|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speed Racer
Super Robot
Posts: 1134
|
|
« Reply #363 on: 11 May 2008, 15:24:43 » |
|
I cringed when I found out Matthew Fox was in it as Racer X.
NOT MY JACK
He's actually great as Racer X. I saw Speed Racer yesterday afternoon. It was fun, and it's obvious that the Wachowski brothers love the series - I'm sure that Tatsuo Yoshida would've been proud of this film. At the same time, I was left disappointed by it. Even though it's visually impressive, it's not a great film, yet not bad either. Probably the most impressive "meh" I've ever seen. Good luck to this film trying to break even; it sure as all hell won't in the USA. Positives: -Feels like a smarter, 2 hr. 15 min. version of the show. -The acting is pretty good, although Matthew Fox was really the only one who stood out to me. -The trippy visuals are awesome. -The race scenes are pretty damn ridiculous and equally awesome. -If you were planning to go see while on various illegal substances, you made a good choice. -The movie is visually stunning. -It's great seeing Peter Ferandez as a TV announcer (the original voice of Speed Racer, I recognized his voice immediately) and Richard Roundtree (the original Shaft) as a race car driver. Negatives -It feels like a 2 hr. 15 min. version of the show. -It feels long for a 2 hr. 15 min. movie, as the pacing is somewhat crappy. -The script isn't the greatest -Too much time is spent building up a plot that feels like it should have ended 20 minutes earlier than it did. -The PG rating ensures that you'll be seeing this with bratty 4 and 5 year-olds unless you go to a late showing. -Not really a negative, but where's Connie Orr (the original voice of Trixie)? Oh yeah, and for those of you who really like the show, there's a subplot introduced that may cause your brain to go bat-##### crazy. It's okay, really. Don't flip out...it resolves itself.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never insult seven people when you only have a six-shooter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinchenz Rock
Super Robot
Posts: 3642
|
|
« Reply #376 on: 20 May 2008, 04:28:54 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jakey
Robot Master
Posts: 736
|
|
« Reply #387 on: 25 May 2008, 21:45:06 » |
|
Guys, don't go see Iron Man. It's the worst #####ing movie ever. Get this, the guy wasn't even made of iron. He was just a man in an iron suit. But get this, the suit wasn't even made of iron. It was like a technometalwhadjahoozit. Total BS. Iron can't even shoot lasers. I looked it up. I'll bet the flying was fake, too. In conclusion. Iron Man sucks. Save your money for Jack Black's panda movie. At least you'll see some real action instead of a couple of pussies firing puss grenades at each other. I give it a 5/5. Posted on: May 21, 2008, 01:27:20 AM
Hey, and don't see Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skullzzz either. I mean, old people, are OLD. And plus Shia Lebouf. I'm surprised I typed that correctly. I'm surprised this movie wasn't MORE RIDICULOUS! I mean, Russians? Aliens? Am I spoiling the movie? Do I care? Did I mention Harrison Ford is old as balls? I think I did not. So now I did. In conclusion. Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skallsz blows big wads of crazy. Kung Fu Panda is sure to be a karate CHOP at the box office, so you should see that instead. I give it a 1up.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ASR
Super Robot
Posts: 10911
|
|
« Reply #388 on: 25 May 2008, 22:08:38 » |
|
I don't want to even bother with the new Indie, but I'll get dragged to see it eventually.
All it means to me is that A) Hollywood is deep into the revival fad and Back to the Future 4 is probably on the way and B) they're going to stop making those delicious Limited Edition Indiana Jones Mint Crisp M&M's soon.
In other news, I bought Pulp Fiction on DVD today on a whim. Mainly because I remembered it being #####ing awesome the last time I saw it, and that was when I was 5-13 years old, somewhere in that range. I can't remember. Watching it now, when I can actually understand and appreciate it for the wonderful film it is, I'm now safely adding it to my small list of Favorite Movies Ever Made along with the likes of Jurassic Park, Shaun of the Dead, and Back to the Future 2, an honor that the likely imminent Back to the Future 4 will not be sharing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lunchebox
Super Robot
Posts: 1235
|
|
« Reply #395 on: 28 May 2008, 17:20:56 » |
|
I saw Iron Man a few weeks back, and being a fan of the comic, I have to say... I loved it.
It had everything I wanted out of an origin movie... Except one thing.
What it had:
1. Witty, drinking, playboy Tony Stark. 2. Perfect casting 3. A very true to the source, albeit more contemporary, telling of the origin. 4. Tony Stark coming off as eccentric and brilliant, rather than just a cold Genius. 5. Pretty awesome pseudo-technology 6. Cool looking suits 7. Rhodey and hinting at War Machine 8. Tony actually drinking 9. Decent looking fight Scenes
What it lacked:
1. Well, not really lacked, so much as the fight between Iron Man and Iron Monger could have been longer.
So really, Iron Man was AWESOME.
Surprisingly, I'm REALLY looking forward to the new Hulk movie.
Edward Norton is one of my favorite actors, and co-wrote the movie.
From what I've seen, he seems to understand Hulk better.
Tim Roth as the Abomination ALSO looks pretty cool.
And they made it clear that this movie is a reboot, which I am HAPPY about, since the 2003 movie SUCKED. (Absorbing Man is his father, WHAT?)
Also, creators have made it clear that the fight scene at the end of the movie, between Hulk and the Abomination, is twenty minutes long.
[spoiler]There will also be a cameo by Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), in the vein of Sam Jackson as Nick Fury in the Iron Man movie. [/spoiler]
Also, there's another Captain America Easter Egg, like in Iron Man (The shield is in one of the background shots), an it's the Super Soldier serum (or so they say).
Then after that, it's Hellboy II: the Golden Army, which, at first, I was weary of, since the first one wasn't very good, but after reading the comic (that was basically the opening sequence of the movie), and seeing trailers and footage of it, I'm optimistic.
And The Dark Knight looks so good. Batman Begins was really great, and this one doesn't look disappointing, and though at first Joker's look had me suspicious, I think he can be great.
And that Two Face picture on the previous page didn't hurt.
EDIT:
And for those that haven't heard, the Captain America movie in 2011 will indeed be set in World War II, which is #####ing awesome.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|