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 12 December 2008, 19:55:25
Cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 12 December 2008, 19:58:51
Radical.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 12 December 2008, 20:00:01
I have always been a fan of end of the world movies for some reason. I find them interesting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 December 2008, 20:31:57
Same here, but they're all terrible movies.

Which is okay because they're guilty-pleasure viewings.

Like, The Day After Tomorrow is one of my favorite horrible big-budget movies.

I mean, Jake Gylenhaal gets chased down a #####ing hallway by GLOBAL WARMING in the climax.

A CHASE SCENE WITH GLOBAL WARMING.

AND WOLVES.

Nothing can beat that.

And I still haven't seen The Core or whatever that was but that seems like another candidate for hilariously-bad-disaster-movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 12 December 2008, 20:46:08
Radical.

I hope you know I was referencing the Dragon Ball movie with that.

Unless you just like saying radical randomly you damn radical.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 December 2008, 21:08:49
The Core is decent.
The Day After Tomorrow is "eh."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 December 2008, 21:49:47
With my sense of humor, there was no way I wasn't going to love The Day After Tomorrow, billed as a disaster movie about highly fictionalized and exxaggerated global warming.

The problem is that it was meant to be serious.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 December 2008, 00:56:06
[...]highly fictionalized and exxaggerated global warming.

Just like real life!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 01:21:11
An Inconvenient Highly Fictionalized and Exaggerated Global Truth?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 December 2008, 02:45:06
Radical.

I hope you know I was referencing the Dragon Ball movie with that.

Unless you just like saying radical randomly you damn radical.

Cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 03:29:05
I'm super serial! I told you Manbearpig was real!


So, I just watched Who Framed Roger Rabbit? for the first time in who-knows-how-many years.

Totally forgot how awesome that movie was.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 09:16:56
My frienemy loves it too much for me to really like it anymore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 19:18:33
The little Roger Rabbit cartoon short from before Honey, I Shrunk The Kids produces so much nostalgia for me. The one where Baby Herman swallows the rattle and then Roger takes him to the hospital, and then he swallows it by accident, etc.

But yeah, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is fantastic if only for being the only place ever where you can find Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny together in the same scene. I like all those "animated cartoons mixed with live acting" movies. Space Jam is awesome.

I haven't seen Looney Tunes: Back in Action, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 20:23:49
Space Jam, no matter how much I loved it, is NOT awesome. It is actually pretty bad, unless you're a kid or remember it from when you were a kid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 20:38:02
Quiet, you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 20:49:04
If I hit 'em high hit 'em high hit 'em high,
then you hit 'em low hit 'em low hit 'em low.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 December 2008, 22:33:32
Goin' straight through the hole
You ain't got no game
I'm breakin' ya out the frame
Coming through like a train
Looking to take over the world is my goal
With my unstoppable crew takin' all control
You can't get none of this, we're runnin' this
Well taker, earth shaker, 3 point gunnin' this
Get out the lane, I'm comin' through
And if you don't wanna move then I'm comin' right through you

Also, I never really cared for WFRR. No particular reason why, it just never did it for me.

I LOVED Cool World though. Go figure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 23:02:18
Never seen that. After looking it up just now, I think I'd like to.

Anyway, just randomly watched a movie called The Ex. I started watching for a little bit just to see what it was because it had Zach Braff in it. And then suddenly Jason Bateman appeared.

He was playing a total asshole. A handicapped asshole. I loved it.

The movie itself was pretty meh, though.

And I still can't figure out why it was called The Ex. Like... the movie said that Bateman's character had sex with Braff's wife once in high school, but never said they were dating or anything. Basically there was no reason to call it The Ex. Admittedly there isn't really a good title I can think of, maybe just Watch Jason Bateman Act Like A Complete Sociopath Asshole For A While.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 23:16:24
Goin' straight through the hole
You ain't got no game
I'm breakin' ya out the frame
Coming through like a train
Looking to take over the world is my goal
With my unstoppable crew takin' all control
You can't get none of this, we're runnin' this
Well taker, earth shaker, 3 point gunnin' this
Get out the lane, I'm comin' through
And if you don't wanna move then I'm comin' right through you

It's like inch by inch and step by step;
I'm closing in on your position and destruction is my mission,
Though eight is not enough, your whole squad better duck.
It's like switch when I bust
Now you're whole crew is dust!
Comin' through my area, I'mma have to bury ya,
The real scream team on your scream scene.
It's like showdown on the range
Go tell me who wanna tangle with the
ghetto witch-doctor neighborhood superhero?

We want it aaaaalll!

(Uhm... Yeah, I have this song on my iPod...)


And yeah, Cool World is good. I like most Ralph Bakshi stuff. But I hate his Lord Of The Rings like I hate polio (verily).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 23:19:02
Polio just sounds like food to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 December 2008, 23:19:34
Or a clothing line


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 December 2008, 23:21:51
I definitely wouldn't want to wear or eat polio.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 December 2008, 23:25:31
I didn't say it was fashionable/tasty.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 December 2008, 04:00:57
I saw The Spirit in an advance screening tonight. It was alright. I might have just been tired, I don't know, but I didn't really think it was all that until the second half. It picked up well there. Definitely find Frank Miller to be up his own ass now, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 December 2008, 06:11:26
Watched The day the earth stood still. It was alright, haven't watched the original.

Gort was pretty boss, though. The movie would be 90% #####tier if he didn't do what he did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 December 2008, 18:13:31
Just watched a new Watchmen trailer or something that I hadn't seen before.

I am sooooo pumped.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 December 2008, 02:49:18
I just saw the movie "Wanted"


Not a bad flick at all.
Worth a watch, and it's got a pretty good plot for what it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 21 December 2008, 00:23:51
It looks silly! Who else is hyping for The Spirit?

Oh, and I read the leaked script for Transformers 2. All I can say is.. wow.

SOUNDWAVE ##### YEAH!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 December 2008, 01:40:48
SOUNDWAVE YESSSSS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 December 2008, 19:52:36
I saw Bolt today.

Worth watching.

Posted on: December 20, 2008, 09:54:27 PM

I have now also watched-
Sex and Death 101 (weird, crude, but kind of funny)
Run Fatboy Run (Swell film, predictable ending)
and am currently watching Step Brothers.

We are getting a nor-easter right now.
By tomorrow morning, we will have 16 inches of snow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 December 2008, 20:03:13
Yeah, Run Fatboy Run was, like, balanced on that tiny threshold between good movie and bad movie. Simon Pegg and Dylan Moran were the film's saving grace. I just felt like it couldn't decide whether to be a stupid comedy or a romantic comedy. And I know, it's clearly possible to be both, but if you've seen the movie, you know what I mean. But yeah, I like it.

Step Brothers, I hated in theaters but I still feel like I'll like it more the next time I see it. That happened with Talladega Nights, at least.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 December 2008, 21:26:30
And Anchorman?


Step Brothers wasn't so bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 December 2008, 22:40:26
I LOVED Anchorman the first time I saw it. And every time after. Love it to death. Still one of my favorites.

I think Anchorman and Zoolander are my two favorite stupid-movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 22 December 2008, 18:03:16
It looks silly! Who else is hyping for The Spirit?

OH! OH!

I'm not!

Speaking of, here's the story about The Spirit movie (http://io9.com/5109022/the-spirit-movie-you-never-saw) that should have been but never was (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2008/12/the-spirit-that.html)...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 December 2008, 18:52:01
I love Brad Bird. That would've been fantastic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 22 December 2008, 21:10:07
Ya know what movie pisses me off already?
The Unborn or Unborn or whatever.
First of all it looks stupid, I saw a long trailer of it awhile back.
It seems to try really hard to be scary but doesn't succeed in anyway, it doesn't even get D minus for effort. The best it can do is people doing crab walks with upside down heads and kids.
Also characterizing unborn and/or miscarried children as evil really pisses me off for personal reasons.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 December 2008, 21:13:44
Any movie that relies on gore and gorey violence to be successful will not be.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 22 December 2008, 21:15:30
The horror genre has forgotten suspense and suprise is worth far more than gore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 December 2008, 21:40:54
It looks silly! Who else is hyping for The Spirit?

Right. Like I said (http://www.megaman.co.uk/mboard/index.php?topic=149.msg59788#msg59788), The Spirit wasn't very good.

I've realized I wasn't just tired. The movie was not good. I only know two people who liked it, and one only liked it because he has a boner for Frank Miller and The Spirit.

But that movie didn't know what it was supposed to be. The dialogue that was basically just like The Spirit books totally didn't fit with the OTHER dialogue in the movie. And virtually everyone was lame except The Spirit, The Octopus, and his helper girl. But that's not saying all that much. They should have done it like a Dick Tracy, and not try for that Sin City look that did not work for it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 December 2008, 04:26:14
Just watched Ghost Town with Ricky Gervais.

I really liked it. Like, it was cute, and it had a good sense of humor. Definitely reccomend it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 December 2008, 04:36:30
I really want to see The Curious Case of Benjamen Button.

Born old, ages backwards.
Sounds neato.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 December 2008, 04:44:11
I saw the preview. Looked interesting, but not so much so that I really wanted to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 23 December 2008, 16:41:20
Recent movies:

Transporter 3 -  Not as good as the other two, but a decent addition to the series. Vaguely annoyed about the "crazy bitch" in the movie poster with the mascara down her face and the guns. In the movie, the girl never even holds a gun and she isn't out to kill Frank. THEY LIED TO ME.

Punisher: War Zone - Holy ##### what an awesome movie. They got everything about it right, and I love this movie to pieces. It only took them three films to get it right. Tons of violence, gore, dark humor...everything the other Punisher films should have had.

The Day the Earth Stood Still - It was okay, a solid three stars. Gort was cool, but in all reality, Fox could've made this a made for TV movie and still be in the same boat. And have saved themselves 70-75 million dollars.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 December 2008, 20:20:52
Little known fact; "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is actually a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald that was adapted to a graphic novel by Nunzio DeFilippis and Christina Weir and is now adapted to film by David Fincher.

I found the graphic novel at work a week or two ago, so I might read that first/instead.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 December 2008, 20:31:57
That's the last movie I'd have thought had some graphic novel roots.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 December 2008, 20:34:33
Contrary to popular belief, they don't only make graphic novels about costumed mystery men.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 December 2008, 20:39:07
Little known fact; "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is actually a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald that was adapted to a graphic novel by Nunzio DeFilippis and Christina Weir and is now adapted to film by David Fincher.

I found the graphic novel at work a week or two ago, so I might read that first/instead.

I knew it was a short story at least.

I just saw "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World"
For free.
On hulu.com.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/1522/master-and-commander-the-far-side-of-the-world

It's a great site to go watch any shows you've missed recently (that they have) and some movies.
For instance, I recently also watched the Fifth Element there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 December 2008, 21:21:11
Yeah. Hulu. It's a great idea, but it's still locked to the USA only so I gotta wait that out.

I miss Stage6.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 24 December 2008, 00:13:55
Right. Like I said (http://www.megaman.co.uk/mboard/index.php?topic=149.msg59788#msg59788), The Spirit wasn't very good.

I've realized I wasn't just tired. The movie was not good. I only know two people who liked it, and one only liked it because he has a boner for Frank Miller and The Spirit.

But that movie didn't know what it was supposed to be. The dialogue that was basically just like The Spirit books totally didn't fit with the OTHER dialogue in the movie. And virtually everyone was lame except The Spirit, The Octopus, and his helper girl. But that's not saying all that much. They should have done it like a Dick Tracy, and not try for that Sin City look that did not work for it.

Thanks for saving me the trouble of seeing it, Mike. Once again, someone else suffers for my benefit.

Recent movies:
Punisher: War Zone - Holy ##### what an awesome movie. They got everything about it right, and I love this movie to pieces. It only took them three films to get it right. Tons of violence, gore, dark humor...everything the other Punisher films should have had.

Huh? Really? I heard nothing but bad reviews, from regular movie goers, and Punisher fans alike. In fact, that movie bombed, badly, at the box office.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 December 2008, 00:51:13
I also liked War Zone.

But I didn't think it was that good. Knowing it was made for DVD release helps. It was what Speed said, but whether that's awesome to you or not is opinion in the same way that people like Alien Vs. Predator or Death Race (I dislike the former, but liked the latter somehow).

I've heard good and bad opinions, but from the people I know are Punisher fans of the bunch, I've only heard good.

It was, at the least, kinda fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 December 2008, 06:48:26
Gran Torino. Good #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 December 2008, 06:25:50
Punisher: War Zone probably would've have bombed as badly if they had kept the original October release date. December was a terrible idea. Who (besides me) wants to see an super violent, bloody action film so close to Christmas?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 December 2008, 16:58:56
Yeah, I wouldn't have bothered to go see it if it wasn't free.

It wasn't really that gory though. Other then a face or two caving in and some people exploding.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 26 December 2008, 21:16:25
In a few minuets, I'm going to go see Yes Man. I've heard that it wasn't as funny as people thought it were going to be, but I'll be watching it with an open mind, so I won't care.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 December 2008, 21:16:45
Saw No Country For Old Men.

Will watch Burn After Reading later.

Want to see Yes Man eventually, but I'm in Aruba.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 28 December 2008, 04:20:13
No Country For Old Men.

I saw half of that on demand a few months ago. I wanna see it all now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 28 December 2008, 04:25:35
Dude...
I realized somethin'.
The entire Children of the Corn series is #####ing retarded.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 December 2008, 04:26:47
No Country For Old Men was great. No music in the soundtrack, or at least that I noticed. Gave it a very unique and real atmosphere. It's a bit slow, but I really liked it.

JUST finished Burn After Reading.

I love movies that bring together a bunch of great performers, and this totally delivered. You've got George Clooney, John Malkovich (absolutely spectacular), Brad Pitt (fun as always), J.K. Simmons, Tilda Swinton, and more.
The plot is great, too. I love the scenes with J.K. Simmons that summarize little bits of what happened and how inconsequential everything is.
It's like... so much everything means so much nothing. Great intertwining-plotline movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 December 2008, 04:49:47
No Country for Old Men was good.
Until the end.

It left a lot of confusion and turned a type of suspense film into some pansy movie about feelings.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 December 2008, 05:06:48
You're a pansy movie about feelings.

I watched it with my dad and brother, and they both HATED the ending. And I know you were joking, but seriously, every good suspense movie relies entirely on feelings or else it won't work. That's almost the point. But I do know what you mean.

I just felt it was appropriate.

It was more a cat-and-mouse movie than a suspense movie, anyway. Though you can't really just have a "suspense movie." There needs to be some other way to classify it.

My brother didn't believe me that No Country for Old Men and Burn After Reading were both directed by the Coen brothers, heh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 December 2008, 05:12:57
NCfOM was a letdown.
The whole thing build up to this confrontation that doesn't happen, then the story is resolved with the killer on the run.

I mean hell, who finishes a movie without showing what really happened to the protagonist? Then introducing some completely new person who's related to someone the viewer doesn't care that much about to give the moral of the story.

It's just a disappointment.

Highlights of the movie were the 'gunfight' in the streets and the mariachi band soon after.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 December 2008, 05:19:39
I really had absolutely no idea what NCFOM was about before I watched it, I just knew I wanted to see it. Thus, I watched it with absolutely ZERO expectations, aside from knowing it won Best Picture, though that really doesn't mean much nowadays.

I can totally see how it disappoints, though. It just didn't disappoint me because I wasn't even in any sort of mindset while watching... I was just watching and nothing else. Best way to watch a movie.

On that note, does anyone take their movie-watching as seriously as I do? Ha, I mean, like... if a movie I haven't seen yet that I've been meaning to is on TV, I'll refuse to be in the room or make them change the channel or turn the TV off. Or, if it's noisy and there are distractions while I'm watching a movie for the first time, I'll stop it and watch it later.

And, like, if I know I'm going to watch a movie that I haven't seen but want to with a group of friends later, I'll make sure to watch it on my own privately beforehand.

I dunno.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 28 December 2008, 17:59:52
Dude...
I realized somethin'.
The entire Children of the Corn series is #####ing retarded.
Wow, really? :o

Anyway, I'm hoping the Friday the 13th remake wont suck. I'm saving up points on my Regal card, just so I won't have to pay a full $7 for it, cause it will most likely be pretty disappointing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 28 December 2008, 19:00:25
Dude...
I realized somethin'.
The entire Children of the Corn series is #####ing retarded.
Wow, really? :o

Conglaturations!
I hate you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 December 2008, 20:52:50
Dude...
I realized somethin'.
The entire Children of the Corn series is #####ing retarded.
Wow, really? :o

Anyway, I'm hoping the Friday the 13th remake wont suck. I'm saving up points on my Regal card, just so I won't have to pay a full $7 for it, cause it will most likely be pretty disappointing.

You don't 'save up' points, when you reach a certain point count they force you to have a free popcorn, or soda, or candy, and movie ticket that WILL expire.

Just go on a Tuesday when a large popcorn is like 2 bucks for regal card holders.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Winged Warrior on 29 December 2008, 02:24:51
So last night we went out to watch "yesman"

For what originally SEEMED like a 'liar liar' ripoff...

It was DAMN good. I forgot what good comedy was, what with those #####ty Adam Sandler films and all. Jim Carry is indeed showing his age, but his humor has yet to yield.  I suggest you watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 29 December 2008, 02:36:52
Yes MAn

It was DAMN good. I forgot what good comedy was, what with those #####ty Adam Sandler films and all. Jim Carry is indeed showing his age, but his humor has yet to yield.  I suggest you watch it.
PREACH IT!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Winged Warrior on 29 December 2008, 02:45:13
no.

[spoiler]NoMan! NoMan!NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan!NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan!NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan!NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan!NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan! NoMan![/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: AlexThePenguin on 29 December 2008, 02:54:07
Tee hee~

I also quite enjoyed Yes Man. I liked how the trailers didn't give away so much that the movie was unenjoyable because of them. They left themselves enough to need to be tied together. It was excellent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 29 December 2008, 02:55:01
Agreed. Most movies use too much scenes in their trailers nowadays.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: AlexThePenguin on 29 December 2008, 02:59:12
It's very annoying, yes.

Too many trailers ruin even good movies, so I'm not sure how people figure that their crapfilms for which they practically release the whole feature in previews will sell well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 29 December 2008, 03:07:08
Trailers should be more like the ol' Star Wars trailers were back in the day. Those trailers barely showed any scenes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 December 2008, 03:33:52
God, you guys are killing me. I've been wanting to see Yes Man for so long. There's ONE theater in Aruba and it's not showing there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 29 December 2008, 03:43:42
There's ONE theater in Aruba and it's not showing there.
>:D

I can't wait to get it on DVD. I love that movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 30 December 2008, 00:08:49
I watched Behind Enemy Lines and Hancock, both of which were rubbish.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 December 2008, 00:21:53
The first half of Hancock was okay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 30 December 2008, 00:22:25
When he's hired as a Super hero, everything goes downhill.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 December 2008, 00:28:46
The first half of Hancock was okay.

Exactly. In fact, I rather enjoyed that half.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 December 2008, 01:09:38
The second half was boring and that dumb twist was just moronic.

I hate to say it, but I really didn't like Michael Bluth here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 December 2008, 01:12:01
I sometimes get the feeling he could be a bit of a d-bag in real life but probably not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 December 2008, 05:29:39
In all the interviews I've seen him in, he seems pretty down-to-earth and fun, if a bit witty and sarcastic. I remember something promoting Hancock where he kept making jokes and Will Smith wasn't really getting any of them.

Oh, and watch The Ex. Well, it's not that good of a movie, but it's basically just him being the biggest dick he's ever played.

Posted on: 30 December 2008, 01:16:32

...just watched Leatherheads.

My dad bought it, since I'd normally never be caught dead buying a sports movie. I don't usually care for them.

But hot damn.

This was actually really good. Definitely an underlooked gem. George Clooney, Renee Zelweggerwhatever and John Krasinski all gave truly fantastic performances, and the plot was surprisingly engaging. They didn't actually play too much football, and the pacing was still great. And even in the mandatory "big game at the end of the movie finale", it was fresh and original and I really liked it.

It also seems like the sort of thing to be based on a true story. Things like the war story scandal seem iffy, though. The war story anecdote is hilarious and would make the movie even if the rest sucked, which it didn't. Very good.

Posted on: 30 December 2008, 04:25:14

And then last night I rewatched The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie since I've been on a H2G2 kick again lately.

God. I'm so hard on this movie. It's like, I don't watch it for a while and then I start constantly badmouthing it to no end. And then I watch it again... and I fall in love.

I think it's because it's such a beautiful movie. The landscapes and effects and overall atmosphere is so breathtakingly gorgeous that there's no way I can't keep falling in love with it. I've come to the conclusion that Mos Def isn't a bad Ford Prefect, it's just that he's vastly underplayed in the second half of the movie.
Sam Rockwell is definitely the best Zaphod in my own opinion, though I'm sure others will disagree.
And Martin Freeman does a fabulous job as usual, and I've always commended him for pulling off this role perfectly.
...oh, and Zooey Deschanel... my god. She's my own little celeb-crush, I love her in everything she's in. Everything from Elf to Weeds. I also really want to see Yes Man because of her. I think it's those giant blue eyes. It has to be those giant blue eyes.

But yeah, the one thing the movie did absolutely perfectly is Marvin. From what I know, Douglas himself designed the new Marvin before he died, and he was meant to look like an extremely elegant and high-class robot that wears himself in such a depressed way.

It's why I own a 10" action figure thing of the movie-version of Marvin with light-up eyes. The TV-show Marvin is pretty ugly and not even what you'd expect him to look like, and for those who haven't seen that Marvin, it makes an appearance in the movie during the queueing scene of Vogsphere.

I mean, I guess I do like the movie. In a few months when I haven't watched it for a while, I'll probably start badmouthing it again. Whatever.

That scene when Slartibartfast takes Arthur down into Magrathea... it's so amazing, it gets me every time. When the movie ends, I always go to scene selection and watch that scene again. And that business with the Point Of View Gun and Marvin at the end was genius.

And that final image of Douglas Adams followed by a dedication to him... makes up for anything the movie might've done wrong.

Posted on: 30 December 2008, 17:35:48

Seriously, this is just depressing. Four posts in a row. Thanks guys, for posting in between and not making seem like such a jackass.

I just watched Tropic Thunder with the cast commentary.

Oh my god.

All I have to say is:
"I don't drop character 'till I done the DVD commentary!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 December 2008, 05:31:19
I saw The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button tonight, and really liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 December 2008, 05:37:06
I saw The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button tonight, and really liked it.

Worth spending 6.75 to see?

Also ASR, I find that hilarious.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 December 2008, 05:48:53
I wouldn't see it again soon, it's long and stuff, but it was worth my cash and I definitely liked it, even though I'm not really in a good mental place for some stuff right now. I paid for two other people as well, but it's OK because it was cheap night.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 December 2008, 05:58:25
Sweet.
I'll go see it soon then.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 1 January 2009, 04:25:08
Today they put "Fluke" on TV.
ALL the movies starring animals I have seen are REALLY boring.
All the bethoven films, the Air Bud ones, Bingo, Jack, the monkey that played hockey(What?) and that movie with this cat that in spanish was called Chatran.
There are a lot more.
They are all TRASH.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Winged Warrior on 1 January 2009, 04:33:57
HAHA.

I remember fluke.

Give me your address and I'll send you my DVD copy of it.

... How I got it is a long story involving having ONE family friendly film in my library.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 January 2009, 05:01:15
Today they put "Fluke" on TV.
ALL the movies starring animals I have seen are REALLY boring.
All the bethoven films, the Air Bud ones, Bingo, Jack, the monkey that played hockey(What?) and that movie with this cat that in spanish was called Chatran.
There are a lot more.
They are all TRASH.

"DUNSTIN CHECKS IN" WOULD LIKE A WORD WITH YOU


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 1 January 2009, 05:04:33
I saw Bed Time Stories tonight, and for a Disney film (not to mention an Adam Sandler comedy), it was actually pretty nice.

Oh so nice........

I like nice. It makes me hapee.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 January 2009, 07:45:07
The monkey was MVP you ass. MOST. VALUABLE. PRIMATE.
RECOGNIZE.


Really though, I've never seen it and I don't want to.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 1 January 2009, 07:45:49
You're not missing much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 January 2009, 07:46:45
That much I am sure of.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 1 January 2009, 11:03:17
Right now, I'm watching GoldenEye on TV.

I was going to have Spider Man 3 be the first movie to be seen by me in 2009, but whenever GoldenEye is on, I have to watch it. It was, and always will be, my favorite Bond movie. (Casino Royale is my second, naturally.)

Maybe the awesome video game contributed to my to how much I love this movie?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 1 January 2009, 17:36:55
I just like it when the credits come on while we're waiting for everyone to leave the theatre.

The credits play Don't Stop Believin'

It's a nice alternative to the Miley Cyrus and Jonas Brothers songs that play on the TV screens set up all over the lobby several times a day.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 January 2009, 21:25:44
What's so natural about Casino Royale being someone's second favourite Bond movie?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 January 2009, 04:33:33
Maybe it's natural to his personality.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 2 January 2009, 04:37:30
Or possibly to my taste.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 January 2009, 04:38:24
I just feel like this is as good a time as any to throw in the funniest line I've heard about Quantum of Solace from a while back before I forget to share it forever:

"I hope it isn't as faggy as its title."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 January 2009, 07:19:48
Maybe it's natural to his personality.

Yes, which would be fine if we knew anything about him before that post.

It's like meeting someone and then minutes later being like, "Yeah! And you know me and my patches jackets!"

Like, no. I don't. I don't know that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 January 2009, 16:41:42
Maybe he was born into a royal family that owns casinos.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 January 2009, 17:49:30
Oh, Alec.

Anyway I was mocking, in a joking sort of way. I haven't really seen the movie so I can't vouch for how natural it would be to rate it your second favourite Bond movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 2 January 2009, 23:54:45
So I saw The Spirit.
It was okay.
It felt like watching a comic book.
It dragged at points.
The action was hilariously over the top.
Samuel L. Jackson is the #####.
It was funny sometimes.
And the whole movie was pretty hot.
But I can see why a bunch of people don't like it.
The credits were really hard to sit through with that annoying-ass song playing the whole time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 2 January 2009, 23:59:41
I watched Get Smart.

Unlike the original TV show, I really liked this. It wasn't the all-slapstick comedy I thought it was going to be.

Stevey was great, as always.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 3 January 2009, 00:02:41
You didn't like the show?
Are you sure you were watching Get Smart?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 January 2009, 01:24:01
It felt like watching a comic book.

A bad one.

Maybe he was born into a royal family that owns casinos.

Where reportedly bad stories take place, maybe.

Oh, Alec.

Anyway I was mocking, in a joking sort of way. I haven't really seen the movie so I can't vouch for how natural it would be to rate it your second favourite Bond movie.

I've heard nothing good, really. ::shrug::


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 01:25:35
You didn't like the show?
Not really. Maybe it was because I was too young to understand anything. I'll try watching it again when it's on TV.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 January 2009, 02:08:41
I watched Seven Pounds the other day, very great, almost cried at the end I did! I really suggest people watch this, it's a real zinger.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 3 January 2009, 02:33:46
I watched Seven Pounds the other day, very great, almost cried at the end I did!

Because of your female hormones or because it was truly emotionally moving?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 02:35:46
I heard Will Smith cries in this movie too. He cries a lot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 January 2009, 02:46:18
Well, he does kill himself in a bathtub, except he doesn't use a razor on his wrist! What he does use is a twist!

I watched Seven Pounds the other day, very great, almost cried at the end I did!

Because of your female hormones or because it was truly emotionally moving?

Why bother answering? You'll probably just draw me with breasts saying otherwise.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 January 2009, 02:50:27
WELL GEE THANKS WIND


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 January 2009, 03:05:37
He says he's gonna kill himself. Literally the first thing said in the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 03:11:41
He's an obligatory emo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 January 2009, 03:15:08
He says he's gonna kill himself.

EVERYBODY SAYS THAT ONCE IN THEIR LIFE WHEN THEY'RE REALLY ANGRY

NOT EVERYBODY DOES IT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 January 2009, 03:21:35
I'm still mad you said that Wind, because I might've watched the movie thinking maybe he wouldn't end up doing it.

And I really wanted to see that but now I'm kind of put off, but I'm supposed to see it with someone so I guess I'll still go.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 3 January 2009, 03:59:35
You still got the "how does he do it?" to look forward to!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 04:56:34
Look at this little bit I found:

http://www.movietome.com/infocus/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=775220

Oh noes


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 3 January 2009, 05:02:41
Why bother answering? You'll probably just draw me with breasts saying otherwise.

You know you love when I do that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 January 2009, 05:26:44
Look at this little bit I found:

http://www.movietome.com/infocus/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=775220

Oh noes

Speculation.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 06:29:06
o look:

http://my.spill.com/profiles/blogs/new-art-from-astro-boy

yays i gess

Oh and here's a Spill.com rating for : Seven Pounds


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 3 January 2009, 22:09:30
Saw Gran Torino the other day. I really liked it.

Though not everyone's acting was up to the job.

Eastwood kind of out-acted everyone in the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 3 January 2009, 23:19:27
I just watched Mr. Jingles.

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51H8684EMJL._SL500_AA240_.jpg)

......wow........this was......ugh. The camera sucked, the actors sucked, the story sucked, the MOVIE sucked. Why did Liongates produce this? WHY? It's like the budget for this film was $100. I mean......GOD! I've wasted my life! AND THREE DOLLARS. GAAAH!!

Y-you know what? W-we need Pennywise again. mkay? He was awesome. I-I can't wait to see the remake of IT on Sci-Fi.

Well, anyway, sorry if I sound really stupid with all the CAPITAL LETTERS, but.....it was that bad.......GAAAAAH!!!!!!!

I-I need to watch a good movie. R-right away! Where's my copy of Citizen Kane?!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 4 January 2009, 02:26:30
STUTTERING STANLEY! STUTTERING STANLEY!

Got back from seeing the Curious case of Benjamin Button.

Pretty good, but not worthy of the praise it's been getting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 January 2009, 02:38:33
What praise is it getting?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 4 January 2009, 02:42:08
People keep saying it's oscar material, and Bradd Pitt did a spectacular job in it, blah blah blah.

It was good, but not that good. Pitt has done a better job in other movies (Meet Joe Black, Seven, Fight Club, just to name a few).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 January 2009, 02:42:48
Yeah I wouldn't say it was that good, but I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 4 January 2009, 02:45:16
Same here. I'm a sucker for movies about people that are drastically different.

...

Well, not all of them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 January 2009, 06:15:50
Watched Vantage Point on the plane ride home.

Enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 4 January 2009, 06:28:45
I thought some of the acting was a little cheesy, and the plot was a little weird. But, yeah it;s fun to watch. But how could you enjoy a movie on an air plane? Won't you're ears hurt? Mine do.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 January 2009, 06:36:50
My brother has terrible ear problems from years of infections and other junk. I think he has a small permanent hole in or near his ear drum or something. I really don't know the specific. Basically, he hates plane rides.

But actually, my portable DVD player is perfect for everything BUT planes, because on planes, for WHATEVER reason, it's almost impossible to hear anything coming out of it, even with headphones. Possibly WORSE with headphones. I really don't get it.

I've always had that problem, so I don't usually watch movies on airplanes.

This time, though, my dad brought his own DVD player, and the sound worked perfectly. I was baffled and it felt like a slice of heaven.

But aside from all that, I really don't get what you're asking.

A large majority of the passengers on most airplanes I've been on in recent years have an iPod or MP3 player of sorts, and listen to them for a majority of the ride. What's the difference between listening to music and listening to the audio on a DVD? I don't get what you mean. What's hard about either?

Ears hurting due to pressure has nothing to do with that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 4 January 2009, 15:57:58
I bought Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and Resident Evil: Degeneration the other day. Haven't watched either of them yet.

I watched part of Wing Commander last night. I got giddy again as I watched it, even though I know that it isn't that good of a movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 4 January 2009, 17:06:50
It's a TERRIBLE movie, but it's so great because it's Wing Commander and the subject material was uber-campy anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Yubi Shines on 4 January 2009, 17:33:00
Live action Cowboy Bebop film in the works. Keanu Reeves as Spike Spiegel. (http://twitchfilm.net/site/view/keanu-reeves-is-spike-spiegel/)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 4 January 2009, 17:38:42
Something about that makes me uneasy. :(


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 January 2009, 20:32:57
Resident Evil: Degeneration

Tell us how it is.

Also, never EVER ANY OF YOU watch "Street Racer," it's a lamest cheesiest crap ball of a movie ever made.

It's a modern street racing movie where they made the cars go fast by speeding up the film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 January 2009, 21:11:49
At first I thought you said "Speed Racer" and then remembered that Speed Racer, the user, liked it and that you also just quoted him so I thought a whole thing was gonna start. And then I read it correctly and shut up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 January 2009, 22:37:23
I didn't read it correctly until I read Mike's post.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 January 2009, 05:33:39
I'm watching the end of Batman Returns on TV before bed.

Even thrashed she's so damn fine.

(http://a.abcnews.com/images/GMA/nm_MichellePfeiffer_071010_ssv.jpg)

Trumps anything in The Dark Knight, I'm sorry.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 5 January 2009, 11:55:09
For a second there I thought that was a pic of that theatrical turd of a movie "Catwomen".

By the way, Catwomen is going to be in the third new Batman movie. So the rumors say......


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 January 2009, 11:56:40
The rumors say Shia LeBouef (however you spell it) will be Robin too.
Don't believe rumors.
And Eddie Murphy as the riddler. pft.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Shawn on 5 January 2009, 11:58:38
Yeah, the Riddler is always white. We totally own that.

And the new Batman movies shouldn't have actors like that. If they want a movie that's as good, or possibly better than Dark Knight, they can't be so quick with decisions. But, yeah, it's a rumor. But if it was true.......


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 January 2009, 13:27:47
I haaaate Shia.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 January 2009, 16:10:56
It's a TERRIBLE movie, but it's so great because it's Wing Commander and the subject material was uber-campy anyway.

What really kills the movie is that they cut out the whole "Pilgrim traitor" subplot out of the film because test audiences were too damn dumb to remember Admiral Bill Wilson (the traitor) is the guy that they saw in command of the Pegasus station at the beginning.

By cutting it out, it creates this huge jump as to why Maverick and the one commander suddenly get along, why Maverick lost his cross, and OH YEAH, why the Pilgrims are hated in the first place.

Still, the ending is great. The first time I saw it I was like "What is he doing? He's going to die...whaaaaaat. Are you serious? THAT IS SO AWESOME!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 January 2009, 16:50:57
Right. If they ever put anything with Robin into the current line of Batman movies, Christian Bale said he'd walk.

I want to see Catwoman in a movie but they could make her awful so I don't know. I'm worried enough that having The Riddler as the new villain is going to make the plot of the movie little more than Se7en with Bat-costumes no matter who's playing him.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 January 2009, 05:35:42
...wat. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KEueJnsu80)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: saldite on 7 January 2009, 06:42:46
...The URL contains a malformed video ID...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 January 2009, 07:00:44
Oops. Fix.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 January 2009, 15:27:10
Resident Evil: Degeneration is what every Resident Evil movie should have been.

I suggest anybody who even slightly likes ANY of the games watch it, as it's damn near perfect.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 7 January 2009, 17:49:46
I want to see it...

I got both House of the Dead movies but haven't watched them yet.

But THIS (http://uk.movies.ign.com/dor/objects/863597/street-fighter-the-legend-of-chun-li/videos/street_fighter_cl_trlr_010609.html) is clearly going to be the best movie ever!

OHO!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 January 2009, 18:00:34
But THIS (http://uk.movies.ign.com/dor/objects/863597/street-fighter-the-legend-of-chun-li/videos/street_fighter_cl_trlr_010609.html) is clearly going to be the best movie ever!

OHO!


I'm pretty sure I just saw every cool thing that movie will offer.
In one minute and 14 seconds.
My review: Too much of a chatty film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 January 2009, 18:33:06
I have a hard time buy Kristin Kreuk as Chun-Li.

...wat. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KEueJnsu80)

It's a comedy, advertised verious seriously. It at least looks like it has good special effects.


I want to watch The Rocketeer right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 January 2009, 20:32:20
But THIS (http://uk.movies.ign.com/dor/objects/863597/street-fighter-the-legend-of-chun-li/videos/street_fighter_cl_trlr_010609.html) is clearly going to be the best movie ever!

OHO!


I'm pretty sure I just saw every cool thing that movie will offer.
In one minute and 14 seconds.
My review: Too much of a chatty film.

What's with 2009 and bad movies?

I know, stuff like Watchmen is coming out.. but this and Dragon Ball count as like 20.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 January 2009, 16:19:33
I thought Resident Evil: Degeneration was okay. It had plenty of need stuff, but I was hoping that you'd get to see more zombies and blood all over the place. The animation was excellent. There were plenty of times throughout that I forgot I was looking at a CGI film. Overall, I'd give it a B-, but I can't really see myself watching this movie a lot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 January 2009, 02:28:23
I thought Resident Evil: Degeneration was okay. It had plenty of need stuff, but I was hoping that you'd get to see more zombies and blood all over the place. The animation was excellent. There were plenty of times throughout that I forgot I was looking at a CGI film. Overall, I'd give it a B-, but I can't really see myself watching this movie a lot.

I didn't feel like there were too few zombies.
I figured it was just about right.
Especially the fight at the end, that was swell, and very videogame-y.

Some scenes looked entirely lifelike in the film, and very few things looked cheesy.

Posted on: January 09, 2009, 12:00:49 PM

Zack and Miri make a porno was a decent film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 January 2009, 17:24:59
Strangely (especially with the subject matter), it shows a bit of maturity for Kevin Smith. I really liked it.

Finally watched Planet Terror last night. Very enjoyable. I feel like I was INTO Death Proof, but I can't decide which was better, and thus I decide not to pick one.

I'm currently in the process of digitalizing my entire movie collection onto my shiny new terabyte external hard drive.

It's going to take a while.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 January 2009, 04:56:44
Saw Repo. Was an alright movie.

The music (it's a musical) was excellent, however. And there was lots of blood. LOTS of blood.

Paris Hilton is in it. But even her singing was alright (though her acting still sucks). She doesn't die but her face falls off so its good.

Definitely worth at least one watch, at least.

However, the movie is only being played at certain theaters (like 15 in the US?)(The movie is being played at Bytown if you're interested, Mike). But the DVD is coming out the 20th I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 15 January 2009, 05:50:53
And yet I've been hearing consistent reviews of how she did such a good job acting because she practically plays herself.

I don't know about the music being excellent, from what I've heard of it (Youtube). But it's listenable, I like it enough to be interested.

I do like Sarah Brightman though. Good singer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 January 2009, 16:45:03
Just finished watching Stranger Than Fiction for the first time since I saw it in theaters.

SUCH an underrated movie, absolutely fantastic.

It's Will Ferrel's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I still don't know how he pulled it off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 17 January 2009, 02:28:00
I just watched Wall-E. It was very well done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2009, 02:32:53
Wall-E is good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 17 January 2009, 03:24:31
Wall-E is good.

...you make a boring drunk..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2009, 04:39:57
Every Pixar movie is perfect in every sense of the word.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 17 January 2009, 06:40:01
That wouldn't be an exaggeration. I don't watch movies much. Especially Disney. I hate a lot of Disney's works outright.

But if Pixar is involved, I consider it 'cause I know it'll be worth my time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 17 January 2009, 13:04:08
I hate a lot of Disney's works outright.


CHILDHOOD MEMORIES. BITCH.

They suck now, though..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2009, 17:06:26
It's not even the childhood memories - Disney just has top-notch quality control. Sure, Pixar's flicks stand out as the tip-top of quality in recent years, but there isn't a single animated Disney movie that you can really say is BAD. The Lion King and Aladdin and Mulan and Hercules and so on and so forth... every one of them is fantastic. Even newer ones like The Emperor's New Groove and Lilo & Stitch are awesome in their own new-age way.

Even as an adult, they'll always follow through and leave you satisfied.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 January 2009, 17:56:41
Didn't Disney create Hollywood Chihuahua?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 17 January 2009, 18:03:53
...

ASR's post is now false.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 January 2009, 18:26:25
Beverly Hills Chihuahua. And yes they did.

Disney just has top-notch quality control. Sure, Pixar's flicks stand out as the tip-top of quality in recent years, but there isn't a single animated Disney movie that you can really say is BAD.

WRONG. Every sequel movie is a pile whether or not I liked it as a kid (i.e. The Return Of Jaffar). There are horrible quality control issues in their FEATURES such as The Little Mermaid, Alladin, and others that they've had to change in releases. A lot of their older films have completely racist or sexist characters and phrases that they've either changed in releases or pretended that the films just don't exist.

There are actually a LOT of bad Disney movies.
Go watch Dumbo, Pinocchio, and ESPECIALLY The Black Cauldron (which is like the worst Disney Movie ever, and deservedly) and then try and tell me how good they are. Even Jungle Book and Cinderella are sucky now, and were basically just alright in the first place.
 
Every Pixar movie is perfect in every sense of the word.

Wrong. (no capitals)

I'll give it to you that over 95% of their stuff is amazing, but not perfect and they've got some movies that aren't up to scratch. Like Cars which is at best an OK movie but has weak storytelling and characters and the visuals aren't as strong as their others. It's still a great movie, just not as good as their other stuff.

I'll never see A Bug's Life unless I have to.


Pixar has less movies than Disney (although now Pixar owns majority share in Disney), but only like 2 released Pixar feature movies aren't good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2009, 18:28:17
Beverly Hills Chihuaha. And I said animated, anyway.

Disney's made plenty of foul live-action films, especially if you count the Disney Channel... though some of those are awesome if you were the right demographic when they first came out. Smart House anyone?

EDIT FOR MIKE'S POST:

Cars and A Bug's Life are actually my two least favorite Pixar flicks, but I still love them, and they're still good movies. But Cars was one of the weaker ones. A Bug's Life was just... it has a different vibe than the rest of Pixar's library.

And fine, I'll give you that maybe not all the old animated Disney movies were as good as I'm making them out to be. I just have a soft-spot for 'em.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 January 2009, 18:32:49
So go try to watch The Black Cauldron and get back to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 January 2009, 22:09:32
I'll pass. I don't doubt you.

Posted on: 17 January 2009, 19:25:21

So I just watched Fargo.

If I wasn't already irritated to death with Palin's accent, then Fargo finished the job.

Decent movie, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 January 2009, 02:28:15
I just watched Tropic Thunder for the first time. It was alright, I liked it. It wasn't as good as the hype was before it came out, and it wasn't as bad as I'd heard it was. Jay Baruchel was my favourite in it, but I'm not at all surprised since I've known that he's wicked since he starred in a show called My Home Town in the 90's which was one of my childhood favourites, and later co-starred with Elisha Cuthbert on Popular Mechanics For Kids in the 90's. And then Undeclared which is so good, and so on.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 January 2009, 22:40:26
Huh, I figured you'd already seen it. I really loved it. I think I mentioned that Brandon T. Jackson (Alpa Chino) went to my high school. And yeah, Jay Baruchel was great.

Posted on: 18 January 2009, 03:00:02

Just watched the movie Cube.

It was fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 19 January 2009, 00:32:30
Hypercube is good too, but not AS good, and I've never seen Cube Zero.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 January 2009, 00:39:20
They're all better than The Sphere or whatever, of course.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 January 2009, 06:54:44
I'll check out the other two when I can. Hypercube sounds like it could be pretty cool with the more futuristic theme.

Posted on: 19 January 2009, 01:18:01

AWGAWD I JUST WATCHED "KISS KISS BANG BANG" AND AWMAWGAWD SO AWESOME

RDJ = <3

Posted on: 20 January 2009, 02:29:56

Seriously, you guys need to watch Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Absolutely unbelievable movie.

But yeah, watched Cube 2: Hypercube last night, and I hated it. I just didn't like it at all, it felt unrealistic and dumb in comparison to the first Cube, which was almost plausible and actually had an engaging plot. Hypercube was just silly most of the time.

And tonight I watched Cube Zero. It was a lot better, but not as good as the original. It has a lot of stuff about what's going on outside of the "Cube" or whatever. Pretty cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 24 January 2009, 16:21:01
I'm going to show my girlfriend and room-mate Cloverfield later today.

Should be good.
Even though the movie is a disappointment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 24 January 2009, 21:00:09
Most of my high-school friends are girls, so unfortunately when we all decided to go see a movie it was "Bride Wars".

Suffice it to say that I was not there because I expected the movie to be brilliant.

EDIT: On the other hand, it was not a COMPLETE waste of my time, there were a few good gags.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 January 2009, 21:23:16
SOMEONE ELSE NEEDS TO WATCH "KISS KISS BANG BANG" SO I CAN TALK ABOUT HOW AWESOME IT IS WITH THEM


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 January 2009, 23:28:22
I haven't watched it all, I just got certain clips of it while it was on TV.. I would've fully watched it if I wasn't busy at the time..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 January 2009, 16:15:33
I was trying to decide whether I should post this here or in the TV thread, but whatever.

I found out that the Dead Like Me movie was already broadcast in Canada or something so I figured it might be online somewhere. I was right.

So, basically, just got done watching it.

For a follow-up movie, it didn't really clear up too many loose ends, but then again, Dead Like Me isn't really that type of show.

Henry Ian Cusick didn't get nearly enough screentime, though I can't say he was giving that great of a performance anyway. Still, nice to see him there. A much different role than Desmond.

Anyway, a lot of it's cool because it revolves around a lot of the reaping "rules" being broken.

Daisy's replacement bugs me a lot, since she's basically just playing Daisy without that hint of heart that was always just there under the surface. So, basically, she's just playing an annoying ditz.

And Rube's absence changes the tone of everything, but it almost works. Still, it's so much different without him.

Anyway, it has its moments and I still really enjoyed it. Give it a shot, I know there's a handful of Dead Like Me fans around MMM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 26 January 2009, 21:22:58
I watched Dead Like Me for the first time last night.

Pretty good show, but I think I like Reaper better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 January 2009, 21:11:21
I'll check it out later but I stopped giving a ##### when they replaced Daisy. Then I found out Rube couldn't be in it and I just hated that they were even going forward with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 30 January 2009, 02:58:50
I watched Underworld the other day.

It was pretty bad, imo.

Beckinsale was hot, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 January 2009, 03:43:47
I really like the first Underworld but can see why some people don't like it.

I didn't like the second one, and I'm not in a rush to see the new prequel that just came out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 30 January 2009, 16:31:13
I've never seen any of them...

Not keen on that lass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 January 2009, 16:51:28
I have a friend that came back from it and wouldn't shut up about how much she loved it.

Doesn't interest me at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 2 February 2009, 10:12:41
I don't remember which recent DVD purchases (and gifts) I've talked about, so here's everything since mid-November:

Babylon A.D. (Uncut)
Deep Impact
Event Horizon
The Family Stone
A Fistful of Dollars
The Forbidden Kingdom
Hang'em High
In Bruges
The Island
Jackass: Number Two
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
The Ladies Man
The Manchurian Candidate (2004)
Max Payne (Uncut)
Narc
No Country for Old Men
Resident Evil: Degeneration
RoboCop (Unrated)
Street Kings
Traffic

I watched In Bruges the other week. I really liked it, but the movie felt like a yo-yo. Comedy-drama-comedy-drama-comedy-drama, although I've heard that the director's plays are all like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 February 2009, 16:06:55
Ha, The Ladies Man.

Also, props for Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 2 February 2009, 17:54:07
"So I see that you have experience with 'debit'."
"Yeah, that's de butt..."

LOL It's a really dumb but hilarious movie. And Billy Dee Williams as the bartender? Classic.

I found Kiss Kiss Bang Bang over in the $5 bin at Wal-Mart. I had heard it was really good, plus it has Robert Downey, Jr. in it, so I was like JACKPOT!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 February 2009, 18:16:03
I love the dance number when all the husbands are tracking him down in The Ladies Man. It's almost worth sitting through the movie for.

And yeah, KKBB is probably the best thing you could've found in a bargain bin.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 00:43:37
For the record, the new Underworld movie doesn't have Kate Beckinsale in it and it shouldn't because it's a story before she's even a vampire. It has that chick who was the well fit redhead in Da Ali G Movie but she has dark hair in this. Still haven't seen this new Underworld and don't really care to.

Posted on:  2 February 2009, 14:13:13

I'm watching Die Hard right now.

JEALOUS?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 February 2009, 01:34:50
I watched Push last weekend. It sucked.

Don't see Push.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 February 2009, 01:45:54
...ew. Go away, mold-brain.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 February 2009, 01:52:29
I'll mold your brain you clanking, clattering collection of caliginous junk!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 February 2009, 01:54:53
It looked good.
It sucked?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 February 2009, 02:00:33
Yeah, it sucked.  Apparently in the 50's the government came up with cool trendy nicknames for different types of psychics. Like bleeders and sniffers and pushers.  But all that amounts to is a couple scenes with floating guns and a drunk Dakota Fanning.  I would gladly walk back to the Starplex and ask for my money and my life back if I could.  I would never recommend it.

Unless inebriated 13-year-old girls is your thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 February 2009, 02:01:08
'Tis my thang.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 13 February 2009, 02:08:35
:O

Hi Jake.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 February 2009, 02:16:35
Anyone who thought Push looked good in the first place is a doofus-butt.

Jake.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 02:46:41
It looked intriguing. I really thought it looked awful at first, then I saw a bit more into it and it started to look cool, but I wasn't going to go to see it anyway.

Holy #####. Holy ##### I love Die Hard movies. But if there's any movie from the 80's that actually holds up completely to this day, it's the first Die Hard. Like, holy #####. It's not dated, everything still looks real, the story isn't predictable. I mean, everything is just as awesome now as it was then, and yet you couldn't make this movie today if you tried. It just, it just really #####ing holds up.

Die Hard. Go watch it if you haven't seen it, and if you have (you should have) go watch it again.
Now I just want to rewatch the other ones, even Live Free Or Die Hard which wasn't as good as the others (my favourite is Die Hard With A Vengeance) but was still enjoyable.

I'm so #####ing ecstatic that I decided to pop in Die Hard tonight.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 13 February 2009, 02:51:23
Die Hard also has the added bonus of being a fun-filled family Xmas movie, as well.

The last movie I saw in a theatre was The Curious Case of Benjamin Buttons.
I'll read back later to see if anyone else watched it, but it was a strange little movie nonetheless.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 02:54:07
I saw it too, and I thought it was really good but I won't watch it again for a looonnng time.
Kind of like how I have no ambition to see Titanic ever again (except I didn't like Titanic nearly as much).



For me, watching Die Hard tonight was like watching Raiders Of The Lost Ark or The Empire Strikes Back except without all the "Wow obvious special effects from back in the day" stuff. So really, it was like me watching Desperado. 'Cause I'm just caught up in the ride. Totally shook.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 February 2009, 04:27:01
I SAW IT ON A BIG SCREEN.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 05:00:59
Well yeah, this isn't the first time I saw it. It's just the first time I saw it since like '93.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 February 2009, 05:02:07
Ah, I didn't see it back then. But we did a DVD screening of all the Die Hard movies just before the fourth one came out. I was happy to have come along to see them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 05:03:33
I know I didn't see it in theatres 'cause I would have been 2 at the time and far more interested in pornos instead.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 13 February 2009, 05:07:14
If you'd had been 2, Majikn would have been
*Checks both profiles*
...0
Or some months.
...
When I was like 2, I saw space Jam on the cinema, it was my first movie.
Yep.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 February 2009, 05:08:24
What a #####ty movie to have as your first movie.
I feel sorry for you. That movie sucks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 February 2009, 05:35:25
WHAT.

MIKE WHAT.

