|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikero
Super Robot
Posts: 11986
|
|
« Reply #194 on: 15 February 2008, 03:26:39 » |
|
You forgot me you jerk Alex.
If you're talking to me, it's Alec. With a C.
You dumb booger.
I don't care what it is anymore, Alrick, because you forgot me so now um i hat you oky? Oky? Oky? Okay. I mean, it's an alright show, BUT SRSLY.
I watched the show years back. Sorry, but I didn't get it. At all. I thought it was awful.
You can't really say those. Each series is very different in some big way. You have to judge them separately to be fair. It is not one show, you can't hate them all based on one. They're more different than Buffy and Angel. First of all it's spelled Trekkie. And I only know that because there's a movie about them (haven't seen it) and it's advertised on Space every once in a while. Secondly, while I like Star Trek, I'm not a Trekkie or a Trekker (whatever the difference is).
I'm going to catch so much hell for this, BUT...
Trekker, a fan of Star-trek.
Trekkie, The dorks who go far beyond the trekker status.
I'd call myself a Trekker then, but in the clip from the Trekkies movie where a guy says "I'm not a TrekkIE, I'm a TrekkER" the guy is wearing a damn STTOS uniform and Vulcan ears. So I'm pretty sure I'm not a Trekker, I'm just a fan. Anyway I've always liked Sci-Fi, so I love Star Wars and Star Trek and hate people that compare them or bring up *Wars when you're talking about *Trek. They have nothing in common other than being in space. Battlestar Galactica has a lot more SW similarities than ST, and that's not much. Enough of that, though. I would assume we arrived on the water near where the Zora's live(d) and then too the "huge" (N64 sized) trek to Hyrule field from there, dhur.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|