WHAT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 13 February 2009, 05:47:18
I think Mike was joking to make Slugkid feel bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 13 February 2009, 06:00:21
I don't remember anything of it, anyway, and I'm not sure if it was my first movie, my mom said it was my first movie in a theatre.
I know I didn't see it in theatres 'cause I would have been 2 at the time and far more interested in pornos instead.
...I wasn't interested in pornos when I was 2.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 13 February 2009, 07:35:33
WHAT.

MIKE WHAT.

WHAT.

Mike obviously isn't feelin fine, and most certainly does not want to take it into overtime.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 13 February 2009, 14:14:52
It was a pretty bad movie when you look back, but when you're a kid it's like "HOLY ##### BUGS BUNNY IS PLAYING BASKETBALL THAT IS SO #####ING AMAZING EVEN THOUGH I DON'T LIKE BASKETBALL MUCH ANYWAY GOD DAMN"

Except with less cursing and more "doodypants", "wow" and "heck"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 February 2009, 17:54:15
Maybe you'll consider it a crappy movie today, yes, but It's part of my childhood.

I like Space Jam just about as much as I liked Toy Story, Lion King, etc.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 February 2009, 17:58:16
I LOVE THE LION KING.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 February 2009, 20:50:48
I was watching A Goofy Movie the other night. Sooooo many memories. SOOOO MANY. Love that movie.

Posted on: 13 February 2009, 19:16:16

http://movies.yahoo.com/premieres/11990378/standardformat/

Get hyped, Tarantino fans.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 February 2009, 02:02:21
THAT LOOKS #####ING GREAT

Brad Pitt doesn't make a good old man though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 February 2009, 02:14:43
Toy Story, The Lion King, and A Goofy Movie are all great movies that stand the test of time because they were actually made well.

Space Jam is not one of these movies and it never actually was. It wasn't made well. It's not a good movie whether you're remembering or not. It's not Die Hard!

I think Mike was joking to make Slugkid feel bad.

I definitely wasn't.

I love basketball. I love Looney Tunes. And I loved that movie when I saw in it in theatres at twelve. But not all things are fine wine, and that movie is actually a piece of ##### in retrospect. It sucks. The only thing I actually like from it is the song "Hit 'Em High" because it's #####ing awesome and currently on my iPod.

It was a pretty bad movie when you look back, but when you're a kid it's like "HOLY ##### BUGS BUNNY IS PLAYING BASKETBALL WITH MICHAEL #####ING JORDAN THAT IS SO #####ING AMAZING LIKE JURASSIC PARK 2 WAS AND I WILL ALWAYS #####ING THINK THIS"

Except with the same amount cursing yet more "doodypants", "wow" and "heck"

Fixed.
No charge, ma'am.




Edit: Pitt did fine as an old man Benji Butt.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 14 February 2009, 02:17:03
Thank you, deary.
Sometimes I have trouble choosing the right words for the right situation.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 February 2009, 02:28:33
Edit: Pitt did fine as an old man Benji Butt.

He doesn't sound like an old man to me whatsoever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 February 2009, 02:29:18
He did fine in Benji Butt. I didn't watch whatever ASR linked to 'cause I'm on my way out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 February 2009, 02:30:20
I'm sure he was a fine Butt indeed, but in this it just doesn't sound like an old man. He looks and talks as an old man would, but the sound of his voice is young.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 February 2009, 03:34:24
It's a Tarantino movie. You can't take these things too seriously. They're just FUN cinephilic movies. They all wear a smirk. At least, that's how I like to describe them.

And back to A Goofy Movie: when I was watching it recently, that was like the first time I've watched it since I was, say, 8 or 9. That was the most nostalgic I'd gotten in a LOOOOONG time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 15 February 2009, 05:11:04
The Uninvited was pretty great.  Had a killer twist.  Made my stomach turn!  I recommend it.  Also, there are cuties abound in that movie.  And by abound I mean, like, three.  But you see them a lot!  So you know.  You have that going for it.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 08:23:53
The Uninvited was pretty great.  Had a killer twist.  Made my stomach turn!  I recommend it.  Also, there are cuties abound in that movie.  And by abound I mean, like, three.  But you see them a lot!  So you know.  You have that going for it.



[spoiler]Was it actually the dad that killed the mom or what? I'm not gonna be seeing it.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 08:25:03
Jake, stop seeing all the movies that I think look stupid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 15 February 2009, 14:03:07
I SAID HI JAKE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 19:36:59
So, Edgar Wright (director of Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz) is about to start filming a new movie in March, called "Scott Pilgrim VS The World."

When I first heard about this, I did the research and found out it was based on a Canadian graphic novel. I promised myself I'd read it eventually.

Then I found out Michael Cera will be playing the lead role as Scott Pilgrim. I didn't know how to think about this. I went and read more about the comics and had no idea if it would work with him in the lead or not.

Now is eventually. I've read the first three volumes and I'll start the fourth later.

At its simplest, it's basically about Scott Pilgrim meeting this girl named Ramona Flowers, and in order to date her, he has to defeat her seven evil ex-boyfriends. It's really wacky and out there, and it's got a really calm and endearing sense of humor. The jokes and fighting remind me a lot of Ranma 1/2 for some reason. It's drawn in a manga-sort-of style but it's clearly a Western work.

And I hate to say it, but the role of Scott Pilgrim was MADE for Michael Cera. The more I read it, the more I'm convinced that nobody else could paly Scott Pilgrim.

If ever there was a role that required him, this was it. He's not a good actor by any means, but he's more of a prop that fits perfectly into certain roles. This is one that I'm confident was made for him.

This movie is now officially on my radar. It's going to be extremely crazy and I'm sure Edgar Wright can pull it off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 19:43:13
So many people read Scott Pilgrim we have a hard time keeping it on the shelf.

I personally don't read it, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 19:48:02
I can't tell if I like the comics or not. They're very different. But I'm convinced the movie will be really entertaining.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 15 February 2009, 19:49:28
I saw somethingorother about those comics while sifting through random YouTube videos or whatever.

Even the premise sounds bland to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 20:09:17
To piss off my frienemy I constantly say that they are "girl comics", but they're not.

Posted on: 15 February 2009, 14:51:29

I have no idea why I'm watching The Phantom Menace on TV right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 15 February 2009, 20:22:20
Curious.
I was watching that a few days ago, and I saw it on the television earlier this week, too.

... maybe it's just time for the movie?
I've noticed cycles like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 20:25:56
Mmmmm I don't know. I'm trying to find things to take my attention away, it works well as background noise and I think Attack Of The Clones is on next too. Phantom Menace is actually better than Attack Of The Clones and Revenge Of The Sith and it IS the most quotable Star Wars movie (because it has so much cheese Anakin stuff) so maybe I have it on ironically or something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 15 February 2009, 20:27:40
Those two movies don't exist.
LALALALALALA
I CAN'T READ YOUR TEXT OVER THE SOUND OF MY CAPITAL LETTERS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 20:31:57
I could almost tolerate Clones if Revenge wasn't even WORSE!

And my problem right now is that I keep actually watching Phantom Menace. But it's about to get to the best part.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 20:32:45
You just reminded me of that Fanboys movie that actually looks pretty decent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 20:39:57
Yeah it should be out soon (again).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 February 2009, 20:43:52
So, Edgar Wright (director of Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz) is about to start filming a new movie in March, called "Scott Pilgrim VS The World."

It took me a while to remember who Scott Pilgrim is. Was about to Google search it too.

Yeah, I heard about the movie. And I like the books so I'll watch this. But my liking the books is nothing compared to the extreme fanboyism of my friend.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 20:52:53
Yeah, Mike, explain that to me. I could've sworn I saw the trailer for Fanboys YEARS ago to the point where someone brought it up a while ago and I was convinced that it must've came out a long time ago.

And then I later found out that it's still not out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 15 February 2009, 20:58:41
Yeah, my friends and I saw the trailer together and a few of us were like, "I saw that trailer before!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 15 February 2009, 21:20:45
I'm the type of person who will make references to things like 'all three Star Wars movies' or 'both Terminator films' and only be MOSTLY joking.

Doesn't mean I like the idea of fanon at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 February 2009, 21:25:45
I'm the kind of guy that LIKES Star Wars but that's where it ends. I think it's cool, but I haven't seen any of the original 3 films in at least 5 years. I walked out of each of the second 3 films with nothing more than an "okay, where are we eating?" or that sort of thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 February 2009, 22:54:30
Fanboys keeps getting pushed around for some reason.

I'm afraid that at this point the timing of the movie is going to be "too late" where as if it came out when it was supposed to (the first time) it would have been just right.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 16 February 2009, 01:10:13
You realize this is just the movie version of Duke Nukem Forever, right?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 February 2009, 17:19:26
As if Watchmen fans need these. (http://watchmencomicmovie.com/021609-watchmen-movie-dr-manhattan-condom.php)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 February 2009, 17:44:45
As if Watchmen fans need these. (http://watchmencomicmovie.com/021609-watchmen-movie-dr-manhattan-condom.php)

I'd use it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 February 2009, 19:04:18
Same.

But they almost look like flavoured ones which are notoriously unsafe.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 February 2009, 19:20:56
"TASTES LIKE MANHATTAN."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 17 February 2009, 19:34:23
A FREE BALLOON

SCORE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 17 February 2009, 19:36:13
Put that back, it was in the tra- aaaw.

... aaaaaaw.
Naaaaw....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 February 2009, 19:40:55
It gives you radiation, anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 February 2009, 05:53:27
Finally watched Yes Man.

I want to marry Zooey Deschanel so hard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 February 2009, 20:51:44
I have no idea what that means.

I watched Zack and Miri recently and liked it, but it's not as awesome as the quotes on the DVD box say.

I watched Die Hard 2 and Die Hard With a Vengeance (aka Die hard 3) again. So awesome.

The second Die Hard is my least favourite of them all (or it's tied with Die Hard 4, I guess. Maybe. I'm not sure, I have to watch 4 again) and most people feel the same about it, but it's still a pretty wicked movie.

Die Hard With A Vengeance is my favourite of them still, I think. It's between that and the first one, which are equally awesome but in different ways. I finally understood how they did that water jug thing (they actually skip over a whole step in the movie) so I have no qualms with the movie at all anymore.

Now I feel like watching Live Free Or Die Hard (aka Die Hard 4) again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 21 February 2009, 21:05:41
I watched Grindhouse earlier this week.

It was bad. Really bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 February 2009, 22:09:40
Ha, I love Grindhouse. I don't blame anyone who hates 'em, though.

Mike, you inspired me to FINALLY download all four Die Hard movies last week. I'm gonna' find time and watch 'em all sometime this weekend. I've never seen any of them. I've needed a good action movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 21 February 2009, 23:51:13
On an impulse, watched The Departed again yesterday. Such a great movie, especially since this time I was paying closer attention and picked up on a few more plot items than last time. And the elevator scene at the end never fails to make me chuckle a bit, for whatever reason.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 03:47:40
Watched Role Models.

It was... okay. I really liked the black kid though, for like the first half only.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 04:20:03
Half of the movie was alright. I didn't know there were gonna be boobies in the movie, so it was really fun, especially since I had my prude girl-friend with me.

There's a hyphen, she's a girl, but also my friend.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 04:33:26
That's when you just say girl friend. And pause the appropriate amount of time in between.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 04:40:56
We do things differently here in Canada.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 04:43:44
It's the same here, too. Don't worry.

Well, not the SAME. We're still BETTER.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 04:55:08
Better at SUCKING!

and if that doesn't do the trick..

YOU'RE SHORT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 05:02:39
So I was watching a movie yesterGO DIE IN A FIRE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 05:18:29
Female friend works pretty well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 05:26:09
Lame.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 05:27:23
I like it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 22 February 2009, 05:35:07
LAME.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 February 2009, 05:38:51
Femalefriend.
I have one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 22 February 2009, 05:55:16
Or you know, calling her a friend sounds best I think. Don't see the point of calling her a girl-friend or a girlfriend unless you're trying to point it out like it's something special...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 06:02:38
Thank you, Nova.

Half my friends are male and half are female. I mean, if I actually counted, it's probably not a CLEAN half, leaning more on the female side, but my point is that I very rarely need to make the distinction when referring to them. But if I do, I hate "friend that's a girl."

And if you say "one of my girl friends," they're either going to assume you're talking about a friend that's a girl, or you're into polygamy. But they at least understand she's not your girlfriend.

Anyway, gonna' watch Die Hard tomorrow for the first time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 06:12:05
Half my friends are male and half are female. I mean, if I actually counted, it's probably not a CLEAN half, leaning more on the female side, but my point is that I very rarely need to make the distinction when referring to them. But if I do, I hate "friend that's a girl."

Yeah, that's what I do, I just had to make that distinction, because having a guy friend that feels uneasy when seeing a pair of breasts is WROOOONG.

Unless they're gay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 22 February 2009, 06:22:33
feels uneasy when seeing a pair of breasts

OH MY GOD WHAT ARE THESE AND WHY DON'T I HAVE THEM


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 06:28:47
Hah, that reminds me of a story my teach told me..

"What? What do you mean boys don't have #####es!? OH MY GOD! MOM!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 07:04:25
LAME.

I'm actually serious. But I don't use it—well, at least in most situations when I'm not mimicking a certain kind of tone. I make the distinction by using GENDER-INDICATIVE PRONOUNS.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 22 February 2009, 16:45:54
I was only kidding. It's okay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 17:22:49
No it's not, bitch, I'm reaming you out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 22 February 2009, 20:42:05
Half my friends are male and half are female. I mean, if I actually counted, it's probably not a CLEAN half, leaning more on the female side, but my point is that I very rarely need to make the distinction when referring to them. But if I do, I hate "friend that's a girl."

Yeah, that's what I do, I just had to make that distinction, because having a guy friend that feels uneasy when seeing a pair of breasts is WROOOONG.

Unless they're gay.

I doubt they even care if they're gay.

No it's not, bitch, I'm reaming you out.

That sounds naughty. In a bad way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 20:45:42
The first gay guy I met, I asked him how he first knew he was gay. Somewhere in the story, he recounted to me a hilarious anecdote that I will never forget:

"I gathered up a bunch of pictures of boobs and just stared at them for hours trying to get turned on."

The image of that is so funny in my mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 21:33:59
That's #####ing terrible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 February 2009, 21:34:50
How is that terrible? Are you against gays Majikn?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 21:41:05
Oh, you're hilarious.

Really, think about it and how it'd make you feel. You'd have to be, like, freaked out to desperation to do something like that. It'd be really sad to watch or even think about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 22 February 2009, 21:43:54
If you put yourself in the shoes of the person it's happening too, yes.

But if you don't it's amazingly funny; other people's pain usually is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 February 2009, 22:13:31
Yeah, he's a friend of mine and he's fine about his identity NOW. I tend to take a lot of my own tough life issues very lightheartedly, so even though I recognize when something might be hard for someone, I tend to write it off and laugh at the lighter side of it.

That's a funny image I described up there, and the kid WAAAAAAAAY past those issues so you're allowed to laugh. So laugh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 February 2009, 23:01:45
Well... I didn't. And that's why.

But whatever, if he's good, he's good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2009, 19:26:31
It's the same here, too. Don't worry.

Well, not the SAME. We're still BETTER.

You guys must measure "better" like you measure everything else in your obese country; Incorrectly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 23 February 2009, 19:34:42
Whoah, wow.
It's not obese.

...

... alright, it is. It's got some bits sticking out of your country and the pacific ocean, it's a freaking whale.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2009, 19:38:26
What about Guam? Is that a sist?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 23 February 2009, 19:42:40
You could ask the same about Puerto Rico or other territories.

The answer is no, they are something more like hemorrhoids.
Condition usually attributed to stationary lifestyles.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2009, 19:44:48
I don't ask after Puerto Rico anymore after it tried to dry hump my almost girlfriend at the goddamn Catalina wine mixer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 February 2009, 20:42:41
IT'S THE #####ING CATALINA WINE MIXER


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 February 2009, 22:38:51
Prestige worldwide.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 24 February 2009, 00:39:05
'Sup?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 24 February 2009, 17:50:58
[...] Puerto Rico [...] like [a] hemorrhoid[.]

You take that back.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 24 February 2009, 18:11:02
As if I was actually serious, Lunche.
Really, you know me better than that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 February 2009, 20:58:11
Just watched Milk.

I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 27 February 2009, 19:15:57
What are we talking about?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 27 February 2009, 21:04:57
It's a movie, starring Sean Penn. It's about a real life politician named Harvey Milk. He was gay and fought for gay rights.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 27 February 2009, 21:07:39
Sounds gay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 27 February 2009, 22:42:34
WAT R U A GAYIST?  >:( >:(


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 March 2009, 01:19:47
Nobody can ever argue that the movie wasn't gay.

Posted on: 28 February 2009, 00:52:40

So I'm seeing Watchmen at the midnight premiere.

I'm going to dress up as Dr. Manhattan.

Except not blue.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 March 2009, 05:14:38
So I'm seeing Watchmen at the midnight premiere.

Me too.

Except I'm not dressing up as anyone.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 March 2009, 05:21:51
I'm not seriously dressing up. I'd NEVER do that. Halloween is the only dress-up time for me.

The joke was that Dr. Manhattan is naked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 5 March 2009, 05:30:20
I'll be seeing it on Sunday for a friend's birthday.



Of course, I still haven't finished it, I guess I'd better go do that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 March 2009, 09:04:22
Just got back from watching Watchmen.

[spoiler]
While I'm not too keen on some of the changes, particularly everything at the end, I still heavily enjoyed it. It's a great movie whether you read the comic book or not.

One thing that bugs me is the changing of the whole "Alien Attack" to "Dr. Manhattan Attacks". Though, while I do like what happens in the comic book, I do have to say that the Dr. Manhattan one would make more sense.

Also, Adrian doesn't scream "I DID IT!" and that made me a little sad.
[/spoiler]

Overall, great movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 March 2009, 17:04:21
Good to hear. I'm seeing it tonight with some other friends since my group for midnight flopped.

Though I woke up to a text from my roommate who apparently went to see it at midnight that said:
"sorry dude but watchmen sucked ass"

EDIT: If anyone had any hope for that Dragonball movie (and shame on you if you did!), here's the final nail in the coffin:
http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/4610415/12329213


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 March 2009, 00:38:37
Oh, God that's terrible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 7 March 2009, 01:32:13
I wasn't looking forward to it in the first place. Actually, I thought it was just a joke until seeing that.

... I feel like smashing the director and writer in the face. I don't even like Dragon Ball much and I feel like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 March 2009, 01:37:47
wat


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 7 March 2009, 02:12:03
I liked Dragon Ball. The movie... ew.

Since when did Goku know how to fly and shoot energy beamz in Dragon Ball when FIRST meeting MASTER Roshi?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 March 2009, 02:17:23
I haven't bothered to look at any of that ##### since the teaser. That was just one big coffin nail already.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 March 2009, 02:25:17
WIND blast?

I'm suing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 March 2009, 02:42:39
I picked up Clerks II for $5.

I saw Taken the other night. I really liked it, although I'm annoyed that it was cut so it could get a PG-13 rating. I'll pick it up on DVD when it comes out.

What really bothered me about the movie is his daughter's friend

[spoiler]
After he discovers her dead, he just leaves the body in the room. What happens to the body, did the authorities recover it and send it home? Or is it there still in France? And what about her family? They never really touch on the fact after Bryan gets his daughter back, that his daughter and her friend just spent almost 96 hours in a world terrible, disturbing world that caused her friend to be filled with drugs and be used for sex and die because of it. Granted, Bryan's daughter was probably also coked up at the time, but don't you think that would cause her to come out of it #####ed up?[/spoiler]

I also watched Babylon A.D. I thought it was okay, but it definitely isn't a good or bad movie. Interesting enough to keep my attention while I wait for another Riddick movie (which you know the studio execs were trying to go for), but not great enough for me to recommend people going off to buy it. Rent it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 March 2009, 03:35:35
I would've prevented that better than him.

I would have prevented that so hard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 March 2009, 05:30:36
...just watched Watchmen.

I could go way into detail on this... but overall I really liked it. I mean, I really liked it.

I'm impressed.

They definitely cut a LOT of important stuff out, and you'll never get the full experience unless you read the book, but I totally feel that it did as much as it could have done as a film of such a detailed, complicated comic.

I went with a large group of people, and only two of us had read it. Pretty much everybody we went with loved the movie, so that's good news. Both the other guy who had read it and I approved.

My only complaint that there wasn't enough blue #####. I mean, after all the talk, I was expecting so much blue ##### and I had prepared myself for so much blue ##### and all I got was a little blue ##### (mind you it wasn't actually a little blue #####.)

Posted on:  7 March 2009, 03:49:07

ALSO, NEW, LONGER TRAILER FOR PIXAR'S "UP" (http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/up/trailer-b)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 March 2009, 05:44:14
"Up" just became a must see.

I like the HD video player there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 March 2009, 05:50:28
The first trailer didn't interest me, this one however, was pretty spiffy!

WIND want see.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 7 March 2009, 06:09:19
MY MASTER MADE ME THIS COLLAR SO THAT I COULD

SQUIRREL



HI THERE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 March 2009, 07:31:36
I was like "Ugh, another talking dog."

And then I actually laughed at that.

Which means this movie is already awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 7 March 2009, 15:38:04
If anyone had any hope for that Dragonball movie (and shame on you if you did!), here's the final nail in the coffin:
http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/4610415/12329213

Cool.

WIND blast?

I'm suing.

I thought the same thing.

ALSO, NEW, LONGER TRAILER FOR PIXAR'S "UP" (http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/up/trailer-b)

This catches my interest. Just a little.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 7 March 2009, 16:09:45
OK, I can't see the player at all.
What has gone wrong?

Never mind, it works in IE. Site is on list of sites to reprimand severely for poor design now.

Trailer looks good. More Pixar stuff, seems lighthearted enough. Crotchety old guy is a plus.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 March 2009, 16:57:25
Oh, and the Watchmen Opening Credits are now available to watch online. They were pretty awesome, so watch away. There aren't any real spoilers since it's, you know, the opening credits.

http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/the-watchmen-opening-credits-are-online

But yeah, only watch if you want to. I had more fun seeing that for the first time on a big screen in a theater.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 8 March 2009, 07:44:20
I just got back from Watchmen. It's completely possible that this is due to the fact that I'm not familiar with the source material (I'm not really the comic type) but I was totally underwhelmed. The blue guy and Mr. Inkblot where pretty much the only characters that I found even remotely interesting (maybe the comedian, if he would have gotten more character development time) and for the most part it just felt like they where trying to do too much at once.

I have to imagine that the comic does a much better job with the material, because I don't think the paint-by-numbers film a just saw deserves the cult following the franchise seems to have.

On a related note: Does anyone else find it annoying when movies like this come out and people who you KNOW didn't even know the comic existed try to front like they're OG?
"OMG! I love The Watchman! I read those when I was a kid"
"... the word 'the' isn't in the title, and no you didn't. You read Spiderman. Only Spiderman."
I remember a similar experience when Sin City came out; It's no less irritating now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 8 March 2009, 07:47:10
Dicks like that are the reason I try to read as much of the source material for comic book movies as possible before I see them, to avoid the possibility of becoming such a dick.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 March 2009, 14:10:24
I've decided that the proper context for seeing Watchmen is to think of it as a bonus feature to the GN. Like, "here, watch all these highlights of the GN in live action!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 8 March 2009, 19:04:05
Why would someone lie about something so dumb? Ugh.

I had an opportunity to see the movie, I decided ##### that. And it's bombing at our theatre.

Geoff came to work in costume again. He was Rorschach this time. A handful of little #####s walked up to his podium (he was ripping tickets) and were like "Who are you supposed to be?" and the poster of Watchmen was like right next to him. Maybe Rorschach wasn't on that poster, whatever. Apparently they were giving him trouble for being in a costume (because it's so dorky, right guys), but this is Geoff, so he doesn't take it. Still I wish I was there. I have more authority, I would've told them to shut up or get out.

This is the same guy who came as Iron Man, Jigsaw, and the Joker. I thought he might've been great as the Comedian, but no, he wanted to wear white panty-hose. Apparently a girl caught him with some panty-hose in the aisle of Zellers and he had his face up to it to see if he could see through it okay. And he was breathing really hard through it to see if he could breathe. Oh man I was dying when I heard that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 March 2009, 19:10:48
Right.

Watchmen was pretty good... err if you've read it. I guess. I've read it, so I don't know what it's like if you haven't but it really is almost only the highlights of the book (of which there are many but still, if you wanted to do it perfect it would be like a four hour movie).

What was weird was even beyond what Edge said, they left some stuff in that actually makes no sense unless you've read it.

[spoiler]For instance, The Comedian saying "Is this what gets you hot?" to Hooded Justice. Or the two men at the news stand hugging in the explosion.[/spoiler]

I liked it but I have a small handful of minor issues with it.

I have to imagine that the comic does a much better job with the material

It does. I REALLY does. And there's a LOT more in the history of The Minutemen that's actually important. Also,
[spoiler]The explosion thing is a completely different sort of trick. Especially taking into consideration that the arrival of Dr. Manhattan actually lead to them solving the fossil fuel crisis in the book.[/spoiler]

On a related note: Does anyone else find it annoying when movies like this come out and people who you KNOW didn't even know the comic existed try to front like they're OG?
"OMG! I love The Watchman! I read those when I was a kid"
"... the word 'the' isn't in the title, and no you didn't. You read Spiderman. Only Spiderman."
I remember a similar experience when Sin City came out; It's no less irritating now.

Yes. Very.
I'd heard of Sin City but hadn't read it, and my friend had read some but couldn't find all of it until they reprinted them like ape ##### for the movie. Neither of us fronted.

I'd read about half of Watchmen and new the ending before the movie was announced, then I went back and re-read all of it.


Anyway I think the movie was as good as it could be and I really liked it despite little things.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 March 2009, 19:26:56
I just feel bad for the people who haven't read it, because they're just missing out on a lot. It feels more like a supplement than a movie, and you feel sad because this is also the best we're ever gonna' get. But also glad that we got it in this form.

I mean, one of the old scripts apparently had it all taking place in modern times, like Dr. Manhatten went to Iraq and ##### like that. Considering that was a possibility, it just makes this movie all the better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 March 2009, 19:32:57
They did a good job of leaving it in the 80's without making it sooo 80's. I laughed at the OTHER things on Veidt's TVs.

Also I just made this because I'm awesome.

Half analyst, half therapist.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 8 March 2009, 19:56:18
I see what you did there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 March 2009, 20:02:03
There was definitely lesbian porn going on in the bottom-right screen Veidt was looking at.

LOOK FOR IT GUYS.

And for the kids, Marvin the Martian was in the top-left, completely on the opposite side of the screen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 8 March 2009, 20:13:40
My favorite line in the entire movie was when what's-her-name asked who's-his-face if something was wrong, while he was standing naked in the basement/sewer in the middle of the night and staring at his old costume.

Does anything about that scenario NOT seem wrong?

Also, Blue Dude gets my respect NOT because he has crazy blue dude powers, but because his junk is immune to shrinkage, even at arctic temperatures.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 March 2009, 21:42:46
About "what's-her-name", I was disappointed they didn't have the bit about her not using the name "Jupiter" and using her family's ACTUAL Polish last name "Juspeczyk". I thought leaving that and her ##### relationship with her mother out of the movie basically ditched a large part of her character. She just became "the girl in the movie" of the movie.

There was definitely lesbian porn going on in the bottom-right screen Veidt was looking at.

LOOK FOR IT GUYS.

And for the kids, Marvin the Martian was in the top-left, completely on the opposite side of the screen.

I meant very 80's things like that famous Mac commercial and stuff like that sure alright then.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 March 2009, 00:54:58
And I meant the lesbian porn.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 9 March 2009, 01:29:24
I noticed the porn, but not the excessive amount of bush that I would have associated with 80s porn.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 9 March 2009, 06:52:03
Just got back from seeing it. Pretty good, but I got tired of Dr. Manhattan's blue junk gently flapping in the breeze every second scene. And the whole disintegrating-people-except-for-their-blood-which-goes-spraying-everywhere-instead was slightly excessive.

I also noted that they took special care to avoid destroying the World Trade Centre.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 March 2009, 17:11:40
There really wasn't that much of the blue junk, you guys.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 9 March 2009, 21:53:14
When compared to what the majority of Americans are used to in their films, yes it was.

I didn't care, but I did find it annoying when some of the women I know got on a "it's about time" kick where they complained about the way breasts are so common in movies, so it was nice to see some wang. That's not the same though. In our culture there really isn't a male equivalent to breasts. Showing some guys doodle is analogous to showing a woman's vertical smile, not her chest.

How does that elude some people?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 March 2009, 22:27:43
It's still some full-frontal male nudity in an R-rated film, and that's definitely a LOT rarer than breasts. So, in a way, it's still valid because it's a private manbit being shown.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 9 March 2009, 22:37:33
Yeah, I get what the argument is, but there are varying degrees of taboo. I know it's different for everyone, but I think we can agree that genitals and nipples aren't at the same level.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 March 2009, 21:33:57
They are stupid. End of story. Yes, it's that easy.

And I meant the lesbian porn.

No #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 March 2009, 00:19:25
I just watched Johnny Appleweed on Hulu.

Absolutely retarded movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 March 2009, 01:06:22
You can't tell that by the name?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 12 March 2009, 13:04:23
Went to go see Watchmen with my friends last night.

Blue junk is unnoticeable unless you specifically look for it, but mostly because Manhattan himself doesn't seem to care at all.

Rorschach wound up being my favorite character, and I honestly would have liked the movie a lot better if it followed mostly Rorschach and all of the useless sex scenes were cut.
Seriously, not necessary or enjoyable in the slightest.

Overall, though, as little as I understood at the beginning, I was more than capable of following the plot and understanding the alternate reality concept and scenario well before everything came to a head, so the movie got that right.

Did manage to work up a new in-joke type thing; "<...> A fate worse than blue <junk>."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 12 March 2009, 15:14:43
Those sex scenes had some really weird soundtrack choices attached to them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 12 March 2009, 15:49:43
Which made an awkward experience slightly more bearable because you had to laugh... but still...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 March 2009, 21:04:14
Sex scenes made more sense in the book, since they just glossed over Nite Owl and Silk Spectre in the movie.

I bought the Role Models DVD the other day and I'm glad. Also a girl in class lent me Love Actually and I watched it for the first time last night and I really liked it.

I watched Die Hard again on like Sunday and man that movie really is the #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 March 2009, 21:17:16
Yeah, I heard Love Actually is a pretty good movie.

I didn't like Role Models all that much, don't know if I posted that here. It wasn't BAD, but... I don't know. I really liked the black kid, though. And Chris Mintz-Plasse had a surprising amount of emotional depth to his performance.

I have all 4 Die Hard movies on my computer and I haven't seen any of them. I say marathon soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 12 March 2009, 21:53:27
Because I've not seen it posted in this thread yet...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDDHHrt6l4w

What if the Watchmen had been given the 80's cartoon treatment?  Now you know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 12 March 2009, 21:55:35
Someone already beat ya to the chase, old man.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 March 2009, 22:18:29
He goes by many names... but you know him as Mikero, crusher of dreams.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 12 March 2009, 22:35:16
Mikero may be fast, but I can run like the wind!

Speaking of which, I've been thinking of a Mikero suit WIND. With different colors and stuff, sort of like a take on the BN4 soul system, except without that #####ty game.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 March 2009, 22:44:02
...SO HOW 'BOUT THEM MOVIES.

I have a friend who's going to see a free sneak preview of I Love You, Man tonight. I'm jealous, it looks good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 12 March 2009, 22:47:17
HEY, THIS IS MMM. WE NEVER GO BACK ON TOPIC!

I Love You, Man looks like a pretty good movie, my friend says the character with the outbursts remind her of me. Probably won't see it, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 March 2009, 00:14:56
I saw Watchmen.

Swell film.
I'd read the first 4 chapters of the comic beforehand and from what i saw it followed really well.
I like the film a LOT.
I also noticed that the lesbian porn was in the UPPER RIGHT.
As soon as I saw Marvin the martian I remembered that there was porn too.

I have the Saturday Morning Watchmen video on my computer now, as well as the song. Absolutely hilarious that Adrian saved the Comedian.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2009, 00:23:26
...nobody says "I saw Watchmen."

That's like saying "I watched Saw!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 March 2009, 03:47:10
I saw Saw too!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 March 2009, 04:01:59
I saw Saw two.
I saw Saw Three too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2009, 04:14:55
"I saw Saw Two, too."

One the greatest sentences in the English language.

Right up there with that "Buffalo buffalo buffalo" one.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 March 2009, 04:42:02
Buffalo buffalo buffalo?

All I think of when I read that is Cher. The way she sings it, I could swear I hear "Do you believe in love, buffalo?" And in the beginning where she's like "After love after love after love" I just... I just keep hearing buffalo...

Even though I know now that she's saying "Life after love."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2009, 04:49:52
...you thought she was saying... buffalo? What? Weirdo.

No, I'm talking about the English sentence that can be comprised entirely of the word(s) "buffalo."

The sentence is as follows:
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."

It's grammatically correct.

As in:
Bison from Buffalo, New York, who are intimidated by other bison in their community also happen to intimidate other bison in their community.
OR
THE buffalo FROM Buffalo WHO ARE buffaloed BY buffalo FROM Buffalo ALSO buffalo THE buffalo FROM Buffalo.

It even has a Wikipedia article!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo

This is another good one:
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 March 2009, 04:55:35
I didn't THINK she was saying it, that's just what I heard. I thought she was actually saying "love after love" and that's where I was wrong.

And that's ten times weirder.

I'm actually practicing how to put correct emphasis on the right words in that sentence so that it makes sense in my head. And I keep saying it aloud and it sounds so ridiculous I hope some secret organisation isn't listening to me right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2009, 04:59:19
James, while John had had "had," had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

Just so everyone knows how that one makes sense.

OH MOVIES


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 March 2009, 05:05:56
I think the "Bar barbarbarbarbar bar bar barbarbarbarbar"  one is my favourite.

Though I was talking about the Buffalo one when I said I was saying it aloud.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 March 2009, 05:07:59
Yeah, I know. I just wanted to add that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 13 March 2009, 05:21:44
I like the Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den) the most.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 March 2009, 18:46:42
That Buffalo one.
new favorite.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 March 2009, 04:34:04
Just watched The Brothers Solomon.

Will Arnett and Will Forte make a great team.

Honestly, I went in expecting total crap, but I only watched it because I've been on a Bob Odenkirk binge lately with all the Mr. Show I've been watching, and I'd kind of wanted to watch this for Will Arnett and Will Forte for a while now.

It's REALLY dumb, but in a really self-aware way, so it's actually smart. Which is great. And the best part is, it's actually funny. I laughed a lot during this. And I watched it alone. I very rarely laugh when I'm watching something alone, so it really surprised me.

All I'd ever heard about this movie was how bad it was and how it got terrible reviews and bombed... and that it was the first and only movie Richard Roeper ever actually walked out on.

But I loved it, haha. It was a very pleasant surprise.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 16 March 2009, 18:37:46
I bought and watched the Tenacious D- Complete Masterworks 2.

The concert was okay, but the documentary is where it really shines, at it shows that Tenacious D is really just a huge joke in itself. They're almost completely not serious about everything they do, and it shows a lot of the pain and problems that they went though with the tour after the movie tanked.

Worth a watch for anybody who likes Tenacious D much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 March 2009, 23:39:20
...nobody says "I saw Watchmen."

Everyone says that.

That's like saying "I watched Saw!"

Everyone says that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 March 2009, 23:49:18
...but... but my way is more fun!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 March 2009, 02:06:07
I agree but at the same time am not SO secure that I would do that in public.

Posted on: 16 March 2009, 19:09:38

I just saw "I Love You, Man" and I really liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 March 2009, 12:18:00
Good to hear.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 March 2009, 21:06:49
I WATCHED THE WATCHMEN.

Pretty spiffy. Enjoyed the exploding people scenes. Though the nude Silk Spectre shots didn't make up for the constant blue Dr.Manhattan meat..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 March 2009, 03:26:39
http://hangovermovie.warnerbros.com/

Okay so this movie looks REALLY funny. I don't know why, but it just screams "This is going to be hilarious."

Posted on: 22 March 2009, 02:53:43

Also, this really belongs in the Video Share thread, and they're really just for Mike (or any of you that are fans of the Edgar Wright/Simon Pegg crew)... but these had me laughing pretty hard:

Edgar Wright introducing Shaun of the Dead. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCDBSeZKr14)

Edgar Wright introducing Hot Fuzz. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdxqvpk423o)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 March 2009, 17:11:26
I WATCHED THE WATCHMEN.

Pretty spiffy. Enjoyed the exploding people scenes. Though the nude Silk Spectre shots didn't make up for the constant blue Dr.Manhattan meat..

:/

It's called "Watchmen" and you know that you jerkfaceneedledick!
I don't like everyone complaining/talking about Dr. Manhattan being naked, it just made perfect sense in my mind when I read it, but I expected this reaction in the movie. I was glad they actually had the balls to have him be bottomless though.

Also, this really belongs in the Video Share thread, and they're really just for Mike (or any of you that are fans of the Edgar Wright/Simon Pegg crew)... but these had me laughing pretty hard:

Edgar Wright introducing Shaun of the Dead. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCDBSeZKr14)

Edgar Wright introducing Hot Fuzz. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdxqvpk423o)

Haha "Answering Machine" was my favourite.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 March 2009, 17:15:05
I didn't mind all the Dr. Manhatten blue dongle.
it wasn't distracting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 March 2009, 17:21:22
If it was distracting then that's an issue with whoever found it distracting and not the movie's fault at all :D


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 March 2009, 17:32:21
I giggled a lot.

But really, though, it makes perfect sense and I GET why people are reacting but I don't like that they are.

Haha "Answering Machine" was my favourite.

"Old lady."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 March 2009, 20:22:25
I WATCHED THE WATCHMEN.

Pretty spiffy. Enjoyed the exploding people scenes. Though the nude Silk Spectre shots didn't make up for the constant blue Dr.Manhattan meat..

:/

It's called "Watchmen" and you know that you jerkfaceneedledick!

I was making a reference to "Who watches the Watchmen?" you snot-eater.

I don't like everyone complaining/talking about Dr. Manhattan being naked, it just made perfect sense in my mind when I read it, but I expected this reaction in the movie. I was glad they actually had the balls to have him be bottomless though.

YEAH WELL I DON'T LIKE EVERYONE COMPLAINING ABOUT HOW EVERYONE IS COMPLAINING ABOUT DR. MANHATTAN BEING NAKED.

I think it's quite normal when I feel a bit weirded out by someone's meat flappin' in the breeze like it's everybody's business, I wouldn't say "Well, that there's a spiffy schlong.". Though it's part of the movie so I don't see it as inappropriate, if I did I'd probably have to start a "OUR CHILDREN SHOULDN'T WATCH WATCHMEN" movement with the other angry mothers.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 March 2009, 20:55:35
...well, children SHOULDN'T see it, honestly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 March 2009, 21:09:42
Which is why angry mothers are stupid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 March 2009, 03:25:41
If it makes sense for the character I don't mind.

I WATCHED THE WATCHMEN.

Pretty spiffy. Enjoyed the exploding people scenes. Though the nude Silk Spectre shots didn't make up for the constant blue Dr.Manhattan meat..

:/

It's called "Watchmen" and you know that you jerkfaceneedledick!

I was making a reference to "Who watches the Watchmen?" you snot-eater.

I know but that's stupid, stupidbumdirthands.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 March 2009, 04:14:29
It wasn't stupid. You're stupid. Dinkbuttsmellyface.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 24 March 2009, 05:25:47
I saw Watchmen the day after it came out.

It... Was alright.

Yeah, it was close to the book, and I appreciate the effort (I'll probably appreciate the 5-hour director's cut even more), but I felt like Snyder kind of changed the wrong things.

In order to give Dan some more character development (he was by far the least developed main character in the book), they ended up making him much more heroic, and took away some of Laurie's development (the least developed character in the movie). Now, making Dan more heroic wasn't necessarily a bad thing, but taking away from Laurie's development was.

Now, a lot of people who've read the book, think Laure is a bitch, and maybe she is, but her sub-plot (I really shouldn't have to spoiler this, as the comic is over 20 years old but, I will) [spoiler]where she comes to the realization that the Comedian is her father[/spoiler] is a lot less powerful in the movie. Mainly because they skimmed it down, a lot, and used John as the deus ex machina, rather than allowing her to come to the realization herself.

And like I said, they made Dan a lot more heroic, which wasn't really bad, but it irked me, but only because they made Veidt seem more overtly evil. And you know what? Veidt was by far, the worst thing about the movie. I hate hate hate whoever they got to play him. He was too young, too skinny, and too European. Seriously, who thought he should be European and have a LISP? Again, it really irked me how skinny he was, as he's supposed to be at his physical peke, and he looked flat out ridiculous in the molded body suit.

I also feel like Snyder dropped the ball with John/Dr. Manhattan. I felt he like he was one of the best characters in the book, he was badly handle. They took away his costume being more and more revealing over time, and just had him in a thong from the get go.  (In the book, he goes from a body suit, at the beginning of his life as a god-like being, to completely naked by the time the book begins, and it should be obvious what THAT represents). The voice was too weak, too emotional... And he's treated more as a plot device than a person. The CGI on him felt a bit weak as well.

Then there were little things that bugged me. They kept a lot of the powerful lines from the comic, but changed the dialogue around it, so the lines felt flat, and sometimes out of place. The whole Comedian is dead line was... Well, mostly the same, but felt emotionally long. Also, they made the pause incredibly long and awkward. "Well, what do you expect?" cue 20 second pause... and "The Comedian is dead." I think even the actor who played Dan was kind of wondering when his cue was coming up.

Rorschach was just about perfect. his voice sounds different than what I expected, but that's no big deal. My only complaint is that he was uglier out of make-up than in. Rorschach is described as being "remarkably ugly" out of his mask. Also, they cut out all of his back and forth with the psychiatrist, which I felt went a long way in developing Rorschach. Instead he just blurts out his past and reasoning immediately, and almost seems desperate to do so. And he was a lot angrier than he should have been, as he's usually pretty emotionless when he retells it. Also, they changed him from a fascist to a an ultra-conservative.

And the ending, I get why they changed it, the original is too convoluted, and, honestly, pretty ridiculous. But the new ending... It  seems almost as ridiculous, and in fact, goes a long way in vilifying Veidt way more than he should have been. A lot of his new scenes did. Remember how I mentioned that while they kept the powerful lines, and changed the dialogue around them? Yeah, that really hurt the last scenes. Like   when Veidt says "I feel like I'm swimming towards a... No, never mind[...]" it makes no sense, as they cut all the Black Freighter stuff (which was fine with me, as that was my least favorite part of the book).

And then there's Rorschach's line "Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon." still makes sense, but doesn't have the same impact, as Dan hadn't agreed to keep Veidt's secret yet. Then there's the whole "Nothing ends. Nothing ever ends." There was no reason why John couldn't have said it himself, and it only made Laurie seem less independent, though not as much as everything else that revolved around her in the movie.

Overall, Rorschach was the best part of the movie (It kind of follows the same in the book, but I was torn between him and Manhattan's parts in the book, the Mars scenes kind of suck in the movie) nd the worst part is Veidt.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 24 March 2009, 13:53:16
I ended up seeing the movie before reading the rest of the book.

I don't have nearly as much of an opinion as you do though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 24 March 2009, 16:11:55
I have read and re-read the book for the past 3 years, and every time I read it, I find something new.

It's a really great book that sits among my favorites.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 24 March 2009, 16:41:48
One thing I didn't like the movie is that Adrian doesn't ask Jon if he did the right thing.

I thought that was one of the more important lines in the book. Adrian having to ask a "God" if he did the right thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 March 2009, 16:45:51
Yeah, I liked that in the book. For some reason I don't remember it not being in the movie. My mind filled in most of the gaps.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 March 2009, 21:39:40
Lunche is pretty much completely right. I have a difference in opinion of liking The Black Freighter and that's about it. I really didn't dig how much Rorschach cried. Maybe there are tears in the book, I can't remember it right now, but I don't remember that being so bitchly.


Anyway yeah, like I said I felt they dropped a lot of the characters' backgrounds and how they all relate which was one of the major damn points of the whole thing. And the book serves up another point; Superheroes don't work in the real world. But the movie somehow reinforces that they do.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 24 March 2009, 23:41:40
In the movie 'schach looks like he's ready to cry at the drop of a hat.

And, I think I forgot to mention this, but the movie really annoyed me on how much they beefed up the action scenes, and made them flat out ridiculous.

Like how Veidt throws Comedian half way across the damn apartment, and through the plate glass window. Another reason why Veidt being so skinny annoyed me! He looked ridiculous in his action scenes. Also, all the slow motion/extra extra gore didn't help either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 25 March 2009, 21:54:26
Where The Wild Things Are (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g84nC5UXbXo)

Oh, childhood!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 26 March 2009, 00:39:27
YES. Oh, man, that book was awesome way back.
I didn't remember those PJ's being so unquestionably awesome though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 March 2009, 02:41:13
I remembered.

Posted on: 26 March 2009, 04:42:48

I just watched SPACE JAM again.

IT'S SO AWESOME.

You're all wrong!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 29 March 2009, 02:41:44
Ick.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 March 2009, 02:55:14
YOU'RE WRONG.

SPACE JAM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 29 March 2009, 03:02:06
You know, it's a well known fact that adding the word "Space" to any word would most likely result in making it awesome and epic. Space Jam however, is neither awesome nor epic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 29 March 2009, 03:20:39
The same thing tends to happen when you tack "quest" on the end of titles.

(http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/1/15562/532682-sq_011_super.png)

To illustrate, this was a doubly awesome game.
... come to think of it, it might make a fun movie, but the problem with that is that you only have the one guy, and for some reason directors always want to add some annoying animal friend or something into the mix and as funny as annoying animal friends (http://madmonq.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/jar-jar-binks.jpg) are, I don't like them much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 29 March 2009, 04:21:24
On the other hand, there are some really awesome and epic games about space AND quests that haven't got either Space or Quest (or any derivative thereof) in their name.

Like Homeworld.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 29 March 2009, 13:46:00
<- refer to avatar for emotion


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 March 2009, 01:14:28
I think the point is that Space Jam is #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 March 2009, 04:01:28
Seriously, you guys.

Looney Tunes enlist Michael Jordan to play a basketball game against space aliens.

SERIOUSLY.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 March 2009, 04:59:04
Makes perfect sense to me....

I mean, who else would they enlist?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 March 2009, 05:40:40
Obviously you enlist Michael Jordan. Except that the rest of the movie is awful. Even Newman.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 March 2009, 05:58:21
Even Bill Murray?!

"Larry's not white. He's clear."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 30 March 2009, 06:03:20
They already had an alien character, Marvin, what they did was cram that movie with unnecessary crap. Like Lola.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 March 2009, 14:04:26
Don't play around, Wind, you know you're just covering up your true feelings for her.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 March 2009, 15:52:21
I know someone who wants to name her kid Lola.

No relation to the one who named her kid after Tuxedo Mask.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 March 2009, 21:49:27
You have, well not "interesting" but... unique friends.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 30 March 2009, 22:50:31
Weird. I think the word you're looking for is weird, Mike.

SO. I watched Daft Punk's Electroma. It was alright..

SAD :'C


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 March 2009, 02:00:18
Been meaning to watch that and Insterstella 5000.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 31 March 2009, 02:27:19
Space Jam was one of those movies I liked a lot when I was little, but would probably be bored out of my mind if I rewatched it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 31 March 2009, 02:44:45
Been meaning to watch that and Insterstella 5000.

Git to it then, they're both gold.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 March 2009, 03:10:36
No time to actually WATCH stuff, only listen. And with those... you gotta watch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 March 2009, 04:05:24
Space Jam was one of those movies I liked a lot when I was little, but would probably be bored out of my mind if I rewatched it.

You'd be wrong. It's so exciting. And there's even more adult-oriented jokes peppered throughout that you definitely didn't catch as a kid!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 31 March 2009, 04:14:51
Space Jam is great.

And I HAVE watched it recently.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 March 2009, 04:34:23
I forgive you for stealing my spot on Chaos' stupid game.

Hug.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 April 2009, 04:36:12
Then you're both severely retarded.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 April 2009, 06:28:44
Seriously. Do I have to explain the premise again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 April 2009, 18:29:22
Then you're both severely retarded.
Seriously.

Case closed.

Do I have to explain the premise again.

Is that a question?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 April 2009, 18:32:50
If it were a question there'd be a question mark, dumbnuts.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 April 2009, 18:36:43
I'm impervious to your "I meant to do that" 3rd grade ##### today, poobum.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 April 2009, 18:46:39
The sad thing is, I actually sat there thinking "Is this funnier with or without a question mark?"

A lot of questions are funnier without question marks, you guys.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 April 2009, 18:51:46
I agree, and did think you might be doing that, but also I couldn't just not say something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 April 2009, 21:36:42
Did you really have to say something or are you just an asshole.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 April 2009, 03:08:24
I guess I didn't HAVE to but I felt I had to.
So both, I guess.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 April 2009, 04:41:43
Acceptable answer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 April 2009, 02:57:08
I just finished watching Back To The Future Part II today. I also saw the first one for the first time yesterday.

Good movies, going to see the last one. However, I'd probably appreciate them more if I saw them when I was younger. Like with Star Wars Ep. 4-6, I really like them but if I saw them for the first time recently rather than when I was a kid I don't know if I'd like them as much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 April 2009, 03:08:31
I didn't see the third Back to the Future until I was way older. It might be why I don't like it as much.

But the whole trilogy is #####ing fantastic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 5 April 2009, 03:46:02
I first saw it when I was 6, and then I saw it various times... The movie is awesome. Or the movies, it's the same, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 April 2009, 07:01:19
2,1,3
that order.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 April 2009, 07:09:28
Nobody should ever argue that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 April 2009, 07:24:04
I doesn't need to be argued.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 5 April 2009, 15:33:22
I hope you're not talking about Back to the Future, still.
Two is the worst movie out of all of them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 5 April 2009, 16:49:33
You're rocking my world.

I thought the third one was the worst.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 5 April 2009, 17:26:51
... that's the best one.

Well, just goes to show you how widely opinions can differ.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 5 April 2009, 17:32:10
I agree with Chron, 3 was the best, then 1, and then 2.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 5 April 2009, 18:13:03
Well, my opinion doesn't count because I don't remember well enough. I just assumed 3 would be the worst and that's what I meant.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 5 April 2009, 19:41:03
Shame, shame.

Mind you I've only ever seen 2 once, but I've never cared to watch it again.
Not to say it's horrible, I just don't like it as well as the others.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 April 2009, 00:05:03
Two is the best. I'm sorry, but I'm not sorry. You're just wrong.

I just watched the Bruno trailer. It looks hilarious. I can't post it here because it's explicit, but I'm sure you can find it yourself. I'm definitely looking forward to it.

Posted on:  6 April 2009, 16:02:46

Finally watched The Aristocrats.

Not to be confused with the Disney flick.

So awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 April 2009, 01:38:23
Uh I remember every Back To The Future REALLY #####ing well and the second movie is definitely the best of the three and the third movie while great is still weaker than the other two.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 April 2009, 02:06:20
I agree completely.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 7 April 2009, 02:13:27
You guys just like the 3D T-rex and the hoverboard.
Admit it.

You're wooed by graphics!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 April 2009, 03:45:42
Okay, guys, I was just convinced to watch Crank, that Jason Statham movie where he's poisoned and needs to keep his adrenaline up to stay alive.

HOLY #####.

That was a GENUINELY fun movie.

I mean, it made no sense, everything was outrageously over-the-top, and it was pretty much just an excuse to go insane with crazy action-scenarios...... but that's almost EXACTLY why it's so awesome.

It's like action porn. So great. I'm gonna' have to see the sequel when it comes out, now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 7 April 2009, 06:15:23
Two is the best. I'm sorry, but I'm not sorry. You're just wrong.

I just watched the Bruno trailer. It looks hilarious. I can't post it here because it's explicit, but I'm sure you can find it yourself. I'm definitely looking forward to it.

Posted on:  6 April 2009, 16:02:46

Finally watched The Aristocrats.

Not to be confused with the Disney flick.

So awesome.

Uh I remember every Back To The Future REALLY #####ing well and the second movie is definitely the best of the three and the third movie while great is still weaker than the other two.

I agree completely.

I disagree with all of you, but I will respect your individual choices to be completely wrong.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 April 2009, 21:00:15
Mike Judge's next film "Extract" looks absolutely fantastic. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5E7zDL9nOc)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 April 2009, 21:12:04
Ben Affleck looks like a bearded Adam Sandler+Ben Stiller combo.

I bet I know how it's going to end.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 April 2009, 02:03:42
He looks like a lame version of The Dude.

And I wouldn't say it looks "absolutely fantastic" but if a real trailer comes out maybe I'll change my mind. Looks aight as is though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 April 2009, 03:59:53
I got a really nice vibe from the trailer and I had just come off from reading an article about it that really hyped it up, so that's why I'm excited.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 April 2009, 04:03:35
Ben Affleck looks like a bearded Adam Sandler+Ben Stiller combo.

I thought the same thing.

Looks good, Mike Judges stuff is pretty solid so this'll probably be good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 April 2009, 09:13:06
A couple friends and I went to see Crank 2 tonight, but we didn't check what time it started and we were late, so we saw I Love You, Man instead, which we all wanted to see just as much anyway.

It was really funny, I definitely enjoyed it.

After it was over, we were walking out when we looked at the schedule thing and realized Crank 2 was starting in 10 minutes. So we walked right back in (didn't even really TRY to sneak, we just walked in and nobody said anything) and impulsively saw Crank 2.

It was... wow. Just even MORE ridiculous than the first, and if you've seen that, you know how implausible that is. It was absolutely unbelievably fun. Just fun. So much fun. See this with a group of friends who just want to go "WHAT. WHAT THE... WHAT THE #####? HOLY... GODDAMN. OH MY GOD THIS IS CRAZY. IS THAT...?!"

Yeah.

Oh, and then we realized we didn't have a ride back so we walked all the way back to campus, which was a lot farther than we thought, and it was pretty cold out, but we were in T-shirts and shorts because when we left it was in the high 60's.

But yeah. Great pair of movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 April 2009, 16:30:46
Yesterday it got up to 62 here.
Stayed above 50 until 2AM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 April 2009, 17:36:30
We don't technically lose money for showing a movie to someone who hasn't paid. We don't register your admission, so no one ends up paying or being paid for your seeing a movie. If we gave you free admission it would cost us more than letting you just walk in. Of course, that'd be legal. But you know.

So even if you were noticed, nobody cared. But you probably weren't because no one is really paid to try and notice.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 April 2009, 18:34:09
Yeah, I mean I've snuck into movies a bunch of times, as has half the teen world, but this time we literally just walked out, said "Hey, wanna' go back in and see Crank 2?", and then walked right back in. But yeah. My point is that Crank 2 was #####ing insane.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 April 2009, 18:47:55
I have never done that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 April 2009, 19:33:18
For me, it was always more sneaking in friends that weren't 17.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 April 2009, 19:50:26
I've never stolen a theatre movie.

ALEC.

I've never had to sneak anyone into anything by other means than just pretending they were of age, either.

ALEC.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 18 April 2009, 20:37:26
STOP RIGHT THERE, CRIMINAL SCUM!

You've violated the law, now either surrender your stolen goods to me or go to jail!

> Pay fine. 80 gold
> Go to jail.
> Resist arrest.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 April 2009, 20:53:43
>roll doubles

HERE IS A LIST OF CRAZY THINGS CRANK 2 HAD (SPOILERS FOR THIS MOVIE ARE RETARDED BECAUSE IT MAKES NO SENSE ALREADY):
[spoiler]
- a crossdressing hispanic who died in the first movie playing that character's identical brother, and he has FULL BODY TOURRETTES
- a floating head in a tank of the main bad guy from the first movie
- Amy Smart with her nipples taped with black electrical tape
- a guy cutting off his own nipples
- a Godzilla-esque fight scene where Chev Chelios and the guy he's fighting become giant dudes fighting in a power plant area for NO REASON wearing weird plastic masks of their faces
- a ferret licking its own balls for a minute
- Chev Chelios JOLTING HIMSELF WITH ANY POSSIBLE ELECTRICAL SOURCE
- Chev Chelios fighting cops but then they TAZE HIM AND HE IS SUPER-POWERFUL AGAIN AND KICKS THEIR ASSES
- Chev Chelios ON #####ING FIRE FOR THE ENTIRE LAST FIVE MINUTES OF THE MOVIE
- public sex scene with Amy Smart and Jason Statham on a horse-race track
- SLOW MOTION HORSE JUNK
- one huge fat sumo asian guy getting pummelled in the nuts until they bleed by a whore with a bicycle
- an insane Asian bitch who DRAMATICALLY POINTS
- Chev Chelios LUBING UP A SHOTGUN AND SHOVING IT ALL THE WAY UP SOME GUY'S ASS
- a stripper gets shot through her breasts AND THEY DEFLATE AS THE SILICONE DRIPS OUT[/spoiler]

Insaaaaaaaane.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: saldite on 18 April 2009, 20:57:14
Sounds like my kind of movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 April 2009, 20:59:16
It's out-of-control and so over-the-top and they know it. It's a modern-day exploitation movie, but a genuine one, not like Grindhouse where they're just harkening back to the old days of exploitation.

This is exploiting the NOW of our insanity.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 April 2009, 05:53:21
I just read the first spoiler and was like "Done."

Posted on: 19 April 2009, 14:49:08

I just saw Adventureland and it kinda sucks. Like... a more decisive person might say the movie is bad. That ain't me. The actual plot of the movie was interesting enough to me, it wasn't totally the same old stuff and it wasn't totally fresh but I was interested in it enough to watch the whole movie when I decided the movie was lacking pretty early.

The movie failed to get me to really care about any of the characters or empathize with anyone. By the end of it I was only kind of getting there but for a long time it was like watching strangers talk. You don't really care or not care. My favourite person in movie was a really off the wall balls hot blonde waitress who was in the middle of a dancefloor and on screen only long enough to click my fingers.

It's advertised as a Superbad-esque comedy and it really isn't. The main portion of the movie isn't jokey at all and the jokes at the start and peppered throughout the movie don't really land. I mean, I can tell where the jokes are, I can tell that they're funny (I guess), but the delivery or timing is off or something. Actually "or something" is a phrase I use a lot in thinking about this movie. Without giving anything away, the funniest joke in the movie had to do with an eye-patch.

I don't know, it was just very bleh and I didn't feel like going to the movies in the first place anyway. If there's a movie you actually want to see and it's between this and that, go with that because Adventureland is pretty skippable even though I liked the idea of it. It was one of those movies where I could see what they were trying to do, they just didn't pull it off. Basically in a nutshell: Something's off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 May 2009, 07:35:40
I have this friend who gets REALLY excited about all the "big" movies, and I mean REALLY excited. He has terrible taste in movies but when he latches onto something, he gets more obsessed than me. So, yeah.

I just got dragged by him to the midnight premiere of X-Mans Original: Wolferine.

Which was actually really good.

Well, I enjoyed it quite a bit.

I heard they really messed up Deadpool from how he's actually supposed to be, but I have absolutely ZERO knowledge of ANY of the events in the movie so I have no idea. Seemed okay in the movie. Mike'll probably be able to comment more on this.

But yeah, basically, I was pleasantly surprised and really enjoyed it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 May 2009, 13:59:28
IT'S OUT?!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 May 2009, 16:37:24
I heard they really messed up Deadpool from how he's actually supposed to be, but I have absolutely ZERO knowledge of ANY of the events in the movie so I have no idea. Seemed okay in the movie. Mike'll probably be able to comment more on this.

Or WIND.
I could compare Deadpool in this movie to the DragonBall:Evolution. That's how far they jammed their ##### stick in Deadpool's butt.

What we were expecting:
(http://filmonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/deadpool_final.jpg)

What we got:
(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2792/picture6b.png)
(the symbols on his body roughly translate to "THIS MOVIE BLOWS")

Now, in the heat of all this retardation, I can only muster up one thought..

"WAT"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 May 2009, 18:11:22
Uuuhhhhh, so it's not worth seeing?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 May 2009, 18:32:51
It was pretty good, and Deadpool is only near the end of the movie. Plus, if you have no idea who he is, then you don't really have any idea that they messed him up. I never would've known if I hadn't read about how wrong they got him a while ago. The movie was still a good addition to the Marvel movieverse.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 May 2009, 18:36:19
Will see tomorrow with GF then.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 May 2009, 22:01:16
This movie has already been pretty much spoiled for me, I'd still watch it but I'm hesitant to actually go. It's gonna be screwey but I can't fully judge it on that..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 May 2009, 22:13:53
It's not like there's much to spoil. You pretty much already know how it's going to end anyway.

Movies like this are weird because you know that anyone in the later X-Men movies is never in any real mortal danger at any time. And on top of that, Wolverine and Sabretooth can both #####ing heal from anything.

I just think it's interesting that (extremely minor spoiler):
[spoiler]they devoted screentime to things such as Wolverine flatlining after they infuse him with adamantium... as if there's a chance he won't live through it.[/spoiler]

Basically, we already know a lot of the story.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 May 2009, 22:33:37
I hear they may actually start a X-Men Origins: Deadpool. That's what I hear, not a fact.

Anyway, watched Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, #####ing amazing. By far one of the best movies I've seen, I was completely entertained through the entire movie. May actually have to buy the DVD.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 May 2009, 23:03:21
The next X-Men Origins is Magneto, I believe. Could be wrong. There was supposed to be a Deadpool movie but it was scrapped - Ryan Reynolds has been fighting for it for a long time, since 2003 or something.

Anyway, THANK YOU FOR FINALLY WATCHING KISS KISS BANG BANG. It's a serious contender for my favorite movie of all time, which I currently proclaim as Shaun of the Dead. Just absolutely fantastic, hilarious, action-packed... the BEST writing I've witnessed, in my opinion, especially in the dialogue.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 May 2009, 23:46:04
Yeah, the script was so well done, and RDJ pulled it off perfectly. There was barely a moment where I wasn't laughing, the movie has everything.

Magneto sounds like a good movie, I may be more interested in that since Magneto is a wicked villain.

Also, first pic of Iron Man 2.
(http://www.marvel.com/i/content/st/7860header_banner1189553.jpg)

It's too bad Terrance Howard isn't gonna be Rhodes in this one, he's pretty dumb to pass down the chance to be War Machine for money. That doesn't make sense, It's #####in' War Machine, that ##### is so cash!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 May 2009, 02:12:31
I heard all about Wolverine today and I know it sucked so Alec is a liar.
I'll see it sometime anyway, but I know it sucks. I know this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 May 2009, 02:26:52
That's only because you care about the subject matter and it can only go downhill for you.

I had the lowest possible expectations, I didn't even want to see it, I was begging everyone to just go see Crank 2 instead even though it wasn't playing at midnight obviously. Basically, not being a big X-Men fan or anything left me with the ability to actually enjoy the movie.

I read up on Deadpool's actual character in the comics and I totally see how wrong and messed up they got him and that actually pisses me off quite a bit now that I know how cool of a character he is. Wisecracking badass who's constantly breaking the fourth wall? He'd be my favorite if I actually read comics.

I saw this panel and fell in love:
(http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2807/60141816.jpg)

So, yeah, basically, you're going to HATE it, Mike. You too, Wind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 May 2009, 02:35:10
I honestly don't care about it, but I'm aware it begins to suck in almost all ways in the last 40 minutes. This has been confirmed multiple times in multiple crowds of people who don't even know each other at all.

And they butchered Deadpool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 2 May 2009, 13:35:18
I just don't think Deadpool was talking nearly enough, and it just seemed off that everyone was telling him to shut up all the time.

My brother didn't even know it was him that was Weapon XI.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 2 May 2009, 16:38:38
Was forced to watch 17 Again last night.

Was surprisingly decent; I liked the nerdy references that one of the characters constantly dropped.

But other than that, it's not really worth the watch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 2 May 2009, 20:03:07
Shouldn't have even mentioned that, V..

Wolverine Vs Hulk is a much better movie, Deadpool is perfect in it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 May 2009, 20:39:16
I've recently been downloading a huge amount of... well, you can only call bad movies. But, you know the kind, the "so-bad-they're-good" kind, the type MST3K would cover (and they've covered most of these.)

I'm going to have a bad movie marathon soon. Here's what's on the list:

- Plan 9 From Outer Space (obviously)
- The Gingerdead Man (starring GARY BUSEY)
- Santa's Slay ("Santa had to be good for 1,000 years... those 1,000 years are up.")
- The Wizard of Gore (they watched this in Juno, I believe)
- Santa Claus Conquers The Martians
- Teenagers From Outer Space
- Shark Attack 3: Megalodon (look this up on Youtube for the best line in movie history)

Last one that I have to download is Manos: Hands of Fate.

Should be a fun marathon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 3 May 2009, 01:50:16
Hahaha, MST3K did most of those, if I'm not mistaken.
Enjoy trying to watch them (Manos will be so amazingly bad that you can't stop watching, even without your robot friends).

> The Gingerdead Man (starring GARY BUSEY)

MUST SEE THIS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 May 2009, 02:45:20
MST3K did most of those, if I'm not mistaken.

the type MST3K would cover (and they've covered most of these.)

Anyway, yeah, I'm doing this movie marathon with some friends. We'll probably split it up over a few days. Should be tons of fun. I watched the beginning of Santa's Slay, and it's spectacular. Also, Emilie De'Ravin (however you spell it, she plays Claire on Lost) is in it! Funny.

And yeah, Gingerdead Man looks #####ing amazing. Can't wait to watch that one. There's a second one (without Busey) titled "Passion of the Crust."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 May 2009, 03:15:01
Review of X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Worth a $5.75 Matinee.
Fun to watch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 May 2009, 05:34:29
Let me be the first one here to say... that Star Trek #####ing ROCKED.

That was... that was REALLY good.

The following doesn't really include any real spoilers, but, well, I'll tag 'em just to be safe because there are some things that are questionable:
[spoiler]
I love how it was a prequel, sequel, and a reboot all at the same time. Really cool. You'll understand when you see it.

I waited like half the movie just for Simon Pegg to come in and BAM. Maybe his best performance yet. Absolutely fantastic, he did an amazing job and it was worth the suspense of him not being there for, like, half the movie.[/spoiler]

For those who don't want to read the spoiler tags, basically it says that the movie was really creative and that Simon Pegg had an absolutely amazing performance.

Anyway, I just really enjoyed it and it's going to be a huge hit. You'll all love it.

Keep in mind that I only have base knowledge of Star Trek, as in, I know what pop culture has taught me. I've seen random episodes on SciFi and G4 but I've never seriously watched it. And even without being a fan, I loved this movie. So don't let that scare you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 9 May 2009, 12:57:46
I'll try not to let it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 9 May 2009, 20:24:49
I liked it, but there were some serious plot holes. I don't get how stuff like that just gets ignored.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 9 May 2009, 20:36:14
It's Star Trek. They accept and embrace their plot holes, not patch them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 May 2009, 20:59:48
You really can't nitpick the plot of a Star Trek movie. I mean, okay, yeah, black holes don't send you back in time or crush you. That's understood. But YOU ALSO CAN'T BEAM PEOPLE ACROSS THE GALAXY WITH THE HELP OF SIMON PEGG.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 May 2009, 00:35:34
Gonna watch Star Trek and I Love You Man at the drive in tonight.

Hell yeah drive in!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 May 2009, 01:07:11
I LOVE THE DRIVE IN.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 May 2009, 01:13:05
LET'S ALL GO TO THE LOBBY! LET'S ALL GO TO THE LOBBY! LET'S ALL GO TO THE LOBBY--TO GET OURSELVES SOME SNACKS!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 10 May 2009, 04:33:18
You really can't nitpick the plot of a Star Trek movie. I mean, okay, yeah, black holes don't send you back in time or crush you. That's understood. But YOU ALSO CAN'T BEAM PEOPLE ACROSS THE GALAXY WITH THE HELP OF SIMON PEGG.

Right, but I'm not talking about science or what is theoretically possible. I'm talking about the plot. I'm not criticizing a Star Trek movie for using Star Trek concepts, why would I do that?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 10 May 2009, 19:21:01
OKAY SO I WATCHED STAR TREK. #####ING AWFUL. I MEAN #####ING AWESOME.

The first 5 minutes almost got me teary eyed, the only word I can describe it with is "epic", I loved Kirk, and Simon Pegg/Scotty was the greatest hands down, I almost wish he had more parts.

I watched I Love You Man too, hilarious. Heheheh, Joebin..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 May 2009, 22:34:36
I spell it Joben, and I say it all the time now for some reason.

But yeah, I reeeeally wish Simon Pegg had more parts. It's not fair that he came in so late, because he was seriously giving an awesome performance that demanded more screentime. To be fair, though, he did get a good handful of stuff to do, and I'm thankful for that. Definitely the showstealer.

And yeah, the guy who played Kirk was a real charmer. I liked him.

Posted on: 10 May 2009, 21:13:13

FINALLY, a new traditionally animated Disney film:

The Princess and the Frog Trailer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6DmEgtibOg)

First black princess!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 May 2009, 22:41:18
Haven't seen Star Trek yet but it's pretty much the only movie I care about seeing right now. I've heard good things from people who don't really know Star Trek, and good things from people who REALLY know Star Trek. So it sounds like an A++.

Gonna watch Star Trek and I Love You Man at the drive in tonight.

Hell yeah drive in!

You're in for two treats!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 May 2009, 21:47:11
Yeah, I actually want to see Star Trek again.

Anyway, I just watched Fanboys. That movie's been in limbo for SO long, since 2007 or something. Glad I finally got to watch it.

It's a really entertaining geekfest. Not the greatest film, obviously, but fun for what it is. All the performances are really funny, and there's so many cameos that you can't help but love it.

Also, Kristin Bell dressed as Slave Leia.

Will Forte and Craig Robinson were Skywalker Ranch guards, William Shatner made an awesome cameo, Seth Rogen had a funny but small role very different than his usual stuff, and also, Kristin Bell dressed as Slave Leia.

I'm not a huge Star Wars fan by ANY means, but I do love it and I definitely reccomend this movie to anyone else who does.

Also, Kristin Bell dressed as Slave Leia.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 May 2009, 21:56:39
Uhm, I heard Fanboys sucked really bad.

But maybe I'll take a look.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 May 2009, 22:03:06
Oh, I could definitely see people hating it. It's not for everybody. I was really lax with it because it's geeky and I appreciated that. They played Mario Kart, made Zelda references, wore G.I. Joe shirts - I couldn't hate it. And it wasn't just a generic road trip movie by any means, though it certainly had that formula to it.

I can't say for sure if you'd like it, but yeah, take a look. Basically, even though I enjoyed it, I definitely can see people thinking it sucked.

You'd like the Kevin Smith/Jason Mewes cameo.

Posted on: 11 May 2009, 22:00:15

Also:

(http://usatv.blogosfere.it/images/200712/kristen-bell-gold-bikini-leia-02.jpg)

I know a guy who knows a guy who used to get babysat by her.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 May 2009, 22:08:20
Oooh those red boxers with Dalmatians on them are cuuuuute.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 May 2009, 22:12:44
KRISTIN BELL.

DRESSED AS SLAVE LEIA.

YOU HOMO.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 May 2009, 22:54:21
Eh, it's pretty hot I guess.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 12 May 2009, 00:01:35
I think everyone who watches Heroes has already seen her in a bikini and this isn't really a step up?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 May 2009, 00:06:47
Oh, HER!

I didn't recognize her with the black hair.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 May 2009, 00:25:35
Goddamnit, John.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 05:07:18
I do have a crush on Kristen Bell, too.

And that's brown hair John. And... Jesus, John. Christ.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 12 May 2009, 06:30:17
Somehow it's impossible for me to have a crush on a celebrity. But maybe it only seems that way because I never have a crush on a celebrity.

Not criticizing of course, that's just my thought.

There's only one time I've been stopped dead by someone's appearance alone, and I never saw that girl again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 06:59:11
I don't have a CRUSH on her like "Oh I so think about her all the time like ooh" I just like her.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 May 2009, 11:51:36
My celebrity crushes are Robert Downey Junior, Simon Pegg, and Neil Patrick Harris. The latter is gay so I have a shot.

But seriously... Zooey Deschanel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 May 2009, 14:41:10
My only celebrity crush is Edward Norton.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 12 May 2009, 15:06:57
Ever since seeing Downey Jr. in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and Iron Man, I've wanted to go deeper into his movies and deeper into his heart <3

NO HOMO. TOO LATE I CALLED IT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 18:55:57
He doesn't really have many good movies...

He's in Weird Science though. That was a good movie. He's not a lead in it or anything, but it's funny 'cause he still had the part in his teeth.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 May 2009, 21:29:17
Downey was in more than enough enough good movies. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Iron Man, Tropic Thunder, and Charlie Bartlett, which was ONLY good because of his great performance even though it wasn't a lead. He was in Chaplin and A Scanner Darkly, though I haven't seen either but heard they're both good. I have to go see The Soloist sometime this week or next. And soon, we've got Sherlock Holmes, two Iron Man sequels, and The Avengers.

So SUCK IT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 21:35:59
He's only been in good movies since Iron Man fame, really. I haven't Scanner Darkly or Kiss Kiss Bang Bang though. Like every movie he was in before those sucked and everyone knows it.

Saying "he's gonna be in this" is bull##### because I'm talking about a ratio of good movies he's in against bad movies he's in, and that ratio is way off. He's been in a lot of crap and talking about four movies you like doesn't change that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 May 2009, 21:36:59
It changes everything.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 21:38:03
Maybe when the universe ends and "everything" and "nothing" is the same not thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 May 2009, 21:46:32
Anyway, yeah, watch Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 May 2009, 21:56:05
I've wanted to if only for the name, I just never did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 14 May 2009, 02:02:18
Finally saw Benjamin Button last night.
Incredible film. Everybody go watch it.

ALSO saw Star Trek.
##### was so cash.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 May 2009, 02:01:25
http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/sherlock-holmes/trailer

Soooo excited for this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 19 May 2009, 07:30:48
Looks like it'll be a wonderful movie but a terrible Sherlock Holmes story


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 May 2009, 06:26:12
I've never read a Sherlock Holmes story, but I've wanted to for years ever since someone explained to me how Professor Moriarty is like, the ultimate villain. That really got me hooked, but I still haven't made time for it.

Posted on: 19 May 2009, 12:24:16

Haha, I just watched that old Tiny Toons movie, How I Spent My Summer Vacation. I haven't seen it since I was really young. It holds up pretty well with a great dose of nostalgia.

I love the entire movie is resolved by Buster and Babs falling through a plot hole and getting tossed out back in Acme Acres. Also how Superman saves their life for no reason at one point. There's a lot of funny references that I would never have gotten as a kid, ranging from Jay Leno to Roseanne.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 May 2009, 06:27:57
A good child's show has things that the child finds entertaining and things that adults can find amusing so they can bear it.

It is what many kids shows nowadays lack.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 May 2009, 03:21:10
It's what the movies have.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 May 2009, 14:23:39
All the kids get now is americanized animes and that sort of shiat.

Anywhom, Terminator Salvation has been getting some heavily bad reviews; saying the flick doesn't have the heart that the others had. I'm still going to watch it because I'm a robot/time travel freak, but it'd be too bad if it doesn't have the same kind of emotion the first 3 had.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 May 2009, 15:33:19
I almost went with some friends on Wednesday at midnight (why'd it come out on Thursday?) but we ended doing better stuff (i.e. nothing.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 May 2009, 01:42:01
Since there shouldn't be a Terminator movie where the war actually happens (if you understood the theme of first two--AKA the good--Terminator movies), I'm not surprised it didn't have the heard the others had.

Since originally they wanted Bale to play Marcus and not John Connor and have very little if any John Connor in the movie but Bale dicked at them and said if he was gonna be in the movie he'd have to be playing John Connor, I'm not surprised the movie is lacking.


But I'll still see it because I mostly love Terminator. Mostly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 May 2009, 04:33:32
Watched Terminator, it was actually really good, not for a Terminator movie, but it was still really good.. I #####ing hate Bale though, the ass still has the same problem he did in Batman, where he starts grunting to be a "tough guy". Almost everything he said was impossible to understand, it was like--"BRUAGRAH-JOHN CONNOR-BRABRAGRAAH-THE FUTURE-GRAWRAGHAW-TERMINATOR"

They had a lot of homages to the first 2 movies though. A LOT. And they were VERY good too. Like I said before, didn't have the heart and story of the first two, but was still pretty good. Made for an excellent action flick.

Since there shouldn't be a Terminator movie where the war actually happens (if you understood the theme of first two--AKA the good--Terminator movies), I'm not surprised it didn't have the heard the others had.

I'm actually happy they made more, they did mess things up by making 3 and this one, but I still like watching Terminator movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 May 2009, 02:03:35
I'm hoping to see that and Star Trek soon, but I'm sure the Terminator show is better than the new movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 25 May 2009, 03:41:09
Batman would have to mask his voice, to be fair. I figured that was just part of their take on Batman.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 May 2009, 07:26:23
I completely disagree. Batman doesn't have to mask his voice. Bruce Wayne does.

The best example of Batman voicing done right is Batman: The Animated Series (90's). When Bruce was alone with Alfred, or Dick, or Tim, he had the same voice as he did when he was Batman because that's his voice. The larger than life Bruce Wayne persona is a disguise and in The Animated Series, he puts on a different voice when he's out in public. I think they continued this in Justice League and Justice League Unlimited but I'm not sure, and I've got no idea how much if any time was spent showing Bruce Wayne at parties or galas or whatever rich people think is fun but isn't.

It makes entirely more sense this way. Otherwise, he'd have to hold up this fake voice 90% of the time (he's Batman almost 24/7) and even when in duress, combat, and such things a comic serial has in spades..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 27 May 2009, 18:35:32
I figured that was just part of their take on Batman. It wasn't necessarily better.

But no, I wouldn't have known about Bruce masking his voice differently in the show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 May 2009, 22:56:04
It just makes more sense that way.

It's like how my friend always draws Batman as more ripped than Superman. Superman is still bigger but in terms of muscle tone and hardness and stuff Batman's more fit, simply because "he actually needs to be". Superman is just naturally super.

As a side note, I'm watching The Batman right now, which I never really liked, and I can't tell what voice stuff Bats is doing but I absolutely hate The Riddler in this. Unfortunate, since I really like the Riddler in other stuff. I also hate Robin in it to no end.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 May 2009, 23:01:59
I was at a garage sale that was basically just a DVD collection on Sunday. I almost got a box set of four of the old Batman movies for $10. They also had a box set of four Alien movies.

I ended up getting a lot of SUPER-cheap TV-show sets instead, like Strangers With Candy and Married With Children for about $5 each.

It was a really cool garage sale. Apparently a relative with a huge DVD collection died and they were selling all of it. Which probably made the dude's ghost pretty mad.

In addition to the TV shows, I got The Terminator 1 and 2, Reefer Madness, Billy Madison, and Happy Gilmore for a DOLLAR each.

I had planned to go back later and clean the place out since it was all so cheap but I totally forgot and then they were closed up. It's on the other side of town and I was only there hanging with some friends so I haven't gone back to see if they're still set up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 May 2009, 23:17:00
Those people are idiots for those movies so cheap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 27 May 2009, 23:20:15
Not to mention it being a jackassy move to profit off your dead loved one's belongings.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 May 2009, 01:23:04
And they were making fun of the dead guy, too!

"He never even OPENED half of these! It's so weird!"

I almost blurted out "I hope my relatives don't just up and sell my entire collection when I die."

But yeah, it was a great find because they had no idea how much any of this stuff should actually sell for, especially the TV shows.

They had the entire series of Stargate SG-1 for $5 each, which totaled to about $40 for all 8 seasons. Now, I have absolutely zero interest in ever watching that show, but I was tempted to buy them all and sell them on eBay or something since the complete series goes for about $150 on Amazon used ($250-something retail.)

I really wish I didn't have such distracting friends because I would've totally cleared that place out if I'd gone back.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 28 May 2009, 03:51:10
It just makes more sense that way.

Yeah, I do see your point. Sorry, I should've said that. I'd just assumed that there wasn't any voice masking going on in the show because I didn't watch it that much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 May 2009, 05:59:09
I just saw Star Trek and liked it.

[spoiler]Except that's not at all how black holes work.
Like at all.

They don't even look like that, so they could've called them wormholes or something instead.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 May 2009, 22:20:50
The black hole stuff was so silly.

Posted on: 28 May 2009, 10:29:02

Saw "The Soloist."

I thought it was a very good movie, but I didn't love it. I liked it quite a bit, but I didn't love it. Downey and Foxx were both very good in it.

Seeing "Up" tomorrow.

I hear they attached a Toy Story 3 teaser trailer to it. Fantastic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 28 May 2009, 22:22:10
I hear they attached a Toy Story 3 teaser trailer to it. Fantastic.

NO. #####ING. WAY.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 May 2009, 22:23:11
##### ##### ##### ##### SHHHHHHIT ##### FCuK


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 May 2009, 22:24:46
##### ##### ##### ##### SHHHHHHIT ##### FCuK

Alec Robbins likes this.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 28 May 2009, 22:42:45
STEVE DRUMONDE REALLY LIKES THAT TOY STORY 3 IS BEING MADE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 May 2009, 22:45:36
Steve Drumonde became a fan of Toy Story 3.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 May 2009, 22:46:24
Mike Collymore is I LOVE THE FIRST TOY STORY!!!!!1


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 29 May 2009, 01:16:38
Steve Drumonde joined the group "I HAD ALL THE FRIGGIN' TOYS FROM TOY STORY!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 May 2009, 01:30:12
Alec Robbins completed the quiz "WHICH TOY STORY 2 CHARATER R U?" with the result MARTIAN SQUEEZE TOYS LOL.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Captain Sanoguchi on 29 May 2009, 02:19:01
Captain Sanoguchi is not amused by facebook related humor.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 May 2009, 02:32:45
Alec Robbins has poked Captain Sanoguchi!

Poke back?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 29 May 2009, 02:41:13
I have my facebook on 1337. They actually consider it another language.

Yup.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 May 2009, 05:57:16
I knew they were making a Toy Story 3, but I've seen no trailers or heard no news of it for months until now.

It could either bomb, be meh like the 2nd, or rad like the 1st. I honestly have no opinion on it but I'm interested in the least.

But anyway...

Nathan Kendall toy story 3?? omg!!
2 minutes ago · Comment · Like



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 29 May 2009, 09:58:10
I hear they attached a Toy Story 3 teaser trailer to it. Fantastic.

This made me smile. I hope they can get the old actors back, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 May 2009, 15:36:34
It could either bomb, be meh like the 2nd, or rad like the 1st. I honestly have no opinion on it but I'm interested in the least.

The second was JUST AS GOOD as the first.

I hear they attached a Toy Story 3 teaser trailer to it. Fantastic.

This made me smile. I hope they can get the old actors back, though.

Apparently everyone is back.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 May 2009, 18:11:44
It could either bomb, be meh like the 2nd, or rad like the 1st. I honestly have no opinion on it but I'm interested in the least.

The second was JUST AS GOOD as the first.

Um, no. But it was good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 29 May 2009, 18:24:58
The second was RAD just like the first. Just different levels of RAD. YOU PUTZ.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 May 2009, 00:45:39
Toy Story 2 was the first non-planned-from-the-start sequel (i.e. NOT Star Wars, Back to the Future) that I truly thought was every bit as good as the first, and better in a ton of different new ways.

Posted on: 29 May 2009, 16:13:42

WHAT'S UP?

FANTASTIC, THAT'S WHAT.

I got there a little late so I missed any Toy Story 3 teasers there might have been. I'd like confirmation that there WAS one, at least.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 30 May 2009, 02:09:19
Only one I've seen. Looked it up a few hours ago before I went to work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXJEDUainX4

EDIT: I should probably rewatch Toy Story 2 before seeing this. I barely remember anything except that I just thought it was okay.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 May 2009, 02:15:21
Um yeah no, Toy Story 2 was a good movie, but it doesn't compare to the first. Especially since it's JUST a reverse of the first. Like Rush Hour 2 (except Rush Hour 2 is better).

The point I'm trying to make is I still would like to know where Ricky Tan at.

I have my facebook on 1337. They actually consider it another language.

Yup.

YUCK.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 31 May 2009, 17:22:50
Up was fantastic. By far the most charming movie I've ever seen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2009, 19:02:49
The parts I laughed the hardest were:

[spoiler]- the Alpha dog's voice
- the second "SQUIRREL!" moment because I wasn't expecting it again
- the dogs playing poker like that famous picture
- so much stuff with that bird Kevin was hilarious
- "I hope he doesn't notice the bird's missing..." "WHERE'S KEVIN?! WHERE'S KEVIN?!"
- and there was tons more[/spoiler]

That's a testament to the movie itself that I laughed so much because I think I laugh less during most PG-13/R comedies lately.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 31 May 2009, 20:04:14
My favorite joke was [spoiler] at the end when they're counting cars and Doug goes "grey car". It took everyone in the theater a moment to understand that and then we all starting laughing. [/spoiler]

I can't wait until it is out on DVD.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2009, 20:06:22
I was the only one in my theater who laughed at that. Twice. Because I ended up seeing it again yesterday with a different group of friends.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 31 May 2009, 21:25:40
Watched it. Copy and Paste what you guys all said.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2009, 22:27:53
what you guys all said.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 31 May 2009, 22:58:05
I just woke up. Didn't want to make a big list explaining why it was awesome.

Didn't feel like using proper grammar either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2009, 23:10:48
I wasn't making fun of your grammar, I was following your instructions.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 31 May 2009, 23:46:49
Oh, good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 June 2009, 04:56:40
Ahahaha, I just saw a commercial for a movie they apparently made of a horrible book I had to read for school once. It's called My Sister's Keeper and it's about this girl who has cancer, and her sister is jealous because the cancer-girl gets all the attention in the family. That, and they make her donate blood and bone marrow and stuff since she's a match. And they really only HAD her BECAUSE they wanted her to keep the cancer-daughter healthy. Then she hires a lawyer to fight her family. And boring stuff happens.

And then she finally decides to save her sister but then she dies in a car crash!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 5 June 2009, 04:59:07
PFFFFT'WHUAAAAAAAT?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 June 2009, 05:12:21
It was like they cobbled together all of the things that have been time-tested to tug at your heartstrings into one book, and the resulting combination is either extremely effective (to girls!) or pathetically obvious (to boys!) and it's just lame.

This movie will be a HUGE hit.

To GIRLS!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 June 2009, 09:17:15
The name suggests it's for gals anyhow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 June 2009, 14:47:37
That sounds like a boring read.

They already did it on CSI Miami once anyways.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 June 2009, 00:27:33
The only good thing about this coming out is that I can now spoil it immediately for everybody.

Posted on:  5 June 2009, 10:30:56

Okay, guys, you gotta' go see The Hangover. I loved it, it was a great movie, and Zach Galifianakis is super-effin'-stellar in it. Ed Helms is good, too. And Bradley Cooper. Basically, the three main guys you'll be watching are all great.

It was really funny and even though some jokes were juvenile stuff, the movie as a whole was just quality stuff and really enjoyable.

Haha, we were gonna' see it last night, but it didn't work out. We were going to an 11:30 showing since one of our friends was begging us to wait until he was off of work, which wasn't until 11. So, we waited for him and he said he'd meet us there. We find out it's sold out, and we're all pissed because our late friend (Darryn) made us wait for this show and we wouldn't have missed it if we had gone to an earlier one. So Darryn still isn't there, and we decide to head home and tell him that we're waiting for him in the theater to make him drive out there anyway.

Turns out when he gets there and finds out it's sold out, he begs them to let him in because his "friends were already inside and holding him a seat." And they gave him a ticket. They let him in. The irony stung a bit.

But yeah, he found out we weren't actually there and got pissed off at us and came back, effectively wasting eight bucks on a ticket. He apparently felt stupid staying by himself. Also I don't think there were any seats.

ANYWAY.

Like I said, we saw it today and it was great. It wasn't outstanding or anything groundbreaking, but like I said, it was quality and definitely a great movie. The best part is that it's NOTHING like an Apatow comedy, which everyone is probably so sick of by now. It's really a breath of fresh air at this point in time.

Also, best end-credits sequence ever. Even better than the dicks in Superbad. Or the art timeline in Wall-E.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 June 2009, 01:01:04
I may go to the drive in tonight. That'll be something to watch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 June 2009, 18:47:05
It was like they cobbled together all of the things that have been time-tested to tug at your heartstrings into one book, and the resulting combination is either extremely effective (to girls!) or pathetically obvious (to boys!) and it's just lame.

This movie will be a HUGE hit.

To GIRLS!

The plot description you just gave sounds like a made-for-Lifetime.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 7 June 2009, 21:47:44
Where are the abusive men that justify an irrational hatred of the entire sex?

Or the psychotic woman that wants to steal your baby and has been secretly replacing your breast milk with her own?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 June 2009, 23:15:54
I think they're somewhere in there. I skimmed a lot, but yeah, in my "report" of the book I had a line like "I didn't know Lifetime made BOOKS now."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 June 2009, 03:50:38
Yeah, Up! was magnificent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 June 2009, 04:19:47
Why did you add an exclamation point there?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 8 June 2009, 17:54:59
Thought I posted here... maybe I posted it in the Hows Your Day Thread...

But yeah, UP was FANTASTIC and a must watch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 June 2009, 02:06:55
UP was INCREDIBLE.

I cried.
Twice.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 9 June 2009, 02:18:09
I KNOW MAN.

Most at the starting, it was heartwarming.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 June 2009, 02:19:50
Well, the start, and when he looked at the next part once he got there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 9 June 2009, 02:30:15
You cried too!?

Awesome. Now I don't feel like such a wuss.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 June 2009, 02:41:06
I was with my friend Hilary and she cried 4 times.

I don't even know how.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 9 June 2009, 02:42:23
Three times. Twice in the same spots you probably did, and I actually forgot where in the third time.

Annie cried too.

EDIT: Dang, now I wanna go see it again. It's THAT GOOD. Definitely worth a DVD purchase upon release.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 June 2009, 02:55:40
I intend to see it in 3D.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 9 June 2009, 03:02:17
I felt like crying. But I didn't.

WUSSES.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 June 2009, 04:09:11
I just can't bring myself to cry at something on-screen. I'm so detached from it all. The closest I've come is the series finale of Six Feet Under, and even then it was just the hint of a tear I had to brush away. (Greatest series finale ever, so goddamn emotional.)

But yeah, nothing else has ever even gotten me CLOSE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 June 2009, 09:39:50
Yeah same here except all that six feet blunder.

I felt like crying. But I didn't.

Yeah same here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 9 June 2009, 18:17:13
The only time I cried watching something on a screen, was when I was 6 and Xena the WARRIOR PRINCESS or whatever it was called was trapped on some cage or something and they were going to burn her!
GOD.
SHE
MANAGED TO ESCAPE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 June 2009, 07:14:43
I saw The Hangover tonight and really liked it except for something I'll get to in a minute. It had a couple references to Old School which I think I might've been the only person in the theatre who noticed. My friends didn't anyway.


OOK so the only things I didn't like were actually not in the movie. It was the people to my front left. Some lady and some dude brought their kid to the movie. Did I say kid? I meant baby. They brought their baby. A goshdamn baby.

And I don't mean one of these crying little babies, THAT would have been better. I mean one of these new-to-talking little #####en babies that will say like "baba" or "mama" loudly enough, but ALSO the type of new-to-talking baby that knows some things so when another baby comes on screen (which from the commercials you know there is one) the baby in the theatre yells  "It's a baby! A baby!"

Now that would be annoying enough if this was a PG-13 movie or something else a baby shouldn't be at, but this movie is rated R in Ontario (that's "Restricted", 18 and over ONLY, but I guess babies aren't people or something), and this is clearly a baby who is able to learn words like the different F words and then probably WILL repeat them. Who the hell brings a baby to see The Hangover? That's not even a decision it's just don't do it. Did this couple honestly NEED to see The Hangover badly enough that they had to bring the baby when they couldn't find a sitter?

...

NO THEY DIDN'T AND I'LL TELL YOU WHY. They were talkers. Uhhhhhggggh#####ing talkers. And not little whispers that are fine by me. I mean the kind of talkers who full voice say things like "Oh he's making it up" when you'd actually have to be their BABY to not understand that a man is lying to his girlfriend over the phone. I don't mind so much when people are talking in the theatre (although it is completely #####ing rude) compared to people that say completely obvious things in life. And when they say completely obvious things in a movie theatre it really grinds on how much I'm enjoying the movie. This dude actually caused to stop laughing at one part because he explained an extremely obvious joke out loud. And he did it to himself, it's not even like someone didn't get it which at least I would understand.

Not that this happens in The Hangover, but imagine someone getting a pie to the face and then you laughing (because that IS hilarious) and the dude to the front left of you goes "He got hit in the face with a pie" and he's not even saying it in a holy ##### did you see that way, he's just sort of saying what just happened. INSTANT mood killer. If I wanted a description I'd have read the script, which they obviously sent to me since they wanted me to play Mike Tyson's bit, but I was already involved with Shrek 7.


But you know, maybe I'm fighting a losing battle here because I could tell from the woman's ultra classy trucker hat that they were clearly the toast of the town.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 12 June 2009, 07:38:17
R?

It's 14A here in Aurora, Ontario. I even checked to make sure it wasn't 18A because I really didn't feel like dealing with underage kids trying to sneak in.

I hate people who talk in theatres. Like, honestly hate them. I don't want to deal with some asshole who won't shut up. I don't WANT to kick them out. And the displeasure of having to deal with them in the first place would make it easier to kick them out if I was actually an asshole who likes ruining things for people but I'm not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 June 2009, 15:25:32
Someone brought a baby to my showing but it only cried out twice and we just thought it was crazy that someone would bring a baby to The Hangover. It wasn't annoying, though, so it was fine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 June 2009, 16:22:33
Those are the people go to and tell them to please shut the hell up.

I'm not shy about it.
I also get a few 'thanks' from the people around when I do it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 June 2009, 19:51:53
Nah. This was the kind of woman that if I'd said that to her she yell at me to ##### off and I really didn't need to be the person making MORE noise.

R?

A Yahoo Canada site said R, but I'm thinking it was 18A. Still it seems to be per province so you're probably right. But still.

Anyway it's actually cool that you guys have employees get rid of such people. I mean, I've never seen ANYONE get taken out of a theatre for such things here, and I've had people seriously yelling and kicking the back of my seat during Scary Movie 4. It was just astounding enough that I was AT that movie, and then the dumbass chicks behind me were actually scared/startled? Are you kidding me?

Someone brought a baby to my showing but it only cried out twice and we just thought it was crazy that someone would bring a baby to The Hangover. It wasn't annoying, though, so it was fine.

Yeah that would've been fine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 June 2009, 02:01:20
Had I been annoyed enough, I would've told them to stop, and if they didn't listen, I'd leave to inform an employee or something about the issue. I really can't stand people ruining crap like that. If it was bad enough, I'd ask if I could just leave and come back to review it free of charge or something.

I've never encountered that problem though, but I rarely go out to see movies anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 June 2009, 02:12:08
Haha, I won't even leave a movie to take a piss no matter HOW bad I have to go, let alone to inform a theater employee that someone's being a douchebuckle.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 June 2009, 02:42:40
Yeah same here, it will probably be my next cause of death.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 June 2009, 03:00:49
You wouldn't even get up to take a piss during Scary Movie 4?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 June 2009, 03:07:22
Clearly I peed anyway 'cause it was so sc-sc-scurrrrdy!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 June 2009, 06:02:13
It doesn't happen often because I don't think people report it often. But there are checks that need to be done every half an hour and you can hear WHISPERING all the way from the top row... the only problem is it may be hard to pinpoint who's making the noise. And you have to disrupt a lot of people further to get involved.

I had to deal with a mentally disabled guy making noise. I couldn't even communicate with him. It was ridiculous. He had a supervisor that I eventually found but from then the person complaining about them was still a bitch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 14 June 2009, 19:11:50
I went and saw Up on Friday night for Emili's birthday. She and I both agree that, while it wasn't a BAD movie, it was easily the weakest Pixar film that we'd ever seen. The villain was rather gray, all the funniest moments were in the preview, and the idea of this guys dead wife is hanging over his head the whole time (symbolically that's exactly what the house was) was gave the whole movie a melancholy tone that tinged even its funnier moments.

I had to watch Airplane! afterword to remind myself that REAL comedy once existed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 June 2009, 20:28:06
Weakest Pixar movie is definitely Cars. A Bug's Life is down there, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 14 June 2009, 23:32:32
Really? I thought it was magnificent and a great (if not perfect) mix of drama, action, and comedy. It's officially one of my favorite Pixar movies ever.

I don't think I have any complaints. It was pretty clever.

EDIT: Directed at Edge.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 June 2009, 23:34:21
You can't be talking about Cars.

Cars was weeeaak.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 14 June 2009, 23:36:29
Yeah, I was talking about Up.

Cars was okay. Still good, but definitely down there.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 15 June 2009, 00:23:13
Cars was boring.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 June 2009, 03:12:26
I liked it, aside from the concept. It's been done before by Disney.

Comedy was a little on the stale side too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 June 2009, 03:15:26
I don't remember a Disney movie about cars.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 June 2009, 03:23:57
Right, but I remember cartoons.

(Maybe I should have specified that)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 15 June 2009, 06:50:55
I said it was the weakest that we had seen.

We skipped A Bugs Life, Cars, and Ratatouille.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 June 2009, 06:59:20
Ratatouille rocks. I skipped it in theaters because it looked lame and I was at the point where I didn't really think Pixar was capable of another hit.

I watched it on DVD later and loved it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 15 June 2009, 07:00:17
I saw Up just today (Sunday) actually. The villain WAS pretty gray.

I was okay with the tone of the movie. But it was rather strange in that it seemed like a kid's movie made for adults to appreciate, I don't feel like most kids would care for this movie very much. But of course I didn't mind, I liked it because I AM an adult.

I liked A Bug's Life when I was much younger. I didn't see Cars or Ratatouille though. I really wasn't interested in Cars at all, and I am pretty surprised that it's a Pixar movie given their track record in my eyes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 June 2009, 23:56:34
It was definitely made more for adults with just lots of pretty colours and a freaky deaky bird for the kids, actually.


I should note that I never saw Cars because I knew it was weak, and I was right. I didn't see Ratatouille either but that's just because a fellow animation student wouldn't shut up about it for soooo long that I didn't want to see it anymore.

I never took a good look at A Bug's Life because I liked Antz and was team Antz which is stupid because while I enjoyed the movie the ant science of it is totally bogus. And I'm not talking about obvious things like them talking or wearing hats.

When there was only promo stuff for Meet The Robinsons at the animation festival, I was really into it. But I never saw it because it ended up looking kind of lame, or somehow... 90's, even though it's future or something. My point is I don't usually watch any of the 3D animated stuff by anybody unless I know it's going to be pretty good, because otherwise they tend to be the same washed stuff. Cars is only different because instead of a talking animal they're cars, big #####ing deal. The only reason I saw Kung-Fu Panda was because the game was forced into my possession, and I didn't think it was as good as people said.

Right, but I remember cartoons.

(Maybe I should have specified that)

I don't remember a Disney short about cars.

Unless you count the one about Goofy driving and while it was awesome NO I DON'T COUNT IT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2009, 00:11:14
Kung-Fu Panda looked awful. Meet the Robinsons actually looked really good, and I loved that part from the trailer with the T-Rex ("you know, T-Rex arms!"), but I never saw it. Maybe I should check it out.

Antz was cool, yeah. And Shrek. I also liked Bolt, though that IS Disney, just not Pixar.

Any other movie with talking animals that isn't Pixar, I have skipped entirely, from Over the Hedge to Madagascar to that dancing penguin movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 16 June 2009, 00:25:50
I thought Madagascar and Over the Hedge were pretty weak, and I haven't seen Happy Feet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2009, 00:28:34
Shrek sucks.

I hate all things Madagascar for a few reasons, and I fell asleep watching Over The Hedge at my friends house because it was boring. I never saw Happy Feet because it looked like it was 100% gimmick, banking on the popularity of March Of The Penguins.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2009, 01:08:04
Someone just reminded me of an old cartoon movie I used to LOVE when I was a kid...

...Felix the Cat: The Movie.

All these memories are suddenly flowing back. I love when this happens. I found it on Youtube and I'm going to watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 June 2009, 01:09:02
Yeah Felix ruled.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2009, 01:14:09
Ahahaha, oh my god, this is so weird. How did I not know it was this weird when I was younger?

The CGI head of Felix in the opening, that villain with the silver helmet thing, those robot things, that high-pitched golden teardrop ("Oriana!")... oh man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9JiC02BfFI

EDIT: Ugh, the sounds out-of-sync for all the parts, not just the first one like I'd assumed. Oh well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 16 June 2009, 02:37:48
I had the NES game of Felix the Cat and I had the movie. It was good.

Right, but I remember cartoons.

(Maybe I should have specified that)

I don't remember a Disney short about cars.

Unless you count the one about Goofy driving and while it was awesome NO I DON'T COUNT IT.

No, it was some other short about how some car didn't want to be scrapped so he ran away or something. Don't quote me on that, because I don't really remember.

But the movie CARS just by the look of movie poster looked exactly like that short.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2009, 02:51:46
No, it was some other short about how some car didn't want to be scrapped so he ran away or something. Don't quote me on that, because I don't really remember.

This triggered some sort of nostalgia alarm in my brain so I think he's right.

It might've been from around the time Disney was tacking on animated shorts to their live-action movies in the 90's, like the Roger Rabbit ones to Honey I Shrunk The Kids!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 16 June 2009, 03:18:16
I'm currently watching Troll 2.

It's so very, very terrible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2009, 03:30:22
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 June 2009, 06:54:06
I'm currently watching Troll 2.

It's so very, very terrible.

Why would you do that to yourself?!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 17 June 2009, 14:44:37
Because it's so bad that it's good.

I have such fond memories of that movie.
The popcorn scene is easily my favorite.

Troll 2 is a life experience that I think everyone should have.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 June 2009, 22:07:50
I was thinking (mark the calendar) recently that I can't wait 'til they start remaking commercials into movies. I hope they start with Where's The Beef? and that Sketchers one where they only show shoes the whole time at a restaurant.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 June 2009, 00:55:27
Hoveround: Revenge of the Fallen might actually be good.

I also want a movie version of that old identity theft commercial from the late 90's with the family living on the streets "because our son gave out our credit card information on the internet!"

"I said I was sorry!"

"GO TO YOUR BOX!"

(I can't find this on Youtube!)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 June 2009, 02:22:35
I've actually kind of figured that whoever does the commercials for Coke would make a really psychedelic movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 June 2009, 02:24:54
I also want a movie version of that old identity theft commercial from the late 90's with the family living on the streets "because our son gave out our credit card information on the internet!"

"I said I was sorry!"

"GO TO YOUR BOX!"

(I can't find this on Youtube!)

Seriously, I would like to know if anyone else remembers or has seen this commercial because it has always been my favorite commercial and I still find it hilarious just thinking about it but I cannot find it anywhere and now that I'm thinking about it again it's driving me crazy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 18 June 2009, 04:17:32
Can't remember it, but by what you mentioned, I'm interested to see it too.

I've actually kind of figured that whoever does the commercials for Coke would make a really psychedelic movie.

Agreed, so much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 June 2009, 05:37:30
I say "GO TO YOUR BOX!" all the time and nobody knows what I'm talking about and I really just want to show SOMEBODY else the commercial, or at least have another human being recognize that it DID exist and WAS hilarious.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 June 2009, 05:47:41
I think I remember something like that. Not sure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 June 2009, 20:40:51
I saw Land of the Lost the other day. I thought it was pretty funny, but there was no way in hell that this would have made its budget back even with proper marketing. I'll be picking it up on DVD.

I'm going to see Year One later this afternoon.

These are my recent DVD purchases:

American Gangster (3-disc)
Fearless (Unrated)
From the Earth to the Moon
The International
Newsies

I'm glad to see my library's DVD collection is finally growing. When I came here I started donating some good titles, and the library has finally picked up with their purchasing. So far I've donated:

Appaloosa
Apollo 13
From the Earth to the Moon - Complete Series
The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly
The Last King of Scotland
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
Newsies
No Country for Old Men
The Right Stuff
Street Kings


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 June 2009, 21:21:22
So you bought Newsies and then immediately donated it?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 June 2009, 06:04:42
Too bad, Newsies is so awesome. If my VCR worked I would watch it RIGHT NOW.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 20 June 2009, 06:20:51
I know I've said this before, but it's worth repeating:

If you like philosophy, watch Waking Life. There's so much in there I wouldn't even know where to start.

All I know is that it would be soooooooooo cool if the movies conjecture about the afterlife was true.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 June 2009, 06:25:49
So you bought Newsies and then immediately donated it?

I bought two copies of it, silly. One for my collection, one to donate.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 June 2009, 06:43:51
Nice.
Nice.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 June 2009, 13:33:37
I used to always sing one of the songs from Newsies but now I can't for the life of me remember how it went. I'll have to watch it again, I remember loving it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 June 2009, 14:14:51
If you like philosophy, watch Waking Life. There's so much in there I wouldn't even know where to start.

Thanks for reminding me about that movie. I own a copy of it myself (I bought it along with eXistenZ and Pootie Tang years ago), and you can find it dirt cheap at most places - an excellent film to donate to the library.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 June 2009, 21:47:38
That was an incredible sentence.

I used to always sing one of the songs from Newsies but now I can't for the life of me remember how it went. I'll have to watch it again, I remember loving it.

Look at me, I'm the king of New York.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 June 2009, 05:14:09
Pootie Tang makes any purchase a great purchase.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 June 2009, 08:09:05
Truer words.


Oh I saw Napolean Dynamite for the first time today. It stank.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 June 2009, 17:12:26
That movie was garbage. I have no idea why people like it so much.

Today is my Takashi Miike marathon with friends. We'll be watching:

The Happiness of the Katakuris (I'm starting here to create a false sense of security)
Gozu
Audition
Ichi the Killer
Visitor Q

None of my guests have seen any of these films. I cautioned them that many of them were not for the faint of heart, but all claimed to be up to the challenge. I'm also providing various intoxicants for those who want to take the edge off, though in some cases I imagine they'll make things worse.

Happiness of the Katakuris is currently underway, and I predict that some folks here won't last through all five movies.
I'm interested to hear the excuses that come up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 22 June 2009, 19:09:28
Hmm... interesting. What are those movies about?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 June 2009, 19:21:49
Yeah, explain.

Also: Napolean Dynamite is one of the worst movies I've ever had to sit through. It bothered me so much that it was as popular as it got.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 June 2009, 19:40:41
The Happiness of the Katakuris is about a family that owns a hotel where people have a tendency to wake up dead the next morning, and their attempts to cover up said trend sort of spiral out of control.

Gozu is about... umm... I'm not really sure. The first quarter of the movie revolves around typical gang land Yakuza exploits, but takes a sharp turn into just plain weirdness. It's one of my favorite Miike films because it feels like a David Lynch parody of all things japanese horror. By the end of the film you get the impression that you just witnessed an in-joke that may or may not have been at your expense.

Audition is about a television director who's wife died before the events of the film. A friend of his suggests that he hold an audition for a character that possesses all the qualities he wants in a wife, and then pursue a relationship with the winner. He meets a nice young lady who is all he could ask for, and she opens up to him about abuse she was subjected to in the past. Asking him to "love only [her]", she becomes psychotic when she sees a picture of his dead wife in his house, and things go down hill from there.

Ichi the Killer is based on the manga of the same name. Kakihara is a sadomasochistic Yakuza enforcer who's boss Anjo split town with three-hundred-million yen. In his search for Anjo he learns of Ichi, a sadistic member of a rival gang who has a hard time differentiating between homicidal lust and sexual arousal. Kakihara then sets out to meet Ichi in hopes of experiencing ultimate pain.

Visitor Q... is... something else. It involves a stranger visiting a rich family and helping them change their broken lives through rather unorthodox means. If something could be called disturbing, it's in this film at some point. Before the stranger arrives: The son beats the mother regularly, the mother shoots heroin (though in this house, who could blame her?), the father gets rapped by a gang of teenagers, and the daughter prostitutes herself... to her father. Things just get weirder from there.

The last two movies would never have survived being made in the USA.
Modern gore-fests like Saw and Hostel have NOTHING on these movies in terms of disturbing imagery/violence.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 June 2009, 20:00:01
Those all sound extremely interesting. I think I have to check them all out now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 June 2009, 20:07:01
I think they're the best of Miike's stuff. There's a lot of food for thought just below the harsh exterior.

You'll probably want to watch them in the order I've listed, as it helps you get adjusted to his style.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 June 2009, 21:48:30
I've only seen half of Ichi The Killer but I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 22 June 2009, 22:40:53
Has anyone seen Gran Torino? I hear its a good movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 22 June 2009, 23:34:07
NO. IT WAS AN AWESOME MOVIE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 June 2009, 00:14:47
Weird. When I was at the video store some kids wouldn't shut up about it. And I was like "I'm pretty sure that's not for kids dad who is renting it" in my head. I obviously didn't say this. I don't really like movies BY Clint Eastwood since I saw the piece of ##### called Million Dollar Baby.



Anyway I'm beyond #####ing pissed off right now. On friday I got a ticket to see the new Transformers movie tonight, which I REALLY want to see, but I forgot about it. I get a called from my friend at 6:30 reminding me and saying that they're saving my seat right now. So I race over to the theatre with my admit one advance screening pass and there's a line because they overbooked. I stand in this line until there's ten minutes before the movie starts, and they're not telling anyone #####.

Ends up they're letting no one in and then best they can offer is you write your name down on some sheet and they'll give you a free one later or something. Well I said ##### that and came home, I want to see it with people, not #####ing alone. And it's total bull##### because I know for a fact that my seat is saved.

They movie  started 13 minutes ago.
I'm beyond pissed off at myself and everything.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 June 2009, 00:57:43
Shame. It's out TODAY? Why so early?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 23 June 2009, 01:06:56
That's what I said too, but its the same date were am at tho....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 June 2009, 01:37:29
Sneak previews aren't unheard of.

How do they overbook something? It's not like they don't have a seat count for every single auditorium.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 June 2009, 04:45:37
It's NOT out today. It's out on Wednesday or something. As I said, it was an "advanced screening". I get these all the time from work, but it was a big weekend and I forgot.

And this is what they do, they do it every time but I've never been too late and not for a movie  I was REALLY excited for; They always put out more passes than seats. Always. It's to ensure that people come, radio stations give them out and places like my store get them sent from whoever makes the movie I guess. It makes sense for movies like Love Guru and such, but it's stupid to do it for the movies that will obviously fill up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 23 June 2009, 05:34:12
Yeah, explain.

Also: Napolean Dynamite is one of the worst movies I've ever had to sit through. It bothered me so much that it was as popular as it got.

With all the hype, I sat down to watch the movie and I never finished it. It was that bad.

And everyone around school would make immature cracks like, "LOL, YOU LOOK LIKE NAPOELAN", and I really really don't. Mostly the immature jocks that still (Yes, they graduated) act like they're five. I also feel wearing a shirt like "Vote for Pedro" is like having a beacon that flashes "I'M A TOOL".

There's just some things in the world I don't understand...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 23 June 2009, 19:02:59
Forgot to update:

Three of the original seven people stuck around for all five movies. One left during Gozu because watching a woman lactate was more than she was interested in. Another left during Audition, because watching a maimed gimp eat vomit from a dog dish was too much. And two more left during one of Ichi the Killer's torture scenes (the one with meat hooks). The three remaining individuals and I had a conversation about the various themes and implications of the ideas presented in the films, though Gozu ended up dominating most of the conversation.

Three words:

Anal Ladle Electrocution.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 June 2009, 19:05:21
I would not enjoy those films.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 23 June 2009, 19:09:53
The really gross moments are usually pretty brief. Honestly, it not like I enjoy watching a maimed gimp eat vomit from a dog dish. But it DOES serve a purpose in the story, and the overall product is greater than its disturbing moments.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 June 2009, 19:17:23
I believe you.

I still probably won't ever see them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 23 June 2009, 19:59:34
Believable, as they're the kind of movie you have to actively seek out.

Not the kind of thing you'll stumble across while channel surfing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 23 June 2009, 21:24:53
Tonight, am sooooo going to see the midnight showing to Transformers 2, but its going to be SUPER PACKED so am going to buy the tickets like 3hrs ahead of time so I won't have to kill mo-fos for it..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 24 June 2009, 09:46:10
My thoughts about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

It was okay.

All in all, I was disappointed by it. It isn't bad, but it isn't nearly as good as the first one. New Autobots and Decepticons are thrown into the mix without you being told what their names are even though a bunch of them hang around until the final act (for instance, there's a new Autobot that's a silver car whose name isn't given until the end, and I'm not sure if it is Bolt or Jolt). The movie's plot, which is too long for its own good and feels like it should be a plot for the cartoon show, not the movie, feels like it's barely there. It's there and I understand it, but for the first hour it feels like the movie goes no where and throughout its held together with explosions.

The movie tries to be like Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, but it felt more like Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (except Mortal Kombat: Annihilation sucked to no end).

Was it fun? Sure.

Do I want to buy the toys? Heck yeah. Especially Jetfire.

Do I want to see it again in the theaters? Not really, unless it is on an IMAX screen.

See it on the big screen once; that's all you'll need.

---------

New films for the library!

Amazing Grace
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
The Hunt for Red October


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 24 June 2009, 15:55:38
I saw it as well, I liked the movie all around altho I did feel that they rushed a few parts in the movie, but overall I the fighting was awesome, other than that I really have nothing to bitch about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 June 2009, 21:45:33
I don't even want to see this one because I still have no idea what was going on in the first.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 25 June 2009, 05:48:28
I just plain don't want to see it.

I'd say I'm boycotting Transformers but I don't pay to see movies anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 June 2009, 06:28:34
#####. I really want to see it.

#####ing Ravage is in it!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 25 June 2009, 09:25:32
I want to know when they're going to put Moulin Rouge on blu-ray. I loved that movie, and as visually stunning as it was, I can only imagine how it will look in 1080p.

I've seen "Coming Soon" features on demo discs at Target and FYE since early 2008.

Clearly, I have a different definition of "soon" than they do. I'm okay with them taking their time, but an actual release date would be nice, even if it's only projected.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 25 June 2009, 19:50:03
I want a blu-ray player.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 June 2009, 00:53:38
I never actually saw Moulin Rouge. I think it has something but not all to do with Christina Agwhu being in that song.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 01:12:31
She had nothing to do with the movie, so fear not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 26 June 2009, 03:36:47
So, tonight, I went to go see Transformers with Annie.

Approximately 30 minutes in the movie, we got up and left. Asked for a refund and everything (we got free movie tickets instead).

Can't tell you if it was "bad" by a review, but it was FILLED with sexual content and other crap that I didn't want to expect or see. I haven't seen the first one, but she kept telling me the first one was NOTHING like this one.

So yeah, I'm disgusted about Transformers for that reason.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 26 June 2009, 03:57:19
Disgusting movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 June 2009, 04:09:39
I am so ashamed of knowing both of you.

You can hate Transformers 2 for almost any reason and I would be extremely happy with you... but being OFFENDED by it?

I haven't seen it yet and I'm not looking forward to it, but I WILL be seeing it. I don't have a problem with it, and I'll probably enjoy it, but I'm getting really sick of all the hype.

Most of my friends saw it and LOOOOOVED it, like they won't shut up. It's annoying. But they'll see it again and I'll probably end up going with them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 04:24:49
BE ASHAMED OF YOUR SEXUALITY!
REPRESS NATURAL FEELINGS!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 26 June 2009, 04:29:56
That's not it Edge. We're offended because we're not pigs who don't want to be involved with that disgusting crap and want something more wholesome than dirt (Not saying either of you are, I just don't want to see that).

It was ONLY 30 minutes in the movie and aside from a few action scenes, it was just everywhere. If it wasn't in your face, it was in the background.

I know you would especially be all like, "wat is this i dont even", but whatever. I could try tuning out a little, but it was blatantly everywhere and I didn't want to be watching that garbage.

We'll just use the tickets on the new Ice Age movie when it's available.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 June 2009, 04:44:24
It's not so much the sexual content I mind, I just hate the message it's trying to send to people regarding the subject, and it's also partly the fact that they did it to a respectable franchise. I don't know. This is a movie about Transformers, and somehow they made it about this douchebag boy and his ridiculously unrealistic love-interest sex-appeal model who's name I only know because guys won't shut the ##### up about her.

So yeah, I am kind of offended. It ticks me off. No apologies


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 June 2009, 04:57:12
I really am not spectacularly turned on by Megan Fox.

I don't really see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 26 June 2009, 05:04:25
... (http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=241)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 June 2009, 05:21:46
Yeah.
Kinda like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 June 2009, 05:39:53
Megan Fox is apparently going to be the next Lara Croft in a Tomb Raider sequel.

I hate her face, but I like her body.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 05:47:04
We're offended because we're not pigs who don't want to be involved with that disgusting crap and want something more wholesome than dirt.

It's not so much the sexual content I mind, I just hate the message it's trying to send to people regarding the subject

This is why I said what I did. A simple "It didn't make sense" or "sex for the sake of sex is pointless" I totally would have understood, but both of these statements seem like moral outrage, which is what I'm poking fun at.

Don't take it personally, it's just my personality.

You'd do well to not give a ##### what I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 June 2009, 05:59:18
I wasn't even responding to your post, but that's alright. I don't think I'm "morally outraged" exactly but I suppose I am acting like it.

I don't think there's anything wrong with Megan Fox's appearance but she's just another good-looking woman to me. Like, I don't drool over people like that unless I actually LIKE them. (Have a feeling Mike's going to say something along the lines of 'Most people aren't crazy like that but people still like to talk about it' which is undoubtedly true, it's just annoying that whenever the subject of girls comes up it's never anything particularly interesting to listen to. And no that quote isn't supposed to sound anything like you, Mike, it's more of a clairvoyant paraphrasing attempt)

The last movie I'll have seen for a while is Up anyway. Keep wanting to see The Green Mile, I've also wanted to re-watch The Lion King, but I'll never get around to that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 26 June 2009, 06:37:16
Megan Fox is apparently going to be the next Lara Croft in a Tomb Raider sequel.

I hate her face, but I like her body.

Then the body would be a waste if there's no face to match it with tho!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 06:47:14
Not if you do it doggy-style!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 26 June 2009, 06:51:43
What wrong with putting a bag over her head? And then you can do all the endless styles there is in the damn book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 06:56:34
I find bags distracting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 June 2009, 07:56:51
I am so ashamed of knowing both of you.

Seconded.

Seriously guys. What the #####?

Edit: I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG. LOOK AT THIS GUYS. DISGUSTING! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd0FhD5Ef-M&feature=channel)



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 26 June 2009, 13:11:04
Well maybe we are the only ones left with morals then...

This world has so many problems because people don't have morals anymore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 June 2009, 13:57:49
Yes, the world is a foul place, so consistently full of rape and slaughter and all KINDS of crazy acts you haven't even SEEN!

I threw my mother into a large tank full of piranhas. THEN, I POURED SULPHURIC ACID INTO THE TANK.

DIE, FRESHWATER PREDATORS!!! THAT'S FOR ATTACKING MY MOM!!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 June 2009, 17:11:59
Wind, wat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 June 2009, 19:59:16
Well maybe we are the only ones left with morals then...

This world has so many problems because people don't have morals anymore.

No. Your morals are just boring and unfun! Boo!

Wind, wat.

wat


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 26 June 2009, 20:14:27
No you just don't get it


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 June 2009, 20:17:35
No, I get it, I just think you guys are prude.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 26 June 2009, 20:27:49
If you got it you wouldn't think that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 June 2009, 20:30:36
Then let me put it this way. I get it, but I think it's wrong.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 26 June 2009, 20:54:41
Then you have a warped vision of what's right and what's wrong....

I honestly can't see how anyone could think that's right, it's so crazy..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 June 2009, 20:59:13
Wait... how is sex wrong?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 26 June 2009, 21:32:24
Sex isn't wrong, but what the media sometimes portrays it as is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 26 June 2009, 23:26:50
Oh my dears look what this conversation has turned into.

To say someone has a warped sense of right and wrong is very... mean and self-righteous. And I don't think it's fair to say at all. This is a big misunderstanding.

People, um, like sex. And that's okay. Sex is a big deal. It's not the ultimate goal of a loving relationship but it's something people want, and it's what happens when two people love each other. Some people have a different view of that, but regardless I don't think there's harm as long as you're not exploiting someone for sex. Every once in a while you get a guy who genuinely hates women and just wants to hurt as many of them as possible, but I think that's pretty rare, and that's still pretty questionable in most views.

And it's also okay if you left a movie because you didn't like the over-sexuality of it. It doesn't make you a prude to not want overly provocative signals shoved into your face. But the media aren't to blame, they're just one part of a perpetuating society that just isn't perfect.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 26 June 2009, 23:41:23
I'm only blaming the media for falling into this crap in the first place, but it's kinda a different story.

Transformers was a movie that shouldn't have been, that's all I'm saying.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 June 2009, 00:25:32
I have broken wire somewhere in my brain that switches my reactions to immoral things and lowbrow humor.

When something is outrageously immoral, I find it absolutely hilarious. When something is trying hard to be funny and failing, I get extremely offended.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 27 June 2009, 00:54:58
Well, I'd say both are in it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 27 June 2009, 05:19:29
I have broken wire somewhere in my brain that switches my reactions to immoral things and lowbrow humor.

When something is outrageously immoral, I find it absolutely hilarious. When something is trying hard to be funny and failing, I get extremely offended.

Am like that when I have like a....VERY...BAD...DAY.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 June 2009, 06:06:50
I honestly can't remember the last time I was offended by something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 27 June 2009, 09:27:38
I honestly can't remember the last time I was offended by something.

This. And I'm supposed to be a Christian.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 June 2009, 13:38:18
I honestly can't remember the last time I was offended by something.

This. And I'm supposed to be a Christian.

This. Except I'm supposed to be Jewish. I don't know if that has any relevance. But yeah, I've said the exact same thing as Edge, verbatim before, several times. Here, too, I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 27 June 2009, 16:50:22
I'm not easily offended, but some things can.

My sister can get me all the time.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 27 June 2009, 16:59:26
My brother AND sister get me majority of the time as well, and it sucks too-.-".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 28 June 2009, 19:51:47
Yeah. Right. I realize the new Transformers movie isn't good, but I'm still going to see it (I kind of have to for work) and am trying to not have it spoiled at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 28 June 2009, 21:39:50
Watched Transformers 2, it was great. BUT..

[spoiler]Optimus Kicks the bucket too early in the movie, not enough Prime time, as well as not enough robot time in the movie. It was too focused on the humans for someone to get to know the new robots. Same problem in the first movie I guess.

there's more parts I don't like, but I can see past all that and love this movie. The above was my only real problem.
[/spoiler]

OTHER THAN THAT GO SEE THE MOVIE KTHXBAI


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 July 2009, 06:10:22
Before the fireworks I watched Tarzan on the Disney channel (my girlfriend and I were at a friend's house).
She fell asleep with her head on my lap and I REALLY had to do pee through the whole movie but didn't.

I really liked the animation for it. Hadn't seen it in a while and the older I get, the more I understand how complex it must have been.
It was very fun to watch how fast he moves.

Anyways, screw cable.
While I was watching Tarzan, during a fast part the picture started to block up, like a low quality internet video.
It was extremely distracting.

ALSO.
The Disney channel is stupid. Every commercial break made me want to shut off the TV because it dumbed me down.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 July 2009, 12:38:02
And Disney doesn't even have REAL commercials! They could, technically, not air any commercials.

Because they're #####ing Disney.

But they CHOOSE to air commercials promoting only Disney-related products and things.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 July 2009, 17:26:09
Exactly. Screw Disney 365.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 July 2009, 23:13:24
Exactly. Screw Disney 365.

You would like to screw frozen dead Jew-haters every day of the year, WOULDN'T YOU?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 July 2009, 00:38:07
Nooo, those are what they call their commercial breaks.
"That's it for Disney 365, now back to X"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2009, 04:15:14
The Disney Channel has commercials?
Weird.

And yeah, Tarzan was really well done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 July 2009, 05:12:55
They've always had commercials, but they're more like promotions for their own shows on the channel, quick mini-features for Disney movies like THE MOVIE SURFERS, stuff about new Disney DVD's, or events and stuff.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2009, 06:04:08
What I mean is...

OK the Canadian version of Disney Channel is called Family Channel--although it is completely owned by Disney so I don't see the point of the name change--and it has commercials, just like those, with the mini-features, including stuff like those horrible movie surfers and "music" videos, but they are ONLY seen inbetween programming. So shows and movies are never interrupted, even if a continent explodes.

It is, naturally, not at all weird for a channel to have commercials in shows, but I just figured the American version would be the same.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 July 2009, 06:22:39
Well, I suppose that it was because it was a movie, these 'commercials' were only every half an hour.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 6 July 2009, 06:58:28
The Argentinian Disney Channel does have actual commercials, not just Disney's, but only a few.
Also, they are like a normal channel. Twenty or so minutes of program, commercial cut, repeat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 July 2009, 07:00:23
Well, I suppose that it was because it was a movie, these 'commercials' were only every half an hour.

I gueeeesssssss... I don't think they do that on ours through, so I don't know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 July 2009, 12:52:07
The Argentinian Disney Channel does have actual commercials, not just Disney's, but only a few.
Also, they are like a normal channel. Twenty or so minutes of program, commercial cut, repeat.

Normal channels have commercial cuts more often than that, though honestly, there really isn't a set timer. It depends on what show and what time it's playing for how many commercial cuts they throw in there. Some hour-long episodes of Lost can have as many as 7 commercial breaks.

And yeah, I think Disney Channel only has them between shows, or at least once during, like an act break or something.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 July 2009, 07:33:49
I watched A Fistful Of Dollars for the first time today.

:-)

For A Few Dollars More tomorrow.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 8 July 2009, 21:10:07
So I saw Battle Royal and Battle Royal 2...they are rather bloody movies, but good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 July 2009, 21:27:49
My family is watching "Knowing" in the other room. They don't seem to understand how BAD it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 8 July 2009, 21:36:28
I found the movie kindda boring too, but the part were everyone dies looks cool tho.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 July 2009, 21:43:48
It's only good for the actual plane crashing sequence.

It looked sweet.

That's about it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 July 2009, 23:00:00
THANKS FOR RUINING IT GUYS, JEEZ I WANTED TO KEEP IT PHRESH SINCE I CARE ABOUT THIS MOVIE WHICH LOOKED SOOOO GOOD IN PREVIEWS!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 July 2009, 23:01:58
I sometimes let bad movies slide if they have one AWESOME segment, like the highway scene in the second Matrix.

Haven't seen Knowing, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 8 July 2009, 23:03:15
All I know is it had a flaming moose, and it was a topic of conversation where everyone tried to imitate the motions and the sounds of the flaming moose.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 July 2009, 23:06:46
That Moose sure was on fire....


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 July 2009, 23:07:19
I like every Matrix movie... Actually no, I like the first two.

I know that's weird and I'm OK with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 9 July 2009, 00:57:37
So apperantly there's a Mortal Kombat 3 movie in the making already. I found it a little akward when I read about it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2009, 01:10:22
I like all the Matrix movies, but the second two were so disappointing that I hold grudges against them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 9 July 2009, 02:04:47
My family is watching "Knowing" in the other room. They don't seem to understand how BAD it is.
I didn't think it was that bad. My only complain was that they didn't use real fire and real animals.
Maybe it has something to do with me not paying for it, but being invited. I can't go all like "I payed (MONEY) for this?!"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 9 July 2009, 04:37:44
"Moon" may be the only film coming out this summer that I'm looking forward to.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 July 2009, 16:48:48
"Moon" looks fantastic but apparently it's hardly playing anywhere. I've been really looking forward to it.

Two others that look great are World's Greatest Dad (though the trailer makes it look awful) and Big Fan.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 July 2009, 18:44:40
Is it wrong that I think the noviciate in Sister Act is a cutie pie?

Posted on: 13 July 2009, 00:07:39

I'll take the silence to mean "We all agree with you Mike" and move on;

I saw The Hurt Locker tonight on pass. I liked it. I didn't really like it at first, but my main issues resolved themselves. Mainly, I wasn't into there being jokey stuff (more on that in a sec) and the main character is a bit of a cowboy.

About the jokes, they probably weren't bad but there's two reasons I didn't like them;

The first is simply that I was in a theatre where the audience was broadcasting their feelings over everything. This is usually fine, but maybe because it was a small theatre filled with a middle aged crowd it felt a lot louder or over the top. And they found all the jokes too funny. Much too funny. And they laughed at things that aren't jokes. Blood jammed ammo is so incredibly not funny.

The second reason is also simple. The movie is about soldiers in Iraq, specifically the ones who defuse IEDs in Iraq. The reason I don't like any of this, at all, being made light of, at all, is that this is exactly what my cousin did in Afghanistan. Both times he served. So this kind of thing is possibly closer to me than most people.

But besides those things I did LIKE the movie. It kept up a constant sense of dread, or anticipation, that I thought was good. It's impossible to make a movie that can even come close to the feeling of the constant need for awareness of actual war, anyway.

It had some excellent shots, my favourite being when you can see a guy's eye through his scope on his sniper rifle--That's a bad explanation but if you see the movie you'll probably recognize what I mean.

Nothing in the movie surprised me, but it was not really predictable. The crowd in the theatre got surprised often enough so I don't know. But a friendly nameless character getting shot during a firefight is not a surprise. In the same firefight, every subsequent enemy kill is not a surprise. I have a theory about their perceptions of what war is compared to mine based on a generation gap. To not get too much into it, their perceptions of "war" are built on them growing up during the Cold War and ONLY the Cold War until 9/11. The Cold War didn't affect my perceptions because I was born during it's closing years. But the further details of the theory would be too long to get into right now.

So anyway, interesting movie. I liked it enough and it got better than it started out.

Posted on: 13 July 2009, 22:26:08

Oh yah last night I saw Brüno and liked ischt, but in all I think he vas funnier on Da Ali G Show than in the movie, where as Borat was more or less equal in his movie with him in the show. Weird.

Today I trek out of the city to see H-Pizzle and the Half Blood Prizzle.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 July 2009, 06:04:40
Zombieland (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-cIjPOJdFM)

This movie looks about eight different shades of perfect.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 July 2009, 06:10:27
Zombieland (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-cIjPOJdFM)

This movie looks about infinity different shades of perfect.

I see sooo many references to different Zombie things in that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 July 2009, 01:23:37
I didn't look at the thing but if it has too many references it might end up suffering from hipster crud disease.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 July 2009, 01:55:20
Nope.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 July 2009, 02:30:28
You say "Nope" as if you've seen the whole movie already.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 July 2009, 04:12:45
Yup.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 July 2009, 05:12:08
It just... it just looks like a ton of good old-fashioned movie fun. And it's been a while. Crank 2 fell into that category, but that's more like a cocaine overdose than old-fashioned movie fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 18 July 2009, 06:53:01
Before watching the trailer, my post was going to read:
"I'm a bit burnt out on zombie flicks. I'll pass."

Having seen the trailer, I may actually go see this.

The initial reviews will determine if I'm sober or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 18 July 2009, 16:07:25
Cocaine overdoes, WOW.

Well, I saw I Love You Beth Cooper yesterday, it was rather funny.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 July 2009, 22:37:21
Cocaine overdoes, WOW.

If you saw Crank 2, you'd know what I mean. You might even say I'm underselling it.

As for Beth Cooper... it looks fairly basic and nothing more. No real desire to see it, but for some odd reason I do kind of want to.

I got dragged to the sixth Harry Potter. I had more fun MST3K-ing around with my friends even if the movie didn't really deserve it. I've avoided the Harry Potter movies and books past the sixth since I know I LOVE them but I don't want to get back into them. Also, I don't think the movies are that good (this one wasn't) but I love the world of Harry Potter so I enjoyed watching it anyway, despite not really wanting to.

I was being an unfunny twat: I honestly lost count of how many times I uttered some combination of "Kills", "Snape", and "Dumbledore."

Posted on: 18 July 2009, 16:22:03

And now I just watched "Seinfeld: A XXX Parody."

Absolutely awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 July 2009, 23:38:50
Yeah I liked the 5th movie best, and the 5th book best.

The new movie was alright, it had better effects than before (well I'm not sure if it had better effects than the last one), but it was the worst book in my opinion so it didn't make a great movie (not the worst of the movies though). The 6th book/movie is in it's entirety just set up for the 7th, anyway. Through a bit of the middle of the movie we were making fun of things too, though it didn't really deserve it. Not "MST3K-ing" the entire movie though, just bits during the somewhat tedious middle.

I've heard about that Seinfeld parody thing, I'll watch it eventually.

Cocaine overdoes, WOW.

If you saw Crank 2, you'd know what I mean. You might even say I'm underselling it.

And then, he might even say it correctly!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 July 2009, 00:29:06
I thought if I said anything about the typo, it would ruin the comedy. I can't top it.

And yeah, watch the Seinfeld porn. It's hilarious. The last sex scene is on-stage during "Gary" Seinfeld's stand-up monologue.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 July 2009, 06:32:47
SO.

Today I went with to the Maine International Film Festival with a friend from High school.

He had gotten a full VIP access pass worth 250 bucks for free from work, and it's good for the card holder and guest.

We saw "35 Shots of Rum."
Well.
It was artsy.
Lots of symbolism and non-verbal plot driving.

Worth a watch just because I've spent the last 6 hours trying to figure everything out in it, because it is in NO way as straight forward as it seems.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 July 2009, 22:23:47
I consider myself an emotional thrillseeker, so the documentary "Dear Zachary" has been at the top of my list for a while...

Finally watched it.

I... I am dumbstruck. I can't believe this entire ordeal actually happened. It's so heartbreaking and tragic and it hurts all the more having to see just how real and wrong it all is.

Here's a trailer for it to get across what it's about better than I could explain: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtyY0CXdiNo


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 19 July 2009, 22:35:15
Wow... I wanna see that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 July 2009, 23:05:35
What a bitch.

I hesitate to spoil real life for those of you that would watch this. Not that I have respect for anyone who would get pissed off over having a real-life story spoiled. But apparently she's a big one. But I won't spoil anything.

I'm sure there's more to it or whatever, anyway.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 19 July 2009, 23:56:52
Yeah, I'm familiar with that story.

The proof that she killed Andrew Bagby was circumstantial, but it's hard to look innocent in the face of the aftermath.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 July 2009, 02:31:42
No! She did it, and I can prove it!

The proof she killed him is this!

(Let's see here... toothpick? No. Bloody knife? No wait, that's mine. Umm... my badge? YEAH! I'LL USE MY BADGE.)

TAKE THAT!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 July 2009, 03:52:17
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v95/sgdaigoro/ani-judge-surprised.gif)
... Uhm, and what is it?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 20 July 2009, 13:34:07
I hate that #####ing judge so much.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 July 2009, 00:53:52
Yeah me too.

Anyway I just saw a preview on Rogers On Demand for a movie called JCVD where Jean-Claude Van Damme plays himself and robs a bank.

:-O


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 22 July 2009, 22:00:18
Just finished watching Being John Malcovich.

I completely forgot how much I love that movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 22 July 2009, 22:09:56
I love that movie.

Instead of repeating it, I saved myself the time to type and quoted you. Except now I've already typed more than I would have.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 July 2009, 23:56:09
Cocaine overdoes, WOW.

If you saw Crank 2, you'd know what I mean. You might even say I'm underselling it.


Crank 2: High Voltage was a million times better than the first one. Anyone who didn't see it because they thought it looked exactly like the first one (as it turns out, was a ton of people) REALLY missed out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2009, 00:02:02
Crank 2 is without a doubt the most fun I've ever had watching a movie in my entire life, and I doubt anything will ever top it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2009, 08:15:15
You might have fun watching Death Race or even Never Back Down, but you might need to be in a theatre.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2009, 09:43:31
I almost wrote that the inherent fun of Crank 2 might have been exclusive to a theater, but it hasn't come out on DVD yet and I feel STRONGLY that it will more than hold up at large friendly viewings or in the background at parties.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 26 July 2009, 12:00:27
You might have fun watching Death Race or even Never Back Down, but you might need to be in a theatre.

Is Never Back Down any good? I had considered picking it up when it came out on DVD 'cause I like movies about people beating the crap out of each other (hence why 1/3 of my DVD collection is poorly-dubbed kung fu flicks), but I never got around to it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 July 2009, 20:41:59
No it's pretty stupid and that's what fun about it. It's one of those bad movies you can watch with people to just to have fun, though it's not the worst movie I've ever seen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 July 2009, 02:28:47
Saw "Moon" tonight.

I loved it. What a great, fresh, entertaining, and just all around quality sci-fi film.

It doesn't pull any cheap tricks on you, even, which I was expecting. If it's playing near you, go see it. It's got a limited release.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 27 July 2009, 12:58:44
Yeah me too.

Anyway I just saw a preview on Rogers On Demand for a movie called JCVD where Jean-Claude Van Damme plays himself and robs a bank.

:-O

I picked that up on DVD a while back along with Outlander (Vikings vs. Aliens. Best. Movie. Idea. Ever.). I haven't gotten around to watching it, but I've heard its really funny. You can find it for like $10 over at Wal-Mart.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 July 2009, 16:23:53
Saw "Moon" tonight.

I loved it. What a great, fresh, entertaining, and just all around quality sci-fi film.

It doesn't pull any cheap tricks on you, even, which I was expecting. If it's playing near you, go see it. It's got a limited release.

That makes me happy to hear. It isn't showing anywhere near me, unfortunately. I will, however, be driving about 4 hours to see it this Wednesday.

Nothing stands between me and a film that interests me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 27 July 2009, 16:59:31
Saw "Moon" tonight.

I loved it. What a great, fresh, entertaining, and just all around quality sci-fi film.

It doesn't pull any cheap tricks on you, even, which I was expecting. If it's playing near you, go see it. It's got a limited release.

That makes me happy to hear. It isn't showing anywhere near me, unfortunately. I will, however, be driving about 4 hours to see it this Wednesday.

Nothing stands between me and a film that interests me.

Nothing except a 4 hour drive.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 July 2009, 17:38:12
A friend and I saw the trailer months ago and we were all excited to see it, but we gave up when we realized it wasn't getting a wide release. Then, we see it listed online one day when we're looking for a movie to see, but we had never heard of the theater it was playing at. Turns out there's been a place that places indie flicks no more than five minutes down the street from where I live. I really wish I had known about it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 July 2009, 17:55:10
I hate you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 27 July 2009, 18:40:33
It's a cozy little place, but the sound quality in the theater was really bad. It bothered me quite a bit at the beginning until I got used to it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 July 2009, 19:12:19
That always seems to be the case.
The little theaters that chose art over commercial gain are almost always suffering from those types of technical issues.
Selling out has it's advantages, apparently.

This is the first city I've lived in that hasn't had one.
It's like a depressing omen; a foreshadowing of what's to come of art.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 July 2009, 21:22:05
Yeah I have a couple cozy theatres that specialize in indie (or rather "in foreign and alternative movies") in town too. I just checked and the main one I go to is playing Moon, though I can't get there in time for today's showing (yes it's that cozy, it's the one screen so only 3 more movies are playing today) but now I'm gonna have to check if my friends are interested and see when we can go.

Weirdly, the sound quality in this cinema is good. Well maybe not good as in compared to technical standard that the big commercial theatres  have, but it's... I don't know. It feels very old school in there and I love it for that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 27 July 2009, 21:37:24
Of all theaters of that type that I've been in, I miss the one I lived by downtown.
Every Halloween there was a midnight showing of The Rocky Horror Picture Show with full audience participation, including the live performances and copious callbacks.
A full bar helped, I'm sure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 28 July 2009, 05:00:27
Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li isn't nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to be, but the 1994 film is still way, way better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 28 July 2009, 06:48:02
LIKE LIGHTNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING






Ahem, excuse the outburst.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 28 July 2009, 19:34:37
Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li isn't nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to be

Contradicts

the 1994 film is still way, way better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 July 2009, 05:14:33
It's not like either makes sense anyway since they both clearly suck and suck too loud.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 29 July 2009, 09:14:42
I don't know about the new one, but the 1994 is worth a laugh or two, at least, especially Raul Julia's M. Bison.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 July 2009, 03:42:20
I'm taking this opportunity to let you all know how much I love that Edge and Speed have nearly the same avatar right now.

Just LOVE it.
::)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2009, 03:50:49
I keep getting confused and I didn't even realize it for sure until right now!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2009, 04:10:18
I keep getting confused and I didn't even realize it for sure until right now!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 30 July 2009, 04:11:30
WE HAX0R YOUR MINDZ!!1!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2009, 04:15:13
It's true, we do!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 30 July 2009, 05:31:16
hey stop double posting


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 30 July 2009, 06:08:30
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2009, 06:15:40
AHHH


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 30 July 2009, 06:45:01
dotdotdot


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 July 2009, 07:42:24
The only one with that avatar who isn't a sellout right now is Edge.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 30 July 2009, 15:56:04
OG as #####


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2009, 16:27:03
I was gonna' do that exclamation point like Vinch but I liked my other idea better.

Also, I meant to change it back before I went to bed last night. I'll keep it for the rest of today.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: GMG on 30 July 2009, 16:34:39
At least mine is upside down so that people can recognize it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2009, 16:43:08
...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: GMG on 30 July 2009, 17:30:10
Is that a 6th finger I see?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2009, 17:46:23
No, his hand is just REALLY muscly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2009, 18:36:42
It's supposed to be a knuckle or something. I have no idea. I was laughing the whole time I drew this. I want Mike to post the original again since when I first drew this, it was from memory of that one to make fun of it and that made it funnier, but I really want to compare them now that it's been a long time.

Posted on: 30 July 2009, 13:22:23

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpYNJRiOXLs&fmt=22

Time to relive my childhood!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 30 July 2009, 22:33:21
The only one with that avatar who isn't a sellout right now is Edge.

When I made it my avatar, I had completely forgotten that Edge had it. I made it my avatar in support of the whole 4chan vs. AT&T thing. I had a Firefox app named ReloadEvery running on at home and work, reloading a search for "AT T blocks 4chan" every 5 or 10 seconds on Yahoo, Google, Lycos, Infoseek, Bing, Dogpile, and a couple of others so it would boost the news up.

Edit: The other ones were AltaVista and Ask.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2009, 00:56:13
Fine, both of you aren't sellouts. But you're still ALMOST selling out to 4Chan which I can't ignore.. And everyone else who has/had it is a sellout poobum!

At least mine is upside down so that people can recognize it.

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a73/mico_dj/mikero_ughF.png)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 July 2009, 01:51:07
Hahaha I had the wrong hand and fingers and everything.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 July 2009, 02:09:34
But look at the level of detail!
That wrist is incredible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 July 2009, 04:13:06
There is nothing wrong with ASR's!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 2 August 2009, 16:59:03
I'm house-sitting for a co-worker, so last night I watched The Spirit and The International.

I felt like The Spirit was a fun movie, more of an adult version of the Adam West "Batman" show. The only people who really matter in this movie are Eva Mendes (MARRY ME!), Samuel L. Jackson, and Scarlett Johannson. Gabriel Macht is okay as the Spirit, but his performance was really just "meh". Samuel L. Jackson's performance is what you need to be watching in this movie; he's hilarious and over-the-top awesome. The wardrobe that they have for him is great too. Fur, samurai stuff, and a Nazi uniform all in one movie! Too bad this didn't do well enough in the theaters to warrant a sequel, because I would have been interested in seeing it.

The International is a very well-made film that unfortunately had to suffer much like the movies about the war in Iraq (Stop-Loss, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, The Kingdom) back in 2006 ("Banks are evil and got us into this economic mess? DO TELL."), thus nobody went to see it. I was surprised to see that it was made by the same director as Run Lola Run. Clive Owen was awesome in this, although I could have done without Naomi Watts. I've never really been impressed with her performances ever since I first saw her in I Heart Huckabee's. The movie was marketed wrong; they made it seem like a huge action movie when it really isn't. I'd highly recommend it though; it's a fairly underrated, riveting thriller.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2009, 03:11:13
I saw Funny People tonight.

I loved it.

I was 100% expecting to be disappointed because I've really been looking forward to this movie, and a Sandler/Rogen film didn't seem like it could deliver after they've both gone so stale.

It was a little long, but I didn't mind. It was a near-perfect mix of drama and comedy.

What I don't think a lot of people will get is that some of the stand-up scenes aren't even meant to be funny, and people will be like "Oh, that ##### wasn't funny, what the hell." The point is that they're supposed to be amateur comedians and they're not always funny, and it's sometimes played out very much in that way... though it'll still go over a lot of folks' heads. But don't get me wrong, they managed to get some good material in there. I enjoyed it.

I'm glad it had a serious spin to it because I've always loved the more serious side of stand-up comedy.

Good stuff. Best Apatow film of the three by far.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2009, 04:03:21
Yeah that's what I've heard about Funny People. I don't really anyone wouldn't understand that parts aren't supposed to be funny but I haven't seen it yet and

Is the "three Apatow films" just the ones he directed? 'Cause he wrote for more than three, and produced a lot more.



And I liked what Speed liked about The Spirit (except I don't care about Eva Mendes) but overall that movie stank and I probably won't watch it again. "Stank" might be a bit too harsh, but it was barely as good as "meh".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2009, 04:06:47
I was just talking about the ones he directed. I know he's written a bunch, and mass-produced an entire ERA of cinema comedy, but his three movies definitely have a style that tie them all together moreso than any other Apatow-branded movie, and that's what I'm grouping together.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2009, 04:08:27
Just checking.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 3 August 2009, 12:50:31
I saw Bruno last night. It felt like more of the same (like Borat), yet different at the same time. Borat was there to bring out the worst in people, while Bruno is really just there to shock you. Hilarious movie, but not as good as Borat. Apparently Cohen has created a new character that he's going to use for a film in 2011, where this time he's an aspiring singer hoping to get onto something named Eurovision.

I bought my ticket for the midnight showing of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, w00t.

I may go see Moon tonight. If I don't see it tonight, then I'll probably go see it Wednesday night.

Then next week I'm going to try to see The Collector and The Hurt Locker.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 3 August 2009, 16:26:39
I thought Borat was trash, so I have low expectations for Bruno.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 August 2009, 17:09:55
Ditto.

I also don't care to see gay anal sex in my rated R movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2009, 17:41:19
I liked Borat quite a bit but haven't seen Bruno.

I don't mind gay anal sex.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 August 2009, 22:05:44
I liked both Borat and Brüno but Borat more, and it's not like you see anything in the gaynal sex, homophobe.

The Hurt Locker was good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 August 2009, 16:48:12
I saw Moon last night. Excellent, excellent film. Probably the best non-Star Trek film of the year.

Anyway, I went in there with the knowledge of "It's about a lone astronaut on the moon who only has a robot for company. Two weeks left into his three-year stint, he starts wondering if he's going insane and what's real after he has an accident," which is essentially what every synopsis said.

Except that's maybe just the first forty minutes. After that, it takes a drastic turn which I don't care to discuss because it completely blindsided me (perhaps because I was relying on the synopsis that others were giving) and gives away a huge chunk of the story. Needless to say, despite the fact that it wasn't as much of a psychological drama that I had been led to believe, I was still completely pleased with what I saw. This isn't a movie that could have ever received a wide release (it feels like an episode of The Outer Limits or something), but I'm damn glad this was made. I hope that it gets nominated for a few Oscars this year.

Moon is nothing short of amazing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 August 2009, 21:24:07
Yeah, it was really fresh and unexpected, but never forced... so that was great.

Props to kid Bowie!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 August 2009, 08:16:21
I just got back from the midnight showing of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra.

IT IS TOTALLY #####ING AWESOME!

Complete "please leave your brain at the door" material, but AWESOME!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 7 August 2009, 13:16:24
Moon was no longer showing at the theatre I was near.

I'm having an awfully hard time finding anywhere that's playing it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 August 2009, 15:40:15
That sucks, man. For real.

I just got back from the midnight showing of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra.

IT IS TOTALLY #####ING AWESOME!

Complete "please leave your brain at the door" material, but AWESOME!

Interesting. I couldn't tell if it was going to be mindless-action-awesome or downright trash.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 7 August 2009, 18:08:54
I couldn't tell if it was going to be mindless-action-awesome or downright trash.

Those are usually synonyms.

As for Moon, I suspect it will end up being the same story as Brick. I want to see it, but it likely won't end up happening till it comes out on DVD. Oh well, I'm a patient man.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 August 2009, 18:34:16
Moon isn't playing up here anymore either. The Cinemark up here usually only runs two "CineArts" at a time, and they just brought in 500 Days of Summer (the other is The Hurt Locker, which I will probably see on Sunday).

I find it really hilarious that Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is now down to a single 11:10 AM showing, while The Hangover is still going strong with five regular showings per day.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 August 2009, 23:23:58
http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/08/iron-man-2-comic-con-teaser-leaked/

Quick, watch the Iron Man 2 teaser before it gets taken down!

Because it's awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 9 August 2009, 00:42:30
War Machine is so badass it hurts.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 August 2009, 18:42:53
I missed it! I was busy getting a twisty-cone...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 9 August 2009, 18:48:50
I downloaded it from youtube with Any Video Converter. I can send it to you if you'd like.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 August 2009, 18:56:23
Please do!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 August 2009, 19:16:34
I should have downloaded it, but figured someone else already did.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 August 2009, 20:24:13
Here, I found it again for you lazy twats. Be QUICK this time!

http://marksweetwood.blogspot.com/2009/08/iron-man-2-sneak-peek.html


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 August 2009, 20:43:51
Stealing all 12 megabytes of it.

Ill have it for anyone who wants it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 August 2009, 02:53:56
I saw G.I. Joe last night and it was awful. Not even enjoyable-awful. Not even so-bad-it's-fun. It wasn't enjoyable mindless action.

It was horribly mediocre, which made it a complete waste of time and money. That's the first I'm have had that thought about any movie in a very long time - I usually find something to enjoy.

Well, okay, I enjoyed Christopher Eccleston playing one of the main villains, since it was really strange seeing the guy I know best as Doctor Who, one of the most righteous heroes I've seen in fiction, play a bad guy.

Posted on: 10 August 2009, 15:34:52

On the OPPOSITE end of the spectrum, I saw another movie with Joseph Gordon-Levitt today, and it was amazing.

Though, really, I cared more about Zooey Deschanel.

Go see 500 Days of Summer. Loved it, one of my top movies for the year so far. It was a VERY fresh movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 August 2009, 05:58:08
I want to see both those movie anyway.

Posted on: 11 August 2009, 01:07:37

I saw Ponyo on a date tonight. I liked it more than she did but we both liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 August 2009, 23:58:45
District 9 was... impressive. Very good, very engaging, and extremely immersive. Very new, very fresh, very exciting. Very ambitious, but it didn't crumble under that weight.

Expect a District 10 in a few years.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 August 2009, 02:07:57
Ew. If they make another movie they'll ruin it. I think they covered everything they needed to say and ended the story at the perfect moment. ##### them if they make another one, I won't watch it because I'll already know what happens.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 August 2009, 02:31:19
I feel like they might milk it. They simultaneously ended it perfectly and set it up really well for a sequel.

I'm leaning more towards no sequel because this was a great standalone flick, but I'm getting some sequel vibes as well.

I personally do NOT want a sequel.

Also, that guy in the lead role was pretty awesome. It was like watching Rhys Darby as Murray from Flight of the Conchords get thrust into a crazy adventure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 August 2009, 02:54:06
I feel like I should mention that what I liked about Ponyo was the characters and animation, the story is lacking but the rest made me enjoy it. I'm likely in a minority for this.

I really want to see District 9 soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 August 2009, 03:17:17
I want to see The Goods, even though I know it's probably not very good. I just love Jeremy Piven. I'm spending the week with my family up at our place in northern Michigan, and I had planned to see it with my dad because he's been looking forward to it, but it's not playing ANYWHERE up here.

Which is pretty weird.

I plan on seeing Inglourious Basterds either this Friday when it comes out, or a little later with some friends when I get back to my apartment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 August 2009, 03:27:24
I've only heard good things about The Goods, though I haven't heard much. But yeah I like Jeremy Piven a lot too so I want to see it.

SOOOOOOO want to see Inglorious Basterds.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 August 2009, 04:05:22
"The Goods" has probably been an annoying joke for girls working here. I know at least one instance where a girl has been asked to see The Goods and where there's been one there's probably been like ten others. All fat old people I reckon.

Wow I'm cynical right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 August 2009, 04:29:55
Okay, that explains why that theater girl flashed me her tits.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 August 2009, 04:58:35
Now I'm just imagining you frowning in confusion at such an act.

EDIT: I don't know how I did that. *DELETES*


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 August 2009, 22:26:49
Saw Inglorious Basterds.

Just...

...go see this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 August 2009, 23:42:47
Don't tell me what to do Bear Jew.

Actually I might be seeing it tonight.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 August 2009, 07:07:29
Inglourious Basterds is the Citizen Kane of movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 August 2009, 20:43:30
Saw it. It was really really great but it's not my favourite QT movie at all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 24 August 2009, 06:52:40
Ditto. Loved the theater fire scene.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 August 2009, 15:45:33
I'd rank the QT movies as follows:

- Pulp Fiction
- Inglourious Basterds
- Kill Bill
- Reservoir Dogs
- Death Proof

Haven't seen Jackie Brown. Oh, and just because Death Proof is last doesn't mean I didn't make sweet love to it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 August 2009, 20:41:52
I can't remember Reservoir Dogs much and I haven't seen Death Proof, but going quickly I'm gonna have to rank like this;

-Kill Bill
-Four Rooms (segment; Penthouse - "The Man from Hollywood")
-Jackie Brown
-Pulp Fiction
-Inglorious Basterds
-From Dusk Till Dawn (written, but not directed by)


Inglorious Basterds is #####ing awesome, but I'm not set that it has that ability to make watch it over and over, and it's entirely possible that I'll watch both parts of Kill Bill at any time on any day. Basically, I like his other stuff because it has more pulp and it's more interesting directorally. This one was basically linear and mostly a normal movie. It had less of a thick QT feel, and I feel his other movies have more interesting character mannerisms (especially with throwback dialogue) I think what people mostly like about it is that everyone likes watching Americans kill ratzis (and pretend they were there more than they were, just saying). That gives it an automatic three stars. Then you put Brad Pitt in it and it goes over five. But the movie was really good and awesome and worth lots of praise and all that, I just can't say that it doesn't help that it's about WWII.

Kill Bill is at the top of the list mainly because I've seen it the most, so I know how much I like it. I love the others very much but I don't own them (for some reason) so I'm less familiar, though I watch them whenever I can.

Some people don't like Jackie Brown. Some people say it sucks, or it's bad for a Quentin Tarantino film. They're stupid. Jackie Brown is awesome. I love everything about it, but maybe you need an appreciation for the '70s blaxploitation genre it takes from, which Pam Grier had a lot of roles in. It has great dialogue and all that other wickedness that makes me like his films.

Four Rooms is a great movie that people don't really seem to know about. It's about a bellhop on his last nerve working New Year's Eve at the hotel. Every room's story had a different writer and director, my favourite two being the room by Quentin Tarantino and the room by Robert Rodriguez.

I really want to see the From Dusk till Dawn sequel and prequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 August 2009, 21:37:19
I went to see IB again in the afternoon yesterday and loved it just as much as the first time. Something about it just clicked with me. I mean, I love Kill Bill and it's hard for me to say I like Inglourious Basterds more, because it's pretty damn equal. I'm still wavering between the two. I think I'm just in love with a movie that let's Jews really kick some ass and basically BE the Nazis this time around. And I loved hating and loving the Nazis.

Pulp Fiction is by far my favorite and I don't think I can top that, and I'd rate Reservoir Dogs higher if there was just a little more to it. It's the most simple of QT's movies that I've seen, but that's not to say anything's wrong with it. The "Stuck in the middle with you" scene is one of my favorite movie scenes of all time.

I've only heard good things about Jackie Brown. I'll check it out soon.

I know about Four Rooms but still haven't seen it.

From Dusk 'Till Dawn I watched part of, but I wasn't really paying attention and really need an alone-viewing with it.

True Romance is another one I know QT wrote but not directed, and I'd like to see that as well because it sounds pretty good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 24 August 2009, 21:52:59
You might enjoy Munich quite a bit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 25 August 2009, 00:41:24
I haven't seen anything written, directed, or produced by Quentin Tarantino!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 25 August 2009, 23:59:48
I just got finished watching World's Greatest Dad.

While it wasn't as funny as I was hoping/expecting, it was still an excellent movie.
There was an incredibly sharp yet understated social critique at the heart of the film, and the symbolism it used was fantastic.

I'm afraid, however, that it's going to be one of those movies that never receives the kind of recognition it has coming to it.

Interestingly enough, the trailer for it isn't a fair representation of what the movie is about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 August 2009, 00:15:42
I haven't seen anything written, directed, or produced by Quentin Tarantino!

..serious?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 August 2009, 00:31:00
I just got finished watching World's Greatest Dad.

Same. Except I watched it last night before going to bed.

I loved it. A great gem that's certainly going to be underlooked. Robin Williams was great, and so was that kid from Spy Kids. It was very fun and very dark, and just like Edge said: the trailers are pretty much making this out to be a completely different movie.

I wouldn't have bothered watching if somebody hadn't told me what one of the major plot points is. That enticed me into watching it. Ironically, I would have enjoyed it more if I didn't see that coming. So, I'm not going to spoil it or anything, I'm just saying that there is a genuinely creative and provocative storyline.

I mean, I'll put it in spoiler tags, I guess. This is a single sentence that will probably get you to watch it if you're the kind of person who would find this sort of thing appealing.

But don't read it if you don't want a big part of the movie spoiled, even if it only happens about a third of the way in.

Here:
[spoiler]What if your son killing himself somehow made your life a lot better?[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 26 August 2009, 02:15:31
More than minor spoilers:

[spoiler]What I really thought was impressive was the way the movie handled all the facets of death. Much like in real life, people who die are quickly absolved of their sins, particularly when those survived by them have some sense of guilt regarding the circumstance. I've always been mystified by that kind of #####, and I felt it was well handled here.

The weight of what he's done so clearly hangs around his neck like some sort of leaden albatross that everything he does almost feels slowed. The fact that he must suffer alone adds to the bitterness, and the risk of exposure never seems entirely out of view.

The irony of the sons death benefiting not just his father but everyone else was delicious. Would the father not have done what he did, his son's life would have remained inconsequential, save for any major personality shifts. This is made that much more Pyrrhic by the fact that his one friendship was a fantastic example of how little something like that really matters so long as you're true to yourself, which ends up being the movies ultimate moral. The symbolic baptism/rebirth scene at the end was pretty poetic as well.

It seriously blows my mind that this was written and directed by Bobcat Goldthwait. I never would have thought he had it in him.
[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 August 2009, 03:39:16
I've never even heard of this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 August 2009, 05:27:02
I've only heard about it when Linda was watching it. Watched the trailer, looks pretty decent.

'Darko entertainment', heh, Frank.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 August 2009, 05:44:36
It seriously blows my mind that this was written and directed by Bobcat Goldthwait. I never would have thought he had it in him.

I know, his last movie was about a girl blowing her dog.

Also, I geeked out at the random Simon Pegg quote Robin Williams busted out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 August 2009, 02:56:40
Apparently, Dr. Light built a rag doll. Not a robot. He named him 9. Not X. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnoJecu9e7c)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 August 2009, 03:00:26
That REALLY screwed with how I watched the video.
Like, almost ruined it.

EVERYONE, DON'T LISTEN TO THOSE WORDS OF CHAOS.

Just watch it, it seems interesting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 August 2009, 03:12:17
It is interesting, but it DOES have a little... MHX feeling to it. >.>

My friend said it worse: "It's a mix of Mega Man, Nightmare before Christmas, and Final Fantasy"

It looks like it could be good, regardless.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 29 August 2009, 03:14:44
I watched it and didn't think of Final Fantasy at all...

The rag doll thingy reminds me of Little Big Planet... and the voice at the beginning sounded like either Dr. Light or Dr. Cain from MHX... >_>


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 August 2009, 03:16:27
I can smell the LBP stages already this movie might spawn...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 29 August 2009, 03:17:09
I can't smell anything because I have a stuffy nose.

You bastard.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 29 August 2009, 03:32:27
It's played in a number of trailer packs and on the television sets at the Cineplex all summer.

It seems like prophetic fantasy sci-fi, something kind of like The Matrix. It's about 9 little dolls created and given life by some Frankenstein—who if I recall correctly is the last of the human race—and they're taking on what seem to be robots. I thought of Mega Man maybe at first but that stopped quickly. (This may not all be correct.)

I've had some people think it's omg stop-motion Tim Burton but they're retarded because the only thing that reminds me of anything stop-motion is the texture of the dolls. Which really has nothing to do with stop-motion.

Also I'm betting on it getting more at the box office than it deserves not only because of Tim Burton but because they used a song on Rock Band.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 August 2009, 03:39:47
THAT'S where I've heard it from.

Anyways, Cyborg Zero Zero Nine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 August 2009, 07:17:15
I thought of that too, strangely enough.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 August 2009, 17:04:49
I saw this trailer a waaaaaaaays back and I thought it looked like standard Burton blargh, even though he's only PRODUCING it.

There's an old 10 minute short movie that this is based on, it's also called "9". You can find it online. There's no dialogue. I didn't love it.

I cannot see ANY connection to MegaMan.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 29 August 2009, 23:05:49
This doesn't remind me of anything Tim Burton has done. There are few artistic details that might look like Burton's style but everything else is... well, Shane Acker, I guess. It looks like a mixture of story flavours.

In fact I'm feeling people will either assume this movie is bad because it has Burton's name on it or just the opposite, and there's going to be little in between.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 August 2009, 23:59:12
It looks Burton-esque in its APPEAL, not it's artistic style. I can describe to you the exact sort of people who are going to see this and rave about it.

From the trailer, nothing about it seemed worth talking about.

I could be wrong, but I just didn't see anything I liked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 August 2009, 00:58:22
Besides the rag-person idea.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 30 August 2009, 01:17:28
I cannot see ANY connection to MegaMan.

Something about you is broken, and it's not just your nose.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 August 2009, 02:13:27
Explain to me how 9 is anything like MegaMan.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 August 2009, 02:21:11
robot future protect world


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 August 2009, 02:29:58
He's not a robot, he's a sackboy.

And "future protect world" can be applied to almost any piece of science fiction.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 August 2009, 03:28:24
It looks Burton-esque in its APPEAL

No it doesn't. You sound like some kind of anti-goth weirdo trying to peer into their culture and not understanding it.

If you can't see the distinction between this and something like The Nightmare Before Christmas then there's no hope for you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 30 August 2009, 04:13:41
Explain to me how 9 is anything like MegaMan.

"He has such potential. Such promise. 9, you are to protect the future."

It's similar dialogue Dr. Light said about X in Maverick Hunter X.

In the trailer, you also see "9" seeing a hologram or image of his creator. I don't see how you can't see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 August 2009, 05:38:14
It looks Burton-esque in its APPEAL

No it doesn't. You sound like some kind of anti-goth weirdo trying to peer into their culture and not understanding it.

If you can't see the distinction between this and something like The Nightmare Before Christmas then there's no hope for you.

Bitch I love Nightmare Before Christmas and Invader Zim and I thought Donnie Darko was pretty cool. I'm not anti-any of that stuff, I'm just saying that 9 clearly (and that can't even be argued) falls into the same category as that stuff.

And I have very little interest in 9. I might end up checking it out, and maybe I'll love it, but I'm just saying that right now I have very little interest in it.

Explain to me how 9 is anything like MegaMan.

"He has such potential. Such promise. 9, you are to protect the future."

It's similar dialogue Dr. Light said about X in Maverick Hunter X.

In the trailer, you also see "9" seeing a hologram or image of his creator. I don't see how you can't see it.

There, now I see some connections. That's all I was asking.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 August 2009, 05:02:08
You appear to be arguing a different point than what you earlier said:

It looks Burton-esque in its APPEAL

One look at imdb reassures me that Tim Burton had nothing to do with Donnie Darko or Invader Zim, and yet the term you used was Burton-esque. Furthermore, I still don't see the connection between The Nightmare Before Christmas and those things except that supposedly certain kinds of people like them all, and you're saying that makes them Burton-esque. Burton isn't a word I'd use to fully describe that sub-culture. It's just one small aspect.

And I have very little interest in 9. I might end up checking it out, and maybe I'll love it, but I'm just saying that right now I have very little interest in it.

If that was all that you were saying I wouldn't be disagreeing. I don't think much of it either. Cautiously optimistic, I'd add for clarity. But I expect nothing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 August 2009, 05:18:51
It's the Burton-esque appeal.
There are "those" kind of people who will just go ga-ga over this, and they are the people who very openly say that "jak skelingtum is mai lovur" or "GIR is teh greatest and if u dont agree ur dum".

It's the type of movie that will cause the greatest reaction from the types of people who like to say they are openly nor part of the norm and do not conform to standards.

Also, take this with a grain of salt as I'm dead tired and can;t put my words together well at the moment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2009, 05:30:39
APPEAL. I chose my words wisely. Not CONTENT, nor STYLE, but APPEAL.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 August 2009, 05:43:01
Also, take this with a grain of salt as I'm dead tired and can;t put my words together well at the moment.

I will do that, thanks. Here's why:

You just repeated what ASR was saying, which is something I already made a solid point against, and then you added your own little shade of negative bias into the mix, which I just don't care enough to respond to.

I have clearly demonstrated that I know what he's talking about and don't need it re-iterated.

I chose my words wisely.

No you didn't. You said Burton. "Appeal" is inconsequential when you describe it as Burton and apply it to things Burton doesn't apply to. You can't take a pile of assorted fruit and call them apples. You call them fruits.

EDIT: Sorry about that last statement I made, if you read it before I cut it. I'm not feeling angry or anything, just kind of mean. A tired, arrogant type of meanness.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2009, 05:58:19
Burton-ESQUE.

There is a shared element between, for example:
- Tim Burton films
- 9
- Donnie Darko
- Invader Zim
- Hot Topic

All of that is undeniable. I spotted the same mood in the trailer for 9 before I even knew Burton was involved. Or rather, I knew exactly which type of people would be getting together and watching this movie on DVD late at night in a few years. It was an observation, and I stand by it and am still clueless as to what you are arguing, and what your solid point not only WAS, but what it was AGAINST.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 August 2009, 06:49:37
It's blatantly misleading, and it's unfair, and it's assholic. And if you call the connection between all those films Burton-esque, and base the connection mostly on its followers, you're basically calling them all Burton-esque. Which is a really unfair statement to be made of a subculture. You're pretty much blowing them the finger with that misleading douchebag of a word. If you're going to categorize them by the type of people who generally watch them, call it something that makes sense to them. They aren't going to call themselves Burton-esque if they like more different kinds of films than Burton usually makes—if they like more films than Burton makes himself, even.

Invader Zim's dark humour about an alien isn't automatically Burton-esque just because it shares the word "dark" to describe any of Burton's other stuff. Burton didn't even invent "dark". He just came up with something original that happened to be dark. And that's the only plausible connection I MIGHT really see between all those things.

I hate to say this word for the way it makes me sound, but it's just not CORRECT. It looks really ignorant and prejudiced and douchey, and it sounds exactly like something someone anti-darkstuff or whateverthisallis when you say it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 August 2009, 14:51:00
I understand your point, but I feel that we are referring to it as "Burton-Esque" because it is a quick and easy way to categorize it.

We could include all of the films we are talking about into one large subgroup, that includes ASR's list: Dark/creepy overtones balanced against awkward protagonists that create consistent light humor, that may or may not be dark.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2009, 17:41:26
I'm not calling the fans "Burton-esque." I'd call them hipster indie art-students or some odd combination of that. And of course at this point I'm just making generalizations about youth subcultures. I'm not saying any of this is set in stone. I love Invader Zim, but that doesn't mean I love Tim Burton's films. And likewise, just because someone likes Donnie Darko doesn't mean they're going to fall in love with 9.

I was just saying that there IS a connection between all of this material and that connection is the sort of people who USUALLY love it. None of this is exact, none of this is perfect, it's simply an observation, and an accurate one at that. This is a dumb argument. If you're angry about me using the word "Burton-esque", that's just silly. I could use any word. And even then, Burton-ESQUE, man. Burton-ESQUE. ESQUE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 August 2009, 17:56:21
PSUEDO-BURTON-ESQUE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2009, 18:42:17
The new word for this that I am making up is Snaggly!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 31 August 2009, 20:01:41
Burton-esque is far less offensive than Angsty Pretension, which is the term I would have used.

There are certainly visual and thematic correlations between all aforementioned films (to varying degrees) and it's silly to say otherwise.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 31 August 2009, 20:48:27
i dont get it


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 August 2009, 23:03:53
I still wouldn't look at Invader Zim and think, "That's something Burton would do." And that's strongly implied by "Burton-esque."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 August 2009, 23:14:26
I have no idea what you're fighting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 September 2009, 00:07:17
Yeah. OK.

I have a pass to see 9 on Thursday and I'm gonna go with the girl. You guys reading MM and FF things into it seems ridiculous and you've probably all got condoms full of illegals bursting in your bums because I think you might have to be dropping your deliriants as abhorrently as that to be tripping so much balls.

I can see the Burton-esque appeal (minus heavily-weirdly-curvy buildings/landscapes/characters/staplers/cups/letters) thing very clearly and anyone missing that has had their eyes replaced with sweet and sour chicken balls, and while Chinese take-out would be delicious tonight that is no way to watch a movie trailer.

Appeal. "Appeal" is one of the principle principles of animation, and one of the more ambiguous ones in that appeal can at times be frustratingly subjective. "Appeal" most basically refers to a sense, or an emotional reaction, to something. It's more about perception of a concept than what the concept actually looks like. Who is involved behind the scenes isn't even beside the point, it's way over there. It took a bus, it got a transfer, it's gone.

There is a very clear feeling you get with the trailer for 9 that is present in films Tim Burton actually did himself, if there wasn't that APPEAL then to assume that Tim Burton superfans (or "those people") would love it because his name is on there would be unfounded. You think that people will think about it as a Tim Burton film because you are, whether consciously or not, picking up on a certain aesthetic about 9 that reminds you of his work. No, the designs don't look like Tim Burton's stuff. Hell, maybe it isn't even thematically similar, exactly. But there is an undeniable aspect, or quality, that reeks (not rings) of Burton. I don't know how anyone doesn't see it. ASR only has four senses and he picked up on it! And I also noticed the similar appeal before I was aware Tim Burton was at all involved. The correlation is both obvious and strong, quod erat demonstrandum.

I wouldn't lump Donnie Darko or Invader ZIM in this myself, though. Those don't give off the same imprint for me, though I do understand the reference under the terms that they tend to share the same (not so) sub-culture.

Don't get me wrong; I don't care at all about the movie. But it's free and at least semi-interesting since I had an idea for a series that seems to have a similar starting point a few years ago, and that's pretty much good enough for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 September 2009, 00:39:24
Gamer looks cool, guys!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 September 2009, 00:43:48
300 guy is OK when he's not in ##### like The Ugly Truth or 300.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 September 2009, 00:53:53
I like both the premise and Michael C. Hall.

Also, the directors are the guys who made both Crank movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 1 September 2009, 02:16:34
I have no idea what you're fighting.

More or less just the term.

Mike, I looked at the trailer and thought only once of Tim Burton at the very beginning, and the whole trailer itself took me away from that. I thought of probable kinds of people who'd like it, much like ASR did, but not Tim Burton. I just don't connect them. It is as you say, it's frustrating (in a way that, for me, lacks emotion) because I know people will compare them like they have such a strong connection and I definitely jumped to a conclusion when I read the term ASR used. I had known that it or something like it was going to come up and I'd known I was going to fight it, and then I did it for the wrong reason.

But you made a good point, and it's okay of course that you've had your say. Unless someone else feels like educating me I'm going to come forward and say I'm willing to drop it, as I already would have but knew more people would be coming in on this.

Anyway I was thinking of finding a way to watch the Rocky Horror Picture Show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 September 2009, 03:37:10
I wanna see TRON.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 September 2009, 02:14:59
I'm gonna watch Tron again with friends soon. Haven't seen it since in the days.

Tron Legacy looks badass. Plus Olivia Wilde can melt me with any of her features including stupid stuff like eyebrows, she's off the wall balls hot.

I always wanted to play Tron 2.0, but it was probably bad.

Posted on:  1 September 2009, 02:17:50

OK so we saw 9 yesterday.

Don't bother.

It's not really bad... Not really. Although she got really bored I was at least interested (but still slightly bored). And the whole movie BARELY over an HOUR long, yet it still drags. There's little to no character development and I basically figured out the whole plot before it was half over.

The Tim Burton appeal isn't as palpable as in the trailer but the movie suffers from hard to read action and what many games these days have so much of, which is "realistic" colouring; I.E. a lot of the movie is painted with an all too heavy hue of gunmetal grey or ##### brown. I don't like this because it's not realistic at all, especially when everything looks a lot alike.


If you really want to see it, find a way to do it for free or wait to rent it. I didn't totally HATE it, though I doubt I'd ever walk out on a movie, but I'd be mad if we had had to pay to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2009, 02:25:22
I really want to see Gamer. I know, I know. Still, if I'm going to go see a mindless action movie, it's going to be one made by Nevaldine and Taylor. These guys gave me Crank and Crank 2, which reminded me of how much fun I could have watching movies. I don't care if Gamer takes itself more seriously than those films, I still trust them. Plus, it's got Michael C. Hall.

I'm just as interested in Extract, which has a fun cast and, more importantly, is the new Mike Judge movie. Might go see that on Monday on of them there date things everyone seems so keen about. You know, with girls and French kisses. Although admittedly there's usually just the one girl, and kissing is gross!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 September 2009, 02:36:57
Gamer doesn't look that bad.

Extract looks good.

I'm not sure when they come out but I'm about to get even busier so who knows iffin' I'll see them.

girl, and kissing is gross!

What are you, gay?

(Yes I had to do it again.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 September 2009, 02:44:23
They both came out today. I was supposed to see Gamer tonight but it looks like that's not happening.

girl, and kissing is gross!

What are you, gay?

Cooties!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 September 2009, 02:47:21
Maybe Jewzians are allergic to human saliva....?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 September 2009, 03:22:59
I went and saw "DISTRICT 9."

(district capped to avoid confusion with 9)

I very much enjoyed it.
It's worth spending money on to go see.

Although, about half the people in the theater didn't like it, which I can't understand.
It's a little slow to get going, but it's a very interesting film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 04:22:53
I'd like to start off by saying that I know this next claim will likely make me sound like an idiot.

"Gamer" is my favorite movie of 2009 so far. More than "Inglourious Basterds," more than "500 Days of Summer." More than "Up" and "Watchmen" and "Star Trek."

It was amazing and I am in love. This movie transcends the already awesome premise of using death-row inmates as mind-controlled players in a video game called Slayers. It's funny because it's tongue-in-cheek, it's action-packed because these guys GET action, and Michael C. Hall is absolutely perfect as a villain. I mean, we're talking classic iconic performance here.

I was expecting to enjoy this movie first and foremost because Michael C. Hall is in it. Also, I like the director team of Nevaldine/Taylor, who gave me two Crank movies. Those were loads of fun and really great, but they were too ridiculous to really ever become endearing. They're just like the roller-coasters of movies. But Gamer has all those elements and manages to make it all respectable, fun, and above all else: cool. These guys have such a great style and after seeing Gamer they're definitely on my list of top directors. They've got this sense of ridiculously crazy movie-theater fun that nobody else has right now except maybe Quentin Tarantino.

Seriously, go see this movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 September 2009, 04:27:46
I'm surprised.

I'll go see it if you go see "District 9".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 04:29:29
I already saw District 9.

It was pretty cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 September 2009, 04:36:29
That means I'll go and see Gamer this week.
Either that or Inglorious Basterds. Or both.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 19:39:25
And keep in mind, I loooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooved Inglourious Basterds. And 500 Days of Summer, but they're both very different movies so I kind of let them sit together as favorites. Until now.

Posted on:  6 September 2009, 23:47:21

Oh, and I forgot to tell you, John.

Your boy Peter Petrelli has one of the funniest cameos ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 September 2009, 21:17:18
MUST
SEE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 21:26:56
I was seriously dying of laughter when he came on screen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 September 2009, 21:57:20
I'll go see it, maybe tonight?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 22:04:24
The sooner the better, this movie probably won't be in theaters for very long.

Tidbit: Milo Ventimiglia is credited as "Rick Rape."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 September 2009, 22:26:58
!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm really having trouble ignoring all the bad reviews though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 September 2009, 22:28:24
Gamer always looked like a video game themed version of Death Race (which already kind of video game-like) so I wanted to see it.

I won't have the time though.

Peter Petrelli is a bollock.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 September 2009, 23:23:28
The reviews are pretty brutal, yeah. This is not a movie for critics, anyway.

I haven't seen Death Race but have wanted to for a while.

Peter Petrelli is a bollock.

Then you'll LOVE his cameo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 September 2009, 04:19:05
Sorry, the CHARACTER is a bollock, not the actor.

Death Race was just fun stupidness. It was like Death Mario Kart, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 September 2009, 05:01:49
One of my roommates has it. I'll borrow it from her. I think she has a poster of it in her room, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 10 September 2009, 01:50:26
I just finished Repo! The Genetic Opera.

It was obviously a labor of love.

It was also #####ing terrible.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 September 2009, 02:37:50
That looked really bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 10 September 2009, 02:42:56
My brother loved it. He bought the DVD.

I on the other hand settled for watching the Zydrate Anatomy part and I was pretty amused by it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 September 2009, 03:29:38
The only thing that I liked about the idea of Repo! The Genetic Opera was the name and some posters, so I never saw it. Though I like the notion of a "gasmasquerade", I don't really care.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 September 2009, 19:25:06
Saw "Gamer" today.
Horrible crappy movie.
But it was charming.

Also, Rick Rape was the highlight of the movie besides the teabagging in the intro.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 September 2009, 21:50:13
Haha.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 September 2009, 05:02:54
#####in' Rick Rape.

I got some weird looks because I was laughing so hard.
Also, saw it at a cruddy theatre in town that only charges $3.
$1 on Tuesdays.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 20 September 2009, 19:57:36
Wow, and I was thinking about going to the theater to see "Gamer" today, now I know its crap and not worth my 10 bucks.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 20 September 2009, 20:21:25
You should have known just from the trailer it was gonna be crap.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 September 2009, 20:52:41
I still stand by Gamer being my favorite summer movie.

Not the best by ANY long shot, but easily and definitely my favorite.

And Crank 2 is my favorite movie of all 2009 so far. Something about these guys make me giddy with excitement. They're so fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 September 2009, 00:08:36


I always wanted to play Tron 2.0, but it was probably bad.

I played it for the PC; it was pretty good. A little confusing at times due to the backgrounds (black with small colored lines), but very neat looking.

I watched Pride and Glory this morning. I thought it was a pretty good movie, but it felt like an aborted pilot for an HBO cop show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 22 September 2009, 06:35:31
Has anyone seen the trailer to Paranoral Activity? It looks like a good spooky to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 September 2009, 02:11:34
: wiki
Both Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg have announced plans to write and direct a third Harold and Kumar movie, with Greg Shapiro returning as the producer, and Kal Penn and John Cho expected to return in their titular roles. Danneel Harris is rumored to be reprising her role of Vanessa.[22][23] A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas is set to be released on November 5, 2010.[24] It is unclear whether Penn's decision to take a job at the White House will affect the production of the movie.[25]

Say what?
I'm sure this won't happen, because Kal Penn said he's not going back to acting while he works with the Obama administration, but I can't say I don't want this movie to exist.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 September 2009, 04:32:51
Yeah, I heard about it a while ago. I remember reading somewhere that Kal Penn said he definitely wants to do the movie, and this was after he was in the White House.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 September 2009, 19:25:59
I remember when he took the job he said he wanted to do more of those movies but not for a WHILE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 30 September 2009, 23:43:45
Saw Gamer with my brother the other day.

It's a pretty good action flick with adult situations and cartoon-esque violence.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 October 2009, 02:19:31
Went to see Zombieland with a group of friends, spectacular movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 October 2009, 02:43:53
Good to hear.

I'm gonna see the new Trailer Park Boys movie in like a week or so and I cannot effen wait.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 3 October 2009, 05:31:09
Yep, Zombieland was absolutely awesome. Incredibly fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 3 October 2009, 06:00:15
Many people walked out of there saying it was the best comedy movie they had seen for the whole year.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 3 October 2009, 07:59:54
I'd agree. It's also the first movie in awhile that hasn't disappointed me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 3 October 2009, 17:10:30
Man, Zombieland is a differant beast from other movies I've seen this year, alolol.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 October 2009, 00:55:45
Hm. Are you actually Swedish and/or a fan of their feetsball team?
Or do you just like yellow shirts?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 October 2009, 21:18:29
http://www.fancast.com/movies/2012-%28Columbia-Pictures%29/148925/1274572948/2012%3A-Exclusive-Scene/videos?startBox=personal&sso_zip=02330

I've been mocking 2012 for a while now because I have a friend who's been obsessed with it since it was anounced, but I've always been a sucker for disaster movies (they've been a guilty pleasure since I was a little kid) and this looks like the mother-of-all-disaster-movies.

In that 5-minute clip they've already topped every single one ever made.

And don't get me wrong, this doesn't look like a good film - it looks like a fun film. I laughed my ass off during "The Day After Tomorrow" (come on, a disaster film about GLOBAL WARMING?) and this looks like it's even more ridiculous and entertaining. You can't tell me there wasn't some carnal enjoyment bubbling up in your tummies after watching that level of destruction... and John Cusack outrunning all of it in a limo.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 October 2009, 22:08:56
I thought it was stuupid looking.

Why don't they PULL UP in the plane?
Jeez.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 October 2009, 04:30:32
It was VERY stupid-looking.

It looks VERY stupid.

Something might be wrong with me, because nobody else seems to love bad like I love bad.

Posted on:  4 October 2009, 23:22:05

ALSO.

Saw Zombieland, then walked right into The Invention of Lying.

Zombieland was GREAT. I was very impressed by it. It's still nowhere near Shaun of the Dead, but I've put that on such a high pedestal that I can't blame this movie at all. Very good and very funny.

Invention of Lying was a huge disappointment, but it still had some really great and creative parts. Halfway through it took a very strange turn... but I definitely enjoyed it. It's just... I was expecting too much out of it, I guess. Louis CK was great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 5 October 2009, 04:38:23
Something might be wrong with me, because nobody else seems to love bad like I love bad.

Not necessarily, I had a blast watching Troll 2 in a large group the other day. EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE LECTURE HALL joined in for the "oh my goooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooood" line


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 5 October 2009, 05:17:13
"We need to make a movie. Any suggestions?"
"A disaster movie."
"Good. Any plot?"
"Just. Go. Nuts."

And 2012 was born.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 October 2009, 06:58:01
Something might be wrong with me, because nobody else seems to love bad like I love bad.

Not necessarily, I had a blast watching Troll 2 in a large group the other day. EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE LECTURE HALL joined in for the "oh my goooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooood" line

That's what I would call watching something ironically, like Reefer Madness or Santa's Slay or The Gingerdead Man. You know, crappy B-movies. There's actually not much difference between what I'm saying and that - there's a very fine line and I'm having trouble putting it into words.

Like... when I watch Shark Attack 3, I'm laughing because it's bad, and enjoying it because it's bad. When I watch Crank 2 or Gamer, I'm actually genuinely enjoying the movie even though I consciously know they're bad in the ways most people judge films... I'm not enjoying them BECAUSE they're bad.

I think the key difference is the passion that goes into them: if the team really cares about the movie or project or whatever, then I would never say I hate it. I give it the benefit of the doubt even if it's not my cup of tea. Stuff that's made clearly for the money and without much heart, like Transformers 2 or G.I. Joe... that stuff I can't stand. Things like Two and a Half Men and CSI also fall into this category. I'm sure some people involved in those things really believe they're making art, but not on enough of a level that I'd appreciate it.

Lost isn't great but I really feel like everyone involved loves making it and working on the show. Kevin Smith movies are pretty bad on the technical side of things in comparison to a lot of movies, but I know he puts a lot of heart into his dialogue and writing and characters and that's enough to carry me. I wouldn't love Crank 2 if I didn't truly believe that Nevaldine and Taylor were having the absolute best time of their lives writing and directing it.

After all this, and since it's an Roland Emmerich film, 2012 really falls more into the B-movie ironic-viewing category much like where I place The Day After Tomorrow. But I'm glad I got into this discussion because I feel I actually got some words out that I've been meaning to for a while.

Posted on:  5 October 2009, 00:57:41

To make up for reading all of that, here is a leaked Toy Story 3 trailer which will likely be taken down by the time anyone reads this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ8vGmAxuVQ


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 5 October 2009, 07:17:32
Downloaded.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 5 October 2009, 11:18:37
Awesome, glad I saw it before it got taken down.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 October 2009, 15:41:54
Still up!
Cool. Downloading now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 5 October 2009, 19:10:32
They JUST took it down now. Good thing I saw it, but Annie missed out.

John, any chance you can send it to her?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 October 2009, 21:16:23
If she gets at me on AIM, sure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 7 October 2009, 07:56:38
This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by The Walt Disney Company.

But whatever. I see #####en 'nuff animation daily right now.

come on, a disaster film about GLOBAL WARMING?

Re: The Happening


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 9 October 2009, 22:29:36
For everyone who missed it, here's the Toy Story 3 trailer again, in much better quality... but it might be gone soon again, so be quick! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpV7dLoV_RI)

It looks really good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 10 October 2009, 01:11:18
Two hours later and it's GONE.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 10 October 2009, 01:30:30
Did anybody manage to download it?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 October 2009, 02:01:22
It wouldn't load for me, and that was right after you posted it.
It linked to a weird URL and froze for a while then it said that it had been removed.

I still have the other version though, if anybody needs it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 October 2009, 03:11:04
I know a certain guy who isn't Steve Drumonde did not put it up on the social networking website Handgraphicnovel.com.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 October 2009, 21:55:32
Just watched Toy Story 1 and 2 back-to-back last night for the first time in what has to be 10 years. I mean, I think I may have watched the first one sometime in there, but I know I haven't seen Toy Story 2 since it was in theaters.

I didn't go to the 3D double-feature, mind you. Ha.

Anyway, my point is... I think I like Toy Story 2 more than I like the first. Both are movie masterpieces.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 12 October 2009, 01:14:12
I still need to review the 2nd one. I also last saw it in the theater and I cannot remember anything that happened (except for a new cowgirl toy and buzz encountering his nemesis in a toy store or something) for the life of me.

I thought the 1st one was better, but again, opinionsssss... they changeeeee...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 October 2009, 03:36:57
The second Toy Story is much like the second Rush Hour in that it's basically a flip of the first one and that's not really a bad thing.

Though while I like Rush Hour 2 more than the first, I like Toy Story MUCH more than it's sequel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 13 October 2009, 00:09:06
Am more into scary movies, that said, anyone seen the trailer to Paranornal Activity? It looks good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 00:59:28
Hollywood doesn't make scary movies anymore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 13 October 2009, 01:37:40
Oh? They suck that much to you eh? Alol.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 01:52:52
Prove me wrong.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 October 2009, 01:55:07
I don't think a single genuinely-scary movie actually exists, at least by my standards.

Paranormal Activity looked promising from the trailer, and I've heard high praise as well as awful bashing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 01:57:01
I don't think a single genuinely-scary movie actually exists, at least by my standards.

Say what?

You must have missed all the classics.
Though I could understand if nowadays the old tyme special effects don't hit people like they used to.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 13 October 2009, 02:06:08
Yea, them specials not as good this day and age, I saw Mortal Kombat last night, and whooo!!, you can soooo tell its fake with an HDTV.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 02:07:50
If you couldn't tell it was fake on a normal TV I feel sorry for you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 13 October 2009, 02:27:16
I did, but it looks even more on an HDTV. Had a good few laughs off of it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 October 2009, 03:03:22
When I was younger, I'm sure a ton of stuff scared me. I remember getting scared during Men In Black when I saw it in theaters!

But now? Classics or not, I'm unshakable. It kind of sucks. This goes for crying at movies, too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 October 2009, 03:11:16
What about a certain episode of Futurama?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 October 2009, 03:43:40
Like I keep saying, the closest I've ever come to crying at anything on-screen was during the series finale of Six Feet Under. One of my eyes teared up a little bit.

That Dear Zachary documentary put up a fair fight, too.

And yes, Futurama's Jurassic Bark is heart-wrenching, but still not enough for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 06:30:41
I honestly barely remember that one. Everyone acts like it was soooooo sad, but it wasn't that bad.

But now? Classics or not, I'm unshakable. It kind of sucks. This goes for crying at movies, too.

Yeah I guess I'm the same.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 13 October 2009, 17:34:32
Being so macho must be rough.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 October 2009, 18:16:13
I think I cried so much between the ages of 10-15 like a total wuss that I effectively depleted myself of tears.

To be fair, those were the dark ages of my life where I was being kicked out of schools and shuffling through therapists and spending time in out-patient mental institutions.

So, movies!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 19:50:07
I'm not "so macho", I just don't actually cry much. Never have cried much.

I get still moved by stuff, jeez.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 13 October 2009, 19:53:02
You know when I was a kid I didn't realize the Mask pulled a condom out of his pocket. I saw the scene just now and I was like WHOA.

THEY CALL ME CUBAN PETE
I'M THE KING OF THE RUMBA BEAT
WHEN I PLAY THE MARACAS I GO CHICK CHICKY BOOM CHICK CHICKY BOOM


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 October 2009, 19:56:35
That movie is nothing like the actual The Mask stuff, but I don't mind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 October 2009, 22:39:40
I still remember being a kid and seeing a condom advertisement, and when I asked my mom what it was her answer was "it's like a raincoat for your wee-wee."

Years later and it doesn't make much more sense.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 October 2009, 23:50:16
Bahahahaha.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 16 October 2009, 22:32:27
So am going to see Paranornal Activity tonight, am looking forward into seeing this movie at last.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 October 2009, 07:00:10
Apparently it's the first real scary movie in ages so I kinda want to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 17 October 2009, 08:46:06
..............That movie.......damn......Paranor mal was......damn...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 October 2009, 13:02:31
Thanks for being so specific, champ.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 October 2009, 17:04:22
I thought the same thing.
I'd at least have SOMETHING after it, like "go watch it if you wanna cry in fear".

Nothing. You have told me NOTHING!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 17 October 2009, 17:10:49
I went to see Paranormal. Candlejack was in it. It was


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 October 2009, 18:23:10
It's honestly so vague to the point where I can't tell if TheOnly liked it or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 17 October 2009, 19:10:02
I think it blew his mind.

Tedd would be proud.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 17 October 2009, 20:48:35
10 points for Majikn -.-", I couldn't even sleep after seeing the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 October 2009, 21:48:25
To be honest I really don't care what TheOnly thinks of a movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 19 October 2009, 22:09:10
The fact that your post changed the page is serendipitous.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 19 October 2009, 22:21:10
Well good for you that you think that way Mikero.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 October 2009, 23:55:33
Started watching Annie Hall today in one of my film classes. It's my first Woody Allen film and I effin' love it. Simply fantastic, and it's not even over yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 20 October 2009, 02:06:35
Last week was the Ottawa International Animation Festival (OIAF '09). I didn't go to much but I saw a short competition with some good and bad stuff. It was Short Competition #5, which included the new Wallace And Gromit which was GREAT. Definitely my favourite of theirs yet. It's got a Batman and Aliens reference for Jah's sakes. Another great short was called "Runaway", I'm pretty sure it was from France, and it was about a runaway train. Real nice.

OIAF '09 Sidenote: Disney recognizes my program as the best Animation program. This has been coming for a while but they were always kind of waffling about it, and now they're pretty much going to start working with our program a bit more so we can get Disney guest lecturers and stuff. They're even talking about some internship applicant opportunities, but I don't think I can get too into that. It's just pretty cool.


Anyway, today we cut short my character animation class to pool into a lecture room with the [loser] first and second years to watch an Israeli-Australian joint production film based on the works of Etgar Keret, an Israeli author. The title was "$9.99" (Nine ninety-nine), simply adapted from the Hebrew title "The Meaning of Life for $9.99". Afterward the director, Tatia Rosenthal (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1038127/), talked to us about it and fielded questions and showed us other stuff like her student film, "Crazy Glue" (also based on an Etgar Keret story), and an early more derivative-promo-fundraiser (proof of concept) version of what became the opening to "$9.99", called "A Buck's Worth".

"$9.99" was pretty good, I thought, though the story was confusing for most (really it's just a bunch of stories at once). It was stop-motion, which we don't really do but animation is animation, of silicone puppets. I was pretty impressed with the shots and the whole thing really, and I think it's worth checking out if you can find it (it's not been released everywhere, mostly just at select film festivals, no idea what the online situation is), it's just over an hour long. The whole lecture was filmed (minus the videos we watched) but I don't know if students will have unlimited access to it or anything for me to do an unauthorized repost (not that I really think anyone here would be interested).

Well good for you that you think that way Mikero.

What I really meant was that I don't know you well enough to base MY movie goings on YOUR movie goings. I don't have a feel for your tastes yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 October 2009, 23:49:54
I saw Saw VI on Friday. I thought was a lot better than Saw V. The series is getting more and more unlikely, yet it is still pretty well written...but I'm really looking forward to the conclusion of the series. It needs to end, and soon - like, within one or two more movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 28 October 2009, 20:34:54
I stoped after Saw III, lost all interest in it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 October 2009, 21:54:47
I still stand by my opinion that the first Saw is a GREAT movie. The second one was fun, but not nearly as good. I saw the third and part of the fourth and honestly I can't say I'm surprised how low the series has dropped.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 28 October 2009, 22:43:44
The first Saw wasn't as gory as people seem to remember it. Most of the gore was implied, which is part of what made it so unnerving.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre syndrome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 October 2009, 02:11:53
Also Pulp Fiction syndrome.

Critics bashed the film for being bloody and gory, where very little of anything was seen.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 29 October 2009, 05:04:06
It's so weird that people have such a hard time separating something they thought and something they actually witnessed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 October 2009, 05:52:47
I try to not read too far into a lot of things.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 October 2009, 15:28:29
John has never finished a book.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 October 2009, 16:00:03
This is what I see.

John has never bla blah blah words


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 31 October 2009, 01:11:58
Well clearly you read his whole post or you wouldn't even have commented like that.




OH. It was an attempt at humor.








Anyway Shannon dressed up as the house from Up for the class Halloween competition today and I thought that was pretty cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 31 October 2009, 01:15:36
Was her old man tied to a hose and being dragged around?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 November 2009, 02:08:41
Watched Paranormal Activity. Terrible, one or two scary parts and not all that scary.

##### sux


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 1 November 2009, 08:16:26
You just not as easy to scare as I do.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 6 November 2009, 03:38:07
Was her old man tied to a hose and being dragged around?

Actually she dressed as like... the concept of the movie Up.

Basically her body had a sky pattern thing going on and then on a hat she had the house and had balloons. I didn't really see it all though. I thought it was probably the most creative in the program.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Winged Warrior on 6 November 2009, 11:28:04
I finally got to seeing Zombieland. I liked it, honestly, much of the humor was great.

I felt that there should have been more zombie representation, And maybe a little more death...

However, all and all a great film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 7 November 2009, 23:08:26
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/364/43388954.png)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 November 2009, 23:40:16
.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 November 2009, 05:25:00
My hair is brown.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 8 November 2009, 05:48:50
That's the part of the drawing you're choosing to fight?

SO!

Guys.

This is the story of my new favorite movie.

I've had "The Boat That Rocked" downloaded and waiting on my computer for a few months now. I initially downloaded it on a whim because Nick Frost was in it and the premise sounded interesting. I later found out that Bill Nighy and Rhys Darby were also in it, two other favorites of mine.

I kept putting off watching it.

When I found out it was getting a US release, I decided I'd wait until it hit theaters here.

Then I found out they were re-cutting the entire film and re-titling it "Pirate Radio", so I decided I'd watch the original version first since they really screwed up "Run Fatboy Run" when they brought that over (and that wasn't even that good of a movie).

I continued to put off watching it.

It hits theaters on the 13th, less than a week.

For whatever random reason, I decided to watch it tonight.

They say you can never fall in love twice.

They were wrong.

When I first watched "Shaun of the Dead", my life changed. It instantly became my favorite movie without even a doubt in my mind.

When "Hot Fuzz" came out, I was glad that it lived up to the legacy but it still didn't beat "Shaun" for me.

When I first watched "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang", I wasn't actually sure if I loved it more than "Shaun" so I let it linger. I later decided they were about neck-and-neck and I would choose one over the other as my favorite movie depending on my mood.

And then came "The Boat That Rocked."

A perfect cast. A perfect soundtrack. A perfect movie. And I really hope you understand that I'm not using ANY of those "perfects" loosely. I mean all of them with every ounce of love my heart has ever been able to muster up.

Assuming the re-cut version doesn't ruin the masterpiece, you guys can all check it out on November 13th as "Pirate Radio" and share the love. I doubt any of you will love it as much as I did because this is one of those very personal loves. Something really resonated with me here on an intimate level. I think it was the music. What I have with "The Boat That Rocked" is very special. It's very special and very personal, and you can never have what we have. But I do hope you'll enjoy it. It's like I'm letting my wife kiss you on the cheek.

And my wife is some amazing fusion of Zooey Deschanel, Jessica Alba, Mandy Moore, and January Jones (who, by the way, has a cameo in this #####ing movie!)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 8 November 2009, 16:48:34
You made me wanna see it now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 13 November 2009, 22:25:03
For all of those that care, starting today and apparently running until the end of November (they may cut it shorter, I don't know), Barnes & Noble is selling all Criterion Collection DVDs at 50% off.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 November 2009, 23:08:30
That's... very nice of them.

Also, Pirate Radio isn't playing anywhere near me yet and I can't really complain because I've already seen the longer, original version but WHATEVER I'M STILL PISSED.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 November 2009, 03:20:39
I'm not.

(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/364/43388954.png)

That movie doesn't actually look awful...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 November 2009, 04:48:37
That's... very nice of them.


Seeing as they usually run $35-60 a pop, yes it is nice of them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 November 2009, 05:16:21
That movie doesn't actually look awful...

Yeah, but he's a ninja assassin, not an assassin ninja! He kills ninjas! That was the joke.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 14 November 2009, 05:26:57
Ninja is an adjective in this case.

Also, I forgot the word adjective. It is a very hard word to describe. It took me a minute to look it up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 November 2009, 06:39:39
That's... very nice of them.


Seeing as they usually run $35-60 a pop, yes it is nice of them.

I wasn't being sarcastic - that was my "Huh, I'm considering going to Barnes and Noble" tone.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 14 November 2009, 15:58:16
GameStop employees get %40 at Barnes & Noble.

I use that discount WAY more often than the one I get from my store.

I wonder if those deals would stack...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 November 2009, 17:14:50
Yeah, my roommate works at Gamestop so I use her discount at both places all the time by forcing her to come with me whenever I want to buy anything from either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 14 November 2009, 17:55:02
Not to pick on anyone, but I just realized Edge said %40.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 14 November 2009, 19:49:40
Not to pick on anyone, but I just realized Edge said %40.

I don't like this new family friendly CV..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 November 2009, 20:20:23
I didn't like the old one!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 14 November 2009, 21:12:01
Edge was on drugs. Cut him some slack.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 15 November 2009, 05:32:23
I don't like this new family friendly CV..

I didn't like the old one!

Hey guys, I don't mean to be the bad guy here, but...

Hush.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 16 November 2009, 00:59:11
"Hush"? What are you, thirteen?

That movie doesn't actually look awful...

Yeah, but he's a ninja assassin, not an assassin ninja! He kills ninjas! That was the joke.

Yeah I got it.

I forgot the word adjective. It is a very hard word to describe. It took me a minute to look it up.

¬_¬



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 16 November 2009, 09:37:43
For anyone who cares, I saw 2012, it was good, LOTS and LOTS of special effects, but well made, well, that's what I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 November 2009, 01:11:13
I heard it was a pretty bland movie but I don't respect the opinion of the person I heard that from so good to hear.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 November 2009, 01:27:10
I'm a sucker for disaster movies but I don't actually think any of them are quality movies. In fact, most of them are plain awful, but the destruction in them is awesome. I definitely enjoy them though and this looks to be the mother of all disaster movies. I'll probably end up seeing it soon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 November 2009, 01:30:25
I'll probably end up seeing it not but I feel the same way.



I've recently rewatched all the Die Hard movies and I'm really happy about that because they are all awesome even though the second one is the worst.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 20 November 2009, 16:26:58
Last night my friend asked if I wanted to see The 4th Kind, not asking what the movie was about, I said suuure why not, so I saw the movie and wow, the movie had footage from video recorders but in order to understand when it happened, that's were all the movie actors came up and about, altho the acting sucked the movie got its point a cross. And even then you decide what you saw is skeptical or not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 November 2009, 02:52:24
I read this in the other thread and all, but I'm still trying to figure what kind of footage the movie would have that isn't from "video recorders".

Clearly much of the post makes little sense, but this part just really throws me. I assume you mean from handheld cameras or something...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 1 December 2009, 16:05:15
(http://wearemoviegeeks.com/wp-content/iron-man-2-poster.jpg)

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF--yessss


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 December 2009, 17:06:10
Might need that poster.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 1 December 2009, 17:48:40
That makes 2 of us.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 1 December 2009, 17:58:30
I'm excited :)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 December 2009, 19:34:08
My pants are so tight right now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 December 2009, 19:54:23
Maybe you should wear larger pants.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 6 December 2009, 21:44:14
(500) Days of Summer was amazing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 December 2009, 21:55:19
Yeah, it's a great movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 December 2009, 06:25:00
It was really good, but it was really depressing.

I started examining my own life as I was watching the movie, and in all honesty...if someone had handed me a gun while I was watching it, I would've blown my brains out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 December 2009, 06:32:19
D:

I don't know if I want to watch it now!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 December 2009, 06:56:23
What? Depressing? Are you kidding me? It was one of the happiest movies I've seen in a long while. Hell, it would almost be optimistic if it wasn't so clearly realistic. It made me very happy and you know from the very beginning how it ends anyway. I think it's because I'm such a fervent realist that when someone nails the idea of love on the head so perfectly, it reaffirms my faith that it's all worthwhile in the first place.

In the end, both characters are better off for the entire experience. That can hardly be considered depressing. This isn't Requiem for a Dream.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 December 2009, 07:09:57
:D

I want to watch it now!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 8 December 2009, 03:13:01
Sure, it starts off happy and ends happy, but there's plenty in between that is downright depressing.

Maybe it was just me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 8 December 2009, 03:37:48
Well of course the middle is depressing! That's because the end hasn't happened, and the end justified the means! I was felt so happy after watching, maybe because I got outta my own burning #####-house, and it felt good to relate to the movie and helped get a better realistic grasp on things.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 8 December 2009, 04:46:07
Whatever man, I've got my reasons.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 December 2009, 03:41:18
"You complete me!" (http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/ironman/)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 December 2009, 05:46:16
I picked up a #####-ton of new movies over at Big Lots, which is a closeout store.

Auto Focus
Broken Flowers
Chisholm '72: Unbought & Unbossed
The Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys
Dogtown and Z-Boys
An Evening with Kevin Smith 2: Evening Harder
Kaena: The Prophecy
Memories
Midnight Eagle
Raising Cain
The Road to Guantanamo
The Squid and the Whale
Tekkonkinkreet
The TV Set
The Warrior

The Klendathu and Zephyr campaigns from the Roughnecks: Starship Trooper Chronicles series

Plus, a 4 disc martial art movies set with:

Blind Fists of Bruce
Bruce Lee: The Man, The Myth
Chinese Hercules
Dragon Lee vs. the Five Brothers
Duel of the Iron Fists
Fists of Bruce Lee
Kung Fu for Sale
Kung Fu: Punch of Death
Militant Eagle
The Real Bruce Lee
Samurai Reincarnation
Snake-Crake Secret


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2009, 09:04:14
Just got back from Avatar.

While the story is bland and predictable (hell, you could map it all out in your head right after you see the trailer - I outlined it for my friends on the drive to theater and I was pretty much dead on), that is most definitely NOT why anyone should go see this movie. And they SHOULD go see it, for the beauty and technological marvels alone. And definitely see it in 3D, though I doubt anyone would choose not it if they had the choice.

It's really gorgeous and breathtaking. The 3D is downright impressive without ever being gimmicky, which only adds to the fire. The fact that not once does anything "pop out" at you like this is Spy Kids 3D or a Disney attraction makes you focus on the movie, which looks will constantly impress you with each new shot. The stuff they do with glass and windows will have you in awe.

Also, the art direction in general. I thought it looked ridiculous and silly in the trailer. Blue elves? Floating islands? Ugh. That trailer had thrown me off right up until the moment I actually started watching. I only went because I was interested in all this "changing the landscape of movies forever" talk, and I only went at a midnight showing because I went with a group of friends. So yeah, the art direction: #####ing fantastic. This movie IS beautiful. I haven't been this impressed with awe-inspiring special effects and landscapes since the Planet Factory Floor scene in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I'm still really more impressed by the technological aspects - the movie itself wasn't all that great. Still fun, and the action sequences are top-notch. It's certainly a great blockbuster, but blockbusters have never been my type. Still, if this is the future of the Hollywood blockbuster, sign me up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 18 December 2009, 09:30:10
Disappointing that Cameron failed to nail the story part of the movie, but it's good to see him back at the forefront of the technological aspect. I'll have to go see that if I can find a 3-D theatre around here


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 December 2009, 17:44:40
No place in Maine near me does 3D.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2009, 17:51:25
It's not that the story is BAD, it's just that it's... it's predictable, nothing new, etc.

It's still engaging, I guess. But I mean, the mineral that humans want from the Navi's planet is called, AND I KID YOU NOT: "Unobtanium."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Edgecrusher on 18 December 2009, 21:25:28
Ferngully + Halo = Avatar?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 December 2009, 21:33:05
Ferngully + Halo + Dances With Wolves + any generic movie where two factions are at war and one human spends time with the other faction and decides that he sympathizes with them and thus "goes native" to fight his own people and then stuff explodes = Avatar

Except, you know, with some of the most breathtaking visuals and impressive 3D technology ever.

Without those visuals and 3D, the movie would be balls and entirely groan-worthy, though.

Just to give you an idea: the mineral that the humans want from the blue elve's planet is called, AND I KID YOU NOT: "Unobtanium."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 19 December 2009, 09:28:17
If the rest of the movie had been great it probably would have been considered an in-joke.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 December 2009, 17:41:55
ONOBTANIUM.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 December 2009, 18:15:56
It's just a generic name you know.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 December 2009, 19:39:15
I saw Avatar in 3-D last night. Really, really awesome. About 20 minutes too long, but altogether wonderful. $220 million well spent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 December 2009, 21:00:55
I believe it was $320 million spent on the movie, with an addition $150 million spent on advertising.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 December 2009, 21:09:00
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/business

They (the IMDb) say $230 million, but I have heard the $320 million number before.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 December 2009, 02:14:30
Because IMDB is such a reputable source. Next you'll link to Wikipedia and the book of playground rules I wrote (and enforced) when I was six.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 December 2009, 06:54:34
Well, Wikipedia says $237 million.
Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%282009_film%29)

Mikero's Playground Rule Book says you all suck and I'm gonna take my ball and go home.
Mikero's Playground Rule Book (http://www.sexwork.com/family/dolphins1.html)

I saw Ninja Assassin tonight...that was AWESOME!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 December 2009, 07:10:01
I don't have anough money for the movies, yaaaaay!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 December 2009, 07:12:39
My playground rulebook was real and I still have it and am thinking of scanning it you jerk.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: AlexThePenguin on 26 December 2009, 02:51:58
I'm confused about the Avatar movie.

One friend is obsessive about it, claiming it's the "most beautiful thing [she's] ever seen."

Another friend wonders aloud if he just watched Fern Gully in 3D.

Yet another friend thinks it's stupid and doesn't know what the big hype is about.




What is the premise of this movie, and why is it such a big fuss?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 26 December 2009, 03:16:54
Was gonna see it today. I refused on account of DGAF.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 26 December 2009, 03:22:04
Something tells me I might have an excuse to go see it while on Christmas break. Annie just got a gift card to the theaters AND she still has free tickets.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 December 2009, 08:30:32
What is the premise of this movie

Dances with Smurfs.

and why is it such a big fuss?

It's the supposed epic James Cameron has been working since Titanic.







I want to see it because I just want to know, y'know? But I'm at least gonna wait until I'm sure all the furries have seen it aren't going to have the theatre packed in their abhorrent costumes with the dickholes in 'em.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 December 2009, 22:48:22
I saw it in 3D.

It was friggin amazing.

After seeing it in 3D though, every time I look at something from the movie in 2D it just doesn't do it justice.

I recommend seeing the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 30 December 2009, 01:46:34
I was just about to make a crack about furries, thanks Mike. #####ing ninjas..

I'll PROBABLY see it.. everyone says it's amazing, but that doesn't move my ass to the theater.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 December 2009, 02:27:17
3 days ago man. 3 days.


See it in 3D. It's. awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 30 December 2009, 03:15:08
I don't check it as often as you think. And even if I do, you really think I pay attention to ANYTHING half the time?

Alltogethernow! NO!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 2 January 2010, 05:37:33
I've heard it's exactly the story of Fern Gully or Dances With Wolves, which makes it much less interesting to me.

Posted on: 30 December 2009, 01:18:12

I'm watching the movie Sicko for the first time and wow I'm really glad I don't have to pay for health care like you doofs. Your health care system is appalling.

I mean, I already knew this because I've researched the topic before, but sheesh.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 January 2010, 15:25:41
Yeah, I saw Sicko and it was oddly convincing even though I know he just didn't focus on the opposition even a tiny bit so it just sounds like our health care doesn't have ANY merits, when there are just as many horror stories from socialized health care and just as many victory stories from what we've got going on. My favorite part of the movie is when he anonymously (well, not after the movie) donated all that money to the guy who ran the Michael Moore Hate site.

Oh, Up In The Air was good. Not Thank You For Smoking good, but much better than Juno.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 January 2010, 17:14:23
I'm not sure what these horror stories of socialized health care are... I do know that there's a lot of fake horror stories about it spread by the big business bastards that run your health care system, though, but I'm sure you're talking about real stuff. I haven't watched any other Michael Moore movies so I don't know how fair he is usually but Sicko definitely has me rethinking some plans (in the future-ture-ture-ture- I want to live in a few different cities for a while).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 4 January 2010, 18:10:36
I really don't know much at all on the subject, so maybe I'm wrong, but Moore is notorious for only showing the pros of the argument he's making and making the other option seem like absolute death.

I did enjoy Sicko and he definitely made a bunch of legitimate points, but I won't let myself be persuaded by it in any way until I read up on all counts of it in a completely fair setting. Which is not something I plan on doing until I actually care more about it, which might not be for a while.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 January 2010, 00:18:58
Seems fair.

I'm just glad I don't have to worry about it ever. Now if you'll excuse me I'mma go do my usual 19:19 routine and play with flaming venemous snakes in the street.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 January 2010, 17:34:21
I very much enjoyed Sherlock Holmes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 January 2010, 18:52:20
Of course you did.

It stars your man crush.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 7 January 2010, 19:14:48
There was this one part where he was naked except for a pillow covering his no-nos I liked that part.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 January 2010, 19:18:46
Good thing you weren't wearing your greenman suit or it would have been really apparent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 January 2010, 07:00:02
I'm interested in that but I probably won't be able to catch it in the talkie theatre.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 January 2010, 07:21:10
WELL I finally saw Inglourious Basterds.

Fairly good movie.
Considering it's nature, it was a little bit shy on the action.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 January 2010, 01:45:19
Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs gets two thumbs WAAAAY up!

On the count that it's actually funny. It's a non-Pixar animated CGI film that's NOT starring animals and has jokes that expand further than "that bear did something a bear wouldn't normally do!" or "that guy made a silly noise and now the other guy's angry at him for being annoying!"

So... basically, check it out if you're interested. Because it was very good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 January 2010, 02:13:57
Yeah I really hate those talking animal Pixar movies like Toy Story, The Incredibles, and Cars.


In all seriousness I am really tired of talking animal movies. Also those kinds of jokes ASR mentioned are more typical of Dreamworks..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 January 2010, 03:43:21
I said NON-Pixar. Meaning since this isn't Pixar, it's surprising that it's not just another one starring animals. Which is pretty much all Dreamworks flicks save for Shrek, so yes. "Cloudy" is Sony, not Dreamworks or Pixar or that recent string of CGI Disney movies that aren't Pixar... and I can't think of any others.

But yes, the talking animal thing is getting old. I'm not saying you can't still make a good movie out of talking animals, it's just that I have no desire to see another one and I'll likely just lump it in with all the other similar crap since barely anybody seems to be able to think of anything more original than that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 10 January 2010, 06:57:43
That's exactly how I felt about Kung-Fu Panda. I did not want to go see it.

I saw it on DVD anyway eventually though. It wasn't bad.

But still, if they release a "Slithers the Sky-Rocket Snake" or a random title that implies an animated movie about a particular animal, I'll boycott it again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 January 2010, 21:31:45
Nonpixar CGI is always talking animals, is what he was getting at.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 January 2010, 23:01:35
Not ALWAYS, but almost always.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 January 2010, 23:56:27
We rented it from the red box along with Terminator Salvation.

So far it seems decent.

Does anybody know what the "Red Box" is?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 January 2010, 00:41:35
It's that DVD vending machine thing, right? There's one at the Wal-Mart by here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 January 2010, 01:35:59
1$ per night.
Plenty of time for me to watch the DVD and return it.
And plenty of time for my hardrive to read the disc too.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 January 2010, 03:13:17
How do those work, exactly? Like, I haven't sat and tried to figure it out, but at first glance, the idea of a DVD-rental vending machine didn't seem to make much sense to me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 January 2010, 04:27:52
Oh, it charges you a dollar for the DVD on the spot (need a card). If it's returned by the next night at 9, no further charges. If NOT, it charges an extra dollar for every night.

Check the discs when you get them, a they may be scratched.
It's normally a dollar or 2 well spent.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 12 January 2010, 00:35:36
Oohhhhh so that's how it works, whenever I pass by there, there's a big line just to get a movie, that's cool.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 January 2010, 03:01:26
I guess that's convenient but I don't see the point.

I said NON-Pixar. Meaning since this isn't Pixar, it's surprising that it's not just another one starring animals.

Not how it read.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 12 January 2010, 04:15:58
I'm not perfect, Mike! You have to accept me the way I am! Do that for me, Mike! Accept me!

As who I am!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 January 2010, 04:03:57
DVDs I picked up this week:

Best Buy
The Hurt Locker

Wal-Mart
City of Ember / Dragonball Evolution 2-pack
Resurrecting the Champ / The Wrestler 2-pack

The Complete James Dean Collection:
East of Eden
Giant
Rebel Without a Cause

The Essential Steve McQueen Collection:
Bullitt
The Cincinnati Kid
The Getaway
Never So Few
Papillon
Tom Horn

All of these movies for $100.

I originally wasn't going to pick up the Steve McQueen collection because I didn't recognize any of the titles except for Bullitt (one of Dad's favorites, along with the other classic car chase movie, Vanishing Point), but then I saw that it was the two-disc version. I knew that it retailed for $20 by itself, so $15 for the two-disc version of Bullitt plus five other movies was a slam dunk.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: DeMatador on 13 February 2010, 08:43:38
M. Night Shyamalan's "The Last Airbender"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iwh70CLHiM

Color me hyped.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 February 2010, 08:57:14
wat

waitwaitwait
I bet he turns out to be the war.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: DeMatador on 13 February 2010, 09:47:22
Considering Shyamalan wrote the script, it probably ends with the main character taking off his mask and revealing that he is, in fact, Shyamalan himself.

Then cut to black.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 February 2010, 18:08:45
I'm assuming that's the title because of the already released "Avatar" movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: XJ on 13 February 2010, 18:11:20
Good call. I think James Cameron had the rights to that movie title for like, what, fourteen years now?

I really don't see this being a good movie, honestly. The show was decent, but live action movie doesn't seem to work in my opinion.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 13 February 2010, 18:32:39
I get the vibe that I don't want to see that movie.

also, if the cartoon had any charm, this doesn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: XJ on 13 February 2010, 18:37:41
Not in the slightest. I watched the cartoon just for the action, not the story or anything. The action in this doesn't seem to be anything special.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 13 February 2010, 19:40:04
I think that seems a bit odd to watch a cartoon series solely on the action and not the plot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: DeMatador on 13 February 2010, 22:54:07
Well, I watched the cartoon because I liked the plot. And I'm pretty excited for the film, it looks like a loyal adaptation so far.
But I've gotta admit, a big part of the cartoon was its charm. And I don't think a live action film can achieve something like that.

Still, looking forward to it. Opens July 22nd here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 16 February 2010, 02:56:12
Guys, the new trailer for Toy Story 3 is cash. #####ING CASH.

##### IS SO CASH GUYS, CASH.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 February 2010, 04:55:46
Thanks for the heads up!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 16 February 2010, 06:01:07
http://www.apple.com/trailers/disney/toystory3/

Im too lazy to make a screenshot, but I made a discovery around 0:48.

Here's a hint (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc17T9XMoVk).

Also, yeah Toy Story 3 is still awesome.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 16 February 2010, 06:36:52
I watched Michael Jackson's This Is It.

I loved it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 17 February 2010, 19:58:09
Last year, before Christmas, there was a sneak peek of Toy Story 3. If you haven't seen it, check it out (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY2rrlpZX_Y).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 18 February 2010, 05:31:04
SOOOO WANNA WATCH IT.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 2 March 2010, 23:59:05
I know how most ppl here HATE Halo, but. I got Halo Legends on DVD on Sunday, as some of you might know, it consist of nine short animes from some of the best well known animation studios in Japan, with that said, the ones I liked best was "The Duel" from I.G. Productions and "The  Package" from Casio Entertainment.

The Duel- I liked The Duel the best because the style on animation that they used, was like a water movement painting, don't know if this makes any since but its the best I can explain.

The Package- I liked the package as well because of the 3D animation they did and used a few of the characters who are in the first Halo novel, Halo: Fall of Reach .       


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: MOX on 3 March 2010, 03:46:09
Those studios make some good stuff, but then I saw the trailer with a bunch of girly boys wearing master cheef suits


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 March 2010, 07:32:01
Holy HELL did I hate Alice in Wonderland.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 5 March 2010, 14:27:19
Sounds like a movie That went from, "I should" to "I should not". That bad?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 March 2010, 15:08:11
Holy HELL did I hate Alice in Wonderland.

I'll make sure not to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 6 March 2010, 18:51:22
Last night my friends were buggin me to go see Alice in Wonderland with them, and they would pay for me, so am like, meh, why not. After I saw the movie, to be honest, FOR ME, it wasn't all that bad, maybe when it comes to movies am the odd man out.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 March 2010, 19:17:47
I'd rather see Shutter Island or even the friggin Lightening Thief first.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 March 2010, 21:28:59
Now why IS that, exactly? What's so bad about it?

I haven't seen it and would like to know why it's so horrible that it doesn't deserve to be watched over all the plenty of #####ty movies out that I don't care about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 March 2010, 23:10:33
I'll get into it later. Basically it felt like Tim Burton was just phoning in his quirky style without putting any heart or passion into the project. Johnny Depp's performance was almost a caricature of the sort of zany dark characters everyone expects him to play in Burton movies. I'll say one thing: Wonderland was pretty cool-looking, even if they called it Underland.

Cop Out was bad, too, but enjoyable.

Honestly, if you want to see a movie this weekend, just go see Shutter Island because that was absolutely fantastic!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 March 2010, 13:20:49
I watched The Boondock Saints with some co-workers last night as we got #####faced for St. Patrick's Day. Next week we're going to watch The Boondock Saints II: All Saints' Day.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 March 2010, 15:36:13
Hate that movie...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 March 2010, 18:32:53
Good thing I didn't invite you over for pizza, beer, and a movie, isn't it?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 March 2010, 21:07:50
#####, eh?

Was sold out when I was at the rental store. I rented Moon, Shaun of the Dead, and 500 Days of Summer instead.

I wasn't impressed by 500 Days of Summer. At all. Not that it was bad...
I appreciated the message it was trying to get across (not that it was a lesson I really needed to be taught). I just didn't appreciate having it spelled out for me at the end of the movie by Zooey Deschanel. And then AGAIN by the narrating voice. And it wasn't all that funny. It just came off as an okay movie with some funny parts.

At the very least it tells me Marc Webb would try to bring some narrative realism into the 2012 Spider-Man movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 March 2010, 21:19:55
Watched District 9 again, but with Director's Commentary.
It's a swell film.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 18 March 2010, 22:00:57
District 9 is one hell of a movie eh?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 18 March 2010, 22:05:11
I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 March 2010, 05:22:22
Good thing I didn't invite you over for pizza, beer, and a movie, isn't it?

I just like judging people!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 March 2010, 10:16:16
Well ASR, we'll be watching The Boondock Saints II: All Saints' Day this Wednesday at 7ish. If you're in the Wilkes-Barre area, then you're welcome to swing by.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 March 2010, 16:19:11
I have priors!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 March 2010, 18:40:08
Totally not worth it. You know you feel like doing a roadtrip to watch a movie you could rent for $1 from a Redbox.

UPDATE: Currently watching Hot Fuzz on Comedy Central.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 March 2010, 08:40:28
Haha, the edited version of Hot Fuzz they air on Comedy Central makes me so frustrated because of the way they shortened the movie... instead of choosing a few scenes to chop out, they simply SKIMMED OFF a bunch of shots every 10-15 seconds or so! It's such a surreal and strange experience to watch a movie I've seen 30+ times but tweaked and torn apart! The rhythm is all thrown off and it's so weird. Plus they took out most of the great lines, AND the kick to the old lady's face!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 20 March 2010, 11:01:54
Isn't about time that crew made another film?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 March 2010, 17:52:36
Plus they took out most of the great lines, AND the kick to the old lady's face!

I knew that there was something missing from the final fight, but I couldn't put my finger on what it was.

I own it on DVD, they just got to my favorite part and I decided to watch it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 21 March 2010, 08:02:51
Yeah, I sat through the entire thing when Comedy Central first premiered it - I hadn't planned on it but the TV was on and I can't resist the movie. It was a jarring experience.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 23 March 2010, 01:17:26
Last night I went to see "She's just too good for you". It got my attention. The movie has funny parts but its has a romance blend in it, so for me it was well worth the 10$.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 March 2010, 04:28:56
Is that like a horrendous ripoff of She's Out of My League?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 March 2010, 04:35:42
Hilarious defilement of the title aside, is there a plot twist that reveals the only reason she's with Jay Baruchel is because he's well-endowed?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 23 March 2010, 16:42:54
*Sigh* Worst brain fart to date, I meant to say She's Out of My League, gosh I feel stupid O.o .


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 27 March 2010, 09:52:44
I will probably be seeing Repo Men and Shutter Island this Wednesday.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 28 March 2010, 07:54:46
I saw RepoMan, the ending had a nice twist to it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 28 March 2010, 08:23:22
Hot Tub Time Machine was great.

Crispin Glover's character alone is worth the ticket price.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 March 2010, 01:45:04
Saw a very realistic movie called Ghost.

And when I mean realistic, I'm serious and sarcastic at the same time.

Sarcastic part: It's an old movie, and some of the stuff that goes on that movie couldn't help but make me laugh.

Realistic part: Patrick Swayze is DEAY-D.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 29 March 2010, 04:50:29
The age of the movie has nothing to do with it, trust me.

Ghost is one of those mostly-terrible movies that I absolutely love for no reason I could tell you (except that one guy on the subway, his performance and lines were the best in the whole film).

It was fun watching Swayze and Moore try to outdo each other's impressions of boards, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Ikeoko on 29 March 2010, 07:23:21
I think Whoopi Goldberg is amazing in Ghost, and that dude on the train scares the heck out of me...

Ghost makes me cry every time I see it, it's so sad


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 29 March 2010, 18:44:50
I have that movie, if I recall, its been collecting dust at thw shop for a good year now, but the movie is good tho, despite being....OLD..


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 March 2010, 19:26:54
...a movie being, as you say, "...OLD...", should have no weight on whether or not the movie is good or bad.

All of the movies you liked that came out in the last 5 years will, eventually, be considered "...OLD...", and the movies themselves will not have changed at all.

Unless George Lucas gets his hands on 'em.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 March 2010, 20:50:01
Well, "old" branches off into different things. Back to the Future is kinda old and yet it's still incredibly awesome. No, what I'm talking about are scenes in this movie where a cat jumps toward a robber and all of a sudden he has blood on his cheek (you just assume he got scratched). The inability or lack of special effects limit what a movie can do and some (at least in my opinion) bad acting in the movie was just funny.

The scene that comes to mind with that would be when Carl is trying to open his car, and Sam as a ghost is pointlessly swinging at him while in a childish whiny tone saying "You're supposed to be my frieeeend!" It's just stuff like that where I'm PRETTY they're trying to be serious but it just isn't working.

But it definitely doesn't make the movie bad. The story is what matters, and it gets better as it progresses, which is what happens in good movies like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 30 March 2010, 09:54:45
Like I said, the leading roles were the worst-acted. Other than that, the acting was decent, and the guy who did the subway ghost (#####, he's been in tons of movies but I can't remember his name to save my life) should have gotten an Oscar. I think Goldberg got a supporting-actress nomination, at least, which was also well-deserved.

Still, there's no real reason for it to be on my top 30 or 40 movies OF ALL TIME, yet there it is somehow. Maybe it's one of those odd pieces that surpasses the sum of its parts.

EDIT: Now I know why, this is clearly the greatest moment in cinematic history:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcS6gXEChbI


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 31 March 2010, 07:41:13
They're advertising the hell out of the movie Knight and Day...even though it doesn't come out until June.

Seriously, it's like Hollywood was like "Let's make a movie starring the two people that will make Jacob NOT want to see it."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 6 April 2010, 04:19:05
Saw Hot Tub Time Machine, rather funny, now am about to see Clash of the Titans.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 April 2010, 05:46:51
I didn't have to see Clash of the Titans to know it was awful, but suit yourself.

Oh, and I apparently forgot to post this: go see How To Train Your Dragon. It's the first time Dreamworks has ever come close to making a Pixar-quality movie... it's amazing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 April 2010, 06:30:00
If you didn't post that here already, where the hell else did you post it that I read it?

I'm seriously asking because I'm mind#####ed right now.

You compared it to Shrek.

EDIT: Nevermind, Facebook. lol
ROOKIE MISTAKE


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 April 2010, 06:54:17
lol facebook.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 6 April 2010, 07:02:12
Just to clarify, I compared it to Shrek as in this is Dreamworks' first great movie since the original Shrek, and it's lightyears above it in terms of maturity and great storytelling.

Although Shrek was funnier, but that's not what I'm going for here.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 6 April 2010, 23:28:33
Yeah, How to Train your Dragon was genuinely good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 7 April 2010, 18:23:06
How to Train Your Dragon was the intent of wantin to see but I was way too by the time the movie started.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 8 May 2010, 18:08:14
I saw Kick-Ass and The Losers last night. Both were great movies, but I loved how silly and over-the-top The Losers was.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 May 2010, 05:41:01
WHY NO IRON MAN 2 LOVE?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 10 May 2010, 05:41:44
I'VE BEEN MEANING TO SEE IT.
I've also been meaning to see kickass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 May 2010, 06:12:45
I saw Iron Man 2 today. It was pretty sweet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 May 2010, 07:03:10
Iron Man 2 was so good that I actually can't decide if I like it more than the original - which is the best you could really hope for, since the original is my favorite superhero movie of all time. I was expecting to be disappointed.

Kick-Ass is just a bundle of extreme fun.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 10 May 2010, 07:11:46
I saw Iron Man 2 twice. It was criticized mostly for lack of action, but sheesh, I didn't really mind. There isn't a lot of plot that I would choose to cut out, had I been a writer for this movie.

Plus, I just... really like Iron Man. The movie portrays him well.

If you stayed after the credits, you saw... [spoiler]Thor's hammer.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 10 May 2010, 14:39:33
My only complaint about IM2 WAS the fact it was rather light on the action.  Even so, it was still a great movie, and more action would have elevated it above the first.  Though as is I'd say they were both about even.  Both excellent movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 May 2010, 15:52:48
This one had plenty more action than the first, I'd say.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 May 2010, 06:46:14
Seeing IM2 tomorrow, but you know I'm excited.

I thought Kick-Ass was only alright, the romance subplot really killed a bunch of it for me.

Posted on: 10 May 2010, 14:20:10

OK so Iron Man 2.

Met my expectations (whereas Kick-Ass did not). I think it's as good as the first Iron Man; Not really better, each have third act problems, but not any worse even if it didn't surprise by how good it was like the first one did.

And I'm a big War Machine fan, so yeah.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 May 2010, 07:51:32
I WAS GOING TO MAKE YOU AN OMELETTE

AND TELL YOU ALL ABOUT IT


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 May 2010, 01:44:33
This probably doesn't apply to people outside of Canada, I'm not sure if it's been/going to be released outside the country, but I got a pass to see The Trotsky the day before it opened and I thought it was REALLY good.

It stars Jay Baruchel as a 17-year old who claims to be the reincarnation of Soviet revolutionary Leon Trotsky.

I liked it better than Kick-Ass and Iron Man 2.

I don't know if it's everyone's thing but if you get a chance, you know what to do.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 20 May 2010, 20:53:54
I WAS GOING TO MAKE YOU AN OMELETTE

AND TELL YOU ALL ABOUT IT

GIVE ME A FUNKY BEAT TO BEAT MY BEST BUDDY'S ASS TO
 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 May 2010, 08:26:49
How to Train Your Dragon was really, really good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 May 2010, 21:32:14
I agree.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 21 May 2010, 21:55:51
LADIES AND GENTS!! So I hear tickets for movie theaters are gonna go waaaay up, like a family of 4 for 100$ up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 May 2010, 21:59:57
That's stupid.
There's no way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 21 May 2010, 22:19:44
From where I am, that's nearly over a $12 increase. That's insane.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 21 May 2010, 23:10:33
Well I heard it from KTLA 5 news, but other ppl have told me that they are not the news station were you wanna get your news. So, I hope its a lie tho.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 May 2010, 05:13:23
It'd better come with unlimited soda, popcorn, candy, and beer.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 22 May 2010, 08:27:28
I actually liked Shrek Forever After. I'm pretty sure it was much better than Shrek the Third. I say this because I don't even remember Shrek the Third. The laughs were worth the price of admission, I'd think, anyway. If you're a fan of Shrek, were thinking of seeing it but wasn't sure, I'd say go see it. I know Mike will barf at me but I still think it was funny.

Don't watch it in 3D if you have a choice, save yourself some money.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 23 May 2010, 00:22:58
I skipped the new Shrek even though I had a pass. I've never liked a Shrek movie so fugg dat ish.

I don't know why I'd barf at you though.

That's insane.

It's also bull#####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 23 May 2010, 03:46:06
I laughed a lot during MacGruber, but it wasn't exactly a good movie. I loved it, though. Will Forte is great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 26 May 2010, 04:13:05
I'll check it out eventually but it's not something I'mma rush toward. The three segments with MacGruber and Charles Barkley from the show are good enough for me, really.

We have MacGruber trucker hats with what I guess are quotes on them to give away at my work.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2010, 19:43:34
New Scott Pilgrim trailer (Trailer #2 in the link) looks absolutely amazing:

http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/universal/scottpilgrimvstheworld/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 31 May 2010, 22:07:15
Agreed, looks really close to the comics.

Michael Cera still might not be the best part for Scott Pilgrim but it looks like he does a good job.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 31 May 2010, 23:03:07
I have to admit, Michael Cera really impressed me in this trailer. I never had a problem with his casting as Scott Pilgrim, and this just boosted my confidence even more.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 June 2010, 23:54:55
My girlfriend lent me the Scott Pilgrim books so NOW I'm avoiding trailers 'til I've read them.

I still think it's more of a "girl book" but it IS pretty good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 June 2010, 18:30:18
Agreed. I totally see why it's become labeled as the "oh, your girlfriend doesn't like comics? Just have her read this" comic. I do love it, though. It's made me laugh on multiple occasions.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 June 2010, 19:06:20
I always joked that it was for girls. And it's not but it walks a fence with a lean to the girl side.

His other book, Life At Sea, was similar but definitely more of a girls' sort of thing.


Oh yeah.
I watched the Hitchhiker's movie with my girlfriend the other day. It was pretty good, but not nearly as funny as it should've been.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 June 2010, 19:56:43
Yeah, it wasn't as subtle and intelligent as the books. Still funny, and still good, but it missed the mark on the BOOK'S type of humor. There's other things that seem off about it that I can't quite put my finger on, but at this point I just don't care.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 June 2010, 00:03:32
It's also just weird for introducing the towel thing and then never talking about it. It's stuff like that what was weird.

But yeah I really liked it, despite everyone but Arthur and Marvin being American(ized) and having that gun maguffin.

Posted on:  5 June 2010, 22:35:24

Random side comment.

It's funny read Scott Pilgrim, sometimes they use real names like Yonge Street, IGA, Licks Burger, and stuff that's pretty Canadian, and then every once in a while you get something like "Wander Bread" showing up.

'Sfunny to me.

Also, I have Scott's CBC shirt.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 June 2010, 00:24:08
WHO WANTS TO SEE STEP UP 3-D WITH ME?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 June 2010, 02:02:31
I have been non-stop making fun of that movie. I love that it exists.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 June 2010, 22:38:21
Thing is Speed probably does want to see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 June 2010, 02:32:33
The name "Channing Tatum" is probably the funniest name I have ever heard.

Posted on: 12 June 2010, 20:31:14

Oh, and I saw The Karate Kid. I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 June 2010, 07:22:14
It looks good and #####, it's The Karate Kid. If someone expects a big twist or something they're an idiot. I may be drunk but that doesn't mean they're not a ree.

Also Channing Tatum is a weirdass.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 June 2010, 06:41:42
Thing is Speed probably does want to see it.

Only after I get done seeing Letters to Juliet again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 16 June 2010, 13:11:54
Splice was soooooo bad. The music was annoying, the spliced person thing was stupid and annoying, and the characters constantly made illogical decisions.

Also, anybody who has taken a college level bio course will just want to punch all of those "scientists" in the face.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 16 June 2010, 19:44:05
Yup. The movie did not make sense.
I'd say go read Frankenstein.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 June 2010, 20:37:21
If you went to see Splice, it's your own damn fault.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 17 June 2010, 00:41:22
I'm just saying. It was bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 June 2010, 00:45:38
And that movie was a waste of time. It was embarrassingly awkwardly hilariously bad.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 17 June 2010, 03:11:01
With that many adverbs one would hope so.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 June 2010, 03:20:35
You are incapable of watching it and not agreeing.

Also, pointless sex and rape.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 June 2010, 08:53:40
I just saw your status on Facebook. My god, you really are pissed about this. This isn't even a movie that LOOKED good and offers the anger of disappointment. This movie looked lame from the get-go, predictably ended up being terrible, and was somehow still bad enough to piss you off this much.

I approve of this movie!

Posted on: 16 June 2010, 23:58:23

Toy Story 3.

TOPS.

Better than the first two combined.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 18 June 2010, 23:46:50
Yeah seriously John... YOU #####ed up. Not them.

Deal with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 June 2010, 08:27:23
TOY STORY 3:

[spoiler]When Baby picked up Lotso and threw him into the dumpster I was like "THAT IS SO DARTH VADER"[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 4 July 2010, 21:41:49
I saw Toy Story 3 on my birthday. It was amazing.

I cried manly tears of manliness.

ah who am i kidding they were pussy womanly tears


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 5 July 2010, 22:40:06
I saw the movie, too. It was really great. Brought back a lot of memories from the first two.
[spoiler]What language doez Buzz speak in the English version when he turns into a spanish-y flamingo dancer? He spoke spanish with a spanish accent on the spanish version. And it was hilarious.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 July 2010, 00:50:19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oApAjJkZWio


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 6 July 2010, 06:01:34
404'd.

EDIT: Nevermind, it's a YouTube problem... not sure when it'll be fixed.
EDIT2: Now it's fixed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 July 2010, 15:00:38
I love Buzz's Spanish mode. The whole movie was great.

On a side note, I have one friend who said it sucked and I was all "waaaaaaat"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 July 2010, 15:25:21
I don't know why anyone would watch Toy Story 3 if they were predisposed to saying it sucks no matter how good it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 July 2010, 15:31:12
What language doez Buzz speak in the English version when he turns into a spanish-y flamingo dancer? He spoke spanish with a spanish accent on the spanish version. And it was hilarious.

Interesting how they handled that. The movie's in Spanish, just make him MORE spanish!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 July 2010, 17:07:53
I think a part of me was curiously wondering how they would handle scenes like that in foreign languages.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 6 July 2010, 17:21:24
Maybe because there's that many spanish speaking people? Maybe?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 6 July 2010, 22:59:15
Well, they couldn't make him not spanish, he was speaking all spanish bull##### and dancing Flamenco.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 July 2010, 23:00:50
I don't know what you're on about, OnlyChild.

Well, they couldn't make him not spanish, he was speaking all spanish bull##### and dancing Flamenco.

I want to learn that dance.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 6 July 2010, 23:09:20
Maybe because there's that many spanish speaking people? Maybe?

...wut?

I don't understand what you said, but something tells me the answer is: No.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 July 2010, 23:54:33
I picked up an absolute #####-ton of movies during the final days of the two Movie Gallery video rental stores in my area. Normally I'd just list everything, but that would make this post ridiculously long, so I'm going to attach a file.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 12 July 2010, 18:37:26
Saw The Last Airbender, it sucked, they skipped so much, the movie would be a lot better if they went along with the cartoon.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 July 2010, 19:55:10
Here's a picture of the Movie Gallery collection that I took for an article I wrote.

ENVY ME!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 14 July 2010, 19:58:12
Well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 15 July 2010, 05:15:04
G.I. Jesus?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 15 July 2010, 05:29:22
It's about a legal Mexican immigrant who tries to become a U.S. citizen by joining the armed forces.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 16 July 2010, 18:39:26
I'm assuming they thought of the title first and then worked backwards. (I'm mildly disappointed it's not a crazy-premised B-movie.)

Posted on: 15 July 2010, 12:11:15

Inception. Perfect. New Top 5 favorite movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 16 July 2010, 22:51:44
Just got back from watching it.

I liked it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 18 July 2010, 18:53:41
I saw it as well last night, very good movie. I didn't expect it to be that good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 18 July 2010, 20:11:08
No, not perfect. It was very enjoyable.

The way I understood it,
[spoiler]If they were worried about dying in a dream, and wanted to back out, they could've done what Ariadne did and fall off a high building and wake up before the fall killed her.

Fischer could've looked over his shoulder and recognized Cobb sitting there right behind him at the end of the dream. He also would've realized it wasn't just a dream within a dream as his "subconscious" had supposedly informed him. He would've been confused, and he would've been looking around.

So perfect? I'd say no.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 July 2010, 20:21:39
An article that I totally didn't write (http://www.roughcutreviews.com/article.php?title=Everything%2BMust%2BGO%2521%2BA%2BGuide%2Bto%2BVideo%2BStore%2BClosings)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 July 2010, 22:31:08
No, not perfect. It was very enjoyable.

The way I understood it,
[spoiler]If they were worried about dying in a dream, and wanted to back out, they could've done what Ariadne did and fall off a high building and wake up before the fall killed her.

Fischer could've looked over his shoulder and recognized Cobb sitting there right behind him at the end of the dream. He also would've realized it wasn't just a dream within a dream as his "subconscious" had supposedly informed him. He would've been confused, and he would've been looking around.

So perfect? I'd say no.[/spoiler]

"Perfect" is always a bad word to use and I should know that by now, but you know what I mean when I say it. Essentially I'm saying "I seriously loved this movie so goddamn much."

This was a quality piece of a filmmaking, and the reasons you just listed off as criteria against its quality are nothing more than just personal preferences or misunderstandings you've had with the movie. For every question I've had about the plot, some time thinking or discussing has resolved the problems.

[spoiler]I don't quite understand what you're saying about Ariadne jumping being applicable to everyone else - that's not the case. Maybe if you explain what you're talking about a little more I could try to figure out the answer.

As for the issue with Fisher recognizing Cobb: they actually address this in the movie. When Cobb is passing by everyone at the end through luggage claim, Fisher notices him and makes an expression that implies he recognizes him from somewhere other than just the airplane. It's a nice little moment which is NOT meant to insinuate that the inception didn't work, but instead just a thing someone in Fisher's position WOULD probably do. He'd think, "Hey, that guy was in my dream..." but he probably wouldn't take it any further than that.
As for the problem with Fisher realizing what he thought was reality in the dream (on the shore near the bridge) was not actually reality (once he woke up in the airplane) - don't be nitpicky. Obviously when he wakes up he realizes that it was still part of a dream, but none of that matters since the idea was planted and who cares what the hell he was dreaming. It doesn't retroactively destroy anything because he won't figure out exactly what happened. It's just a dream to him. He doesn't know that the dream specifically changed his thought-process.[spoiler]

Anyway, I just really enjoyed this movie. I already know it's one of my favorites. I've always been a fan of Nolan's - Memento is absolutely fantastic, I love The Prestige, and obviously I like his Batman movies even if I don't like them as much as everyone else - and this is a movie of his that really meshed with me moreso than his others.

Hope it does well in the box office.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 July 2010, 05:07:42
Logic isn't a personal preference...

[spoiler]They were talking about being trapped in the dream when they apparently weren't, is what I mean, because they couldn't risk being killed and being stuck in some void. And they were in accelerated time all the way down there, yet Ariadne wasn't there very long at all because she jumped and that woke her up to the 3rd level. Anyone else could've done that to go up a level. Not that they would, to be fair. It's just weird that she could do that outside of what was actually established.

Why wouldn't he take the thought further? He was told, in his dream, that he was dreaming. That would mess with anyone, at least long enough for a paranoid glance-around. I think it's a little hole that could've been filled if it'd been addressed sooner.[/spoiler]

When a movie is high quality the ONLY mistakes are nitpicky, anyway. If I said it was bad that would be entirely personal preference, because there's not much really wrong with the movie. It kept my interest. It was oppressive, kind of, with the length of the action and the timed events, but I still really liked it. I'd buy it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 July 2010, 16:13:34
Four new Criterion Collection releases for this fall!

http://networkedblogs.com/5YjTA (http://networkedblogs.com/5YjTA)

I can't wait for the 2-disc of The Darjeeling Limited!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 July 2010, 17:04:41
Logic isn't a personal preference...

[spoiler]They were talking about being trapped in the dream when they apparently weren't, is what I mean, because they couldn't risk being killed and being stuck in some void. And they were in accelerated time all the way down there, yet Ariadne wasn't there very long at all because she jumped and that woke her up to the 3rd level. Anyone else could've done that to go up a level. Not that they would, to be fair. It's just weird that she could do that outside of what was actually established.

Why wouldn't he take the thought further? He was told, in his dream, that he was dreaming. That would mess with anyone, at least long enough for a paranoid glance-around. I think it's a little hole that could've been filled if it'd been addressed sooner.[/spoiler]

When a movie is high quality the ONLY mistakes are nitpicky, anyway. If I said it was bad that would be entirely personal preference, because there's not much really wrong with the movie. It kept my interest. It was oppressive, kind of, with the length of the action and the timed events, but I still really liked it. I'd buy it.

I'll give you that there's a lot of things that don't seem obvious at first and still a ton of things I haven't figured out, but I do trust the movie that everything makes sense. It always felt one step ahead of the viewer and I'm going to trust it. However, yeah, there's a bunch of parts that feel like plot holes so you're right.

Anyway, to answer your questions about limbo:
[spoiler]If you die in the dream world while heavily sedated, you get sent to limbo and are unaware of how you got there. You don't remember you're in a dream. You get lost and stuck there and accept it as your reality. If at some point you realize you're dreaming, the only way out is to kill yourself. This is what happened to Saito, who stayed there for so long that he grew old.
There are some exceptions: when Cobb and Mal first went to limbo, they were exploring the dream world. They found it by accident but were still aware they were in a dream. After spending so much time in limbo, Mal eventually accepted it as her reality - causing Cobb, who knew it was a dream - to plant the idea in her head that none of this was real.
The other exception is when Cobb and Ariadne follow Fisher into limbo to rescue him. I am not 100% sure on this, but I believe they were connected to Fisher's "dream" while he was "dead" in the snow fort because they didn't kill themselves to get to limbo... they simply were hooked up to the machine. Since they didn't get killed to go there, they were aware it was a dream which is why they did not get lost or stuck there.[/spoiler]



Posted on: 19 July 2010, 11:04:24

Oh, and I read the article Speed! Nice!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 19 July 2010, 18:30:31
Excuse me for I've been away for a while, but I did see Inception.

Inception. Perfect. New Top 5 favorite movie.

DITTO.

I went in the theatre with Annie and others not knowing what I was walking into. She said I'd like it and at the beginning, with all the shooting and stealthness going around, I was into it.

Then my eyes were completely glued to that screen. I was SOOOO INTO IT.

[spoiler]At the very ending when they cut you off, a bunch of people (including myself) yelled out. Some said "OH COME ON" and I yelled "YOU'RE KIDDING ME".[/spoiler]

Oh, and that theatre was packed, so I was instantly given an impression that this movie was going to be good. I was wrong. IT WAS INCREDIBLY AWESOME.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 July 2010, 19:02:43
[spoiler]That moment right when the credits rolled the audience as a whole did a huge friendly collective groan is one of my favorite theater experiences of all time.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 July 2010, 20:19:03
Barnes & Noble is running a 50% off sale on all Criterion Collection DVDs and a bunch of 1st season TV show DVDs.

I picked up:

Beastie Boys Video Anthology
Blast of Silence
The Blob
Che
Gomorrah
Hoop Dreams
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom
Videodrome


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 21 July 2010, 22:01:34
I barely saw Slumdog Millionaire, I ask myself this, "were the hell was I at when this movie came out?". For me, it was a really good movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 21 July 2010, 23:44:42
I saw that... uh... last year I think?

I can't remember. I do remember thinking it was alright at least.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 22 July 2010, 01:00:45
The last new movie I saw was...
... I honestly can't remember to tell the truth.  I need to go to the movies more often, I haven't even seen Iron Man 2 among like... everything else.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 24 July 2010, 21:14:05
Going on from Inception:

So far from what I can also tell, if you hear anyone that saw the movie and they thought it was "meh", "okay", or "bad"... they most likely got so confused with what was going on that they couldn't follow the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 24 July 2010, 21:45:40
That's an ignorant way of looking at it. There's plenty of intelligent people who understand the entire movie and still just plain won't enjoy it. That happens. Though I at least hope they appreciate the cinematography.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 24 July 2010, 22:24:56
Oh, I finally saw Inception as well.

It was good, but for such a supposedly complex movie it was way too straight forward.

Posted on: July 24, 2010, 05:12:44 PM

And reading through the topic, and everyone's concerns, there are definitely plot holes and things that make very little sense.

I also thought the imagery of the children was way too heavy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 25 July 2010, 05:33:17
That's an ignorant way of looking at it. There's plenty of intelligent people who understand the entire movie and still just plain won't enjoy it. That happens. Though I at least hope they appreciate the cinematography.

Well, I did say "From what I can tell".


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 July 2010, 14:01:01
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt355/TheRabbitBox/slowpoke/Slowpoke-4.png)

So guys, I finally got around to seeing WALL-E.  That's how far backlogged I am with Pixar films (except for Up, I saw Up).  It wasn't the best but I thought it was pretty entertaining, and the robots were somehow just as expressive and relateable as the people... which is arguably pretty hard to do with me.

Also, yes, it is better than Short Circuit in my opinion, but that is mostly because WALL-E isn't constantly saying unfunny things.  Doesn't top Fake Indian Guy though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 25 July 2010, 18:05:04
Wall-E was a'ight.

Up was a bajillion times better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 25 July 2010, 19:00:11
Recent movies that are currently my top favorites:

Toy Story 3
Up
Inception
Avatar
The Dark Knight

Wall-E was really good, as all Pixar movies are, and it was something that I've wanted to see for a long time. It's just the above 5 mentioned movies left me either smiling big, in tears, utter awe, or an open jaw.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 25 July 2010, 21:29:11
I've yet to see Inception or Toy Story 3, but I have to agree with you on Up and The Dark Knight.  Both excellent movies.

I think Avatar is far more technically impressive than it is well written, but it's still a very good movie... I just don't think it's quite up to the level of Dark Knight... and definitely not Young Frankenstein, which is one of my all time favorite movies.

Both Inception and Toy Story 3 are definitely on my list of things to go watch, however.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 25 July 2010, 23:14:32
Nothing can top Back to the Future and nothing ever will. Ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2010, 00:28:32
For me, there's a huge difference between films I love and films that I think are the best ever made. I can't make a list of what I believe to be the best films ever made simply because I'm not qualified to - I haven't seen enough films to compare and make an accurate judgement, even though I've seen loads more than the average person.

On the other hand, I do have favorite films, and even though some of them are certainly well-made quality films, there are certainly better films out there if you're looking at them subjectively. For me, though, these particular movies all struck personal chords in me. I can make a list of 50 movies I love, and the order will always change depending on my mood... so I won't bother trying to make a definitive list. Here's three tiny lists of favorites that I usually use as an example of what I like.

THE BIG THREE:
Shaun of the Dead
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Pulp Fiction

CLASSICS:
Jurassic Park
Back to the Future 2
Toy Story

GUILTY PLEASURES:
Crank
The Italian Job
Zoolander

And then of course I love every Pixar movie, most Kevin Smith films, and an enormous number of dumb comedies. I hate picking favorite movies because I can never remember everything I love... but what I listed generally remain pretty static.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 26 July 2010, 02:21:48
Jurassic Park?  That's all I needed to confirm that you are indeed ASR, man of fine tastes.

And yeah, there is definitely a difference between "best ever made" and "favorite" for me.
I probably don't like some of the best movies ever made.  I love fun movies... movies that move you... and the ridiculously bad.

There's nothing more fun than forcing friends to watch some horrible piece of trash with you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 July 2010, 03:10:59
Creature from the Haunted Sea is one of my favorite horrible movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 26 July 2010, 03:55:45
Prince of Space.

Also, Killer Klowns from Outer Space.
Oh yes.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2010, 04:00:09
Crank walks that fine line between complete trash and pure genius, and the sequel only amplifies both sides of that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 26 July 2010, 04:36:45
Seriously, Crank 2: High Voltage is a work of pure #####ing genius.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 26 July 2010, 05:30:46
I will never have more fun in a theater than the day I saw that movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 July 2010, 14:39:42
It's my belief that Crank was much better than Crank 2.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 26 July 2010, 17:04:22
I still haven't seen 2 yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 26 July 2010, 17:27:46
It's very very silly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 26 July 2010, 18:23:24
Its very very funny.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 27 July 2010, 04:12:13
After seeing bits and pieces of From Dusk Till Dawn, I finally picked it up and watched the whole thing with the woman. I don't know whether to not like it or love it. Kinda good story. George Clooney gave me a hard-on. Tarantino did a damn good job. Parts of it were really wicked.. other parts could have belonged in 70's B-horror movies, and OTHER parts could have just been chucked into a black hole.

Deep down it was kind of crappy. But it's one of those movies that are so-cool-you-just-don't-care-nothin'.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Slugkid on 27 July 2010, 15:45:09
I have that favorite and best made thing with games, too. Like, LoZ:OoT, to me, is the best game there is, but it's not my favorite game.
It still is pretty high on my favorite game list.
And I have to watch a lot of movies I've missed. A lot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 28 July 2010, 02:49:05
You and me both, Sluggo.
I was gonna go watch Iron Man 2 today with a friend...
... and completely forgot to.

So we watched The Killer Shrews.  Apparently I'm going to have to watch Manos by myself again because this guy crawls up the walls at the mention of it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 July 2010, 01:48:26
This movie supposedly can beat Inception.

I'd like to see it.

http://www.capcom-unity.com/s-kill/blog/2010/07/28/scott_pilgrim_vs_capcom_


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 July 2010, 04:55:58
Yeah, that's my Most-Anticipated-Movie of the year by far - Toy Story 3 was my second-most-anticipated. Then Inception. Then The Expendables.

Edgar Wright has apparently delivered again. All I've been hearing about is how amazing Scott Pilgrim is since it screened at Comic-Con. I'm literally counting down the days 'till it comes out because before hearing about how great it was I was already too hyped. I get a little too excited when it comes to Edgar Wright - I remember being this way when Hot Fuzz came out.

I highly doubt it'll do better than Inception, though. Inception was... more accessible. This is a VERY NARROWLY AIMED film targeted SPECIFICALLY for people of our generation who don't mind a silly movie like this. For those of us who DO love it, though, I have a feeling it's gonna' be a new generational anthem.

The comics are really fun, but not everyone likes them - and I don't blame them. They've got that hipster vibe that you kind of have to fight past to enjoy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 July 2010, 05:15:53
If you doubt it, then I suspect bias written in that article.

(Then again, I guess he does specify it as his opinion)

It does look interesting though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 July 2010, 05:58:32
What I mean is that I know that myself and several other like-minded people will LOVE the movie, and I know that both from my faith in Edgar and what I've been hearing all across the internet... BUT the problem is that it's just not the kind of movie that has enough universal appeal to knock it out of the ballpark and make a huge impact. It's most likely going to be on par with something like Kick-Ass, and at best something like Zombieland. I really hope it kicks off though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 29 July 2010, 06:06:04
Don't get me wrong, it sounds good and I might like it, but like you're saying... I doubt it can beat Inception.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 29 July 2010, 13:21:44
I highly doubt it'll do better than Inception, though. Inception was... more accessible. This is a VERY NARROWLY AIMED film targeted SPECIFICALLY for people of our generation who don't mind a silly movie like this.

It all makes sense now.
Your generation.

I knew all that Barney had to have some effect on you later.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 29 July 2010, 16:28:20
I'm just talkin' 'bout my generation.

(Mike just told me via Facebook that he saw an advanced screening of Scott Pilgrim and really liked it)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 29 July 2010, 17:40:51
*grumble grumble*
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/299034/grumble_grumble.jpg)

Well, I probably won't go myself to specifically see it, but I also won't turn down going with my friends if they want to... not likely, but hey.
All of this makes me want to try reading the comics again.  I'm almost to the point where there is this little crack in the armor of my hatred.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 30 July 2010, 02:39:03
I highly doubt it'll do better than Inception, though. Inception was... more accessible. This is a VERY NARROWLY AIMED film targeted SPECIFICALLY for people of our generation who don't mind a silly movie like this.

It all makes sense now.
Your generation.

I knew all that Barney had to have some effect on you later.

[spoiler](http://www.grandmemories.com/smilies/lex-luthor-wrong.jpg)

I think ASR was aiming more specifically to Nickelodeon.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 July 2010, 03:38:19
Nope, definitely the Barney.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2010, 04:45:22
What are you talking about Nickelodeon for? I mean, sure, that's a part of it, but not at all specifically what I meant. I'm just saying this is for the more nerdy, active, "ADD" (though I hate attaching "ADD" to this) generation of the late 80's and early 90's. We all grew up on pretty much the same stuff, be it Nickelodeon or MTV or whatever.

All I mean is that barely anybody above the age of, say, 30 is going to care about this movie at all. And there's plenty of people in the 18-25 demographic that will think it looks stupid or pass it up. It's not going to be a money-making machine. It doesn't have those kinds of legs. What it DOES have legs for, though, is establishing itself a cult classic, a generational anthem, and a good film. All of which I'm quite sure it will.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 July 2010, 13:42:06
This still doesn't excuse you from the fact that you grew up watching Barney & Friends and Nick Jr. instead of Muppet Babies and Pee Wee's Playhouse.

I agree with you, anyway... albeit in a more toned-down manner.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 30 July 2010, 16:51:48
Hey, I watched tons of Muppet Babies and barely ever watched Barney. I wasn't really a Barney kid. Rugrats, though, that was my #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 July 2010, 17:06:33
That show was goddamn genius.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 30 July 2010, 20:51:03
Oh hi there. I hated Barney (and nearly every kid around me said likewise), and I watched a ton of Muppet Babies.

Also, Nick Jr. didn't have anything good until Blues Clues, and I came from a home where I wasn't allowed to watch Pee Wee.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 July 2010, 21:57:35
You're 20.  You were born after the show stopped airing.  You also probably weren't old enough to remember watching Barney in your infancy.

But I bet
you
did


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2010, 22:22:36
I always left the room when Barney was on.

The Angry Beavers was my favorite childhood show.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 30 July 2010, 22:59:00
That started in 1997.  You were seven or eight.
This is not the developmental time frame I am speaking of.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 30 July 2010, 23:16:34
And?

Who said I was referring to anything you said. I'm just making a comment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 July 2010, 23:53:40
crazy mister twister is a crazy guy
he can make you laugh, groan, giggle or sigh


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 31 July 2010, 01:10:34
Was that suppose to rhyme? It sounded like you were.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 July 2010, 01:35:37
crazy mister twister is crazy, you see
one day he's a cowpoke, the next he's a bee
he's dracula, an englishman, vitaman too
he's crazy mister twister, just for you


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 31 July 2010, 02:59:46
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/uJwxY8x7Nds/0.jpg)
HISSSSSSSSSSSSSS


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 31 July 2010, 03:03:10
My first thought was Rainbow Road.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 3 August 2010, 07:14:27
Oh boy.

I don't know whether to be excited or to face palm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyU2LyTAFZM

I don't know how long this news has been around but nonetheless, it looks fairly new.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 3 August 2010, 07:45:20
I could've sworn I've seen a parody of that by LittleKuriboh months ago.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 5 August 2010, 07:29:30
That is about 8 or 9 months old, am waiting to see when a fan subs for the movie will be out, really cool when I 1st saw the trailer, and apparently it was in 3-D when it was in theaters.

EDIT: There will be a USA version to the movie in 3D (in select theaters) as well to add new footage to extend the movie past 50 minutes, umm, Spring 2011 will be out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pX6RjjVSRc&feature=related
 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 5 August 2010, 22:11:20
It might look cool, but I'm already expecting failure since the last one was considered "worst movie of the year" for a good reason.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 6 August 2010, 01:55:36
Well, the last one was stupid, very stupid. But I hope am wrong for this one, tho 4Kids is rather famous for having crappy as hell dubs.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 11 August 2010, 06:21:38
I thought 4Kids died.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 11 August 2010, 07:46:38
Fortunately yes, but they LIVED!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 12 August 2010, 17:06:02
If fansubs come out for the movie, am going to nab that instead.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 August 2010, 04:10:49
I've only watched the anime fansubs (and read some manga).

I'm probably thinking the movie is going to tank either way.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 13 August 2010, 15:23:25
Were you got it from? I've been looking for it but can't manage to find it. :/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 13 August 2010, 18:46:15
Around.

It's been years since I read/watched stuff. The original Yu-Gi-Oh! stuff ended. I kinda stopped caring with the GX garbage.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 13 August 2010, 21:15:52
Shush with the playing card talk. This is now The Official Scott Pilgrim VS The World Thread.

Let's all talk about how great it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 14 August 2010, 00:56:27
Does it really need its own thread for a moment so slight?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: MOX on 14 August 2010, 04:35:09
I wanted to see the movie because of the director but is the comic worth reading?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 14 August 2010, 04:47:01
I like the comics a lot but they might not be your thing. I say at least give 'em a shot if you like the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 14 August 2010, 06:11:04
Shush with the playing card talk. This is now The Official Scott Pilgrim VS The World Thread.

Let's all talk about how great it is.

Funny. I came to this topic to do just that.

Most of it was pretty awesome. I'm not a fan of the comics (because I haven't read any) so this is my first introduction to it all. This is fantastic for any video game lover.

Posted on: 14 August 2010, 05:01:13

http://www.capcom-unity.com/jgonzo/blog/2010/08/13/scott_pilgrim_creator:_i_was_mega_man


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 August 2010, 09:53:20
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World was fantastic...instant classic.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 14 August 2010, 14:41:21
I hate the comics.
... pretty much in their entirety.  Is it possible that I would even want to see the movie?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 17 August 2010, 18:54:35
So how good was Michael Cera as Scott Pilgrim?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 17 August 2010, 22:45:08
I wouldn't know, but apparently... he's the same as he was in his other movies, and people are pretty much greatly enjoying the scenes where he gets punched in the face.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 August 2010, 05:45:09
Scott in the comics is a bit more... I don't know, silly? Airheaded? Self-conscious? Clueless? I mean, he was all of those things in the movie, but they were all clouded by the Michael Cera Awkard School of Acting. I'm a huge Michael Cera fan, and probably always will be. I think he's a genuinely funny guy and he's perfect for a lot of roles - the problem is when he gets cast in something that he doesn't quite mesh with.

From what most people seem to be saying, everyone was fine with him in this. He did much better than everyone was expecting, and he meshed pretty well with the role of Scott. There are some clashes with the character in the comics, but overall the performance comes out great.

I never understood the outright hatred some people have for Cera - I guess some people just got sick of him very quickly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 18 August 2010, 13:14:50
He's an ugly, retarded looking goofball with no talent.
A dead squirrel in a brown paper bag has mote emote than Cera does.

(Actually, I just wanted an excuse to say that)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 18 August 2010, 17:38:46
They might as well have put Napoleon Dynamite in it since that's exactly who Cera is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 18 August 2010, 22:55:27
Michael Cera is a funny person, but not a good actor. That latter bit is generally understood and universally agreed upon. He is a funny person, though, and when he fits into a role (as in Arrested Development, Superbad, and even Scott Pilgrim) his presence really works. Other times, it's terrible (Nick and Norah, Youth in Revolt and several other crappy flicks he popped up in during his "indie teen romance" phase.) I thought he was pretty good in Juno.

He has absolutely nothing in common with Napoleon Dynamite aside from the fact that they're both kind of awkward. Nothing at all. I don't even understand that comparison.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 19 August 2010, 00:23:26
There is no comparison to understand.

They both just are their sole characters, and will never be anything else.

Which isn't good enough.

I will never know Napoleon Dynamite's name and in a few years Cera will be "That guy from Superbad.  No, the skinny one..." again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 19 August 2010, 02:56:20
I thought you were talking about the character of Napoleon Dynamite, not the actor who portrays him (Jon Heder, now you know his name!)

I definitely agree that Cera isn't a strong actor, and until he shows more range I don't think anyone should ever be able to argue otherwise. HOWEVER - he's a genuinely funny comedic talent. At least, that's what I think. Which means nothing, really. (But I like to think it does.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 19 August 2010, 08:34:18
I can't see Scott Pilgrim because you know why? The goddamn commercial said the word epic one too many times.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 August 2010, 08:48:39
I made a post on facebook about Scott Pilgrim, and I'll carry over the part that applies here:

"I hate using the word epic as much as anyone who's grown tired of that word being thrown around by today's youth BUT the word fits here because the movie was TRYING to be epic and succeeded."


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 19 August 2010, 16:10:30
I wont go and see it because the alleged hot girl is pig ugly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 19 August 2010, 17:36:35
I watched it but was not impressed. Fun movie though. I'm one of the people that hate Cera, and this movie, of course, fueled the hatred a little bit more. Maybe it was just me seeing things, but I swear Cera kind of looked like Butt-Head at one or more points, as if his chin and neck were merging..

AAAAAAAAND I saw it in Toronto, so just about everyone was getting high off of their own funk.. the entire night I was bombarded with hipsters and pretentious douchey-butts. But hell, overall, the entire movie was a bit hipstery and douchey-buttesque, so that was a given..

Good movie. Not gonna see it again. Not gonna buy it. Game looks fun though!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 19 August 2010, 20:10:19
I don't get the confusion over the hipster and the gamer culture. I don't know about anyone else but I see a wild difference. Not that some gamers aren't pretentious douches, but hipsters are snarky by stereotype, and gamers are geeky by stereotype. This movie attracted hipsters because old video games, among other things, have been absorbed by the culture and it was "ironic", but gamers genuinely enjoyed that #####.

If anything the movie makes fun of hipsters and expresses an open "It's uncool, but it's okay to be me" vibe which makes gamers proud of their roots. If you ask me. I for one wasn't sitting there thinking, "The fact that I understand this movie is why I'm better than everyone else." I just enjoyed it for what it was.

EDIT: I think the "hot girl" was pretty, by the way. Then again you'd have a hard time arguing with me that anyone is ugly.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 19 August 2010, 22:55:48
They're all stupid looking kids.
Every last one of them.

Also, "gamer" is a word that does not mean what it meant when I used to call myself one.  I don't see how SP is a part of gamer culture because it throws around a lot of references for no good reason.  There is no need for it, and it does not make up for the story and writing being boring tripe.
Or the art looking like #####.

The movie apparently has very little in the way of these references.
I don't know if that's a good or bad thing.  I still don't know if I want to see it.  Leaning no.

But I agree with Wind that the game looks cool.  It's basically River City Ransom with sprites drawn by a narcissistic a-hole and really awesome music.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 20 August 2010, 01:14:28
You're acting like it's just a weird random story with video game stuff thrown in, but the whole THING was a video game.

It was a video game movie. The reference to interaction and gaming and stuff doesn't "make up" for the story, it's a huge part of the story, down to the fact of him
[spoiler]grabbing a life-up being actually essential to the story and not just a random video game reference.[/spoiler]
The story doesn't exist without it BECAUSE it's so integrated into the idea. I mean, there are even boss battles. I don't have a clue how you could say it's not heavily inspired by video games.

Since "video game" isn't a genre in itself, I tend to say it's like a chick flick with action sequences and video game references... but truthfully, the video game element is such a huge part of it.

They're all stupid looking kids.
Every last one of them.

That's not even true. A few of them are stupid looking but they're kind of supposed to be. There's a silliness vibe to the movie. Still, you'll either like it or you won't. You probably won't, and that's okay. Just... it is what it is. I dislike No More Heroes, for example, and I'd be met with the argument that if you just sit back and let yourself enjoy it, you'll enjoy it.

What does this movie tell you that "gamer" supposedly means? For me it means the same thing it did years ago. It's just a person who likes video games.

Reading the book, the art kind of IS Eeehehhhhhh, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 20 August 2010, 02:12:54
I'm butting in for 1 comment.

That's what "gamer" should mean. I would like to call myself a gamer without people being so judgmental. But the truth is people associate "gamers" to whiny teens on their Xbox screaming over Halo 3 because someone stole their kill, got sniped, and tea bagged.

I know it's really stupid, mainly because it's pretty much the equivalent of seeing someone with glasses is reading a comic book, and then assuming they're into anime and Star Trek.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: MOX on 20 August 2010, 02:41:23
I thought the art was cool, kind of reminded me of the Powerpuff Girls and it seems to fit the comic (i havent read it yet).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 August 2010, 13:56:14
Oh, it is like Powerpuff girls.  Then you realize some of these characters are supposed to be fairly old and there is zero distinction between children and adults, aside from some people being bigger.  It's cookie cutter, and it gives me a headache just looking at it.
That's not to say I don't like simplistic styles like the PPG, but at least that shows some variety.

As for Majikn's comment, I was mainly talking about the comic; I've not seen the movie and my comments about the movie are based on the trailer.  And yeah, maybe it's inspired by games but the whole idea of it feels like a slap in the face because someone is literally lifting things I like and giving them to people who do not deserve them.
In a form that does not deserve attention.

You know what, I don't think any of us are really going to come to some sort of consensus on this anyway, so let's just agree to disagree and drop it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 20 August 2010, 15:23:52
You guys are all crazy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 20 August 2010, 20:06:24
Okay, Chron. I was just providing a different perspective, is all.

The movie, at least the first part, seem to be a lot like the first volume was. I noticed only pretty minor differences. If anything the movie took some things slightly more into depth. I've been informed, however, that some parts are completely different.

From what I understand of hipsters, they take things from other cultures and absorb it into themselves at a later period. You could say it's unfortunate that it happened; I don't know. I don't even really care. It's their problem, I mean, and I don't let it affect me.

On the other hand, there are still plenty of people who admittedly don't understand the comic or the movie and wouldn't without having played video games. I bought the first comic to give it a shot; the art IS weak and girly. If that's the worst part about it though, I see past it. I don't think of myself as undeserving and the book seems to fit with my target audience, given that I still kind of like it, and for all I know, I'm a gamer. The only reason I was never "hardcore" is simply that my parents wouldn't spoil me with video games when I was younger. I stuck with the few favourites that I had.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 August 2010, 21:15:19
I just finished reading the rest of the comic because people won't shut up at me about it.  I guess I am just too old to be in range to think it's really all that great.

I suppose what got me so worked up about this is that it is really not as great as so many people say it is.  At least it's not in my eyes.  That, and all of the shoving it in my face people have been doing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: MOX on 20 August 2010, 22:29:59
Oh, it is like Powerpuff girls.  Then you realize some of these characters are supposed to be fairly old and there is zero distinction between children and adults, aside from some people being bigger.  It's cookie cutter, and it gives me a headache just looking at it.

Same for me with most of anime.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 20 August 2010, 22:34:36
I can ignore it in anime for the most part because sometimes I just genuinely like the subject material.

I'm not sure there's anything that can stand on the art alone with the exception of a few movies like Akira and a handful of the cartoon shows.

--- EDIT

Not that anyone will probably see this, but Piranha 3D.  So much blood, so much cheese and so much fun.  This is the perfect horror/gore more for someone who hates spring breakers as much as I do.  It also has Christopher Lloyd.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 September 2010, 02:39:04
I saw Piranha 3D and loooooved it. So much fun. Not a good movie by any means, but it's not trying to be and anyone who doesn't understand that it missing the point. What a blast.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 September 2010, 05:38:25
I honestly can't put aside my biases to enjoy that movie. I never could. I could, at my level of maturity, simply let it be what it is, but I could never like it for what it is. I reject the idea that, at any age, I could scream affirmatives at the slightest unveiling of someone's tits, let alone all the ##### they rockin' in this movie. I just can't. It's stupid and I just don't care.

At best I struggle not to be offended that I am portrayed as an idiot for having male genitalia, and try to remind myself that I was not the targeted audience despite knowing about the sexist ignorance this movie will perpetuate about male behaviour.

I'm sorry. I hated it, but not for lack of trying to enjoy it. I gotta admit that there were three pretty awesome parts at least.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 2 September 2010, 13:30:42
See, you're caring too much about the plot and trying to pick out themes and messages from the movie.  There aren't any.  It's a movie about horrible people who, for the most part, deserve to die.  You get to see that.  Reading into the representation of characters would ruin your enjoyment.

The men (and women) are portrayed that way because it makes it more fun to see them get pulled apart by silly looking fish.  (I can't be the only one who laughed when they showed up on screen the first time).

You're not supposed to like anyone but the police.

I get the feeling, Majikin, that this is just not your kind of movie because you're much too focused on morality.  Which is OK, that's rare these days.

You're making a mistake in thinking the movie is only sexist towards men, though.  It's sexist all around.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 September 2010, 16:42:16
It's not about the nudity or the gore, it's about the nudity and the gore that have become the landmarks of these kinds of movies... if that makes any sense at all. (It doesn't.)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 2 September 2010, 17:11:17
It sure does to me!!!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 September 2010, 21:11:23
See, you're caring too much about the plot and trying to pick out themes and messages from the movie.  There aren't any.  It's a movie about horrible people who, for the most part, deserve to die.  You get to see that.  Reading into the representation of characters would ruin your enjoyment.
The men (and women) are portrayed that way because it makes it more fun to see them get pulled apart by silly looking fish.  (I can't be the only one who laughed when they showed up on screen the first time).

You're not supposed to like anyone but the police.

I get the feeling, Majikin, that this is just not your kind of movie because you're much too focused on morality.  Which is OK, that's rare these days.

I didn't have to think hard to get that message, and I don't believe I was trying to. When I was ignoring the rest of it, I was still looking at stupid people panicking and getting slaughtered, because the gore and the nudity do nothing for me.

I could have interpreted it wrongly anyway, because I see your point. I've always seen the point of horror movies like this as to be blatantly over-the-top in order to frighten and disgust people. It didn't really occur to me that people simply enjoy watching slaughter. In the end I'm completely detached from the movie.

You're making a mistake in thinking the movie is only sexist towards men, though.  It's sexist all around.

I didn't say that it wasn't. I was more talking about what the movie creators must really think about their male audience to expect them to enjoy all the over-the-top nudity and gore (i.e. its sexism towards women works as a suggestion that I enjoy that). That's not something I can turn off, sadly. I'm not exactly fuming, but it's tiresome. When girls suggest to me that I might enjoy this movie when they didn't, I respond with attitude: "Oh, it's because I'm a guy, right? That's not getting old at all."

It's just one of the few things I feel really strongly about.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 2 September 2010, 21:31:21
Just saw DragonBall Evolution for the 1st time and honestly, its NOT the best, but its NOT all that bad, kindda chessy in a way, but I enjoyed it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 2 September 2010, 23:40:43
I've yet to watch that.  I don't think I ever will unless I can get a Rifftrax version of it.

I didn't have to think hard to get that message, and I don't believe I was trying to. When I was ignoring the rest of it, I was still looking at stupid people panicking and getting slaughtered, because the gore and the nudity do nothing for me.

I could have interpreted it wrongly anyway, because I see your point. I've always seen the point of horror movies like this as to be blatantly over-the-top in order to frighten and disgust people. It didn't really occur to me that people simply enjoy watching slaughter. In the end I'm completely detached from the movie.

Well, if you were enjoying it and were really into the movie as a reality, that would be a problem.  It's not something you can watch without distancing yourself from the world in the movie.  In real life it is not cool to see so much bloodshed going on, nor is it easy to watch.

With Piranha there's a real disjoint between reality and what's happening on screen, to the point where the "slaughter" is just ridiculous carnage done in increasingly silly ways.  Yeah, it's disgusting, yeah it's probably frightening for some people aside from the cheap shots... but it's also just silly.

I really don't think I can find the right word for this to make it sound nice... but...
... perhaps you are too prude for this kind of movie?

I didn't say that it wasn't. I was more talking about what the movie creators must really think about their male audience to expect them to enjoy all the over-the-top nudity and gore (i.e. its sexism towards women works as a suggestion that I enjoy that). That's not something I can turn off, sadly. I'm not exactly fuming, but it's tiresome. When girls suggest to me that I might enjoy this movie when they didn't, I respond with attitude: "Oh, it's because I'm a guy, right? That's not getting old at all."

It's just one of the few things I feel really strongly about.

So what offends you most is not the content, but the idea that people think you should like the content because you're male.  I can see that being annoying, but that's just how people are.

Eh, that's enough on this for now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 3 September 2010, 01:47:01
I went to see Dragonball Evolution in theatres just to see how bad it was.

Of course, it's a "harmless" kind of bad movie. It isn't terrible, but amusing, just as long as you don't bring your expectations to the movie. Nobody needs to make a parody of this movie, because they pretty much did the job themselves. I especially like the FINAL BATTLE. All 2 seconds of it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 3 September 2010, 03:43:22
I still need Rifftrax.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 3 September 2010, 04:09:51
Dragonball Evolution, Vampires Suck...

These are movies I would not watch.

Anyway, I may be a lot of things, but I don't think I'm a prude or self-righteous. I just don't have a taste for that type of movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 11 September 2010, 06:13:33
'Captain America'(MOVIE) Set Pics

http://www.myspace.com/everything/photo/2010/09/09/captain-america-set-pics#pm_cmp=mce_con_ent_ftop_MH_CAP

yea...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 20 September 2010, 11:14:12
Sometimes, what I want and what I need is some pretty explosions, big guns, good guys kicking ass and bad guys getting what's coming to them. I'm a fan of action movies, maybe even action B-movies and I don't like when precious explosion-shooty-time is wasted on story.

And in that sense Resident Evil and The Expendables delivered. Was a little disappointed though Willis only had a talky-part.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 September 2010, 15:14:41
Looks okay-ish...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 20 September 2010, 20:32:34
I went to see Resident Evil Afterlife, a lot of action, borrows stuff from RE5, but I honestly didn't see the movie was gonna end like that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 October 2010, 03:12:53
My girlfriend and I saw It's a Pretty Funny Story and Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps. Both are excellent films.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 10 October 2010, 03:46:31
With both It's A Pretty Funny Story and It's Kind Of A Funny Story in theaters at the same time, I can only imagine it'll get a bit confusing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 10 October 2010, 06:40:46
I saw these guys sneaking into Pirahnas and I'm like dude you need 3D glasses for that and also I can see you I'm #####ing looking RIGHT AT YOU pulling the used glasses out of the recycling and then walking in and look we even made eye contact what the hell man

And then I realized I'm not in uniform I'm not working I'm in a cardigan vest and I don't even own a cardigan and I went home and played chess with myself


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Chron on 10 October 2010, 14:22:37
Saw Legend of the Guardians.  Oh, sorry, GAAAAAWDIANS.
Apparently I've been saying the word wrong this whole time, so it sure is a good thing I saw this.

It was kinda neat, though, and the screech owl guy was probably the best character.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ChaosVortex on 10 October 2010, 16:22:25
I heard that was a pretty good movie too.

And it's okay. I apparently have had a problem saying one of the most basic words myself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6cyDsuNx_U


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 October 2010, 16:31:14
With both It's A Pretty Funny Story and It's Kind Of A Funny Story in theaters at the same time, I can only imagine it'll get a bit confusing.

I had a conversation going while typing that message, so thank you for the correction.

Also, ##### you.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: preventerWIND on 13 November 2010, 06:37:25
KSO.

Having just moved into a new area, I decided to check out the Blockbuster down the street.. I now live in a surprisingly wealthy area so, damn, this store was top #####.. I ended up buying a Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead combo back for ten bucks, along with Joe Dirt for my girlfriend.. The big deal is that I also bought the Sergio Leone Collectors Anthology, which usually goes for about 70+ bucks, for 14.99. Hell, not even that! The employees must've been puffin' an' passin' all night because the cashier took off $5 from the Anth and a bit off the first two..

This is my Christmas gift to myself, THANK YOU ME! : )


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 February 2011, 03:12:19
My brother, my girlfriend, and I saw True Grit on Christmas Day. Excellent film; Jeff Bridges' performance is definitely better than John Wayne's.

Posted on: December 29, 2010, 02:16:23 PM

I'm writing a paper for my film class on the changes in American comedy pre-1945, mainly looking at Charlie Chaplin and the Marx brothers. So far today I've watched The Gold Rush and Animal Crackers. I may have to watch another Marx brothers film, a later non-Paramount Pictures one, because Animal Crackers is too close to the invention of sound in films, and I need to see if they switched their act up any once they went to another studio.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 22 February 2011, 08:43:23
Harpo is my Jesus.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 August 2011, 02:59:19
I watched Captain America and Cowboys and Aliens this weekend.

Captain America was what I expected, plus more line dancing than I was expecting.

Cowboys and Aliens, though. I don't even.
Very mixed feelings.
Part of me knows it's an awesome movie, and another part of me is still just confused by what happened.
It all makes sense in the theme of the movie, and it has some decent action sequences, but its just odd to see all the same old cowboy clichés in a movie that feels like a cross between skyline and the new show (whatever it is called) about humans fighting back against an invasion.

Also, Olivia Wilde is hot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 1 August 2011, 09:24:17
Cowboys and Aliens just thoroughly bored me.
You can't deliver a half-good experience and expect me to acknowledge only the good parts. I'd rather just cut it in half. If I keep looking at my watch, I KNOW my time was better spent.

I don't know. Maybe every movie I see just sucks these days, OR it's just me being cynical and hating on EVERYTHING. Or maybe I just keep getting bored in general with movies, and have trouble paying attention...

But I liked the last Harry Potter, actually. I was overall quite satisfied. I also came out of the theatre thinking that I experienced something actually unique... as in, never felt before in a theatre setting. That feeling was some really intense nostalgia. Toy Story 3 came close... but I think Harry Potter totally overwhelmed it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 1 August 2011, 15:05:15
I looooved Cowboys and Aliens. Thought every minute of it was great fun. I'm very picky about what action movies I'll enjoy, and this one covered all my bases. I thought Captain America was pretty good, too, but nothing all that spectacular.

You know what was a DAMN fine movie, though? Midnight in Paris. I left the theater in a very uplifting and romantic mood and it stayed with me for the rest of the night. I really recommend it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 1 August 2011, 20:22:09
Remember when I said I hated Pirahnas 3D? Well, here's a gore flick with an actual PROPER tone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFFh25DmPNU
Looks like the whole movie is in the trailer though.

I'd put Captain America beneath X-Men: First Class. It wasn't spectacular but it was a solid movie, start to finish. I actually feel like The Green Hornet was the second/third best "superhero" movie of this year, even though we should all rightly hate Seth Rogen by now.
I really didn't like Thor or The Green Lantern—those movies were all special effects and I'm never impressed by special effects alone... as far as I'm concerned you should be working hard on your visual effects anyway, whether it's CGI stuff or makeup or just lining up the shot or holding the camera correctly. It shouldn't be the number one reason you're making a movie, and it should NEVER be the best part.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 1 August 2011, 21:46:06
There were like three moments in Thor that had me doubled up in laughter; I spent the rest of the entire movie bored out of my skull. At no point was I genuinely excited or particularly involved.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 1 August 2011, 22:43:19
I learned how to enjoy movies more:
Go see superhero and action movies and expect pointless action movies with good fight scenes.

Nothing fits that criteria like Crank though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Fatso on 2 August 2011, 07:22:23
The problem is that Thor didn't even have any decent action.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 August 2011, 09:06:06
I feel like The Dark Knight should have changed things. Forever.
I don't necessarily mean Nolanized... I mean done right.

Iron Man came along, as well, and there was hope. Then there was Iron Man 2 and news of a Spider-Man reboot; a kick straight to Tobey Maguire's face—to which I approve. I realize I'm in a minority when I say that I approve, but I approve SO hard.

But now it's 2011, and look what we got this year.

People should have started taking their superhero characters seriously, man.

I watch a movie for a good story. I don't care what genre it is, or how much action there is. I just want a GOOD movie, start to finish.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 2 August 2011, 18:05:08
Don't be so limiting on why you watch movies. Some movies have good stories, some movies have great visuals, some movies have snappy dialogue or funny jokes or tearjerking moments. Let yourself be surprised by what you see - don't limit yourself.

I thought Piranha 3D was brilliant. It was a lot of fun and I had a blast watching it. It might've been too tongue-in-cheek for its own good, but it had a lot of people I like in it and I was glad to see them dicking around in such a ridiculous movie. Obviously, it wasn't high art or anything like that, but I can't understand people who shut down movies like this, or Crank. You have to be able to tell the difference between a movie that just wants to have fun with itself (and accomplish what it set it out to do) and a movie that was made to make money.

That being said, Tucker and Dale VS Evil was great, and it towers above Piranha 3D as an actual quality movie. Very funny, too. Doesn't mean I don't appreciate Piranha 3D any less.

Anyway, the indie film I've been directing (and acting in) wraps up shooting on the 12th, which is terrifying and amazing to me. I get to start editing it soon. I hope I find a way to make sure all of you guys get to see it, because I'm rarely ever proud of my own work... and this time I am. Maybe it's just because such a huge amount of people are involved that I can't rag on it without bringing everyone else down with me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 August 2011, 19:33:24
I don't think I'm limiting myself. I'm just not a connoisseur. I'm the kind of guy that would almost never watch movies, but I'm literally surrounded by them because of where I work, and it's the only social thing I have available to me.

I go into any movie hoping to be pleasantly surprised, but mostly I'm just bored. I feel like praising everything is itself very limiting. You have a good point in that actors are allowed, and probably deserve to take on fun roles, but I really don't think the only alternative is a film "made to make money." I think all or at least most directors and producers and writers should already genuinely enjoy what they do. It's just that these people make tons of money NOT to screw anything up, and they can either resort to easy clichés that people always just gobble up, or they can make art. SOMETIMES the in-between is fun and worth watching, but I guess from there it really depends on my personal taste of what it actually is.

I admit to my own biases against certain types of films, anyway. Gore flicks no. I've never seen a horror flick in general that I thought was genuinely disturbing. Romantic comedies tend to be all the same.
I've invested a lot of my time into the superhero movies lately and I think that was probably just dumb of me to do.
I tend to enjoy animated movies, though. I tend to frown on 3D but I don't go out of my way to avoid it.

People spend money to watch these movies. I frankly don't need to spend a dime. All I offer is a few hours of my time that would probably not have been better spent anyway. That's the only reason I end up watching these movies. If they were not offered free I'd be all "This movie looks like crap," and I wouldn't see it at all. I could buy like a trade paperback novel for the price of a movie, and while THAT medium can also suffer from bad quality writing, there's less involved when it goes bad, and even when it does, I still feel like I'm at least exercising some part of my brain and fuelling my own imagination with ideas.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Professor Hazard on 2 August 2011, 20:16:29
SO... anybody seen that South Park episode where everything Stan sees reminds him of turds...?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 3 August 2011, 05:19:01
I learned how to enjoy movies more:
Go see superhero and action movies and expect pointless action movies with good fight scenes.

Nothing fits that criteria like Crank though.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Crank: High Voltage was the best 90 minutes I've ever spent in a movie theater.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 3 August 2011, 07:03:38
I agree with you 100%. My all-time favorite movie theater experience. I genuinely have pity for people who never got to see it in a theater filled with people just as surprised as you were.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Vinchenz Rock on 4 October 2011, 02:32:10
So... the Arrested Development movie is definitely a-go!

Better yet, there will 10 episodes made that willl ead up to the movie!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 October 2011, 15:33:33
I saw The Wiz. I really enjoyed it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 5 October 2011, 15:57:13
Drive.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 October 2011, 02:54:16
Attack The Block.

I love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: ASR on 11 October 2011, 03:06:31
I can't wait to watch that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 November 2011, 16:40:41
I watched it recently c/o of a friend, and I'm going to see it at this little indie theatre we sometimes hit up later this month with other friends of mine who've either seen it a few times or not at all. Should be a good time.

I think it's an Alec movie.



Oh yeah speaking of that theatre; After all the hype built up for me by listening all about it for a year and change, Red State was kinda "eh." I thought it was well-done but short and unfortunately for me I already knew everything that happened via podcasts and such. The characters don't really go anywhere but the movie was OK.

Posted on: 10 October 2011, 21:18:34

I'm sure you guys have seen this, but I thought I'd post it anyway.

http://twitchfilm.com/news/2011/11/full-trailer-for-takashi-miikes-ds-game-adaptation-phoenix-wright-ace-attorney.php

WOW.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 November 2011, 16:52:24
That looks absolutely silly. It's just that nobody would ever look like that, It really just looks like a bunch of cos-players in a courthouse.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 November 2011, 17:04:50
Lotta Hart was spectacularly ridiculous for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 March 2012, 10:44:00
John Carter was #####ing awesome as all hell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 9 March 2012, 15:57:18
RIGHT, movies.

I've been watching some.

Contagion was a fictional documentary type thing. I was disappointed but the whole thing made sense. There was no tension though.

Act of Valor was okay, most of the best parts were in the trailer and all the guys looked the same so you never understood how important it was when someone died.
"Was that THAT guy?"
"Nah, it was the other guy."
"Oh, what the hell? That's not important..."
"Oh wait, it WAS that guy."
"Oh god so sad."

I really liked The Grey. Good character development, great sense of tragedy, and Liam Neeson fights wolves.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: saldite on 21 March 2012, 04:34:33
I watched The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.
Never read the books, so I can't say how the movie compares, but It was pretty alright.
Had a good mystery-solving-##### vibe to it.
Drug on for a little too long for my taste, though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 March 2012, 18:07:32
I've been playing L.A. Noire, which is like watching a movie that you suck at.

It's fun when I recognize the actors they used for the faces.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 25 March 2012, 04:20:38
A movie that you suck at. I did alright!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 25 March 2012, 17:57:32
I've had a few 2 star cases.

Those hurt :(

I felt good after anything 3 stars and above. Some of those people, damn good liars.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 March 2012, 05:28:53
True. There are actually a few times where it's like... "How was I ever supposed to even think to try that?"

I felt like a lot of the success was really dependent on knowing EXACTLY how to really press for information.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 15 April 2012, 16:15:50
I saw Titanic (in 3D) for the first time last night. It was way better than I thought it would be, and I certainly understand why it was as popular as it was. I don't know if they touched up the CGI at all, but it still holds up extremely well.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 15 April 2012, 22:49:42
The only major technical change (aside from 3D-ify-ing)was the night sky, thanks to Niel Degrass Tyson.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 April 2012, 02:14:06
I've seen Titanic 1.5 times back when it came it out, and then half of it on VHS tape. I didn't like it either time so I don't think 3D is gonna do it for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 23 April 2012, 20:00:17
I really liked Cabin in the Woods.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 4 May 2012, 14:44:05
I hated The Hunger Games. It felt like a completely unoriginal mashup of Battle Royale, Battle Royale II, The Running Man, The Condemned, The Truman Show, The Blue Lagoon, and whoever designs characters for Tim Burton. At 2 1/2 hours long, holy ##### was it way too damn long - trying to focus on the society while never actually focusing on said society. On top of it, it was the first time I've ever felt nauseous while watching shaky-cam footage.

I want my $9 back.

Posted on: April 29, 2012, 09:21:03 AM

Avengers was AWESOME!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 4 May 2012, 15:43:30
The Avengers was more than awesome.
It's was so perfect...

The humor, the action, the short term character development, even!

SEE IT.

I'll be seeing it at least twice more.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 June 2012, 06:23:11
It apparently pulled in $200 million this weekend. #####in' A.

Posted on: May 06, 2012, 01:21:01 PM

My girlfriend and I went to the drive-in to watch Rock of Ages and Snow White and the Huntsman. Rock of Ages wasn't terrible, but it wore out its welcome halfway through, and if it had any balls, it would've ended at the halfway point. I can really only recommend it to fans of hair metal/80s rock and/or Glee. Snow White and the Huntsman was terrible. I feel like there's about 30 minutes of footage missing, yet because I was so bored throughout the movie, I don't give a damn enough to see an "uncut" edition. It just threw you into the world, had terrible pacing, there's two or three plot lines that are introduced yet never full explored, and this movie just gives us definite proof that Kristen Stewart can't act for #####.

If anything, Snow White and the Huntsman makes me hope that I find a genie who will grant me some wishes, one of them being that Kristen Stewart is forced to only find acting jobs with terrible SyFy "Monster of the Week" movies for the rest of her days.

Posted on: June 17, 2012, 09:10:02 AM

Holy ##########, Prometheus is amazing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 June 2012, 21:08:25
I disagree.

I hated every single character and the choices they made. Also, reading interviews with Ridley Scott, it made me hate the film even more.

[spoiler] Turns out they are pissed at us because we killed Jesus who was an Engineer, so we are like children who got out of control and had to be stopped.[/spoiler]

Posted on: June 18, 2012, 11:27:32 AM

Going to see Brave today with my girlfriend.

I think she's more pumped for it than I am. The trailers got on my nerves.

Posted on: June 22, 2012, 11:26:27 AM

Huh. For a Pixar movie, that was disappointing.

WAY less action than expected.
I didn't get teary eyed or excited of even laugh much.

Does anyone else agree?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 July 2012, 10:03:07
I liked Brave. Not their best work, but still a very good movie.

21 Jump Street was #####in' hysterical.

Posted on: July 05, 2012, 02:19:25 PM

The Dark Knight Rises is the best of the series, but I still like The Dark Knight the most.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 20 July 2012, 23:08:58
I watched all 3 in a row yesterday. Overall, a pretty okay series. Not as good as I had hoped, though.

Christian Bale never closes his mouth when he's wearing the mask. It makes him look like an idiot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 28 November 2012, 16:31:24
I saw Silent Hill: Revelation last week. The visuals were pretty awesome, and while the story and acting were lacking, I enjoyed it. I have a feeling that we won't be getting a third movie in the series.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: orclev on 28 November 2012, 23:32:18
I'm going to see The Hobbit in IMAX 3D on opening night next month! Anyone else?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 December 2012, 17:27:04
I possibly will be.

Posted on: November 28, 2012, 07:11:11 PM

The Star Trek Into Darkness trailer is here!

http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrekintodarkness/


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Abominator on 13 December 2012, 23:43:36
Looks good, doesn't give much away!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 19 December 2012, 09:09:12
I count myself among the few Trek fans who liked the new movie, so I am genuinely looking forward to this one too.

Tonight I'm gonna see The Hobbit. I'm excited.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 19 December 2012, 19:32:56
I wasn't aware it was that unliked.  I thought it was ok for what it was.  I thought most of the casting was decent even if the sets were largely awful.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 March 2013, 17:32:53
There's plenty of haters out there for the new Star Trek universe, who are against the use of lens flares, the fact that they would dare have someone else be James T. Kirk and crew, the fact that it made Star Trek cool again, the whole "parallel dimensions" thing, and most of all, reusing stuff from the original show (ideas, characters, the name Star Trek, etc.).

Some of the biggest Star Trek whiners ever.

Posted on: December 23, 2012, 07:51:32 PM

Got a rare chance to watch three movies in one day. Haven't done that in a long-ass time.

Something From Nothing: The Art of Rap (2012) is a decent documentary by Ice-T where he interviews a lot of rappers about where they got their start, what their "method" is, etc. If you like rap, you'll be interested the whole time (some awesome freestyles and discussions of who influenced who), but Ice-T isn't the best interviewer and thankfully it ends before it starts feeling like a fluff piece.

The Parallax View (1974): Largely forgotten thriller starring Warren Beatty as a journalist who quickly gets in over his head when trying to find out why people who were present at an assassination three years previous are now dropping like flies. A pretty decent film, it really reflects the feelings of the 1970s. You've got an immense amount of paranoia in the film - you can't trust the government (either due to being corrupt or inept), are corporations in on everything, why are things being covered up, etc.

Watching movies like Dirty Harry, All the President's Men, The Conversation, and The Parallax View really gives you an idea of the attitude of the 1970s that Hollywood reflected - lack of trust in the government, tons of shady #####, police are corrupt, etc. It makes me wonder why Hollywood doesn't go for this kind of stuff anymore - the closest we've got is George Clooney's movies, but they barely scratch the surface like these films did. Maybe it's because Hollywood is far more chummy with Washington nowadays, or maybe today's audiences would just watch a movie like The Conversation and be like "Duh. We know that all of this ##### is happening, this isn't shocking."

Last film was ParaNorman (2012), which I thought was an excellent children's film. The animation was well done, and there was plenty of humor to keep adults and children entertained throughout without feeling like you're dumbing down the story. I'd like to see more films like this instead of more crap like Shrek and Ice Age.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 March 2013, 23:25:49
I really want to see The Art of Rap doc. Heard Ice-T on some interviews and podcasts when it was coming out and sounds really good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 March 2013, 14:39:45
Wreck-It Ralph was pretty fun, especially for those who are huge video game nerds.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 March 2013, 22:45:55
I loved that movie, but unfortunately it didn't do well. Somewhere along the line someone must have shrugged off that today's kids just don't get the references, but more importantly, have no idea what an arcade is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 16 April 2013, 14:47:42
Watched Expendables 2 and Seven Psychopaths over the weekend.

I enjoyed Expendables 2, although I feel like Jean-Claude Van Damme's bad guy wasn't explored at all. In fact, none of the characters are really explored...which kind of bothers me 2 movies in.

Seven Psychopaths is excellent. I love Martin McDonagh's stuff.

Posted on: March 18, 2013, 03:19:16 PM

My girlfriend and I saw G.I. Joe: Retaliation and Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters at the drive-in. Neither of the films were particularly good, but they were fun for what they were. Hansel & Gretel I'd watch again if it was on TV.

I've also started watching Ordinary People again. We had to read it for my 11th grade English class and then watch the movie - at the time, I thought both sucked balls. However, I still think about it every once in a while, so I wondered if I was just too young to "get it". I'm 30 minutes in, and the verdict thus far is, yeah, young Speed Racer was too young for it.

I really want to see 42.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 16 April 2013, 21:45:02
Buying Django Unchained as soon as I can. I really like that movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 April 2013, 19:04:20
If you can, you should grab the Future Shop Target exclusive steelbook. It's way nicer looking than the regular Blu-Ray and DVD boxes, it's the combo of the two, and at the same price.

I got it and am beyond pleased.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 May 2013, 17:51:50
Girlfriend picked up Django Unchained and Iron Man: Rise of Technovore. Haven't watched either yet, but she loved Django.

Posted on: April 22, 2013, 05:10:43 PM

We saw The Great Gatsby on Friday night. #####ing great adaptation.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 May 2013, 06:18:22
The new Star Trek was only OK.

Seems like people that don't really know Stark Trek liked it more, I just found it was nearly 100% predictable.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 May 2013, 11:39:46
Between a good/bad rating, I'm leaning towards it being good. I understand why some Star Trek fans don't like it, though. Those people have strong points, but none which retroactively ruined the enjoyed experience for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 30 May 2013, 15:43:02
I really enjoyed it. I thought it was an exciting take on a well-established character, although what should have been an emotional gut-punch wasn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 30 May 2013, 21:28:47
They just kind of... They just weakly cobbled together bits from past Star Treks and after the first bit I never felt compelled again. A friend and I talked about it later, but it was like you could call every plot point 5-10 minutes early, so that makes it lose a lot of points.


I also thought they would have left most of the little jokes/sly references to the old series with the first movie though, and be doing their own thing finally. I get WHY they do it but it seems more like something you would do in the first installment; Like in X-Men when Wolverine was asked if he'd prefer "yellow spandex". The term "red shirt" shouldn't ever leave the lips of someone in Star Trek... The characters shouldn't even be allowed to think it. It's a uniform to them, and they're not in on it, nor would they be that disrespectful of it.

I'm not saying there's no room for jokes (this film had plenty that actually fit in place) but that particular brand of silly stuff always reminds me of hackneyed lines from like the Star Wars movies and stuff.

"Anakin, you'll be the death of me!"
OHhOhohohoohhohHOh. dear viewer! Even if you find that funny in the theatre it becomes a blemish during a rewatch.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 June 2013, 18:59:01
Took the girlfriend to see Epic. Much better than I thought it would be...it's the movie that Ferngully should have been.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheOnly on 9 September 2013, 18:22:57
Saw Riddick, it was alright, but ppl felt it was like a Pitch Black.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 19 October 2013, 04:41:04
Saw Machete Kills in a sneak peek the other week (thx rhymezone.com 4 dat), it rocked. But I only watched the first one the day before, even though I am a fan of Robert Rodriguez and Danny Trejo, so I liked it a bit more.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 November 2013, 02:29:45
My fiance and I watched "What to Expect When You're Expecting", as I won an auction for a 12 Rounds 2 UV code with a "mystery code"...and that was the mystery code. Still, the movie was better than what I was...expecting.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 26 February 2014, 15:00:09
The Lego Movie is grand.  I suggest you all go see it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 March 2014, 01:24:01
I second that but I hate the two songs.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 26 March 2014, 20:12:00
Robocop isn't awful.  I was very surprised.  It was a solid OK.  Not great, but not awful or even bad.  It's far short of the original, but as far as a reboot goes, not bad.  There's some real promise for a sequel.  Lets just say if Total Recall is how you DON'T remake/reboot something, Robocop is at least going in the right direction.

Also, Frozen is ok.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 June 2014, 00:21:27
Couple guys from my class worked on Frozen. They're really good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 5 June 2014, 00:44:57
Frozen failed to wow me.

It was okay, and quite unexpected at points, but just okay.

Beautiful film though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 5 June 2014, 15:11:08
Frozen gets points for actually surprising me on several plot points that you expect to go traditional ways.  It was refreshing if only for that, but other than that it was also a pretty decent movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 21 June 2014, 09:41:01
Frozen needed to decide whether or not it wanted to be a music all. The song placement screwed with the movie's pacing. Also, I could have done without the trolls. That said, I liked the movie and I like that Disney isn't pushing the whole "romantic love is the truest love there is!" Thing anymore.



Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 23 June 2014, 20:11:01
Love is a lie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Lunchebox on 26 June 2014, 03:35:10
Your life is a lie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 2 July 2014, 18:08:03
That's the truth.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 July 2014, 05:41:29
My wife and I LOVED The Lego Movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 August 2014, 00:37:36
Lego movie rocked, I just wish it came out when I was kid with a Legomaniac subscription instead of an adult with a laudanum addiction.

From what I've heard, the Trolls in Frozen were a late add-in so that's why they're so out of place.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 September 2014, 00:50:19
Had a RoboCop marathon and watched the entire series while taking care of my son.

The first RoboCop movie is an American classic. No discussion is needed.

RoboCop 2 was weird, because they failed to continue the discussion of RoboCop's humanity by brushing it away in the first twenty minutes of the movie. Which should have been a strong point to the series, and something that could have been constantly examined throughout got tossed away because they felt the need to keep it as an action movie, which if you watch the first RoboCop movie...it really isn't an action flick. In fact, the movie doesn't really get going until the second half as it meanders through a bunch of barely explored ideas and trying to imitate the social satire of the first. It really feels like it was cobbled together from two different scripts. Cain is a throwaway villain, but the action is satisfying. Not great, but a decent follow-up.

RoboCop 3 was amazingly "meh". I liked how it handled the fear of Japan taking over everything, but again, they dumped the social satire in replace of PG-13 action. I hated the whiz kid character that they threw in, and it just became a generic action film. Crappy way for the trilogy to end.

Part of the problem is that in all reality, RoboCop should never have had any sequels and just stayed "as is". Clarence Boddicker is to RoboCop as the Joker is to Batman - no one else had the "Bitches, leave" attitude that sold the bad guy so well. I was surprised with the route that they took The Old Man in with RoboCop 2, turning him into a vile business man whose main concern was the bottom line, not so much introducing products that helped make a better world. He's a very different character from what was seen in the first film. The kid gangster was also interesting, but only because he's got social commentary within the character. All other villains in the series are bland because they're just "the bad guy".

The 2014 remake of RoboCop I found to be "meh", but I enjoyed the ideas that they put forth with the movie, returning to examine RoboCop's humanity. The acting was good, but overall the movie was average. They tried going back into the satire with Samuel L. Jackson, doing a Bill O'Reilly impression, but in my opinion, it wasn't enough. The fake ads really sold it. I'd be interested in a sequel to the movie, but it doesn't seem like we'll be getting anything - you figure they would have announced it by now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 17 October 2014, 22:54:58
I think the RoboCop reboot at least TRIED to do it right.  They didn't quite hit the mark, but I thought it was pretty decent all in all.  It has enough promise to give a sequel a chance, but I agree, I don't think it did well enough to get one, even though far FAR worse movies have.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 November 2014, 20:05:23
I watched Sex Tape, thanks to Sony accidentally giving it away for free on their Ultraviolet website - ironic, right? The movie's marketing made it seem like a really raunchy comedy, but that couldn't have been farther from the actual project. I haven't seen a more confused marketing campaign since Hollywood Homicide (where they couldn't decide if they wanted to advertise it as a serious cop drama or a zany buddy-cop flick). It was amusing, but I really get the vibe it was given the green light on premise alone. Doubtful I'll watch it again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 12 November 2014, 16:51:56
What a shocker... Isn't that like the Hercules movie with the Rock where all the previews showed the legendary Hercules fights but those were all like the first 6 minutes of the movie and just a story being told by the "real" Hercules and the rest of the movie was just the Rock playing a mostly normal guy?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 13 November 2014, 02:25:55
Don't know. Haven't seen it yet. It's in my Ultraviolet library. I'm finally getting around to seeing Transformers: Age of Extinction, which is rather ho-hum.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 13 November 2014, 19:32:16
I can't believe it!  Said no one ever.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 3 August 2015, 06:13:37
I've watched the first half of Man of Steel. I like what I've seen so far.

Posted on: November 17, 2014, 02:18:30 PM

Wife is sick, so I watched The Princess Bride with her. I had yet to see it - I liked it.

Posted on: November 22, 2014, 10:57:42 PM

I saw Inside Out and Ant-Man this week. Enjoyed both movies. Ant-Man's 3D was probably the best use of 3D in a Marvel movie thus far.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 3 August 2015, 16:02:46
Ant-Man is my #3 Marvel Movie now.  Behind Guardians and Avengers 1.  Cap 1 gets moved down to #4.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 1 December 2015, 03:34:06
Holy #####balls Creed was a great movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 1 December 2015, 19:37:46
I was considering seeing it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 17 December 2015, 16:57:48
What stopped you?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 18 December 2015, 19:32:51
Nothing, I just haven't gone to see it.  I'm not a big movie goer anymore.  That said, it looks like it'd be ok and maybe I'll see it at some point.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 December 2015, 12:45:18
Ant-Man is my #3 Marvel Movie now.  Behind Guardians and Avengers 1.  Cap 1 gets moved down to #4.

Little late but this is a pro list.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 24 December 2015, 06:43:45
I'm a pro guy!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 25 December 2015, 22:28:47
Star Wars: The Force Awakens was a lot of fun and a good movie. The first 10-15 minutes of the film felt very disjointed, almost like Disney stepped in and was like "JJ, you're directing a Star Wars film, not one of your Star Trek reboots. Calm your tits." Rest of it was great. Probably going to see it again for my anniversary.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 27 December 2015, 03:06:57
I concur.  Force Awakens is solid.  It does have some issues, but it's got that proper Star Wars vibe the prequels never did.  Episode 7 is more Star Wars than a single second of the entire prequel trilogy.  The practical effects made a SIZABLE difference in the the movie and made if feel real.  Not some 90% green screen garbage.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 February 2016, 14:51:56
Oh, definitely. While the all-CGI thing was an interesting experiment, it did royally screw the movies. Meanwhile, the new movie just looked fantastic and real.

Posted on: December 28, 2015, 08:49:37 PM

I saw Spectre and Deadpool. Spectre was a good Bond movie, but they completely wasted the character of Mr. Hinx, and John Logan needs to drop the father/son issues in his writing. The dude literally can't write a movie without parental issues in it. Not every #####ing movie is going to be a Greek tragedy.

Deadpool was excellent. Well done and funny as hell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 23 February 2016, 17:14:37
Deadpool was every bit as good as a Marvel film.  I hope to GOD Fox learns from the massive success of it and applies that level of faithfulness to the X-Men next tim... oh who am I kidding.  At least Deadpool was gold.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 March 2016, 05:36:59
The only thing that Fox learned is that audiences will go see an R-rated film based on a comic book. Everything else is ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

I just saw Gods of Egypt, which was not a particularly good film, but highly entertaining. The concept itself is ridiculous and it took me about half of the film to buy into it, but once you do, it was a very fun ride. The acting is mostly terrible, with Gerard Butler pretty much carrying the film by himself. The 3D was gorgeous. I'd be up for watching it again.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: StatiicX on 21 March 2016, 23:47:48
you guys ready for Batman Vs. Superman? Me and the wife will be there night 1...im nervous of Afleck but I give him the benifit of the doubt based on the extended trailer they showed of him fighting..im looking forward to it me and my wife


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 22 March 2016, 19:37:00
BvS looks like dog #####.  Seriously, it's so god damn grimdark and "realistic" and "not comic booky" it hurts.  It's a "mature film for mature film goers like me and not some kiddie comic #####" just like Man of Steel, which is one of the single worst comic book adaptations ever made.  And that's what BvS is based on/building on.

It will still make hundreds of millions of dollars, so by that measure, it will be a "good" movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 24 March 2016, 06:19:19
I haven't liked anything Snyder since 300...

I'm still going to see it probably. I don't have anything against the tone of the movie. I liked The Dark Knight, but Rises was godawful in my opinion. I don't think being "comic booky" is inherently better because it's gotten old with Marvel lately. I haven't really liked much from Marvel since the first Avengers. "Grimdark" might be boring, but it's at least a contrast to when I've gotten bored of a lot of Marvel's recent attempts at humour. Deadpool notwithstanding.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 28 March 2016, 22:53:34
If it's a comic book, it should have that tone.  Most of DC falls into that.  The BEST animated DC stuff is that in spades.  It doesn't have to be ##### just because it's live action.  Marvel has absolutely NAILED the tone of it's comics in it's movies.  They're far from perfect, but they're generally good and loyal to the source material in both tone AND content.  DC can not say the same thing, at all.  As a fan of these characters, it makes me extremely sad to see them portrayed with such a deafness to tone and style of the source material for the sake of making it "mature" or "not comic booky".

But as I said, this is Superman and Batman.  That ALONE will make half a billion, regardless of if it's good or bad.  And make no mistake this is a BAD movie.  Period.  Can you imagine if they'd nailed the tone and style?  They'd have easily made billions.  Marvel has done it, and with C and D tier characters because they respect the source material and it's style and tone.  DC does not and does not.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 March 2016, 02:57:51
Marvel IS doing a better job. I saw the movie and I pretty much agree. All I'm saying, though, is that I don't mind superhero movies being dark or taking themselves seriously. I don't think that's an inherently bad thing, just as I don't think the Marvel style is bad either. It's just that we've gotten so much out of Marvel lately and since they've set the bar high, my expectations have gotten higher. If Batman V Superman movies was like more of the same stuff we'd seen from Marvel, I'd feel like an opportunity for variety was missed.

But yes, regardless of what path DC movies want to take in the future, they still need to do better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 1 April 2016, 21:27:59
Marvel isn't a "style" of comic book movie, it's just actually portraying it's characters far more accurately.  Making a superhero movie that is dark or takes it's self seriously is FINE, but not when you do it for something that isn't dark/serious JUST for the sake of doing that.  And that's what they did for BvS, MoS and is the general direction DC is taking it's CU.  Batman, as edge lord as he's portrayed sometimes isn't and doesn't HAVE to be as dark as he's been of late.

And that's the problem with DC, they're doing dark, serious and mature JUST to do that, regardless of if that's what the tone and characters call for.  I don't even recognize MoS/BvS Superman.  He's not Superman in any meaningful way the character has been for 60 years.  People, who seriously/unironically defend this portrayal of him or that BvS is literally a cinematic  masterpiece and transcendent comic book movie are blowing out more ##### from their ass than Galactus after eating a Jupiter sized burrito from Taco Bell.  I have no issue with people liking the movie, but it's a HORRIBLE rendition of the characters, and criminally off tone.  Suicide Squad is going under reshoots to make it "funnier".  That's entirely due to the large amount of negative feedback on how dark and soulless MoS and BvS are.  But even then, it's just another knee jerk reaction to try to catch more of that Marvel Money Train.  It has NONE of the forethought that Marvel has put into their stuff.  Just like shoving more of the cut BvS footage to make an "R" rated cut to try to piggyback off Deadpool's R rated success without ANY attempt to understand WHY Deadpool was rated R and why it worked.

I could go on forever about it but I'll end it there. 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 2 April 2016, 22:00:03
Marvel movies all conform in a way that has a recognizable style. That's all I was saying.

My only motivation for believing that allowing varying tones and character interpretations is acceptable is that I liked Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. You also might smite me for saying it, but I even liked The Amazing Spider-Man. However when it comes to your reasons for not liking BvS I pretty much agree.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: StatiicX on 7 April 2016, 00:22:34
Marvel movies all conform in a way that has a recognizable style. That's all I was saying.

.....You also might smite me for saying it, but I even liked The Amazing Spider-Man.

So for the record Andrew Garfield had probably the best interpretation of Peter Parker I've seen, save for this Civil War Spidey(Tom Holland is his name right?). He is unproven and I'll hold judgement on him. I feel like Garfield was snubbed because he did an awesome job and I think he wouldve fit in quite nicely considering that his rendition of Spidey/PP is from the Ultimate universe, as is all these MCU characters/movies.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 29 November 2017, 04:09:01
I really enjoyed Batman v Superman. I thought it was a lot of fun, although if you go in there hoping for Batman and Superman to be duking it out for most of the movie, you'll be disappointed.

Only other film I've completed lately is Trainwreck with Amy Schumer. I thought it was okay, but it fell into the generic rom-com crap at the end. Worth a watch and I'm glad I got it for free, but I don't know if I'll ever feel the need to watch it again.

Posted on: April 09, 2016, 09:07:38 PM

So I've been watching a lot of documentaries as of late because my younger son gets really upset over people raising their voices angrily or shouting, so pretty much all action, drama, and comedy films are right out the window. We are currently watching The September Issue, which is about the American office of Vogue magazine trying to get their fall fashion issue ready, as it's the biggest #####ing thing in the fashion industry. It's really well done, and as all good documentaries do, it teaches you quite a bit about the subject.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 29 November 2017, 14:28:11
Thor Ragnarok was the best Thor movie. Considering I hated the first two, that isn't saying a lot but I'm happy to say it was pretty decent movie. Spider-Man Homecoming was serviceable, Black Panther looks tight.

So on that subject, I'm just seeing all this now but... Better a year and a half late, with more films out as examples, than never:

Marvel movies all conform in a way that has a recognizable style. That's all I was saying.

This is 100% true and they did by design. After, I think the first Avengers movie, they started making all the Marvel films look and feel the same. In terms of writing style the Marvel films started to lean much more towards comedy, which has it's place, but has gone overboard. For example, Thor himself shouldn't be cracking actual jokes. His character is best when he says funny things out of ignorance or arrogance (or both). The recent Thor movie shows Thor acting more like Star Lord in it's opening scene, making up of his predicament and joking about spinning on a rope. It's minor, and doesn't hurt the film overall, but Thor isn't the type of character that should know he's funny. This lean towards accessible comedy directly contrasts what DC had done with Man Of Steel and Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice (horrible title) and it's kept Marvel's films more successful. Justice League had Joss Whedon go in and try to punch up the comedy just to compete, and Suicide Squad attempted it with reshoots, however I think Marvel should dial it back to pre-Avengers levels.

For example, Captain America: The First Avenger (mediocre title) is probably still my favourite Marvel film thus far because everything in it is perfectly measured. It has funny moments, and serious ones, and treats the character with a level of respect that I, frankly, wasn't sure they could pull off. At the time, this was a big roll of the dice--Captain America and the Red Skull on film can very easily go wrong. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs8rFsmhNTc) I feel that care for tone in Marvel films had been pushed a bit to the side for a while post-Avengers, however I think they are starting the right the ship with Thor Ragnarok and Black Panther.

Now looks-wise, we have a whole other thing. By shooting digital and adding a blue-grey wash, Marvel forced a bunch of it's films to fit a rubric of "The Marvel Universe". It makes sense in theory; Force the idea of a cohesive universe on these popcorn munching idiots. In practice however, all the movies started to look like garbage (in aesthetic terms only) when the audience wasn't THAT stupid in the first place. We don't need colour grading to inform us that Dr. Strange exists in the same universe as Ultron. I specifically noticed it for myself during the huge fight scene in Civil War. I sat in the theatre thinking "This is all I've wanted and it looks terrible, why is this not enjoyable?"

Recently they've gone back to varying the colour palette at least a little bit, which I appreciate. All of this has been done very well in Marvel's Netflix shows. There is a very well done video essay on the subject of colour grading in Marvel movies. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpWYtXtmEFQ)

I've only watched two of the new era DC movies, I think they all look awful, and only one of those had 2/3 good acts. That was Wonder Woman. The other one I've watched was Man of Steel, which is one of the worst things I have ever seen and I've watched people at an apple store before.

The Infinity War trailer came out today. I don't often like to watch trailers for things I know I'm seeing anyway, but I took a look and I honestly have no idea what I think of it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 30 November 2017, 17:28:01
I watched the trailer yesterday and I wasn't impressed. As you said, Marvel movies are all becoming the same to the point where Captain America: Civil War was boring (which makes me sad because it should've knocked it out of the park). I liked Doctor Strange but trippy visuals aside, it felt like Iron Man. The only deviation that seems to be allowed is GotG.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 1 December 2017, 14:24:41
Yeah, like... It's tremendous and I should be over the moon but that trailer was just exactly what I expected it to be. I guess I wanted to learn more about the story? I don't usually like that, but we already know a bunch of the AVENGERS would be in it. Probably not a trailer directed at people who were already gonna go, though.

Plus visually it's a very bland trailer. Like Iron Man in Hulkbuster armor flies in front a city that is very near to his colour palette--That's not a good look. I know the movie will probably knock my socks off (and I'll never get them back on) but the trailer didn't move the needle either way for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 2 December 2017, 05:49:55
So as you guys may know, I do reviews for video games for my friend's podcast, The SML Podcast. Each episode is long as hell, but it's pretty fun. Anyway, occasionally he is given a movie to review - last one they did was Need For Speed, if that gives you an idea. I was given this independent look at the Call of Duty franchise called CODumentary, which got a physical media release as well as Steam, iTunes, and I think Amazon.

It's just not very good. It's one-sided, a lot of talking heads, you don't really learn anything unless you know absolutely nothing about the series, and the last thirty minutes is about how COD is God's gift to eSports and focuses on a bunch of players who we aren't given reasons to give a ##### about them. It's just plain bad, and worse there were three storylines that they could've followed that would've been infinitely more interesting (even if it meant we got three short documentaries!), but drop them as side notes. Avoid, avoid, avoid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 4 December 2017, 02:44:58
CoD is ALWAYS an "avoid".  You don't need to tell us that.  But we appreciate it none the less.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Snare on 4 December 2017, 18:52:11
The only good cod is the kind served on a stick and dipped in caramel.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 4 December 2017, 22:19:05
Who eats fish with caramel?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 4 December 2017, 22:55:02
CoD is ALWAYS an "avoid".  You don't need to tell us that.  But we appreciate it none the less.

This was about five years ago, but I took a marketing survey about how I played Call of Duty, and one of the situations they asked about was about releasing the single-player campaign as a standalone download for $20. I was really enthusiastic about it, because I couldn't give a ##### about multiplayer, but they never bothered doing it. Disappointed by that, really.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 5 December 2017, 18:41:17
Maybe they're like current EA and they think no one wants single-player anymore.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Orange Devil on 23 December 2017, 06:26:25
Did anyone see The Last Jedi? I thought it was pretty cool. I'm hearing lots of complaints but I think that's bound to happen with Star Wars.

Spoiler:
Do you think Luke had those Banthas imported because he just loves blue milk so much?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 23 December 2017, 09:48:14
Those were not Banthas...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 23 December 2017, 16:30:40
Those Walrus cow tiddies were a little bit too much like human tiddies and not enough like cow udders.

And the look of pleasure on it's face, weird.

Also good catch with the blue milk.


Also I was disappointed by most aspects of the film, but it did have some of the coolest scenes in star wars yet.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 28 December 2017, 06:17:35
This movie didn't COMPLETELY knock my socks off because it had its weird moments, but for me it was a fun ride throughout. It's hard to make a long movie really feel like an epic without making it just plain boring; I think they pulled off the pacing very well. That's partly my attitude, though. I bought tickets to this film to enjoy it, even if I had to see it as more of a "ride" than an actual film.

I almost laughed aloud at Luke's character... at least once. For the most part I thought Luke was very entertaining but I'm not sure I understood his motivations.

Oversensitive spoiler tag that doesn't spoil much just in case you still accidentally click on it:
[spoiler]I feel like the "twist" at the end should have been obvious to anyone who has an inkling to what the Jedi are all about. And if you're asking which one, I mean the one involving a character and a lot of explosions. It surprises me more that anyone was surprised. I still thought it was cool though.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 January 2018, 20:47:53
I thought it was pretty good. I was really high on it coming out of the theatre. I haven't really cooled down other than people trying to make me. Overall I dug it, I could just use a few less jokes (felt a bit like a Marvel movie at the start, and I've already ranted about the jokes therein).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 4 January 2018, 19:31:21
It had all of the things that I would say a Star Wars sequel should have; I'll give it that. I felt pretty much the same way about the latest Pirates movie. Though I felt that Star Wars was overwhelmingly on the better side of fun than Pirates was, I enjoyed both. I may decide to watch it again, and of course I probably inevitably will, and maybe then I'll have a better understanding of how I feel about... some of the things that happened and whether they make sense to me or not.

But I guess for every overpowered character or weird lucky thing that happens you can justify it as "the force wants them to succeed" anyway.

Those Walrus cow tiddies were a little bit too much like human tiddies and not enough like cow udders.

And the look of pleasure on it's face, weird.

Every time I check this thread and read this, I chuckle a little.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 6 January 2018, 19:16:38
I'd say I enjoyed Thor: Ragnorok about 3 times as much as TLJ.

Definitely want to see Ragnarok again, it was just FUN.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 16 February 2018, 18:50:53
TLJ was pretty great, but I'm going to need to see it again to absorb everything. Disappointed I never got around to seeing it in IMAX 3D, but it has hit the cheap seats, so maybe I can see it multiple times?

My wife and I saw Justice League, and while it wasn't great, it was a lot of fun. It throws a lot of stuff at you with only a couple of chances to breathe once things start moving, but that's possibly because Warner Brothers was adamant to keeping the film under two hours. There were only a couple of scenes that felt like they were Joss Whedon's touch, so I'm curious what all he added or reshot. It still wasn't the most coherent movie, but it was a fun ride. I'm a little disappointed that we don't have an extended or director's cut, but of course that may come a few years down the road. Not sure IMAX or 3D would've added anything. I'm stoked for the rest of the DCEU movies.

Watched an Australian drama called John Doe: Vigilante, which was like Anonymous (the group back when they were SJWs), Boondock Saints, and Jigsaw from Saw mashed together. It was interesting enough, with the main character breaking the fourth wall a few times during the end. What I find really odd is that the movie's website is long gone, but the Facebook page for it is still updating. They haven't discussed the movie since 2014, but it regularly updates with social justice stories in a "You need to get pissed about this and do something!" kind of way. I'm really curious who's running the page.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: White Shadow on 19 February 2018, 16:48:12
like Anonymous (the group back when they were SJWs)

Feels like an eternity now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 19 February 2018, 22:09:13
Finally watched Wonder Woman. Hated it.

Watched Black Panther, it was really good. Killmonger's theme was one of my favorite parts of the film. Got me so hyped.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 20 February 2018, 17:55:29
I watched CHiPS. Went in with low expectations because it was universally hated, but I really dug it. Not great, but there were plenty of laugh-out-loud moments for me, and it was fun. I'd be down for a sequel, but the disastrous box office ensures there won't be.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 21 February 2018, 13:29:14
Black Panther was a lot of fun. Over time I could see it getting high on my list of these movies. It had more depth to the story than most of Marvel's latest ones combined, especially considering that while Thor: Ragnarok was fun it was ultimately thin in plot.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 21 February 2018, 14:27:00
I saw Black Panther last night, and I agree.  The plot and themes in it were surprisingly deep, and relevant.  It was a solid movie, one of Marvel's best for sure.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 March 2018, 03:25:53
Watched "Midway", which is about the decisive US naval victory against the Japanese in WWII. It was okay, but some of the acting was crappy, the real footage used was not as exciting as one would've hoped, I wasn't thrilled that there was no epilogue given for the surviving characters, and I'm pretty sure this movie was a last-ditch effort to persuade the public that what we were doing in Vietnam was right (that also came out after the war was over). The timing of the movie, the amount of real footage they got to use, and the fact that bunch of heroic Americans are killing a bunch of Asians feels very much like expensive Pentagon propaganda.

Posted on: February 21, 2018, 09:26:01 PM

As far as animated comic book movies go, Batman: Gotham by Gaslight was pretty damn good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 30 June 2018, 07:41:48
I saw Deadpool 2. I might never have seen it but an opportunity came up. I actually think I like it more than the first movie.

I didn't have high expectations going in. It somehow managed to come out more creative, at least in my view. The first Deadpool seemed to rest on Deadpool's novelty in terms of a movie audience. It worked, and everyone loved it, but I kind of came out thinking, well... I think I enjoyed the humour most of all, but the villain and like half of the plot was just uninteresting to me. The second Deadpool seemed to have a lot more of the stuff that works.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 2 July 2018, 06:50:37
I was surprised I ended up liking Deadpool 2 more than 1, by a bit.  I still dislike the casting/random race changing for Domino, and Cable was short and not makeuped well, but for what both characters were, I liked them, and honestly, Deadpool himself is just so god damn perfect I can't not love it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 2 July 2018, 17:53:15
The plot of Deadpool 2 seemed more like one of those 5-part episodes that 90's marvel cartoons like the X-Men & Spider Man did back in the day, and it's so perfect. 

Man I missed the 90's cartoons like X-Men & Spider-Man.  Those were the days.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: LCrazy11 on 2 July 2018, 18:35:49
i may not have been around in the 90's but those were good shows, along with beast wars


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 3 July 2018, 02:55:11
I'm glad I never knew who Domino was so I could go ahead and not invest any energy into forming an opinion on her race. I thought she was awesome though. I should also get the OST at some point because the music was another one of the high points.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 July 2018, 17:02:40
I saw Deadpool 2. I might never have seen it but an opportunity came up. I actually think I like it more than the first movie.

I didn't have high expectations going in. It somehow managed to come out more creative, at least in my view. The first Deadpool seemed to rest on Deadpool's novelty in terms of a movie audience. It worked, and everyone loved it, but I kind of came out thinking, well... I think I enjoyed the humour most of all, but the villain and like half of the plot was just uninteresting to me. The second Deadpool seemed to have a lot more of the stuff that works.

Agree 100%. I didn't really like the first Deadpool movie that much, probably because I was already familiar with the character and the movie was only there to introduce him. I felt like all the jokes were obvious from a mile away, and that he really didn't feel like Deadpool much (not helped by the fact he was barely in costume in the movie). In particular, the scene where he freaks out that girl was taken and starts yelling "get the guns, get all the guns!" felt very non-Deadpool to me.

I liked the second one so much more, his characterization was much better, the jokes weren't nearly as obvious, but more importantly it wasn't as gimmicky. I thought Domino was excellent, I couldn't care less about her race. She acted with the personality of the character from the comics just fine, and that's all I cared about. I thought Cable was really good too, though I wish they touched more on him actually being a mutant with powers and not just guns. I don't really consider 5' 11" as "short", but I guess I'm bias. Regardless, I've never read a Cable comic (and I've read a lot) where his height was even a topic, I think people are just making this a thing because hating on short people is still popular.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 4 July 2018, 01:32:58
Guns are Cable's main thing though. When I was a kid, my three favorite Marvel characters were Cable, War Machine, and the Punisher. Why? Because they brought the big guns. Everything else was secondary.

I watched At the Earth's Core, which is an old British sci-fi film from the 1970s. If you ever get a chance to see it, you should probably do it baked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 4 July 2018, 15:17:07
Guns are Cable's main thing though. When I was a kid, my three favorite Marvel characters were Cable, War Machine, and the Punisher. Why? Because they brought the big guns. Everything else was secondary.

Yeaaahh... It's not like I said he shouldn't have had guns. I just would have liked if they touched on the fact that he's mutant AT ALL. I can't even remember them mentioning it once. I understand that maybe him having telepathy would have been a problem for the narrative, but it's easily solved by just saying he can't read a mind as scrambled as Wade's.

I get what you're saying, and it definitely wasn't necessary to get into him being a mutant for this movie, but I think a mention of it would have been good. His powers were a central part of the Cable & Deadpool comics, and while I don't want them to pursue those storylines in film, I just can't see his powers as ancillary. Especially when his storyline in the movie has multiple ties to the Hope storyline from the comics, which was completely about the future of mutant-kind.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 28 October 2018, 13:16:58
I watched Action Point last night, as it's already out on Bluray. If you're a fan of Jackass, you'll be disappointed because there aren't enough stunts or gags to make it really worth your time, and Knoxville is really starting to show his age. In the opening scenes (at Action Point), he's walking with an obvious limp, but supposedly he ended up going to the ER like 14 times during shooting of the film, so...yeah. On the other hand, the plot isn't written well enough for you to care, so it's kind of like "Who exactly was the target market for this movie?" It would've brought in plenty of 15 year-olds back in the mid 00s, but nowadays I wonder if today's kids even watch Jackass, and I can't see it bringing in older fans (which it obviously didn't at the box office). It wasn't terrible, but it's very forgettable. I doubt I'll ever watch it again.

Posted on: August 26, 2018, 12:45:12 AM

Watching Jumpin' Jack Flash as it was a favorite of my wife when she was a kid, and I've been watching The Masque of the Red Death (with Vincent Price) in chunks when I get a chance.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 5 January 2019, 19:31:50
Into the Spiderverse is the best Spiderman film and probably one of the best superhero films ever made don't @ me


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 6 January 2019, 04:45:58
I plan on taking my son to see it when it gets to the cheap seats.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 6 January 2019, 05:58:46
It was fun and good.

Aside from that there was nothing that really bothered me about it which is a step up from pretty much any other Spidey film. Even moments that could have come off cheesy if they were handled ineptly, didn't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 January 2019, 16:57:33
I have some friends that worked on it, pretty proud of them. I've been a Miles Morales fan for years now, and I was pretty happy with the film. The conceit that it's all about multiple universes is great because you don't have to have that "well in the books THIS was different" thing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Jakey on 8 January 2019, 22:03:33
Same, I was really stoked with how they wrote him. Definitely felt similar to the comics, which I guess makes sense since Bendis had his hand in it too.

I'm honestly glad it didn't follow the actual Spiderverse series with all of its vampire #####. Though, I am sad I didn't get to see my favorite alternate Spiderman (http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Hobart_Brown_(Earth-138)), or more of 2099.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 9 January 2019, 14:18:48
Those two (and Miles) are my favourite Spideys for sure. I loved the comic Spider-Verse storyline but it wouldn't work well as a movie at all really, though I think you could adapt some of it for the sequel like the entire hunt thing.

I think this version of Miles is different enough from the comics one you could even have the comic version show up as a cameo, since it's the Spider-VERSE after all.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 9 January 2019, 20:00:28
I liked the actual story arc of the Spider-Verse in the comics. The first part of the first arc introducing Morlun was one of if not the very first actual Spider-Man comic book I ever read, by happenstance, and it took ages before I finally finished that arc, and then Spider-Verse, but I enjoyed all of it.

I don't care that it was different though. It only bothers me when it's different if it feels like the actual spirit of the thing never translated. I could maybe argue that that's the case here, but the movie had a soul of its own that I was satisfied with.

Actually now that I think about it, the only thing that bothered me was Doc Ock. I mean, Doc Ock is SUPPOSED to be a [spoiler]roboticist!!! What's she doing opening portals to other dimensions?![/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 January 2019, 17:44:34
Oh yeah I loved the comic, and I don't care that it was different. Was just saying it leaves it more open this way. What I DON'T like is people who clearly never read the comics saying the movie was "pretty close" to them with some authority they don't have, but that might just be my workplace.

[spoiler]I think in this universe Doc Ock is meant to be more of a multi-hyphenate all around science-person, so she's into all avenues, and just gets hired by The Kingpin to do research for his selfish plan.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 15 January 2019, 01:53:47
[spoiler]True. I mean I wasn't serious; while I do think that the more fields you'd need to study and master to be able to have robotic arms grafted to yourself that you can mentally control (though I guess that was an accident) while also doing all of this other highly technical stuff in completely different fields sort of diminishes the core traits of the character, you could probably argue that the Doc Ock in the comics already does a lot of that anyway. I mean at the very least he does transcend the sum of his own physical parts and transfers the essence of himself onto another person and succeeds Spider-Man. He probably does a whole lot of other weird stuff that I've probably never even seen because I mostly only read from issues 500-730-ish.

The way that I think I would write the character is to keep him strictly to neurology and mechanical engineering to keep him believable, but I really didn't mind in the case of the movie. There was so much to the movie that was just pure fun and clearly not meant to be taken seriously.[/spoiler]


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 March 2019, 17:48:38
I finished up the Outrage trilogy with Outrage Coda. Well done slow burn.

Posted on: February 13, 2019, 05:00:29 PM

Wife and I watched Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween last night. Not great, but it was pretty fun.

Posted on: March 01, 2019, 04:01:44 PM

Holy ##### guys, Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse was insanely great. Deserves every award it gets.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 11 March 2019, 17:59:16
The final end sequence was golden.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 13 March 2019, 18:56:46
Yeah Speeeeeeeeed, that's why I saw it when it came ooooouutt!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 March 2019, 18:55:34
My oldest son loved it although he through Prowler was scary at points. He wants a Miles "big guy" (the 12 inch figures) now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 March 2019, 13:24:03
The animation on Prowler is fantastic, while I like his normal look I don't think they've ever had a better version of the character.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 23 March 2019, 14:00:51
Finished watching Gimme Danger, which is a documentary about Iggy & The Stooges. Interesting listening to them talk about their times.

Posted on: March 19, 2019, 04:06:39 PM

If you get a chance, check out Peter Jackson's World War I documentary "They Shall Not Grow Old". The switch to the colorization is jarring, and you suddenly feel like you're there with them, no longer watching men filmed over 100 years ago. It's haunting, sobering, beautiful, and ugly. Stick around for the short documentary post-credits where Jackson talks about how the documentary was made and his personal attachment to the project.

One crazy and sad moment that the film didn't reeeally mention but Jackson did later, is that there's one shot where you're watching a bunch of soldiers looking at the camera, some laughing, some looking scared out of their minds...pretty much all of them died 30 minutes after the footage was taken.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 1 May 2019, 12:35:38
So that new Sonic Trailer huh?

I...uh...er....what?

No.  Just bloody no.

Why is it even a thing? 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 1 May 2019, 14:13:17
I can not wait for the game based on the movie!  This is going to be Street Fighter 2 the movie the game bad!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: LCrazy11 on 1 May 2019, 14:22:16
So that new Sonic Trailer huh?

I...uh...er....what?

No.  Just bloody no.

Why is it even a thing? 
to get a money


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 1 May 2019, 15:50:58
The funny thing is that the Detective Pikachu movie actually looks really good for a video game adaptation. The models, while creepy, look like an accurate representation of Pokemon in the real world and actually fits.

I don't expect to go see it, but still. 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 1 May 2019, 21:46:47
I expect to see the Sonic movie above/under the influence.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 8 May 2019, 13:29:34
Can't wait for the memes about how fast it left the theatre and went to home video.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 9 May 2019, 01:22:58
It's the gift that keeps on giving.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 27 May 2019, 16:57:35
Finally finished The Equalizer 2 the other night. I thought it was good, but not as good as the first one. I hope that more get made, because I liked that it was a mature (as in, the target audience is 35 and up) action movie and we don't get enough of those these days.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 29 May 2019, 15:49:01
Detective Pikachu was a good movie.  I'd recommend it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 31 May 2019, 07:25:36
I was expecting better.

It certainly wasn't soulless, though. Good is a pretty fair assessment, and I could tell a lot of effort was put into it.

I saw John Wick 3 and it didn't disappoint. Some of the action could have been done better (and by that I mean I could maybe pick out a shot or two that felt either badly choreographed or just botched, and that's not saying much). Overall I liked pretty much everything about it.

Bad Times at the El Royale: also very good.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 3 June 2019, 16:50:14
I thought Detective Pikachu was pretty good all in all. It's in a very odd place, right, because it's a kid's movie (and directed as such) who's main demographic is 30 year-olds. There was a fair amount of moments where I felt like I was watching a higher budget Disney Channel movie, but then also lots of moments where I thought they did an incredible job. I would definitely watch another Pokemon movie in that style.


I didn't really like the first John Wick but I plan to check out the others eventually. I found the first one very flat compared to how hyped it is.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 8 June 2019, 19:14:53
To me, Detective Pikachu felt like the opposite. It felt like the movie's targeted demographic was kids, and then it was marketed to older audiences.

We had Pikachu drinking in a seedy bar, we had Ryan Reynolds joking about abandoning his wife and kids to put himself into the role, and we had Bonnie Tyler from the 80s singing in one of the trailers. Just as examples I could remember at the moment.

I wasn't expecting anything like Michael Bay's Transformers or Ninja Turtles or that recent Power Rangers flick but I wasn't expecting Spy Kids vibes either. Perhaps that's a more difficult line to walk than I thought.

One thing I'll say about John Wick sequels is that they expand upon the universe in interesting ways. I don't know about hype. It's this combination of violent escalation and things getting weirder and weirder that keep it interesting for me.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 27 June 2019, 17:48:07
Actually I think we're on the same page. I felt it was definitely marketed to older audiences yeah, but shot like a kid's movie. Especially the Torterra sequence.

With John Wick I just always hear people go "You haven't seen it?!?!" or are surprised when people don't like the first one. There's an air about it as if it's ground breaking but I've seen better revenge films. It lacked substance, imo. It's weird, I like everyone in it but it just didn't live up to the hype. I do think I'll enjoy the sequels more though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 12 November 2019, 13:09:53
New Sonic trailer is out and it looks MUCH better.  Almost makes me think they purposely did a ##### trailer for a publicity stunt then go LOL JK here is the fixed version in a ploy to trick people into thinking that they are "listening to the complaints of the fans"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 12 November 2019, 22:24:42
Conspiracy theories!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 12 November 2019, 22:54:00
I'm legit stoked for the Sonic movie now. I was on board with it before because I'm like "wtf adaptations, just entertain me", but now I'm excited to take my oldest son to it.

I watched Dead Trigger, which is based on the F2P fps zombie shooter. It was #####ing awful, and it's no wonder Mad Finger Games wanted nothing to do with it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 14 November 2019, 18:24:01
Since the first trailer came I out I believed they did that on purpose as a stunt marketing move and I have no reason to believe otherwise. It's not that simple to suddenly hit the brakes and change the MAIN CHARACTER's entire model from a nearly finished movie.

And since the new trailer doesn't have that many scenes in common with the old trailer I'm still thinking this was always how Sonic would look and they knew people would get persnickety about his design, so they threw everyone off with a worse one. I'm willing to bet only scenes of the original trainer exist that have that old design. It's marketing 101 on the level of "Sega does what Nintendon't", but I still don't find the movie particularly enticing.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 14 November 2019, 19:40:50
It looks decent enough to see.  So I will.  Before the model swap it looked like it might fall into the "so bad it's good" category.  Now it looks like it might just be decent on it's own merit.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: LCrazy11 on 14 November 2019, 23:02:51
in film studies my class is studying teen rebel movies, first we did "rebel without a cause", it was cool
not we are doing "ferris buellers day off", it's a ton of fun to watch


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 15 November 2019, 13:59:00
Those a good flicks and wildly different, you have a good teacher.

For Sonic, I'm hoping to see a little more about it before I decide if I'll go to a theatre for it. Have had diminishing returns in terms of good experiences in movie theatres in the past decade...

Whatever my terrible luck is, I'm always sat right near the person on their phone (every movie), the teen girls fake laughing while kicking chairs and throwing popcorn (How To Train Your Dragon 2), or someone starts a huge screaming fight at the start of the movie (Avengers: Endgame). With a 4k television and a lovely room, it's just a better experience streaming a movie and curling up with my fiance and my cat.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 December 2019, 22:00:32
Doom: Annihilation is obviously straight-to-video/made-for-cable fare, and doesn't get going until the last act. Avoid.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 11 December 2019, 14:53:59
Appreciated, but you didn't really need to tell us to avoid it, that was self evident from the first trailer!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 December 2019, 21:00:39
Notice how there was no dialogue? Yeah, there was a reason. Honestly though, the set design was pretty good; enough that I was wondering if they were using the sets from another movie/TV show.

The film is pretty much "What if Alien, but boring actors wearing 'armor' from the company paintball tournament?"


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 12 December 2019, 19:34:17
Frozen 2 stinks, but I didn't like the first one either.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 13 December 2019, 13:30:55
Doom: Annihilation is obviously straight-to-video/made-for-cable fare, and doesn't get going until the last act. Avoid.

It was very obvious from the get-go that it was going to be a trainwreck. 


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 17 December 2019, 14:10:46
The fact that it's a Doom movie in the first place...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 17 December 2019, 19:18:52
I maintain you COULD make a good Doom movie.  They just won't.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 18 December 2019, 01:54:17
How would you go about making a DOOM movie Rez?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 18 December 2019, 19:57:34
I'm not a screen writer, but we've had good movies based on properties.

The original Mortal Kombat wans't too bad overall.
Clue is the best board game adaptation ever done (and a good movie to boot).

I'm sure i could come up with more if I thought about it, but off the top of my head that's what pops up.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 December 2019, 14:26:54
I saw Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and while I thought it was underwhelming, I thought it was a fine end to the Skywalker saga. My main issue is that it spent a lot of time apologizing for The Last Jedi, but hey, maybe it was headed in this direction anyway when they were originally mapping the sequel trilogy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: NovaMan XP on 21 December 2019, 22:53:46
I saw it last night and I liked it overall. There were some moments that were dumb or unnecessary but I think those kinds of moments happen in every Star Wars movie...


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 December 2019, 13:10:28
I threw my hands up in a "wtf what kind of motivation do these characters have to do THAT?!" action quite a few times, but I left the theater feeling waaaaaay better than The Last Jedi. I'm kind of glad it retconned a lot of that movie, too.

Although, the Emperor's reintroduction message being a Fortnite Exclusive is unforgivable.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 2 January 2020, 18:27:44
I saw Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and while I thought it was underwhelming, I thought it was a fine end to the Skywalker saga. My main issue is that it spent a lot of time apologizing for The Last Jedi, but hey, maybe it was headed in this direction anyway when they were originally mapping the sequel trilogy.

Mapping the sequel trilogy?  They had not road map.  It was done in the most haphazard way possible.  It's been well documented by leaks from multiple sources that it was a cluster ##### behind the scenes the entire way through.  And frankly, looking at the movies we got, it explains everything.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 31 March 2021, 19:39:09
I bought a movie called "Vampire Cleanup Department" last night for $2, because with a name and price like that, why the hell not?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 1 April 2021, 14:54:35
It's always good to have a few movies to watch while wasted.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 April 2021, 16:09:16
Looking forward to the Mortal Kombat movie coming out later this week. Something to keep me entertained while recovering from round 2 of the Pfizer vaccine.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 18 April 2021, 21:09:20
Is that thing already releasing?  The live action one?  I guess I didn't notice they had a release date for it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 19 April 2021, 00:29:39
Yeah, it was supposed to release last week, but they pushed it back a week.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 26 April 2021, 17:52:57
I was baked as hell, but I really enjoyed the new Mortal Kombat movie. The plot is a tad crap and convoluted, but they had a nice selection of characters, the fights were awesome, and the guy who played Kano stole the movie. I'm looking forward to a sequel.

At this point, the Mortal Kombat has retconned and reinserted everything to hell with more timelines than Doctor Who, so I'm fairly whatever about the plot - I just view it as yet another timeline that got redone with MK11's bull#####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 28 April 2021, 13:23:19
As far as movie adaptation of videogames go, I'd say Mortal Kombat was fine. I enjoyed it for being a dumb action movie with some OK fanservice. It was also refreshing that there was no sexualization of characters or romantic subplots. Established Husband/Father wants to protect his family, how refreshingly simple.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 4 July 2021, 17:25:05
I watched the Steven Seagal classic "Out For Justice," which was a dumb film with bad acting, but some decent action scenes. I don't get how Hollywood was like "Yeah, we're totally going to buy Steven's terrible fake NYC accent" FOR MULTIPLE FILMS.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 July 2021, 18:23:43
Got baked and watched Cobra. The fact that the movie made $160 million in 1986 dollars worldwide just shows that cocaine was king. Also, the soundtrack sucks.

Tonight I'll be watching a JCVD movie, either Hard Target or The Order.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 7 November 2021, 14:21:28
Dune was swell.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 7 November 2021, 14:28:01
Dune was swell.

Yeah, my wife and I really enjoyed Dune. It was the first date night we'd had since the pandemic. I would've liked to have seen it in IMAX, but we couldn't remember if it was the large screen or 3D (or both) that made my wife sick last time, so we didn't want to risk ruining one of her favorite novels on a large format and just saw it on a normal screen - which was fine. To be honest, it looks like it would be great to see in IMAX, but if you can only do normal for the first part, you'll be okay. Now Dune Part 2 - that NEEDS to be seen in IMAX. Also, I want to say that my only experience with Dune was the 1984 movie, and I was very impressed with the pacing in the 2021 version and how they were able to explain so much political and economic stuff without making it boring or losing the audience.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 10 November 2021, 02:10:06
I'm quite looking forward to Ghostbusters Afterlife.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 10 November 2021, 18:56:18
I'm quite looking forward to Ghostbusters Afterlife.

Early reviews were mixed; pretty much everyone said when it was trying to be its own thing it's great, when it tries to go for the nostalgia factor it loses it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 10 November 2021, 19:34:46
The nostalgia can only be good.  Mix that with it's own thing and I think it will be great.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 20 November 2021, 23:45:48
I saw Ghostbusters Afterlife and it was amazing.  Go see it.  This is everything I wanted in a movie.  It has a deliberate pace and is a bit of a slow burn, but I never felt like it was dragging.  The build up to the end was fantastic, and the climax legit had me tear up a bit.

It has a nice mix of horror and comedy, much like the first Ghostbusters.  The characters were all pretty well done, and even though it moves along comfortably, no scene overstays it's welcome.  I didn't find any hints of "woke" anywhere.  Phoebe is a great and likable kid, who is far from the Mary Sue I've seen her described as.

It treats the continuity of the series with great respect while also being it's own thing.  The callbacks and easter eggs are just a cherry on top of the films specific plot and they work great.  Honestly, from a plot stand point it's really more of a direct sequel to 1 than to 2, so while I liked 2 ok, that was more of another adventure, whereas Afterlife directly tackles plot points from the first film.  I really enjoyed that.  It wraps up the original Ghostbusters story really well.  Afterlife can serve as a finale, or maybe a jumping off point for more.  This really does feel like an 80s movie, in all the best and right ways.

I left the theater with a big smile.  THIS is the kind of movie fans want.  Not pandering, not "message" above entertainment, not quotas or check lists.  Fun.  A good adventure.  This is proof good movies can still be made, Hollywood just chooses NOT to.

Go see this movie.  We need to support good films like this.  And when you do see it, stay ALL the way to the end past the black screen credit rolls.  There is another scene before the curtains come down.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 21 November 2021, 02:41:45
I'm pretty sold on it, then. Alas, The French Dispatch is our theater trip for tomorrow. Ghostbusters will have to be later in the week.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 21 November 2021, 03:49:20
Pull some kind of "I'll buy the tickets" jujutsu and "accidently" buy Ghostbuster tickets instead.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 November 2021, 17:51:29
I like the Dune novel so I liked the movie. I'm curious what people who didn't read the book thought of the film, since I'm sure there's a lot of seemingly random terms being thrown at you with little explanation.

I'm not interested in Ghostbusters, I don't actually have any affinity for the franchise, but I find it odd that (based solely on the trailer) this adaptation is trying to add some sort of seriousness to the concept that was never there to begin with. I'm glad to hear this one's good though, I'll probably check it out on streaming.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 22 November 2021, 18:14:25
I've never read any of the Dune novels, and my only experience with it before the current movie is the one from 1984. I thought the old movie was okay, but I barely remember anything about it and the constant inner monologue was annoying. The new Dune movie I thought was really cool and made all of the political/economic stuff way more accessible to general audiences; my wife thought that alone was a huge feat in of itself.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 22 November 2021, 18:17:39
Interesting. I've never seen the 80's movie to compare but that's good to know, 'cause I feel like the truly unique plot stuff doesn't come up until the second half so I was wondering if people would stick around for it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 22 November 2021, 21:00:19
I like the Dune novel so I liked the movie. I'm curious what people who didn't read the book thought of the film, since I'm sure there's a lot of seemingly random terms being thrown at you with little explanation.

I'm not interested in Ghostbusters, I don't actually have any affinity for the franchise, but I find it odd that (based solely on the trailer) this adaptation is trying to add some sort of seriousness to the concept that was never there to begin with. I'm glad to hear this one's good though, I'll probably check it out on streaming.

It's not any more serious than the original Ghostbusters.  Both are a mix of horror and comedy.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 22 November 2021, 22:34:31
I like the Dune novel so I liked the movie. I'm curious what people who didn't read the book thought of the film, since I'm sure there's a lot of seemingly random terms being thrown at you with little explanation.

I'm not interested in Ghostbusters, I don't actually have any affinity for the franchise, but I find it odd that (based solely on the trailer) this adaptation is trying to add some sort of seriousness to the concept that was never there to begin with. I'm glad to hear this one's good though, I'll probably check it out on streaming.
Dune was swell.

I knew it would be dense going into it, but the pacing and presentation of the important information was so well balanced! It felt like a book being adapted to a film: the side characters weren't as fleshed out as they could have been, BUT their importance to the protagonists and the overall plot felt adequate. Specifically, Jason Momoa, and Josh Brolin's characters, as well as the magical doctor guy.

It did what a great adaption should do: inspire you to read the books and delve deeper into the lore.

I loved it, and the whole time I was thinking (and even said to my wife) "This is like Star Wars for adults."

I watched at home, steaming, on my aging 65" TV with dolby atmos surround, and it was a GREAT experience. I could tell that some scenes would have been even more breathtaking in IMAX.

Dune is next on my Audiobook list now.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 January 2022, 16:07:55
Watched the 4K edition of RoboCop. Holy hell what a film.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 March 2022, 23:09:49
I got baked and watched Dungeons & Dragons for the first time. Holy hell that movie is bad. It's a fan film with theatrical distribution, although some parts were cool, there's a part about halfway through that you can tell they just cut out a ton of #####.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 10 March 2022, 14:51:50
If a movie isn't good when baked, you know it's cooked.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 11 March 2022, 22:41:29
If a movie isn't good when baked, you know it's cooked.

Ehhhhhh there's some movies that are hilarious when I'm sober but dumb when I'm baked - usually comedies. Monty Python and the Holy Grail and Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle are two movies I've sat through baked as hell and didn't laugh once.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 18 April 2022, 22:14:42
Wife and I took the kids to go see Sonic the Hedgehog 2. We sprung the oldest kid out of school early that day so we could go to a 4:15 showing where there wouldn't be anyone. Whole family enjoyed it and it was great seeing the surprise on their faces once they realized that we were going to a movie theater AND seeing Sonic 2.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 19 April 2022, 14:13:21
Kind of the opposite of when you take your dog to the vet and it realizes it's not going to the park!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 14 June 2022, 19:47:23
We were on vacation in Maine a couple of weeks ago, we watched a few films as a family, and a couple by myself:

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (of course, multiple viewings)
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (oldest son is really into the Silver Surfer and likes the idea of the Fantastic Four - haven't watched this since the theaters, and honestly it was pretty fun. Except for not knowing what to do with Galactus, they did a pretty good job)
Hop (youngest son loves this movie, it is absolute bland kid crap)
Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959)
At the Earth's Core
Marked for Death
Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City (low budget, fairly middling crap movie. Worth a rental)
Constantine: The House of Mystery (good anthology movie, some genuinely weird/#####ed up #####. I'd love there to be an Adult Swim-esque Blue Beetle/The Question cartoon show. Honestly all four cartoons I'd be willing to see sequels to)


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 15 June 2022, 00:59:44
We were on vacation in Maine a couple of weeks ago

And you didn't stop in to say hi?! Preposterous.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 15 June 2022, 16:25:56
Considering you shot at the last person who came onto your property, can you blame him?


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 15 June 2022, 17:28:40
We were on vacation in Maine a couple of weeks ago

And you didn't stop in to say hi?! Preposterous.

#####, I didn't realize you lived there! And now that I go through FB and look at your last job posted...we may have been 10 minutes away. :(


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 17 June 2022, 02:06:49
We were on vacation in Maine a couple of weeks ago

And you didn't stop in to say hi?! Preposterous.

#####, I didn't realize you lived there! And now that I go through FB and look at your last job posted...we may have been 10 minutes away. :(

Now you know, for next time!

Considering you shot at the last person who came onto your property, can you blame him?

It was a throwing axe.
Now you know, for next time!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 31 January 2023, 15:11:17
For real, it is absolutely wild that some of us have been discussing film in this thread since 2007. Like, holy #####, I was still in college and writing for a now-defunct UK film site.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 2 February 2023, 20:38:56
The specters of our youth haunt these blue halls.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 21 April 2023, 04:14:00
The Menu was really well done.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 9 May 2023, 14:48:58
We sprung the kids from school early last week so they could go see an early afternoon showing of Return of the Jedi before it left theaters. Both kids loved it; it was also the second movie my youngest has seen on the big screen (first being Sonic the Hedgehog 2). For me it was great because I haven't seen ROTJ on the big screen since 1997, and as an adult who has easily seen the movie 200+ times, this time I could ignore the plot and just take in all of the stuff going on in the background like the different aliens, set design, details on the matte paintings, etc. Fantastic time!


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 9 May 2023, 15:07:16
I saw it in theatres in 1983 when my brother took me.  I fell asleep because it was something like a 9 pm show or some such thing.  I was only 5 or 6 though.  I don't think I've actually ever seen it in the theatre again since then though.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Speed Racer on 5 July 2023, 14:53:26
Wife and I took the kids to see Across the Spider-Verse which was holy ##### an amazing time. Loved it so damn much, between seeing all of the different suits, the fun jokes for fans, and just a really #####ing good movie. Looking forward to the next installment.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 27 August 2024, 03:56:44
Deadpool & Wolverine was the most recent film I've seen in theatres.

And it's... for a second sequel, it fares about what I'd expect, and I didn't go in with high expectations myself, and had fun with it.

A lot of people are happy with it and had fun with it, and that's great. But it's interesting to me how the popularity of Ryan Reynolds and the Deadpool character make the hype of this movie into something that it just isn't. The best part of the film is right at the beginning and then it's just a slow decline. I enjoyed the movie very much and I'm glad to have seen it but it's weird to me, almost borderline creepy, how impressed some people are with it. I feel like the plot is just incoherent and weird.

I'd love to see Deadpool enter the MCU and if this is the weird transition that explains it, and if there's anything awesome left in the "MCU" to actually be seen, I guess I'll tolerate it.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 28 August 2024, 21:10:21
I thought it was good, dumb fun, which is all I expect from a Deadpool movie.  There have been some things in all 3 I didn't enjoy as much as other parts so overall they're all about on par with each other for me, and I like them.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 29 August 2024, 01:29:55
I thought it was good, dumb fun, which is all I expect from a Deadpool movie.  There have been some things in all 3 I didn't enjoy as much as other parts so overall they're all about on par with each other for me, and I like them.

I cried watching Deadpool 2. Didn't cry for 3. not as good, but still fun enough. If you didn't watch Loki, you're gonna be lost as ##### on TVA stuff.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: TheRedPriest on 6 September 2024, 17:22:25
I don't watch any of the garbage Marvel put out since Endgame.  I keep up on the gist of it, but it's all been such a dumpster fire I have zero interest in anything they're doing.  I think they explained the TVA sufficiently in the movie itself to understand enough to enjoy the movie.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 8 September 2024, 19:29:17
I think Loki and Wandavision were pretty fine shows and showed a promising future.

Falcon and Winter Soldier was like a weird slice of life show for half of it that made me wish it was half as long. I understand what they were going for, but how much can an Avenger talk about a mortgage and a boat? It would fit in the 80's or 90's, but we've had a black president. As far as I understand, that kind of corporate racism is anachronistic for a show taking place in the 2020s.

She-Hulk was a #####in mess though, and turned me off of all of it. Haven't been into anything since that.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: SB on 9 September 2024, 23:47:25
I seen my once-a-decade film not long ago since family wanted to see "Twisters" on the big screen, and it sucked. It could have worked as a Captain Planet film with how the main cast acted during it, but the 90s version did it all much better.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 10 September 2024, 17:29:49
I'm with John here mostly.

I loved Wandavision tbh, I grew up on sitcoms from all eras so the way they played with each decade's tropes was a lot of fun. It became a generic Marvel thing later, which is a little disappointing I guess but overall I didn't mind at the time and I think we really saw Elizabeth Olsen flex her range as an actress with these different roles. I came out of it very much a fan of hers and wanting to see more of her acting (I recommend Love & Death)--for reference I didn't know her before Age of Ultron and they really didn't do ##### with the Wanda character until Wandavision. What I dislike is how they treated the character afterwards in the abysmal Dr. Strange sequel, but imo the first Dr. Strange movie sucked too.

Loki's first season was good. People focus on the office's 60's-70's visual style but I love how on the other side of the windows it had so much aesthetic design taken from Moëbius' art. This season really hit for me because of big I used to be into comics for most of my life, and it really was hitting a lot of cool beats. I imagine if you aren't into that stuff then the show is just fine. I found the second season was only compelling for about two thirds, then just kind of... Was a show. It doesn't help that Jonathan Majors has turned out to be a really bad person.

Falcon and Winter Soldier I enjoyed because I enjoy those characters--well actually I never liked Falcon-Cap in comics, I felt it actually removed agency from one of our few historically standalone Black superheroes making him just another "not-the-REAL-<insert superhero here>" a la Rhodey/War Machine. However the MCU dodges this issue because the character of Sam/Falcon/Cap was just never established at that level and his conversion over to Cap is more organic. But what I liked about the show was actually the exploration of how the "blip" actually improved the lives of many people, moreover how undoing it (a decision made by the haves that didn't consider the have-nots) created a metric #####ton of problems for people at society's bottom. The show's execution can be long and dry but I think that singular concept was interesting enough to make it valuable to me. The US Agent storyline was done decently enough to fit into that larger narrative, it wasn't extremely interesting to me but I don't think there's a better way to execute that storyline. I will disagree, John, that that level of corporate racism is gone in the 2020's. That is very much still alive it's just quiet, especially with corporations hiding behind their performative social media presence. Regardless, as someone who read a lot of the "black" superhero comics in the past I very much enjoyed the nods to "Truth: Red, White, and Black" as well as how that trickled down in one of my favourite Young Avengers' characters: Patriot.


But those are shows, I guess I should see this third Deadpool movie to understand what you guys mean. I haven't had the drive to see it 'cause I never really found the first two THAT great tbh. I'm sure it's just as fun as those though.


Borderlands stunk.
I just finally watched Under The Skin and don't know what I think.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 11 September 2024, 00:48:03
Deadpool & Wolverine is a dumb popcorn movie, with a lot of low brow comedy, but it weaves that amongst good (to great) acting, fun R-rated violence (especially in the first third), insane and unexpected cameos for some beloved edge characters, and an overall wholesome(?) story.

I appreciate the insights, Mike. "As far as I understand" is definitely rooted in my experiences in Maine, one of the least diverse, and (I believe) it is the least black state in the continental 48. I'm also in the more liberal part of the state, where every corporate culture I've been in has been extremely pro-diversity. I guess I wasn't thinking about it from the point of view of more diverse and (often) oppressive areas, and I guess I didn't give it as much attention as it didn't relate to my experiences at all, and wasn't what I thought I'd get from a Marvel show. It's been years since I watched it, but thinking back on it a bit more it holds a bit more weight than I thought.

I also agree that Dr. Strange 2 was doodoo and character murder for Wanda. Strange 1 was middle of the road for MCU at the time, but at least it played a part in the episodic MCU leading up to Infinity/Endgame. Strange 2 was especially bad because, like, what's the payoff? Who cares about the next things. They dropped the ball hard. Deadpool 3 gets right up in their face with it (literally in Jon Favreau's face).


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Mikero on 11 September 2024, 15:30:41
Yeah that totally makes sense, and every city is doing these things differently anyway so I fully get where you're coming from. No judgment here.

That's a good point about Dr. Strange 2, it not leading into anything notable means it just felt as wholly pointless as a lot of post Endgame content. That's why it's even more important that those movies and shows are actually interesting but Multiverse of Madness was nothing of the sort. It's amazing how something that shows a multiverse of possibilities could do so without showing even one slightly memorable AU.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Johncarllos on 12 September 2024, 01:39:20
What changed in Strange 2? Wanda bad now. Wanda dead? Bad Stranges? Fight with Music! Strange has the worst CGI third eye and a new lady pal.

I missed that he wasn't even sorcerer supreme any more and that it was Wong now. I spent the whole movie wondering why they made a film about a weaker and lesser alternate universe Dr. Strange, hoping we would encounter the prime MCU one. Whoops, they nerfed the MCU one (charismatically, mentally and magically) and it was him all along. I left confused and disappointed.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Majikn on 12 September 2024, 02:27:27
I just feel like Deadpool 2 had a much stronger premise and plot. Or at least it connected with me a lot more than the other two. I think that's the main thing. It's hard to say that I'd call any of these movies great, but I thought Deadpool 2 was uniquely satisfying as a superhero movie, and for me that was good enough to say that I enjoyed it and that I think it was an overall good movie.

Deadpool and Wolverine is enjoyable but it just didn't earn my respect in that way.

I was actually thinking of watching Under the Skin recently but haven't had the chance to. I remember watching maybe the first half hour of it closer to when it came out. I don't think I gave it my full attention and just stopped.

I was listening to the soundtrack for it just a couple of weeks ago and I kept waking up at like 2-3am in a pitch black room with Lonely Void playing in my head. The soundtrack for it is beyond.

Not beyond anything in particular.

Just beyond.

It will take you to places that your brain will instantly forget once you stop listening, out of necessity.

To protect your sanity.


Title: Re: The MOVIE Thread
Post by: Xero on 14 September 2024, 15:12:08
The last movie I watched fully was Once upon a time in Hollywood.